Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXXvii- Mens Rea… Don’t Go To The Crown Without it!

This article is in the continuing series “Developing and Maintaining Your Own Web Site”. It demonstrates how to research a new word or phrase which is important to the reader.

I use the “Mens Rea” attribute of an alleged offence. It is an important concept to get right, because to bring to court a charge WITHOUT a documented mens rea, a guilty mind, is to taste a lot of valuable court time.

Back on December 2nd, 3rd and 4th, Justice Rose wasted about $25,000 in court time over 3 days when police failed to detect and document the “mens rea” in my charges.

Every criminal act, well most, require it to be proven that the alleged culprit:

  • Knew that the law said NOT to do “that”.
  • Knew what would happen if he acted and did “that” anyway.
  • And still acted, still did “that”.

Basically, it has to be proven a man set out to break the law KNOWING both the law and what it meant if he took some action that violated the law.

So, my cow fart joke cannot possibly be a breach, because it was written for education of those clients who are maintaining their own web sites.

I had no idea a cow fart joke was against the law. I doubt ANY fart jokes violate the criminal code. So, these two police officers will now prove fart jokes are universally well known as being criminal acts in Canada.

They have to give PROOF of mens rea, and then document it….it cannot be just a theory.

And that is why I got J. Rose’s conviction oveturned by Superior Justice Dawe…. and why the Crown decided quickly it will not now pursue a new trial. There was no evidence of anything about the mens rea. I blogged a tiny iPhone photo of a page of my law suit. Police magnified the photo and came up with the blurry list of defendants in my suit, a list I never saw.

But, police had not even hinted they could prove the mens rea, that I knew what I was doing was a crime and that I went ahead and did it anyway.

A lack of a “mens rea” is what stands between you not knowing that the Criminal Code DOES ban cow fart jokes and jail. There are a LOT of criminal code acts that will get you jailed, no one forces you to read the Criminal Code to see if bovine fart jokes are criminal. But I am expected to do so I guess.

My blog is just one of my Charter Rights. Libel and slander laws control what I say, not the criminal code.

One has to be pretty stupid to KNOW cow fart jokes are illegal, and THEN blog one in www.BobLeppsOpinions.com. If you KNOW flatulence is verboten, (reference to Nazi Germany intended) then you dare not blog them.

But, if you are fat and happy like me, fart jokes are a gift from God and Mad Magazine.

Long live Alfred E. Neuman!

Categories
A real gnu it all About Bob Lepp Business Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXXvI- Now When you use humour on your web site to attract viewers..

(Note: At 5:00 pm Nov. 30, 2020 I removed J. Dawe’s words where he said the real name of a person and I replaced them with X,Y, Z. I have no bail term saying I cannot “mention” people anymore. I will soon, but for now X Y and Z are just as useful.)

To my retained defence counsel and the civil suit’s defendants’ counsel

To York Regional Police

Ref: Urgent Happening Today.

Aurora and York Regional Police have today, November 20, 2020 taken new interest in my web site due to my choices in humour as a suggested way for client web site developers to engage withviewers.

The 7 Defendants’ counsel in my law suit do not respond to me.

DS Bentham does not respond to my emails in any way. I can ask a question or make an announcement and I cannot tell if she has even read it.

Crown Frank Giordano, while I was self represented, would also not respond to emails, even though the Attorney General has approved email for all manner of court matter correspondence.

I use my blog to communicate to him and all other Crowns as assigned and my Probation Officer to him I am also forbidden to send emails.

Dear Town of Aurora Counsel, York Regional Police Counsel and this of 3 individuals

You choose not to respond to emails or letters so I am left with communicating by my blog, which the courts have directed I can do. Please understand I would prefer private emails but I see no alternative.

Last March 4, 2020…. 3 lawyers signed up to agree with police to arrest me for being in a court room and filing court documents. Those 3 lawyers represent ALL 7 defendants.

So, their defence is to arrest me. The police supported their idea and a 3 day trial is to be set Friday December 3.

Police I spoke to today feel I should not blog my opinions. I believe that they have developed their own understanding of the courts’ orders using CPIC, a national Federal computer system… rather than the Newmarket’s courts’ orders\/

Today, 2 officers attended at my home, one did not name herself, another male officer who had no business cards and would not give a name and only read out a badge number real quick told me it is his opinion I am breaching my release orders. He had read CPIC about me and says there are three different orders I am to follow. He went back to the office to discuss it with Ms Bentham.

The Court sets the release terms and CPIC reports them on a “manual” basis, there is no automatic data exchange with the courts, and “paper only” is used and scanned, if an officer hears of a change it is scanned into CPIC and if he does not hear of a change, he does not.

Police read CPIC, not the Crown or Court paperwork, to decide to arrest me. If CPIC differs from what I was ordered, they arrest me.

I now have the cumulative bail orders email from the senior Crown Prosecutor Peter Westgate who got it from Superior Court Justices.

I asked him for confirmation of my cumulative orders after Justice Dawe modified my Release Order of March 6, 2020 and he struck Term #6 in my Release Order, he also struck down the guilty finding of Justice Rose December 4, 2019 and he struck the related probation order of December 4, 2019. All my other court decisions are under active appeal delayed by COVID-19.

Mr. Westgate then asked the court on my behalf for the cumulative bail/release terms and he replied as follows:

From: Bob Lepp <boblepp@gmail.com>
Sent: November 11, 2020 3:37 PM
To: Westgate, Peter (MAG) <Peter.Westgate@ontario.ca>; Virtual Crown Newmarket (MAG) <VirtualCrownNewmarket@ontario.ca>
Cc: Giordano, Frank (MAG) <Frank.Giordano@ontario.ca>
Subject: 2020-10-27 Motion TO CORRECT RECOGNIZANCES.pdf

Mr. Westgate,

This is what I filed to the court (a motion to have the court issue cumulative terms) to get my recoginzances.

Do you know why it has not been scheduled? 

Bob Lepp

He replied…..

On Nov-11-2020, at 3:43 PM, Westgate, Peter (MAG) <Peter.Westgate@ontario.ca> wrote:

I do not know

Peter A. Westgate

Assistant Crown Attorney

Newmarket, Ontario

Then he sent this:

On Nov-11-2020, at 1:55 PM, Westgate, Peter (MAG) <Peter.Westgate@ontario.ca> wrote:

Mr. Giordano is aware of the stay.

Justice Roses probation order is no longer in effect because Justice Dawe granted a new trial on those charges and the Crown then stayed those charges.

Justice Harpur’s sentence of a conditional sentence and probation is in effect

Justice Henschel’s sentence of the 1000 fine is effect. You lost the appeal so the stay of sentence pending appeal no longer applies.

The recognizance on your latest charges is in effect

Peter A. Westgate

Finally, he got the answer:

On Nov-12-2020, at 3:41 PM, Westgate, Peter (MAG) <Peter.Westgate@ontario.ca> wrote:
Attached is the recognizance that you are currently on. It is my opinion this recognizance made by Justice Dawe supersedes the orders made prior to June 3, 2019  At the time this was signed you had five charges before the court.  Charges 3-5 have now been dealt with.  Only your most recent charges are still outstanding and this recognizance applies to them. 
This is my interpretation and understanding and is not offered as legal advice.
I strongly encourage you to seek independent legal advice.  I am not and cannot give you legal advice.
Peter A. Westgate

<Pages from releases by premji and dawe.pdf>

Page 1

Conditions

Internet access

 
I) Direct continuous presence of surety – She is present here 24 hours a day. I only work at home.
 
II) For the purposes of employment with Google Maps, remote PC Support and web site development.
OR….
III) For purposes related to your ongoing court processes
INCLUDING (Added by Lepp: but not LIMITED to)
  • Conducting online legal research.
  • Serving and filing electronic documents
  • Communicating with your own and other counsel.
  • Attending virtual court proceedings
 
There is no requirement for my surety to edit my work. Only to be “present”. If they had wanted a person to edit my words, critique or otherwise change my opinions under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, they would have stated in precise terms the role of the surety. Since “presence” is all they cared about, that is all the surety has to do.
 
Polic took my surety aside and questioned what she has been doing. I believe she stated she has been present as requested. She does not normally choose to read fart jokes, at least she has recounted none to me.
 
My blog is public and anyone can read any and all of it, just as can my surety. She was given no guidelines I know of to EVER read it or EVER know what the words mean. She certainly was not asked to vet jokes about farting cows.
 
The orders do not say “Do not blog”.
 
I would consider ANY specific additional surety roles to be performed.  I know a surety for a murder suspect would not check to see if he is writing fart jokes. But maybe they are required to do that. I suspect is supposed to make sure no weapons are possessed, but I doubt books about fart jokes as written by experts are allowed.
 
I blog a series of custom written instructive articles for 2 kinds of web site development:
  • Clients who are not professionals and must maintain their business web site… they can read free tips and hints,
  • My personal and business web site developments, as approved by the bail terms and by Justice Dawe.
 

So, to you web site developers using humour… what did I learn today?

 
Step 1.  Make the humour REALLY obvious or really subtle. People will understand either. But if it is TOO vague, you will lose viewers.

People will not come back if you write only subtle humour.

Step 2. Mix it up. Read “The Onion”, or TMZ, or Fox news. Watch Saturday Night Live. Go to Yuk Yuks. Listen to classics by Robin Williams, Dave Chappelle, Amos ‘n’ Andy.

Know Your Audience: 

If you know your readers are mostly Aurora staff or police.  as is the fact for me, then write for them. As you add viewers you can alter your style accordingly.

Do not assume everyone even HAS a sense of humour. Most people treat everything in life with the most sincere, stoic, bland honesty and seriousness, they believe whatever and everything they read. That is why President Trump is so successful. All his followers believe every word he says, despite how absurd.

When you include fart jokes you made up yourself to be unique to your style and your web site, as I do for mine… on occasion some people will simply not “get it”. That is a risk every comedian takes.

Absurdity is and has always been a common form of humour.

Jackie Gleason, a much honoured humorist of my era, coined the angered phrase  “To the moon, Alice!” back in a day when political correctness did not extend to humour. Today, even a joke about smacking a wife “to the moon” would result in arrest.

But cow fart jokes?

So, let’s just say 2 people from Aurora Water felt my joke about putting rainwater back into the grid as we do electricity, and for pumping cow farts back into the natural gas lines was serious and they came to check my water meter, gas meter and my back 40 pasture.

They of course were afraid of me, as the Mayor has told them all, so they called in 2 police officers to come along with them in case I suddenly sent them out a hurriedly typed, opinionated email.

They checked the water meter and police accompanied them to my basement. They checked my pastures, found no cows and left.

But the police officer had read my blog and he read CPIC and he compared what I wrote with what CPIC says and it is his opinion  my joke violates the bail terms so he may come back and arrest me.

That would be my 8th arrest. For words in my blog.

Police said to me today they could arrest me for this cow fart joke and blog.

They say CPIC is clear, no cow fart jokes…. and so I better be ready to be arrested again.

In July 2017 my very FIRST bail term was “Do not communicate with anyone who works for the Town of Aurora.” They took way my right to ask my town for help. They led people to believe that EVERY employee of Aurora was endangered by my BL’OG AND EMAIL words.

Later, they added complainants’ names and even one company name to the bail terms. Terms which are meant ONLY to protect people from harm when something you did to get arrested harmed them.

My words, when published openly and publicly here, are what Aurora and York and police want silenced. There are no people who can be harmed or injured by my words. And no one can remove my right to write my opinions out in words.

Every person can choose to NOT read my blog. Those who read it have a personal reason to do so. Revenge on me for winning in court. Most of the 8-12 readers on a typical day are looking to see what else they can arrest me for. There are 7 named defendants, many with lots of employees, and there are 3 complainants. No one else would read my blog.

So, now, fart jokes and rain water recycling are new topics they do not wish to read, yet they do not simply ignore my Charter of Rights expression of my thoughts. They do not simply go to some other blog. They do NOT watch TV instead. They choose to read my blog and then tell me what to NOT wrote about.

The police end courts are spending tens of thiosasnads of dollars so that 3 women can read my blog in “comfort”, and police allow THEM to define “comfort”.

Only the courts decide what I am to do.

Justice Dawe of the Superior Court said on June 2, 2020:

[30] Indeed, by agreeing to eliminate or relax some of the very stringent restrictions the Justice of the Peace placed on Mr. Lepp’s liberty, the Crown is effectively acknowledging that these restrictions are no longer necessary or appropriate, if they ever were. As I see it, this opens the door to the other terms that were imposed by the Justice of the Peace also being judicially reassessed. 

[31] There has also been a potentially material change of circumstance, insofar as Justice of the Peace Premji released his decision a week before the courts were shut down in response to the COVID-19 public health crisis. As I will explain, the COVID-19 shutdown would have made it necessary for me to reassess the severe restrictions Justice of the Peace Premji placed on Mr. Lepp’s ability to use computers and the internet (Term 7), even if the Crown had not already opened the door to judicial review of this term by agreeing to substantially vary this condition. 

[37] As noted above, Term 6 of the current release order provides that Mr. Lepp is: 

Not to mention, that is speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method on social media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method X,Y, Z or the W dog walking business in any online media, EXCEPT in a court room or on court documents in a courtroom or through a member of the Law Society for purposes of matters before the court. 

[38] In my view, this term is problematic in at least three different respects. First, the wording is opaque and extremely difficult to interpret. In particular, it is far from clear whether the term is meant to only restrict Mr. Lepp’s ability to “mention” the named persons and the business online, or whether the restriction is meant to apply more broadly to all uses of these names by him out of court or outside of court documents. Different aspects of the wording of Term 6 point in different directions. On the one hand, the phrase: 

… speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method on social media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method … 

can be read as modified by the subsequent limiting expression “in any online media”, with the result that the term as a whole only applies to Mr. Lepp’s “mentioning” these names online. However, on this comparatively narrow reading of the term the complexity and breadth of the earlier phrase make little sense, as does the exception permitting Mr. Lepp to “mention” these names “in a courtroom or on court documents”. This latter exception would seem to be completely unnecessary if the term as a whole is understood as only applying to Mr. Lepp’s online communications. 

[39] The reference to a “printed blog” as something apparently distinct from an “online blog” is also puzzling, since in ordinary usage a “blog” is by definition something that appears online.

[41] Trotter J.A., one of the leading Canadian authorities on the law of bail, notes extrajudicially in his text The Law of Bail in Canada that “[t]he most important feature of conditions of release is that they must be certain. That is, they must be understandable to the accused.”15 In my view, Term 6 of Mr. Lepp’s bail utterly fails to meet this very basic threshold requirement for any proper bail condition. 

[42] A second problem with Term 6 as worded is that it includes X and Y, which I specifically ordered on December 11, 2019 should be removed from Mr. Lepp’s bail order because he was no longer facing any charges in which they were the complainants. Crown counsel who appeared before me on December 11, 2019 (again, not Mr. Westgate), and who opposed my order removing Ms. Z and Ms. Eddie’s names, also appeared at Mr. Lepp’s March 6, 2020 bail hearing. He presented Justice of the Peace Premji with a draft release order that re-inserted these names, without informing the Justice of the Peace that I had previously deleted them from Mr. Lepp’s previous bail. While it would have been open to Crown counsel to argue to the Justice of the Peace that there had been material changes of circumstance that allowed the Justice of the Peace to depart from my ruling and re-insert these names, he was not entitled to simply ignore my previous order as he did. 

[43] The third and most fundamental problem with the Term 6 condition is that regardless of whether it is interpreted broadly or narrowly, it is not carefully tailored to advance legitimate bail objectives. In Antic, supra, Wagner J. explained (at para. 67(j)): 

15 G. Trotter, The Law of Bail in Canada, at §6.5(b)(ii). 

Terms of release imposed under s. 515(4) may “only be imposed to the extent that they are necessary” to address concerns related to the statutory criteria for detention and to ensure that the accused can be released. They must not be imposed to change an accused person’s behaviour or to punish an accused person. 

In Mr. Lepp’s case, the Crown has relied exclusively on the secondary ground in s. 515(10)(b) of the Criminal Code as a reason to put restrictions on his liberty. This section provides: 

10. For the purposes of this section, the detention of an accused in custody is justified only on one or more of the following grounds: 

 

(b) where the detention is necessary for the protection or safety of the public, including any victim of or witness to the offence, or any person under the age of 18 years, having regard to all the circumstances including any substantial likelihood that the accused will, if released from custody, commit a criminal offence or interfere with the administration of justice; … 

Accordingly, any bail condition that is imposed on Mr. Lepp must be directed at “the protection or safety of the public” and must be demonstrably necessary to achieve these objectives. 

 Does arresting me for fart jokes “demonstrably achieve these objectives”? Unlikely.

[45] In my view, Term 6 could only be found to be “necessary for the protection or safety of the public” if there were some cogent reason for believing that no more carefully crafted restrictions could be devised that would be effective at stopping Mr. Lepp from harassing the complainants. 

[46] The evidence before me falls well short of the mark. While Mr. Lepp has been found guilty of one count of sending “harassing telecommunications” to Ms. Y, this charge was laid in May 2018, at a time when Mr. Lepp does not appear to have been facing any criminal charges or to have been subject to any bail orders. There is no evidence before me that he has ever engaged in any similar conduct after he was charged.

[47] The record before me also contains no evidence that Mr. Lepp has EVER blogged about the complainants in a way that might raise legitimate concerns about their psychological health or personal safety. I recognize that when Rose J. sentenced Mr. Lepp for breaching the earlier version of this bail term, he described Mr. Lepp as having “engaged in a pattern of online postings, which constitute bullying” and declared that the bail term at issue had been imposed “to prevent him from online blogging in a manner which is hurtful and demeaning to Ms. Eddie, Ms. Y and Ms. Z”. These conclusions may very well have been justified on the evidence that was before Rose J. However, the problem I face is that they are not supported by the record that has been put before me. To the contrary, the only specific Mr. Lepp was charged with sending harassing emails to Ms. Z in July 2018, but was acquitted of this charge by Harpur J.  information I have been given about Mr. Lepp’s blogging and other online activity is that he has “mentioned” the complainants’ names by posting documents from his civil case and other documents relating to the operations of the dog park, and once when responding to a negative “Google review” that attacked him personally. Nothing about the content of these posts as they have been described in the materials before me would appear to raise any secondary ground concerns. 

48] Mr. Westgate argues that since any “mention” by Mr. Lepp of the complainants’ names captured by Term 6 would now also be a breach of the identically-worded term of the probation order imposed by Rose J., Term 6 can now be seen as directed towards preventing the commission of further criminal offences under s. 733.1 of the Code (fail to comply with a probation order). I do not accept this argument, for two main reasons. First, probationary terms, unlike terms of a bail order, can properly be crafted “to change an accused person’s behaviour or to punish an accused person”. I do not think the restrictions Antic places on including such terms in a bail order can be circumvented simply by pointing to the presence of a similar term in a probation order. Second, the existence of a “substantial likelihood that the accused will … commit a criminal offence” is only one of the factors bearing on the key question of whether a bail condition is “necessary for the protection or safety of the public”. In my view, conduct by Mr. Lepp that does not in and of itself pose any substantial risk of harm to the complainants or to the public will not give rise to a genuine secondary ground concern merely because it has already been prohibited by the terms of his probation. If Mr. Lepp violates these latter terms he can be charged and prosecuted for the breach whether or not the terms are duplicated in a bail order. 

[50] While varying Term 6 along these lines would address some of the vagueness concerns that I discussed earlier,17 it would not deal with the more fundamental problem of overbreadth. While I appreciate that the judicial officers who previously barred Mr. Lepp from even “mentioning” the complainants’ names online likely had some reason for taking this approach, I simply do not know what this reason was. I do not know when this term was first added to Mr. Lepp’s bail conditions, who first imposed it, or why he or she did so. Moreover, 

17 I remain puzzled by the proposed reference to a “printed blog” as something distinct from an “online blog”. it is of some potential bail at a time when he was facing much more serious charges than he now faces.

[51] On the record before me, I am unable to conclude that a bail term with the sweeping reach the Crown proposes is justifiable under Antic as “necessary for the protection or safety of the public”. Moreover, the necessity of such a bail term as a practical matter is made even more questionable by the fact that Mr. Lepp is currently under a probation order that replicates the language of the existing Term 6. Accordingly, striking Term 6 from Mr. Lepp’s bail entirely will have no immediate impact on his permitted online activities. If the charges against Mr. Lepp to which the bail order applies are still before the courts when his probation order expires or is varied or set aside on appeal, this will in my view constitute a material change of circumstance for the purposes of St-Cloud, supra that will allow the prosecution to apply to have the terms of Mr. Lepp’s bail reviewed under s. 521 of the Code. The Crown can then seek to present a proper evidential record to support its contention that an order prohibiting Mr. Lepp from even “mentioning” the named persons online or elsewhere is necessary for the protection or safety of the public. 

[52] Accordingly, I am directing that Term 6 be struck from Mr. Lepp’s release order in its entirety. 

[53] As discussed above, Justice of the Peace Premji prohibited Mr. Lepp from possessing or using any computer or device with internet or any network capabilities (Term 7 of the release order). However, the Crown has subsequently agreed to vary this term to allow Mr. Lepp to use internet-connected devices for work when he is under the direct supervision of his surety or another adult whom she has approved. In its amended form, Term 7 now reads: 

7. Do not access or use the internet or email or text messages except in the direct continuous presence of your surety or an adult over the age of 21 as approved by your surety and only for the purposes of employment with Goggle [sic] maps street view photography, remote P.C. support and website development. 

[54] In my view, both the original and amended versions of Term 7 have two serious defects. First, they take no account of Mr. Lepp’s status as a self-represented litigant who is currently defending himself against multiple criminal charges, as well as dealing with multiple civil actions both as a plaintiff and as a defendant. Neither version of Term 7 permits Mr. Lepp to use the internet for purposes relating to his various court cases. While I have considerable difficulty imagining how entirely barring Mr. Lepp from doing online legal research or using the internet to communicate with court staff and opposing counsel could have ever been justified, these severe restrictions have become entirely untenable in the current landscape created by the COVID-19 public health crisis, which has closed the law libraries and is likely to shift most court hearings onto online platforms for the foreseeable future. In my view, Mr. Lepp’s Charter-protected rights to reasonable bail and to make full answer and defence now require that his bail terms allow him to use the internet for legal research, for serving and filing documents and for appearing in virtual online court hearings, as well as for communicating with his counsel if he should choose to retain one. 

[55] However, even if Term 7 were amended to permit Mr. Lepp to use the internet for litigation and court purposes as well as “for the purposes of employment” while he was under the immediate supervision of his surety or her designate, I am not satisfied that such a term would be reasonable in the circumstances here. Limiting Mr. Lepp’s ability to do internet legal research and other work relating to his court cases to such times as his surety or another adult is willing and able to supervise him would significantly interfere with his right to make full answer and defence. In my view, in order to justify this interference, there would need to be very compelling reasons to think that constant supervision of Mr. Lepp’s internet usage was “necessary for the protection or safety of the public”. 

[56] On the record before me I am not persuaded that such stringent limits on Mr. Lepp’s internet access have been demonstrated to be necessary. Unlike cases where there is a concern that the defendant will use the internet to commit offences covertly, the only apparent secondary ground concern with Mr. Lepp is that he might use the internet to harass the complainants overtly. Although the record before me indicates that over the past two years Mr. Lepp has not fully complied with his bail conditions, none of the internet-related breaches that have been alleged or proved against him seem to have involved him sending any harassing communications to the complainants. Rather, as discussed above, all of his alleged and established breaches have involved him making blog posts in which he “mentioned” the complainants’ names, most often by posting documents from his civil suit that contains their names in the style of cause. 

[59] There is no evidence before me that Mr. Lepp ever took advantage of the opportunity he had until March 2020 to use the internet without supervision to send harassing communications to the complainants. Rather, the only evidence of any breach of this bail condition is the recent allegation that in March 2020 he breached a different term of his bail by “mentioning” Y’s name in a blog post. Mr. Lepp maintains that this post consisted of an uploaded image of his Statement of Claim, and the Crown did not suggest otherwise.

[60] This history suggests that allowing Mr. Lepp to have unsupervised access to the internet may well lead to him making similar blog posts that breach the current terms of his probation by “mentioning” the complainants’ names, and that he is not likely to be deterred from doing this by the knowledge that his blog posts will be scrutinized by the police. However, this same history also suggests that Mr. Lepp is not likely to try to communicate directly with the complainants. Further, at least on the record before me I cannot conclude that the prospect of Mr. Lepp blogging in breach of his probation presents such a substantial a risk of public harm to make it “necessary” for his internet usage to be restricted in a manner that would significantly interfere with his right to make full answer and defence. 

[61] In my view, an appropriate balance would be struck by permitting Mr. Lepp to use the internet without supervision for the purpose of employment, as his bail did prior to March 2020, and to expand this exception to also permit him to use the internet without supervision for purposes relating to his criminal and civil court cases. I also see no compelling reason to prevent him from using the internet for other purposes, including sending emails, when he is supervised by his surety or her designate. 

The observant reader will note that at no time has J. Dawe said I could not blog anything. He has clarified that all bail terms can protect the complainants foo physical harm. He confirmed I have never used the internet to harass anyone.

Categories
A real gnu it all About Bob Lepp Business Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXXv -At The Age When Friends Go Missing

My friend was missing for 1 ½  Days

We spoke Saturday around 2 pm his time. He had gone walking and just returned home. Within half an hour, he just walked out the door with completely empty pockets. 9-1-1, neighborhood alert, tracking dogs, helicopter with heat detectors.

28 hours later, he turned up safe in another city, but likely caught Covid-19 from his new friends at the shelter.

I can put up with most things that happen as I age.

I don’t even mind sagging skin, having limited energy and even less mobility. I am about as sloth-like now as I was at age 13… just a lazy guy watching TV in the basement as the world floated by outside the windows.

But I find it much more difficult today. I am forced to watch and see my friends fighting tragically, predictably with age in this new, very dramatic way, and it upsets me.

They go off on benders more often. They will just pick up and go and leave the cell phone, wallet and the keys behind and go off to new places and new adventures simply because the grey matter is deteriorating.

They disconnect and depressurize for a few days. Then they remember their duties and get back home somehow.

But the greatest grief they bring themselves is that they don’t invite me along as often anymore.

He will NEVER be allowed forget this past weekend!

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXX🏌🏻 – Silly Cop Tricks

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/25/bunny-welsh-trump-sheriff-theft/

A Trump-boosting sheriff earned White House visits. Now she’s charged with theft.

This explains MY situation totally.

When this sheriff was “taken in” by Trump for promo shots, she realized he would have her back if she EVER needed him.

So, she knew whatever she did would be pardoned byTrump.

The same with me…. as soon as DS Bentham began arresting me July 14, 2017 the other women quickly learned anything they do would be ignored and/or forgiven by all police.

Empowering those would seek revenge on me is a key reason their plans work.

If a woman can make over 20 complaints resulting in my arrest 6 times, and NEVER produce proof that even ONE is true, she will just keep telling stories.

But, if a person were allowed just one or two exaggerated claims and THEN jailed for public mischief, that person would NOT get to tell 18 or 19 MORE stories.

Nuff said.

Dave Granlund / politicalcartoons.com

 

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXX🌲- Being a net electricity generator pales to being a net water generator

 

Everyone knows solar panels on the roof mean on sunny days you can make money feeding the excess power BACK INTO the hydro grid so someone else can use it.

I have now perfected the same for water.

I often collect more rainwater than I can use for laundry and showers, and I usually just used to put it back into the moraine beneath us all.

Now, I pump it back into the Aurora water supply, and my meter runs backwards, and I effectively have generated a credit on my water bill.

Natural gas is next.

I’m installing a clear plastic dome over the cows who generate my Milk Refund (Oh! I GOT milk!), their exhaust is trapped and compressed back into the gas grid, again the backwards spin in the meter is me being paid back. And no need to add SO2 to highlight leaks. You will KNOW when cow gas leaks.

PS: Website Development 101: Mix it up a bit! Keep your readers coming back.

 

Bubble Gum Farms.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXXII- Now I see why hiring a lawyer is preferred

On November 27, 2020 I was represented at last by an approved counsel, and the difference is amazing.

Instead of the court being delayed by me wanting to submit my evidence and the Crown refusing to accept it, we just go straight to a trial. I see now it makes much more sense to just keep all my evidence to myself and go before a judge to show it for the first time. Catch them by surprise in effect.

I avoided surprises on purpose from July 14, 2017 onwards. I decided back then to just be right up front and tell the Crown what I had to bring to court. They never wanted to see it, and I was told so often I was wasting their time trying to convince them to look at it before they spend a lot of money on me.

I even tried to show them in advance  how they had mixed up indictable charges with summary charges to be tried before J. Harpur and instead of correcting their error, they had to throw out the charge,

When you use a defence counsel, all that work is removed. I am no longer compelled to give them time to fight off my evidence.

Example, if I discovered that the 3 witnesses recorded 4 different stories for the very same event with the police and the Crown in disclosure, I just ignore it.  Normally I would point out to the Crown he will have difficulty presenting all 3 witnesses because they cannot agree on the same story. I think that is to my advantage though.

If no two witnesses support each other, I doubt a justice will believe either witness.  If one witness says the allegations occurred while I was still packing up standing at the defendant’s desk, and another witness says I had my coat on and was leaving and had walked past where the complainants sat, well, the justice has to pick one story, or reject both stories, because the third witness has yet a different story altogether.

I think that the justice would like to know all 3 witnesses were not in the same court room as I was when they alleged a crime.

But now I do not worry about any of that, I will just go on trial and surprise everyone with my evidence.

I get it now! Be sneaky. Lay low in the grass until called on.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXXjuan- We got a trial!

Today, November 27, 2020 the Justice decided a trial was required on my two last charges, since the evidence of my guilt is so strong in his mind.

Wow, and THREE FULL DAYS!

I was worried the flimsy evidence and 4 conflicting stories from 3 lawyers and the struck Illegal Term #6 in the struck probation order after J. Rose’s decision was reversed…. well, I thought it looked pretty bad for the Crown.

I thought my Box Score spoke for itself. Bu Mr Giordano assured the justice today I was a very bad person with lots of convictions and a long, sordid history. He likes to cite the number ion charges but NEVER the number disposed of in my favour. 22 of 26 in my favour.

But what they had cleverly done was to get Mr. Giordano up to speed on the 42 months’ history, and so he quickly spelled out how many witnesses and how much time for each. He charged into it with alacrity. He knew his stuff this time. He even offered to provide a copy of the video the cops took proving the breach. They will again blow it up on a big screen in court and point out words they can see on the head of a pin.

No, we found out that did not work for J. Rose either, but maybe they will get it right this time.

3 days of trial, about $30,000 to prosecute 2 of the most minor alleged breaches imaginable, ones which affected NO LAY PEOPLE in any way…. just perfect.

Ho9w can the arrogance of ONE person be worth $30,000 MORE to Ontario. The fact they want 3 more trial days finder proves the lack of perspective. Administration of Justice charges were indentified in Bill C-75 as being THE major problem in Ontario courts. Huge amounts of time and money for very little results.

More charges for the AOJA than for the criminal code. And overall, 75% of all Ontario charges are not proven and are withdrawn.

The Crown gets it right in trials one time out of 4 they are trying.

3 out of 4 arrested walk out without a conviction.

Not one person “in the public” has an interest in these 2 alleged charges. The alleged typing of 2 words of a person’s name who seems offended reading her own name and 8 alleged words of hopeful encouragement…..

You know, in 2018 I had more than DOUBLE these three charges, in fact I had 8 charges set for the same 3 day trial, and one of them was an indictable charge needing a jury. It went to over 7 days. And here, they estimated the same 3 days AGAIN for 6 LESS charges. What a coincidence.

I believe they think the cost of a lawyer is my punishment, and 3 days PLUS PREP at $500 an hour will break me. So I may have to self rep again. If I did that, Mr. Giordano would have to move for another s.486 counsel to question the victim who testified she was so afraid of me she needed a police escort to get to work… in the court house.

OTOH it would be nice to avoid that expense for the taxpayer. Maybe I will suck it up and pay for counsel.

I may have been too nice to people for the last 3 years, because now she has no fear of me at all and she even comes to my OTHER matters and often sits alone. My P.O. will be proud. Especially since she will be a witness that the 3 women all called her February 27 telling her I was under investigation for trespass at Ines Donato’s school. I was not of course, just like I did not feed glycol to her dogs after breaking into her home undetected by her armed guards and cameras.

And the ONE LSO licensee “affected” by seeing her name on a lawsuit in the court office has previously failed to win on EVERY LAST CHARGE she brought. NOT ONE has been successful.

“22nd time lucky” seems to be the hope this time.

Well, since I wanted something (dropping charges) to NOT happen, I just asked for it and POOF it did not happen. I have never gotten what I asked for and once again they did not give it. Do not tell them though, they have not figured out I control them by asking for what I do NOT want to happen, they give me the opposite which is what I really wanted in the first place.

Finally, all the lawyers who have been charging me with contempt and saying I lie can come to Criminal court and swear to uphold the truth and get in the record with their diverse stories. It will be inspiring for student lawyers to see how 3 lawyers can make up 4 different stories and all still tell the truth.

Stand by for the fun.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CXX- JPT Checklist To Keep My Mouth Shut

Today, November 27, 2020 is the set for the last set of charges being looked at by a Superior Court Justice to make sure it requires a trial.

Alleged Acts (2)

  • Speaking to a counsel in a court room February 14, 2019
  • Naming the defendants in my law suit on a court document filed to the scheduling office March 2, 2019

The Impact On the Safety and Good Health of the Victims

zero

In no particular order…

The 7th arrest was based on the prevarication of the same 3 women.

7 arrests from July 14, 2017 to March 4, 2020

26 counts written up, 21 prosecuted.

4 appealed guilty findings

22 False, Withdrawn, Stayed, Not Guilty charges

76.9% Innocent/Cleared, 7.7% outstanding Nov. 27 JPT, 15.4% Appealed

The 3 witnesses told 4 stories, no story matches any other story. All 3 differ on major points.

All 3 claimed to be in room 405.

Two lawyers sat together as I approached down the exit aisle. One heard me speak. The other, sitting BESIDE HER, did not hear me speak.

The one who did hear me speak THEN tells TWO different stories:

  1. I spoke at her first, directly and first only to her
  2. I spoke to Barry FIRST, then I TURNED towards her and spoke to her.

The third lawyer denies I even moved. He swears that I never MOVED from the defendant’s desk, that I stood stock still gathering papers and instead just spoke over my shoulder.

Now, all 3 stories should be the same. Or similar. Or in the same room as me. After all, they are 3 trained lawyers who swore to always tell the truth. Why would all 3 risk their careers on me?

The Probation order in effect March 4, 2020 was struck in its entirety in June, 2020.

The Probation order cited was based on a false guilty finding by J. Rose. That finding was overturned as not even attempting to prove mens rea. The charge fell and the Crown chose to NOT RETRY.

Term 6, “Not o mention…” in the March 6, 2020 Release Order was declared by J. Dawe to have been rubber stamped by J. Rose. It was the IDENTICAL 85 words Crown Elder gave every justice for signing. This illegal term was struck June 6, 2020 by J. Edwards. He cited Greg Elder as refusing his order of December 11 to remove women’s names without active charges from the bail terms. Crown Greg Elder refused. He has also refused on Nov. 16, 2019 the very SAME order by Sr. Regional Justice Fuerst. Charges were disposed of and “victim” names must be removed as soon as they are disposed. No court order is required, it’s the law, but Elder was told TWICE in two orders, and he is STILL TODAY in contempt of both.

J. Dawe ruled June 6, 2020 that Term 6 could NOT be understood, even by him, a trained Superior Court Justoce. It was vague, unclear, ambiguous and contradictory. He characterized it as “a blunderbuss swatting a fly”. Overbreadth. Illegal in light of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. All of it was ordered dropped immediately.

DS Heather Bentham on March 2, 2020 created incident report GO# 77377 and now refuses to give me a copy in disclosure. What is she hiding?

On February 27, 2020 I went to her office as ordered by my Probation officer and I recorded her confessions in my arrests and how she was so mad for being named in my blog over Jeff Brown’s false arrest in 2017. She stated Lepp was not under investigation on that date, and they struck a new “deal”…she would call him and speak to him FIRST next time should any of the 3 women call her.

On March 2, 2020 she assigned 4 detectives to the 7th arrest and 25th and 26th false charges. She gave Lepp no warning call. She had an entire open week and chose to send him to prison to wait for court. There was no need for incarceration.

The complainant cites February 14 as the alleged offence date, 3 weeks previous. This “frequent flyer” complainant had never waited even one day in the past to complain, and had ONCE been able to have Lepp arrested in under 18 hours Dec. 6, 2019. Why did she wait 3 weeks?

The same person brought 11 NEW complaints. Det. Goobie believed just 3 and disbelieved the other 8, and he did not think to himself that was kind of odd, to be wrong on 75% of the claims.

The Crown accepted all 3, despite a total lack of ANY witness statement from one lawyer, and despite HAVING one from the other lawyer saying he heard NOTHING at all. At that point, the Crown HAD to decide they had no chance of winning and not prosecuting. Instead, they approved.

Several months later, the Crown looked to see that the person named count 1 was illegal and false. They withdrew it.

The “will say” from the 2nd lawyer was not written until 3 days before JPT. It was NOT an affidavit as require day law, it is anecdotal in an email and unusable in court. It swore Lepp did not move from standing at his desk orgainizing [a[ers, and alleges he simply spoke over his shoulder, while the complainant described a walk down an aisle first.

Frank Giordano is the 13th Crown assigned to this 30 month long matter. He does not know the lengthy case history. He has not read the materials.

The same cited orders allegedly breached were NOT recorded correctly with ALL of the court, crown and police. The original is on paper in one place only. The remainder risk being out of date after 30 months.

The province has spent approximately $250.000 on this matter and it has no impact in the community at all, none despite repeated attempts to prove a case. Not one person was made afraid for any reason.

March 2, 2020 witness Interview was not provided

Why did they forget to disclose the video interview? Maybe the summary text is not accurate?

I submitted dozens of documents of evidence. Not one page of it was selected as “balancing” evidence for inclusion in disclosure.

Three days in PRISON during COVID-19 when I had not even been LATE once for court.

We had to put up $15,000 surety. Murderers put up under $13,000 and THEN they were forgiven and did not have to pay.

The complainant CHOSE to be in whatever court room she claimed on February 13, 2020. She demanded police escorts to be in the same building in August 2018. Now she follows him from date to date on matters that do not even affect her. Is she baiting him again as she alleged in her 4 false charges of August 23, 2018? For many weeks she worked undercover for James Ward to entrap me. All 4 charges lasted 30 seconds at JPT with Sr. Regional Justice Fuerst October 11, 2019. All were withdrawn November 16, 2019 after she simply challenged the Crown to read the materials.

What Crown accepts 3 charges when NO EVIDENCE from ANY witness backed up even ONE allegation of the complainant?

What Crown reads my disclosure and sees evidence off guilt?

Where is the mens read for February 14, 2020? Did I set OUT to breach in front of witnesses, most of which were lawyers?

Did I look out at 3 lawyers who were suing me and say to myself… I can do this! I can actually SPEAK to her! OR, did I see Lloyd’s of London’s bottomless pockets set to send me back to jail?

Of course not. I ALWAYS greeted Barry in court, and I did February 14 as well. He would always smile and say “Hi!” back, and he did that day a as well.

With microphones on, a court reporter, a clerk and 3 LAWYERS and hangers on as witnesses… I actually said to myself “You’ll be arrested but it will be fun”?? or something and then just walked right up to her and spoke to her?

Even the “victim” states I walked right past her, stopped and then spoke to Barry.

Charles PAINTER disagreed and swore I never even moved. Nuff said.

The complainant is the same one who said “Lepp sued my client May 11, 2018 because he KNEW she would be arrest him May 30, 2018… 19 days IN THE FITURE. And she claimed that TWICE to J. Harpur. And she typed that on MY copy of her defence.

In all 7 arrests, the same pattern was followed.

  • The complainant phoned the police
  • The were invited in to record a statement
  • Lepp was told to come in to be arrested
  • Not one question was asked of him BEFORE arrest
  • Only ONCE was he recorded in a post arrest interview
  • NONE of the police and NONE of the Crowns required any physical evidence of guilt before the arrest. The best they got was “will say”‘s.

Self represented persons get a second class form of justice.

Buying a lawyer instead gets one:

  1. Crown Pre-Trial meetings ARE held, which the Atty General says are mandatory BEFOFE a JPT can be scheduled.
  2. Lawyers can PHONE the Crown himself on his personal cell phone to negotiate peace bonds
  3. $15,000 is tech typical “block fee” charged. Because 75% of charges are else, a peace bind is normally offered for that $15,000
  4. That money you Gove lawyers BUYS you service from the Crown which no self rep is permitted to receive.

Newmarket Crown Moull has ordered that no Self Rep gets a Crown Pre-Trial meeting to accept evidence.

The same Crown refuses to follow Bill C-75 when it comes to breach charges which clog the entire system for little valid reason.

Crown Prosecutor like Greg Elder can remain to this day in contempt of two Superior Justices and STILL practice law.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C7⛹🏻- Canada Rules: Prosecute ONLY “What best serves the “public interest”

  1. Part II : Principles Governing Crown Counsel’s Conduct

2.3 Decision to Prosecute

Public Prosecution Service of Canada

Guideline of the Director Issued under Section 3(3)(C) Of The Director Of Public Prosecutions Act May 14, 2019

The decision whether to prosecute is among the most important decisions that will be made by Crown counsel. Considerable care must be taken in each case to ensure that the correct decision is made. A wrong decision to prosecute and, conversely, a wrong decision not to prosecute tend to undermine confidence of the community in the criminal justice system.

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under the authority of s 3(3)(a) of the Director of Public Prosecutions ActFootnote 1 (DPP Act) initiates and conducts prosecutions on behalf of the federal Crown.Footnote 2 The DPP delegates this power and function to federal prosecutors who are appointed or retained for this purpose and act as the DPP’s agentsFootnote 3 when making a decision to prosecute.Footnote 4

As part of their quasi-judicial role as “ministers of justice,”Footnote 5 Crown counsel ensure that prosecutionsFootnote 6 based on sufficient evidence and which best serve the public interest are brought before the courts. In the exercise of this power, Crown counsel have a high ethical duty to act independently, fairly and objectively without either negative or positive animus towards the accused.Footnote 7

At the same time, Crown counsel must recognize the independent functions of the police and investigative agencies, which decide what charges to recommend or lay in light of evidence gathered during an investigation, and of the courts, which determine the admissibility and weight of the evidence at trial and determine the guilt or innocence of an accused person.Footnote 8

2. The Decision to Prosecute Test

When deciding whether to initiate and conduct a prosecution on behalf of the federal Crown, Crown counsel must consider two issues:

  • Is there is a reasonable prospect of conviction based on evidence that is likely to be available at trial? If there is,
  • Would a prosecution best serve the public interest?

If the answer to either question is no, the test is not met,Footnote 9 and the prosecution should not proceed.

If charges have been laid, the charges should be withdrawn or a stay of proceedings entered.

3. Application of the Test

The test must be applied to each charge against each accused. This should take place in a timely manner following the laying of charges, or in pre-charge approval provinces, upon the referral of charges by the police or the investigative agency.

If requested by the police or investigative agency, Crown counsel may provide a preliminary assessment on whether the test would be met prior to charges being laid or referred for approval. However, it is preferable that the advice be given once the investigation has been completed.

3.1. Reasonable prospect of conviction

Crown counsel must objectively assess the whole of the evidence likely to be available at trial, including any credible evidence that would favour the accused, to determine whether there is a reasonable prospect of conviction. This assessment should be made on the assumption that the trial will unfold before an impartial trier of fact acting in accordance with the law.

A reasonable prospect of conviction requires that there be more than a bare prima facie case, or in other words, it requires more than evidence that is capable of making out each of the necessary elements of the alleged offence against an accused.Footnote 10However, the test does not require a probability of conviction, that is, it does not require a conclusion that a conviction is more likely than not

So, did Det. Goobie and his 3 co-workers have MORE evidence than a bare prima facie case?

NO, they had not enough evidence for prima facie.

“Term #6” which us cited as the breach, is NOT UNDERSTANDABLE, CLEAR, or UNAMBIGUOUS./

Jistceo Dawe, with MANY years as a lawyer and justice could NOT say what Term #6 meant.

Det. Goobie did not and could not understand it with his lesser understanding of there law.

His boss, DS Bentham ALSO does NOT have experience enough to understand term #6 and therefore should NOT have approved assigning ANY detectives to the complaint by X.

DS Bentham should instead have used the Term #6 wording as a train exercise for her men. They should have been taught how no one can be asked to follow wording which a Superior Court Justice could not understand.

No one should be out own bail on terms they cannot understand and cannot POSSIBLY follow. Police can legally write in ANY bail term they want at the time of arrest. There is NOTJIING to stop them from telling me “Do not communicate in any fashion with ANYONE who does work for the Town of Aurora.”

That was illegal. Polic can write ANY illegal term. Then YOU have to pay a lawyer $500 an hour to get it made legal.

Yes, the Crown accepts charges with totally ILL:EGAL terms of bail every day. HOW? The Crown NEVER refuses a charge made by police, they accept every one. Just ask them.

WHY? Because a breach conviction counts the same as a murder conviction at salary increase time.

Prosecutor A – prosecutes 5 murders, wins 4, gets credit for 4 “wins”

Prosecutor B – prosecutes 10 breaches, wins 10 and gets credit for 10 wins.

If justice were “commercial” B gets a bigger raise.

Because this is civil service, both get the same raise as does C who lost every case.

So, what do lawyers say about “In The Public Interest?” This is a 13 minute podcast.

https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/podcasts/2017/whistleblowing-what-is-in-the-public-interest/

We will be talking about the first Court of Appeal decision on what “in the public interest” means in deciding whether a person makes a disclosure that gives them whistle-blower protection.

Is it in the public interest to prevent a person from seeing their own name in print?

Or, is it for the opposite effect, a “Special Interest” of just one person.

How does ANYONE except X benefit from putting me in prison?

Why would ANY justice consider a case where the charges are so uniquely aimed at protecting just one “friend of the court” or “officer of the court”.

Why do paralegals get such special cionsdierations form police AND Crown AND the judiciary.

Is there an historical bias of the Crown to prosecuting those who “make fun” of the law? Or those who speak their opinions out loud and often?

Of course there is. Every famous person and large company uses the law to silence those who criticize them. Usually with a lawsuit not a criminal arrest. But when a paralegal has friends in the evolve department, they get special attention.

I had an ex-cop assault me, she admitted it and the judge identified her behaviour to me. I RPTE out a complaint next day and it went nowhere.

X, a paralegal, went 19 days AFTER observing 11 alleged breaches without lifting a finger.

Then, Det Goobie was told to call her up and get 11 counts into the courts QUICK. Even he did not have the stomach to get behind 8 of the lies, but he agreed on 3 charges that I must go to prison.

Did he assess “public interest”? NO. How do we know?

No one could find any interest BEYOND X herself.

And since that means there is NO public interest, he should have sent her home with her 11 counts.

When I “blew the whistle on Bylaws” for losing $300,000 EVERY year, I was shunned. Councillors, the two mayors and every Director simply stopped replying to me.

Now, losing $300K EVERY year is in the public interest.

Unless Lepp is the whistle blower. Then, we do nothing for him.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C7⛹🏻- Lawsuits and Crimes Prosecuted Must Be “In The Public Interest”

Fencing Bylaws are most certainly “Public Interest”, EVERY home has a fence and every homeowner needs to know how their neighbour can abuse them legally and illegally.

My neighbour has three separate fence structures collapsing onto my property. Bylaws says they can do nothing to help me.

Crimes prosecuted must be those assured to be in the public interest to spend tax money litigating.

Murder is obviously worth the expense to identify the culprit.

But a breach of an illegal recognizance of bail? Is it in the public interest to spend tax money, a LOT of it, to stop me from such acts as writing a person’s name on a page handed to the court clerk. Or, speaking to a lawyer in a court of law where the lawyer seeks to have me falsely imprisoned.

Is it appropriate for the Crown to prosecute me on 3 counts of writing a person’s name on a court filing?

Every lawsuit, and every crime is “public record” and you can go to the court office and buy a photocopy of it and see the same woman’s name… should I go to prison for showing her name to a judge iNSIDE a court room.

She show her name on at least 6 web sites in 6 businesses… I lost count.

If Superior Court Justice Dawe TRIES to read my “Term #6” in my old probation order and he CANNOT understand how to apply it in any court room…. can a “lowly” Court of Justice judge STILL rule that he CAN understand it?

NO! Because the precedent was set by SCJ Dawe. OCJ Smith cannot THEN claim he CAN understand how to apply it. I think I get a SCJ tomorrow as it is a pre-trial and they know better than to permit abuse of the Administration of Justice Act..

So, back on March 4, 2020 when I was arrested, Crown Greg Elder determined police had 3 valid charges HE would prosecute because HE understand Term #6 because he wrote it.

Tomorrow, a new Crown, Frank Giordano, will argue to either an OCJ OR a SCJ justice that because a Crown wrote term #6 that HE can understand it.

I will (figuratively) argue that NEITHER Giordano can claim to understand and apply Term #6 when J. Dawe already set the precedent.

In addition, J. Dawe ORDERED ELDER to remove the women’s names from Term #6 and he refused to do so.

Senior Regional Justice Fuerst a month EARLIER had also ordered Elder to drop the women’s names because she had just killed the last charges involving them.

And does a dog walking business merit protection for “fear” of me at ANY tome? Of course not, inanimate objects do not experience fear and that is the only reason for a bail or release term.

So, is Crown David Moull spending YOUR money in a responsible way and only litigating charges “in tjh public interest”?

No, he is pandering to a fellow Law Society “friend”, another Officer of the Court”… one of the MANY fringe benefits of paying LSO union dues…the Crown protects you, and gives you better access to their offices and better service to the accused who can afford a lawyer.

Justice for cash!

“The Court of Appeal ultimately concluded that the plaintiff’s claim survived the merit-based and public-interest hurdles and dismissed the appeal. Nevertheless, it is clear that the court is interpreting the public interest threshold quite broadly, particularly in the context of elections. While it remains to be seen if the court will continue to interpret the public interest threshold this broadly in other contexts, it appears that most of the argument and analysis should be focused on the remaining steps of the test.”

July 2, 2020, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Nanda v. McEwan.

Strangely. Americans concurrently believe BOTH Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories:

  • Man did not land ion the moon in 1969, and
  • Snoopy WILL land on the moon this year

If they believe both of those, why do Canadians not believe that police, Aurora, York and 5 women have conspired to silence me since July 14, 2017?

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C7⛹🏻- Aurora Home to Adamson BBQ Fanatic

Aurora is the second location of Adamson’s BBQ, and the first in Etobicoke/Leaside is under assault by police. Seems the owner is defying the law on NOT dining in. He encourages it.

Strange, is it not, that the Cannabis shop was forbidden from setting up their tent on Yonge Street while Adamson was greeted with open arms. Proximity to a school was the excuse, an adult school.

So, now, Aurora planners are proud to bring you death by Covid on Yonge inside the sexy new community project and also easy teen access to Jane’s Cannabis just west of the Catholic High School.

Do you support a restaurant that spreads the virus?

Or, do you buy elsewhere from responsible owners?

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C🥂⛹🏻- Caught! A witness waits 8 months to make a statement.

Q. Why would his memory improve by waiting 8 months?

A. Because he allowed me to catfish him again.

Back on Monday, March 2, 2020, DS Bentham came to work set to have me in Lindsay prison by Wednesday. I had upset her on the previous Friday, February 28, 2020 by blogging her confession to me she had me arrested a total of 7 times because she did not like seeing her name written in my blog, and that HAD to have been read by anywhere from 8 to 17 people every day. So, on the Monday March 2, she assigned 4 detectives and told them to go find some complainants.

Det. Goobie called one, an LSO licensee and asked her if she had any dirt on me. She did! And she suggested 2 other LSO Licensees would also help him out if DS Bentham were to call them. She did so.

Barry Stork, the straight shooter ,told the truth, He heard nothing at all. He swore:

“On March 3, 2020, X e-mailed me advising that I may hear from a detective with respect to whether I heard Mr. Lepp state “glad to see you are not afraid of me anymore” at the conclusion of the February 14, 2020 motion. I did not have any communications with X respecting the contents of her aforementioned e-mail. At the conclusion of the motion, as Mr. Lepp was exiting the courtroom, I heard him direct a comment to X. I do not recall the exact words used by Mr. Lepp.”

Affidavit of Barry Stork

Note he admits he was given the quote in ADVANCE, and asked to agree, and he still could not. That does not bode well.

Note also that he said BOTH:

  1. “I heard him” and
  2. I do not recall the exact words”

How could he say WHAT occurred if he cannot recall the words he heard? If he heard no words, and recalled no words…how did he deduce who was speaking to whom? About what?

Chas. Painter, even further away towards the front of the room, offered NOTHING to the Crown from March 2 to November 24, 2020… 3 days before Judicial Pre-Trial. Now he suddenly recalls everything. He was facing ahead he swears, and before I even turned to go, while I was “packing up”…he suddenly dreamed I did not leave at all, but rather, I stood still and just spoke over my shoulder somehow.

I was at counsel table at the front packing up, as was Bob Lepp, standing to my left at the other counsel table.

Barry, a lawyer from Clyde and Co. was in the gallery, as was X. I don’t recall anyone else sitting in the body of the courtroom at that point.

Mr. Lepp was standing at the counsel table and I recall him saying over his shoulder, turning his head towards where X was sitting, that it was nice to see people were not afraid of him anymore.”

email of Chas. Painter November 24, 2020

This a miracle.

By cleverly waiting for my blog, he read what I said happened, and he took THAT and changed a few elements and swore in an email, (Q. “If this email is sufficient,” ummm,… No!) ) it was NOT an affidavit, that I stood BESIDE him and I spoke BEHIND HIM as he observed an LSO Licensee way back in the gallery, just as Superior Court Justice Dawe told me to do.

Here’s the problem… he FORGOT to read what X spun as her own TWO stories. Why tell one story when two is better than one?

So, on page 37 of disclosure is her first story:

X – Story #1

“X states that at the conclusion of the contempt hearing in Superior Court on February 14, 2020 in courtroom 405, when court adjourned, the suspect walked past where she was seated in the body of the court, looked at her and stated “good to see you’re not scared of me anymore”. X advised that counsel Charles PAINTER and Barry STORK were witness to this exchange. Accordingly, X contends this amounts to a breach of the Probation Order. Copies of the letter and blog posts were seized.”

So, the justice on Friday will believe one or the other, but cannot believe both.

One says I walked PAST her and THEN spoke to Barry.

X, who must have been looking at Painter’s back, looking towards the bench, says Painter was a good witness anyway.

Mr Painter says I did not walk away, I did NOT even turn around, but instead, I was able to detect Barry Stork BEHIND me and I simply stood still and just turned my head to Barry and spoke.

X, OTOH, says I walked PAST her and THEN spoke to her FIRST, and only to her.

X – Story #2

But wait, there is a third possibility. X underwent a full video interview because they had such strong evidence they wanted to record it for court.

The notes of the police observer tells this 3rd version.

“(X said she was ) … in court on motion. Court adjourned. (I) always wait with another lawyer, Barry Stork sitting beside me and he (Lepp) walked past, in court room 405. Mr. Lepp stopped, ‘Barry always nice to see, looks at me and says “glad YOU’RE not afraid of me anymore.”

X as noted by DC Rosenthal

Painter: that it was nice to see people were not afraid of him anymore.”

X Version 2.0: “‘Barry always nice to see, looks at me and says “glad YOU’RE not afraid of me anymore.”

X Version 1.0: …(Lepp) looked at her and stated “good to see you’re not scared of me anymore”

glad/good

afraid/scared

people/her

No one told the same story twice. And all 3 stories differ on key elements such as my position, my movement, my stopping, etc.

Painter now swears what he could NOT swear 8 months back. Back in March he offered no stories at all.

All 3 lawyers waited 3 WEEKS after watching me breach 11 times, a new record for me in one day. Instead of calling out at the moment on February 14, they ALL went home and forgot about it until DS Bentham called them all up and asked them to cooperate on testifying to arrest me again,

At the 3 week mark March 4, X documented ELEVEN breaches. Stork documented one. Painter offered nothing at all. They would not have been in agreement even ON February 14.

Now 8 months later, they have sworn to 3 very different versions.

Painter HEARD but did not SEE.

Stork SAW but did not HEAR.

X says I was already PAST her and on my way out the door when I stopped and spoke to her. If that were true, she would have had me arrested at home that day.

But, it did not happen and the three of them will perjure themselves, a crime in Ontario. Stork signed an affidavit. Painter sent an email which today is taken as gospel axxriding to the Attorney General.

And I was in room 401 just as the docket AND the transcript proclaim.

That said, I am sure it will be set for trial and I can do a better job of pointing out the flaws in their logic.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C🥂⛹🏻- Coined! Can you create new words?

Quick, you find yourself LOST for words… make up a new one!

If you can’t get enough impact out of words you KNOW, make up one no one ELSE knows instead.

Here are mine: (Use the up and down arrows to page forward and back)

Urban-Dictionary-of-mine-1

Don’t leave them inside!

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C🏌🏻⛹🏻- How Do Friday’s Charges Relate?

The complainant is a licensee of the Law Society of Ontario.

Witness #1 is also a licensee of the Law Society of Ontario.

Witness #2 is also a licensee of the Law Society of Ontario.

Cumualtively the 3 counsels represent 5 of 7 defendants in my law suit.

  • York Region
  • YR Police Services Board
  • YR Police
  • Aurora
  • H…. C…. and T……. 4 P…..s

And what the 5/7 of my defendants have done is to conjure up a structure, a set of 11 complaints to get me 3 days in prison, a $2,600 LEGAL BILL, 100% house arrest, loss of all communication devices AND anything using the internet.

Of the 11 charges the 3 witnesses came up with, 8 were judged as not credible by Det. Goobie. He then chose 3 counts which he could prove. And he never read the Probation order or the court’s recognizances FIRST.

He believed the LSO Licensee because they swear to not lie to police. She said I breached 11 times, and so he CHARGED me with breaching just 3 times. So, right away, he should have known she had a VERY different interpretation of the SAME terms he could have read.

Only 3 out of 11 were true?

Why did Goobie not say: Hold on, she’s an LSO Licensee and she got 8 out of 11 wrong? I should reconsider and ask the Crown for guidance before I charge Mr. Lepp.

But, the Crown accepted all 3 counts, trusting Goobie’s trust in the faith of the LSO Licensee. It was a “Faith Fest!”. A daisychain of trust. A clusterfaith.s

All chains have a weakest link by definition. The LSO Licensee was that link. She had helped write term #6 and son she had a very different view on its purpose. In her mind, I must erase her existence and that of her 2 friends and one corporation and simply live without EVER speaking or writing theio\r names ANYWHERE.

Because in her mind I was banned, she visualized crimes where other people see normal life. She then EXPLAINED her vision to Det. Doobie and he believed her.

Likely because his boss, DS Bentham, ordered him to agree with the complainant’s view. He does not arrest me to right injustices. He does it to keep me silent talking about crimes committed, money wasted, taxes evaded.

Then, despite the costly investigation by Det, Doobie, the Crown nevertheless rejected one of the three and only 2 counts are being tried this Friday, Nov. 27. Both are alleged breaches.

  1. Speaking to an LSO Licensee inside court room 405
  2. Typing the defendants’ names on a court filing made to Superior Court through Llyshelle Barrett, scheduler, then coming to room 405 to have it heard.

They will produce my Recognizance or Probation order as at March 4, 2020 and they will argue that the orders FORBID both actions.

Possible Problems

  • The recognizance in effect March 4 was ALREADY ordered corrected by Justice Dawe 4 months earlier and one month before THAT by Senior Regional Justice Fuerst.
  • Both orders were ignored by Crown Greg Elder. Justice Dawe cited him twice in his June 2020 release order review as he struck the term #6 “Not to mention…”
  • Det. Goobie did NOT have a corrected recognizance or probation order to compare the complaints to. If he HAD such a copy he would see both charges were falsely laid. He believed what the complainant orally described as breaches instead of using the wording issued by the court.

The Root Cause Of My Charges

The same court and police who IGNORED Bill C-75 and continue to over charge Admin. of Justice…. ALSO control what the various Ontario departments see as my REAL orders.

Police, Probation and Courts if Justice have THREE DIFFERENT VERSIONS of my Probation order and Recognizances. And each will assure you on the witness stand that all three are identical.

They are not identical.

  • The real orders lie in a folder on filing trays in the Court Office, but are seen only by the Crown and the justice.
  • Police use the version in CPIC, whenever someone chooses to update CPIC, or not.
  • Probation officers have something, they will not tell me what, but they DO tell me it does NOT permit them to confirm my recognizance terms at meetings. They have not way to KNOW what I am NOT supposed to be doing.
  • A 4th version is in my hands. All 4 can be different and they usually are.
  • Other copies ar win the hands of the complaionants.
  • Bottom Line: Paper systems cannot keep up.

You can see the flaws instantly:

  • A woman comes in to complain and waves her copy, a piece of paper, at a cop and claims 11 breaches
  • The cop believes her without checking HIS copy, but THEN decides 8 claims do not match the terms in effect by the courts… without reading HIS copy OR her copy of the terms
  • The Crown believes the cops have detected (pun intended) crime in all 3 acts and they now take steps to commit at least $10,000 to prosecute the 3 charges… which affected no one at all
  • A few months later, the Crown reads the actual recognizance terms and withdraws Count #1, the FIRST one they approved.
  • They leave the other 2 counts which are NOT covered by the terms even as much as COUNT #1 was.
  • The Crown then refuses to accept my evidence of innocence, proof of the previous statements, and demand an expensive Judicial Pre-Trial November 27, 2020.

And the SAME Crown who prosecuted me FAILED to even confirm I was in the alleged court room #405 on February 14, 2020.

And they did NOT check the audio recording of the court reporters.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CX iii- The Court Room was 401 not 405

People say I write too many words.

I agree.

Nuff said.

Not, “Nuff Seen”

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CX iaye- The Crown Barnier Incident December 2018

Crown Elizabeth Barnier was on duty in court the day I began to prosecute the three “Pre Enquetes”. That is the court process YOU must use if police refuse to arrest and prosecute someone who wronged you in any way. I have had 26 false charges laid using lies told to police on video and audio. Lying to police is “Public Mischief” and this charges will be raised again when ALL the existing charges are disposed of.

Perjury and fabricating evidence are indictable offences with potential prison terms of up to 14 years, while obstruct justice under 139 (2) of the Criminal Code is an indictable offence with a maximum sentence of imprisonment for 10 years.

https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/police_who_lie.html

Pot growing charges dropped after cop lied to get a warrant

Judge rules Peel cop ‘lied’ to obtain warrant

‘Serious concerns’ raised about Toronto police officer’s credibility

Toronto police officer rebuked by judge for fabricating evidence

Police board seeks public report on cops who lie in court

Star gets action: Crown must now report police who lie

Police who lie: How officers thwart justice with false testimony

So, you just KNOW DS Bentham likely already has a few cops lined up to arrest me after Friday Nov. 27, 2020 brings an end to the last unheard charges.

Ms Barnier saw that there were three separate women who teamed up to report me again, and again, to police and she wondered out loud to me “What is going on?”.

I replied “I will send you a link to a video I made up to quickly explain the days from June 3, 2017 forward.” or similar. I went home from court and emailed her a URL to a movie I made.

She or Crown Moull gave JS a copy of that email and that simple URL link, to J… S… who called Det. Loughry and he wrote up 5 breach charges.

This is how the Thin Blue Line (cops) and the Thin Black Line (Crowns and paralegals, LSO Licensees) work together.

Crown Moull wanted Solomon to arrest me some more, so he gave her a copy of my private email to Elizabeth Barnier.

JS accepts the stolen copy and goes to police and points out 5 new charges to police. They scratch each other’s backs every day. They see this “cooperation” as noble I suppose… that they are getting scum like me off the streets.

Ask any black person how honest the cops are in court. Everyone knows they testify to their own benefit only. Have you EVER heard a cop BACK UP something an accused claimed to have said or done? No.

This article is by the NY Times, the same conditions exist wherever police testify:

The New York Times published an article yesterday that documents the persistence of lies told by police to gain a conviction. Through their investigation, the Timesdiscovered that in more than 25 instances since 2015, judges or prosecutors concluded that a New York City police officer likely presented false testimony.

The Times’ article highlights the common lies about which police testify, including: saying they saw a gun in a suspect’s hand or waistband when it was actually out of view; saying they witnessed an arrest for which they were not actually present; claiming they watched a drug deal occur, only to later recant or be proven to have lied. In two recent cases, officers appeared to have given false statements about eyewitness testimony. “These cases,” says the Times, “are particularly troubling because erroneous identifications by witnesses have been a leading cause of wrongful convictions.”

Why do police lie? According to the Times, in many circumstances, it’s to avoid restrictions against unconstitutional stop and frisks. In other cases, the motive is to convict someone, regardless of whether or not that person actually committed the crime. Some officers have stated they are pressured by their supervisors to write more tickets, to reach an arrest quota, or to close a case.

The 25 cases identified by the Times are a small portion of those in which officers are believed to have lied. This is because a large majority of cases result in plea deals. With a plea deal, if an officer lies, it is unlikely to be exposed: it is rare for a case to progress to a hearing where a defendant can question an officer’s version of events.

“There’s no fear of being caught,” a Brooklyn officer who has been on the force for almost a decade told the Times. “You’re not going to go to trial and nobody is going to be cross-examined.” The percentage of cases that progress to the cross-examination of an officer is quite small. According to the article, in 2016, for example, there were slightly more than 185 guilty pleas, dismissals, or other non-trial outcomes for each criminal case in New York City that went to trial and resulted in a verdict. There were 1,460 trial verdicts in criminal cases that year, while 270,304 criminal cases were resolved without a trial.

Ontario has the same issue, there exist way too many peace bonds and release orders meant to punish people police do not like.

Me, for example.

But we adapt…

Categories
About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CX i- If You Find Yourself Speed Reading…

As a web site developer in training, you already know that you are constantly adjusting technology to meet new demands. I had to cancel my TV, telephone and internet to save money with just me in the house.

Loyal readers know that our separation began the first day Jeff Brown came to my wife in our home in June of 2017 when I was out and scared the s&%t out of her by revealing private details of my “matters” with the Town of Aurora Bylaws staff. She knew instantly what lay ahead and she told me I had to go it alone. Once she stopped crying next day.

So, 41 months later, after being forced to stay with me as a surety, she sees that the end is near… Friday maybe it will end at the JPT if I get my way. Which I won’t and the trial will be set. A trial will be so much fin as it will be the first I get to cross examine the complainant face to face. I need ti understand how police were convinced of something NOT in my Release Order or any recognizance.

Because, and lets face to, no judge will believe her when she claims I cannot type her NAME on a court filling where SHE is the defendant. Absurd, but they believed her over Justice Dawe of the Superior court who struck the entire term as violating my Charter Rights to publish my opinions wherever I want.

And so I saved money with an internet reseller and it is good enough. And since I no longer buy Bell TV, the internet is faster again because Bell takes bandwidth to watch TV.

So, you may find yourself reading faster than your brain can absorb, Slow down.

You can never get enough internet speed.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Law Without Remorse - a book The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻Cnein – Crown Moull Assures Court He Has *ALL* Of My Evidence

On May 2, 2019, before J. Kenkel, Crwon Moull assured us all that every last letter and email I have sent is safely filed with the Crown.

No one has refused to take anything from him.

So, he should have been able to “balance” his prosecution and show the court a fair representation of police evidence and defendant’s evidence.

I have sent him and his staff dozens of such emails and I am glad he kept them all and can show selected pieces to the justice Friday at he Judicial Pre-Trial (JPT).

BUT, if he has Frank Giordano present ONLY police evidence, we know he has NOT kept his word as expressed to J. Kenkel May 2, 2019.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Law Without Remorse - a book The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C8 – Box Score

2 left for pre-trial

4 APPEALED

22 RESOLVED IN MY FAVOUR

Categories
About Bob Lepp Law Without Remorse - a book The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CVII – Dep. Chief Paulo Da Silva ordered…

Note: My very first charges were by person X July 14, 2017 and by the same person X August 23, 2018. All 3 X counts were false and were withdrawn by 1) an offer negotiated by Crown David Moull when faced with J. Johnston forcing his hand on NOT accepting my evidence refused by Crown Sham Kumaresan, and 2) by Senior Regional Justice Fuerst Nov. 16, 2019 who suggested Peter Westgate should actually take a look at them. He folded his tent.

Deputy Chief Da Silva was DS Bentham’s boss in 2017. I wrote to him because DS Bentham was non-responsive to my pleas for justice.

aka – Why did no one tell DS Bentham about this email from her boss?

https://www.yrp.ca/en/about/Deputy-Chief-Paulo-Da-Silva.asp

February 27, 2020 I recorded Det. Sgt. Heather Bentham IN HER OFFICES, claiming “No one in York Regional Police knew she was once a cop until you told us at your trial (which began June 11/18 2019).” referring to my first complainant of July 14, 2017.

She was, of course, misleading me in the hopes they could all just say “Sorry, eh? We did not know she was Thin Blue Line.”

We represent the interests of police in the international community and provide capacity building support to strengthen their abilities to protect and serve their communities.

https://www.thinbluelineint.org

YET, in 2017, just 5 weeks AFTER I was first arrested, I advised her BOSS, current Dep. Chief Da Silva PLUS 6 police cc’s that the person who swore out those 2 charges for my arrest was an ex-cop.

and, since then, DS Bentham has been under his orders to NOT speak DIRECTLY to me

Oopsie! She did.

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 1:15 PM Da Silva, Paulo #916 <916@yrp.ca> wrote:

CC: 6 cops

  1. Bentham, Heather #627 627@yrp.ca,
  2. Jeffrey #1019 Brown 1019@yrp.ca,
  3. Jordan, Judy #5616 5616@yrp.ca,
  4. MacDonald, Kathleen #5810″ 5810@yrp.ca,
  5. Slack, Michael #756 756@yrp.ca,
  6. Wallace, Patricia #5122 5122@yrp.ca

Good Afternoon Mr. Lepp,

In your correspondence of Wednesday August 16, 2017 you indicated that it is your intention to commence civil proceedings against York Regional Police in relation to this matter. Given your intention, it is inappropriate for members of York Regional Police to communicate directly with you outside of the court process. Please be advised that all correspondence you have sent to members of York Regional Police thus far is being forwarded to the Crown and may be entered into evidence. Your correspondence will also be provided to our legal counsel in any future civil proceedings. Any further correspondence from you to any member of York Regional Police regarding this matter will go unanswered.

If you require emergency assistance, please call 911.

Paulo DaSilva| Superintendent | Badge 916 |York Regional Police

Email: 916@yrp.ca | Tel: 905.830.0303 ext 7110|1866. 876.5423 

So, that PROVES that THIS email telling of the ex-cop is already with police AND the Crown and is therefore available for my lawsuit.

Because I had said to him…..

From: Bob Lepp [mailto:boblepp@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 11:19 AM
To: Da Silva, Paulo #916 <916@YRP.CA>
Subject: Det. Jeff Brown is away

His complainant has a history of lying. 

I wrote my CAO of Aurora about her. And about her drinking alone at a bar and posting her map coordinates ten times July 21 in Facebook in a public profile. She has now deleted them. He must have told her to do so.

One week earlier, July 14,  she described herself afraid for her life of me because I wrote an email to my councillors about her. She claimed she was varying her car route home because of me, and that she was considering wearing body armour at work. This is not behaviour consistent with a person fearful of being found.Her “business” background is full of l**s and exaggerations. She claims expert status in so many businesses. Marketing, advertising, planning, human behaviour, systems installation, web sites, etc.  skills yet she never worked in a business outside of Halton Regional Police.

She suddenly dropped out of policing after 8 years to be a professional closet organizer.

She suddenly dropped out of business to become a fireman.

She put out her own national press release in 2012 announcing she has suffered from depression her entire life…. Because she heard a radio show about abuse of women.

I believe the judge will laugh at your charges (Lepp 2020: she did!) as none of them have any evidence supporting them. All communications were legal, none were illegal. I did not threaten her life or to do her harm. I emailed my councillors on her shortcomings. 

The email was blocked from the complainant, she never got a copy. 

A councillor (Lepp 2020: or her boyfriend) played to her paranoia and showed her the email. In her paranoia, she took one line from the very end of it and told Jeff Brown it was a direct threat made to her, it was not made to her. It was about her lack of defences the next day July 14 in Superior Court brought against her by another taxpayer fed up with her irrational behaviour. He is also suing her for vexatious litigation.

This is a ……… suffering depression and paranoia and medicating with alcohol to excess by her own descriptions still on Facebook.

Jeff (PC Brown) was coerced to raise charges by a fellow ex cop. I have his case notes, he has no evidence in support of either charge.

No need to reply.

I am not asking for legal advice.

I am just making you aware of facts in the public domain.

Email from Bob Lepp to Dep. Chief Paulo Da Silva August 2017

END EMAILS

The 2 false charges of July 14, 2017 were withdrawn 3 months later, I was self represented.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Law Without Remorse - a book The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻CVI – Coincidences

What are the odds America can produce BOTH Trump and Mr. Rogers as famous TV personalities?

My past 3.5 years gave been a time of tremendous coincidences and freakishly strange occurrences.

Today, I finally watched Tom Hanks as Mr. Rogers. If you have not done so, go watch it. It’s not what y0u imagine it must be.

And for it to end up with the 5 most perfect words that explain my predicament is just so interesting.

Without giving away the plot, I can tell you the 5 words:

“It it’s mentionable it’s manageable!”

Mr Rogers… as brought to life by Tom Hanks.

In other words, if we can talk about it, we can fix it. If we CANNOT talk about it…. THEN we CANNOT ever fix it.

So, I wanted to fix just the small amounts of corruption in the Town of Aurora’s council, BUT I was shut up 100% on July 14, 2017…. forbidden to even communicate with ANY town employee by police. They wanted me silenced. AURORA wanted me silenced and so when an employee told them how she could arrange just that through her family, The Thin Blue Line.….the law enforcement family she has never left, they jumped on it.

That was my first arrests, July 2017… but, what is the source of my arrests after May 30, 2018?

“Mentioning” caused my arrests after May 30, 2018, as when Crown David Moull did NOT want me mentioning his friends in my blog.

So there he was, coaching on the sidelines of my arrests, and he saw I was slipping through his net and actually talking about my arrests and so he sends in a play to the field, an audible to Crown Elder called “Term 6” aka “The Not To Mention” term. Just the same 85 words arranged to shut me the EFF up about his friends on my blog.

And he told Crown Elder to just ignore whatever was said by Superior Court justices, J. Fuerst and J. Dawe, when they both ordered Elder to make CORRECTIONS to the list of “those who shall not be mentioned.”

And then, because it worked so well, Moull had Elder photocopy the same 85 words into every breach arrest after that. He wanted no chance for me to speak of his friends in my blog. So I just sued them all instead, and then Crown Moull arranged for that to be disrupted as well.

But now, Rogres/Hanks points out “If it’s mentionable… it’s manageable!” and I see why Moull has been so upset. He knows if I am allowed to mention my accusers, I could certainly manage them as well.

So began life with my “Not to mention” penalty in term 6.

It ended June 2020 under the order of Justice Dawe, such sweet irony for a name.

Justice Dawe’s Order after reviewing my March 4, 2020 Release Order for legality (Hint: it was NOT)

[23] Justice of the Peace Premji’s release order named Mr. Lepp’s wife as his surety in an amount of $15,000. The terms of release included a house arrest condition (Term 3) that required Mr. Lepp to remain in his residence at all times except when in the company of his wife or in the event he experienced a medical emergency. It also included non-contact and non-attendance terms in relation to Ms. …, Ms. S.. and Ms. E…. (Terms 4 and 5), as well as a term stating that Mr. Lepp is: 

Not to mention, that is speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method on social media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method H..C….., J…. S……, M….. E………. or the T…. F… P…. dog walking business in any online media, EXCEPT in a court room or on court documents in a courtroom or through a member of the Law Society for purposes of matters before the court. 

This latter term, Term 6, is identical to Term 10 of Rose J.’s probation order. Finally, Term 7 of Justice of the Peace Premji’s bail order directed that Mr. Lepp: 

not possess or use any computers or any other device that has access to the Internet or other digital network. 

III. Disposition

[63] For the reasons given above, Mr. Lepp’s bail review application is allowed.

I would vary his current bail by striking Term 6 in its entirety and varying Term 7 as set out above.

[64] I would also vary the non-contact and non-association terms, Terms 4 and 5, to take into account my December 11, 2019 order that deleted Ms. S… and Ms. E…’s names from the equivalent terms of Mr. Lepp’s previous bail recognizance. In this regard, I note that the situation with Ms. S… has changed since I made my previous order, in that she is now the complainant in one of the new March 2020 charges that has been laid against Mr. Lepp. I am satisfied that this is a material change that justifies re-introducing her name into the non-contact and non-association terms of Mr. Lepp’s release order.

[65] However, there has been no similar change in relation to Ms. E…. She is not a complainant in any of the outstanding charges against Mr. Lepp, and he is already barred from contacting or communicating with her or going to places he knows to be associated with her by the terms of Rose J.’s (FORMER, NOW STRUCK) probation order. As best as I can determine from the record before me, the charges against Mr. Lepp in which she was the complainant were stayed in the fall of 2017. In these circumstances I continue to be of the view, as I was in December 2019, that it is no longer necessary or appropriate for non-contact and nonassociation terms relating to her to be included in Mr. Lepp’s bail order. Accordingly, Terms 4 and 5 will also be varied by deleting Ms. E…’s name from these conditions.should now be renumbered, so that what are currently Terms 4 and 5 will become Terms 3 and 4 of the new release order, and the amended version of Term 7 set out above will become the new Term 5.

So, did “Not To Mention” become “Not To Manage? as Mr. Rogers assured me it would?

Yes, this entire charade has been unmanageable.

Because Crown Moull wanted me to shut up about his friends in my blog.

As Justice Dawe said after Crown McCALLION showed him the VERY WORST of my emails, blogs and posts… quote…

[38] In my view, this term is problematic in at least three different respects. First, the wording is opaque and extremely difficult to interpret. In particular, it is far from clear whether the term is meant to only restrict Mr. Lepp’s ability to “mention” the named persons and the business online, or whether the restriction is meant to apply more broadly to all uses of these names by him out of court or outside of court documents. Different aspects of the wording of Term 6 point in different directions. On the one hand, the phrase: 

… speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method on social media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method … 

can be read as modified by the subsequent limiting expression “in any online media”, with the result that the term as a whole only applies to Mr. Lepp’s “mentioning” these names online. However, on this comparatively narrow reading of the term the complexity and breadth of the earlier phrase make little sense, as does the exception permitting Mr. Lepp to “mention” these names “in a courtroom or on court documents”. This latter exception would seem to be completely unnecessary if the term as a whole is understood as only applying to Mr. Lepp’s online communications. 

[39] The reference to a “printed blog” as something apparently distinct from an “online blog” is also puzzling, since in ordinary usage a “blog” is by definition something that appears online.

[40] Mr. Lepp advised me that he understands Term 6 to mean that he “cannot say or write the [four] names unless he is in a court room”, and I am unable to say that his broad reading of the term is plainly wrong. 

[42] A second problem with Term 6 as worded is that it includes Ms. S…. and Ms. E,,,,,,,,,,,e’s names, which I specifically ordered on December 11, 2019 should be removed from Mr. Lepp’s bail order because he was no longer facing any charges in which they were the complainants. Crown counsel who appeared before me on December 11, 2019 (again, not Mr. Westgate), and who opposed my order removing Ms. S……. and Ms. E……..’s names, also appeared at Mr. Lepp’s March 6, 2020 bail hearing. He presented Justice of the Peace Premji with a draft release order that re-inserted these names, without informing the Justice of the Peace that I had previously deleted them from Mr. Lepp’s previous bail. While it would have been open to Crown counsel to argue to the Justice of the Peace that there had been material changes of circumstance that allowed the Justice of the Peace to depart from my ruling and re-insert these names, he was not entitled to simply ignore my previous order as he did. 

J. Dawe about Crown Elder…”he was not entitled to simply ignore my previous order as he did.” 

So, Crown elder twice ignored Superior Court Orders.

[44] Term 6 places sweeping restrictions on Mr. Lepp’s ability to “mention” the complainants’ names, without regard to the content of his communications or to their surrounding context. As discussed above, the extent of these restrictions is unclear, since the Term 6 condition can be understood broadly as applying to all communications that take place outside a courtroom or in court documents, but can also be read more narrowly as applying only to Mr. Lepp’s communications on the internet. On either reading, however, the term captures a vast range of expressive activity that is not likely to cause any identifiable harm to anyone, including the persons named in the order. While protecting these named persons from being harassed by Mr. Lepp would be a legitimate secondary ground objective, a term that bars Mr. Lepp from simply “mentioning” their names in any and all circumstances seems on its face to be somewhat like trying to swat a fly by shooting at it with a blunderbuss. The potential overbreadth remains striking even if Term 6 is interpreted as being limited to Mr. Lepp’s online communications. 

[46] The evidence before me falls well short of the mark. While Mr. Lepp has been found guilty of one count of sending “harassing telecommunications” to Ms. C…., this charge was laid in May 2018, at a time when Mr. Lepp does not appear to have been facing any criminal charges or to have been subject to any bail orders. There is no evidence before me that he has ever engaged in any similar conduct after he was charged.

[47] The record before me also contains no evidence that Mr. Lepp has ever blogged about the complainants in a way that might raise legitimate concerns about their psychological health or personal safety. I recognize that when Rose J. (FELL ON APPEAL) sentenced Mr. Lepp for breaching the earlier version of this bail term, he described Mr. Lepp as having “engaged in a pattern of online postings, which constitute bullying” and declared that the bail term at issue had been imposed “to prevent him from online blogging in a manner which is hurtful and demeaning to Ms. E…….., Ms. C,,,,,,,,, and Ms. S…………..”. These conclusions may very well have been justified on the evidence that was before Rose J.

However, the problem I face is that they are NOT supported by the record that has been put before me.   Mr. Lepp was charged with sending harassing emails to Ms. S…… in July 2018, but was acquitted of this charge by Harpur J.

To the contrary, the only specific information I have been given about Mr. Lepp’s blogging and other online activity is that he has “mentioned” the complainants’ names by posting documents from his civil case and other documents relating to the operations of the dog park, and once when responding to a negative “Google review” that attacked him personally.

Nothing about the content of these posts as they have been described in the materials before me would appear to raise any secondary ground concerns. 

[50] While varying Term 6 along these lines would address some of the vagueness concerns that I discussed earlier, it would not deal with the more fundamental problem of overbreadth. While I appreciate that the judicial officers who previously barred Mr. Lepp from even “mentioning” the complainants’ names online likely had some reason for taking this approach, I simply do not know what this reason was. I do not know when this term was first added to Mr. Lepp’s bail conditions, who first imposed it, or why he or she did so. Moreover,  I remain puzzled by the proposed reference to a “printed blog” as something distinct from an “online blog”.

[51] On the record before me, I am unable to conclude that a bail term with the sweeping reach the Crown proposes is justifiable under Antic as “necessary for the protection or safety of the public”. Moreover, the necessity of such a bail term as a practical matter is made even more questionable by the fact that Mr. Lepp is currently under a probation order that replicates the language of the existing Term 6. Accordingly, striking Term 6 from Mr. Lepp’s bail entirely will have no immediate impact on his permitted online activities. If the charges against Mr. Lepp to which the bail order applies are still before the courts when his probation order expires or is varied or set aside on appeal, this will in my view constitute a material change of circumstance for the purposes of St-Cloud, supra that will allow the prosecution to apply to have the terms of Mr. Lepp’s bail reviewed under s. 521 of the Code. The Crown can then seek to present a proper evidential record to support its contention that an order prohibiting Mr. Lepp from even “mentioning” the named persons online or elsewhere is necessary for the protection or safety of the public. 

[52] Accordingly, I am directing that Term 6 be struck from Mr. Lepp’s release order in its entirety. 

So, J. Dawe is clear. The Term was puzzling, unsupported, questionable. over breadth, contentious, of a sweeping reach, improper…. just plain wrong AND it had been rubber stamped by multiple justices even AFTER J. Dawe ordered it be removed.

That means Crown David Moull has ordered Crowns Elder, McCallion, Westlake and Giordano to break the law more than I have broken any laws.

.

Categories
About Bob Lepp The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C5️⃣ – My Loyal Viewers

I know my “regulars” by the number of times they have come to view and how many pages they look at.

So, I have visitors I call 153, 94, 77, 46 and 25. That is the number of visits each have made.

153 always uses a VPN, so that will be Cosmo Metics for sure. Trained legal professionals are taught to hide their tracks with a VPN (virtual private network) through a foreign country. She thinks she appears as untraceable if she uses a vpn. Not true. She has viewed 310 pages.

25 and 94 are Tekaavy customers. 63 and 187 page views.

46 uses Rogers cable in Newmarket, the cops maybe. 87 page views… not much, yup, must be cops.

77 is me, 667 pages viewed as a comparison.

So, if you want me to notice you, just drop by regularly.

Categories
About Bob Lepp The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C🌲 – Pffftt! It’s not to be done!

aka “I want to face the 3 LSO Licencees in court, so therefore I demand the charges be dropped, and POOF! they will NOT be dropped. Watch me do it again!

Justice Rose, while he was ignoring the entire lack of the mens rea component in my guilt, also read my entire blog and he bragged about that. That was an “independent investigation”, it was definitely illegal and it led DIRECTLY to his rulings being overturned on appeal. Only THEN did the Crown admit it had no case at all against me to begin with and stayed those charges.

The one phrase J. Rose did not understand was: “If there’s something I don’t want done, I just ask for it, and POOF! it is NOT done!”

He just could not grasp that for 3.5 years from July 14, 2017 to present the Crown, Police and Aurora and York and the 3 (soon to be 5) ladies have NEVER done one thing I requested, but BETTER, everything I DO ask for is refused and the OPPOSITE action is GUARANTEED to be executed.

This means they dance only to the music that I play. I can control them all, precisely, yet without speaking even one word. I just ask HERE for it, and there is no way on earth it will EVER happen in my lifetime.

Example: The March 4, 2020 charges brought by LSO licensees Barry Stork, Charles Painter and Cos, the metics seller… I cannot WAIT for the trial. The JPT Friday will be FUN, feigning to cajole the justice out of a trial, but that will most certainly result in a trial date being set. Then the real FUN begins, as I will then be allowed to self rep and CROSS EXAMINE those 3 people for a change.

After all, Justice Harpur forbid me to have a defuse counsel, so the same is likely to happen again.. Common Law works like that… BIG on case law, short on common sense.

The charges are AGAINST justice, so there is NO human target of my alleged breaches and I can ask all the accusers ALL of my questions… MYSELF.

I can ask “Cosmo Metics” how many PREVIOUS complaints she made against me and how many were truthful… 18 charges made, NONE were truthful. Every last one was withdrawn in some way.

For 18 charges to fail that completely, Metics had to tell fibs. A lot of fibs. And to tell fibs JUST to get someone arrested is “Public Mischief” in the Criminal Code s.140.

“The purpose of the law is to discourage and punish false reporting and of course to prohibit people from falsely accusing others.  Making a false statement transpires when the person makes the statement with the intention of misleading justice. One cannot be convicted if it is determined that they genuinely believed the statement to be true at the time it was made.

Canada: What Are The Consequences Of Filing A False Police Report In Canada?
08 March 2019 
by David Schell

But, by asking for her to be charged, she NEVER WILL BE CHARGED. You watch, never.

Next, I can ask Det. Goobie how it is he believed Metics when she cried “Wolf!” yet again? How did he believe all that without even reading my Probation Order “not to mention” term STRUCK in total by J. Dawe? Did he not see “except in a court room”, “in court documents” and “through a LSO licensee”? Did Metics not tell him SHE is an LSO Licensee so ANYTHING I may have been so stupid to say THROUGH her to herself was legal anyway?

And he will have to agree he was assigned to the police report GO# 77377 March 2, 2020 and that DS Bemtham originated that report on her own AFTER she called Metics to think up some more dirt on me. I need that report Friday. So now I will NEVER get it, because “POOF! It’s gone!”

Then, of course, I get Metics on the stand under cross. I get to question her every motive in ALL the previous false charges and why she waited 18 days to arrest me when her best record time was less than 18 hours December 5-6, 2019. Why THIS time did she let me have those 19 peaceful DAYS at home instead of in prison?

So, I hereby demand these last two charges be withdrawn NOW so that we can skip the expense of a JPT Friday November 27, 2020.

OK, POOF! I am rejected and the JPT shall continue.

Such power I hold, but you can trust me to use it only for good and never for evil.

It is just too bad JPT’s have restricted attendance, and my 3 accusers may NOT watch the carnage. Metics could come be scared $#%tless again seeing her name on my lawsuits against her.

Categories
About Bob Lepp The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C&2 – Just 7 More Sleeps!

aka “Judicial Pre-Trial is Nov. 27, 2020”

We both received invitations to attend the Estreet Hearing December 17, 2020. We are to explain why the court should not take our surety commitments.

But by then we will know the results of the charges.

Both charges are 2 of 3 by the same person as about 15 other false charges. It depends on whether I count the 5 submitted by this person after stealing a copy of a private email from me to the Crown E. Barnier.

ONE was withdrawn ALREADY…. such was the detective work accomplished in one full day by 4 guys assigned.

The 2 remaining two allegations simply did not happen.

Eleven charges were requested by this person, 3 were believed, one was BS AND WITHDRAWN.

EIGHT were rejected by police as being TOO far fetched

Q. If you’re a trained detective, and a person, known to have submitted 15 failed charges prior, now brings you 11 more, and 8 of those are useless again…. why do you accept the last three?

What was it that made these 3 stand out?

A. Was it that they happened 3 weeks ago and this person has NEVER wanted on hour to call police? No…..

Was it that she is a licensee of the Law Society?… No.

Was it that your boss TOLD you to?…. well… yes…..

So, Det Goobie did his best and picked 3 charges… Errr…. 2 charges

What kind of law do they allege I broke? And, who or what is the “victim”?

Is it:

  • “Justice”?? or
  • a person being “protected”??

I dunno either.

In this alleged act, one person, aka “The Protected Person” is one who had to suffer the alleged sound of my voice.

Where? In court room 405 the witness, one of 3 Law Society licences signed up to witness, says.

Why? Well, the witness decided to come to MY appearance to hear my voice speaking forward towards the justice. She took time from her cake sales site to come hear me.

THEN, she decides 19 days later to run to the cops and say “Hey! Lepp spoke in MY direction in court 4 weeks back. I got busy with faux finishing and cosmetics. Well it was actually Barry Stork he spoke to, but I could see his eyes and he called me “some people”!”

Now, Barry signed an affidavit on her support. Did the “aggrieved”?? NO. Barry swore he heard nothing anyone said. Painter avoided swearing anything… more experienced.

So, the SOLE victim in this charge was in now way offended at the time, but wakes up from a coma 19 days later and says “Hey! 3 weeks ago I was horrified when I attended Bob Lepp’s hearing and I heard him speaking in my direction… to Barry Stork… in room 405…… the horror, oh, the horror!!.”

Think of the cost to taxpayers of this absurd allegation.

OK, DON’T do that, you will just get mad.

“Madness” is spending one more penny on this 16th and 17th false allegation from the same person because SHE and ONLY SHE if pretending she is SCARED S$%TLESS to have heard me greet Barry Stork.

Detectives cost York $600 a day. Times FOUR plus some of DS Bentham’s time. Plus the office help.

How much more should taxpayers be forced to pay because, like DJT, she cannot accept she lost the other 15 charges?

How could she survive 19 days of being traumatized without either PTSD treatments, OR exacting revenge?

Did she complain to ANYONE in 19 days? Therapist? Husband?

HER FREE LAWYER in this suit??

NO, she cannot name ONO person to whom she mentioned this excruciating trauma and so there is but one expert witness, Barry, who heard,…. nothing. Hist sworn testimony is he saw me but did not hear me. I have always liked Barry because of his INATE HONESTY.

So, when you ask: “Do Lawyers get and give special treatment for personal causes because all the players are “friends” of hers… the answer is: “YES”. I know I treat my friends better with computer problems than random strangers. It is inevitable that lawyers are more trusted than alleged criminals. So criminals must buy lawyers to get treated fairly.

June 4, 2017 I took a WRITTEN, documented, photographed assault complaint to DS Heather Bentham’s detectives. I had 25 photos of proof, +2 Bylaws officers as witnesses, she even testified to me she had declined to have anyone check if the alleged complainant was once a mafiosa or a cop. DS Bentham just did not care because she knew by then she simply would NEVER accept ANY complaint from me. But a lawyer? OF COURSE, MA’AM… sit right down, I will get a couple of cops to type it out for you. Cappa?

So, May 11, 2018 when I emailed DS Bentham a second time asking HER to help ME with a dog attack, she knew she had to arrest me to get my attention once and for all. Then she would arrest me 5 MORE times after THAT as each charge fell to the justices’ common sense.

I had zero assault complaints of two in writing taken up, while “she who sells cosmetics” gets taken up orally 18 TIMES! And that’s the hardest way to be taken up. Heads Up! It is difficult to be taken up orally. You may have to take your lickings, and write it down and sign it.

So, it is with much jubilation, I announce it’s only one week away!

Lawyerfest!

FUN FACT: Every day, just from 13 to 18 people read my blog.

THE SAME 13 to 18……. every day/

I get just one or two first timers every day.

So, since DS Bentham and Crown Moull feel that those 18 people need to be protected from seeing their names shown on my lawsuits or their threatening ;lawyers’ letters…. then Ontario taxpayers just wasted another $5,000.

Great Article: http://www.slaw.ca/2020/09/03/thursday-thinkpiece-the-justice-crisis-the-cost-and-value-of-accessing-law/

According to the former Chief Justice of Canada, Beverley McLachlin, there is a “lack of adequate access to justice in Canada.” Access to justice, in her view, “is the most important issue facing the legal system.” In its review of the justice system, the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters – a collaborative organization made up of leading voices from all justice sectors across Canada – concluded in 2013 that there is a “serious access to justice problem in Canada.” At the same time, former Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci – in the report of his independent review of First Nations representation on juries in Ontario – stated that “the justice system generally as applied to First Nations peoples … is quite frankly in a crisis.” The Canadian Bar Association (CBA), in its national justice review, claimed that the state of access to justice in Canada is “abysmal” and further, that inaccessible justice “costs us all….”

In 2016, the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs reached a similar conclusion regarding court delays affecting access to the criminal justice system.

And so, 4 cops spent 2 days getting me charged 3 times and paid for 3 days in Lindsay prison, transport, court services, wheelchair service, a full Release HEARING THAT COST ME $2,600 ALONE, A PROBATION OFFICER at $6 a day. The pay for a JP, clerk, reporter, Crown Prosecutor Elder

… ALL of that because an “officer of the court” CLAIMS I spoke to her, “nice to see some people are not afraid of me any more” (12 words, 20 vowels) and to her ALONE, to her face, in room 405 when I am documented on the docket and transcript as being in another court room, 401. And lawyers Stork and Painter agreed to be witnesses to the date, time and place and exactly what was said by ME at MY appearance others CHOSE to attend JUST to hear me.

$5,000 at least spent for, 19 days earlier, 12 words ALLEGED by ONE person to have been spoken by me to her alone IN A COURT ROOM WITH AUDIO recordings 24/7 which she CHOSE to attend when she had ALSO hired a lawyer for that purpose.

She chose to come to the same room with same man for whom, she testified at my trial, she bought a complete new security system and an armed guard standing duty at her home… so afraid of an attack by me was she. Now, she sits 25 feet away with NO COPS in the room at all. She has no fear anymore.

She once initially testified to police that the next day she had to be in the same building as me, was SO afraid of that idea that she asked for and got an armed escort to and from her car.

February 14, 2020 she CHOSE to sit unprotected in the SAME room she claims. Sadly, she had the wrong room and the wrong guy.

12 words. I bet that it’s at least $1,000 per word Ontario taxpayers spent on me due to ONLY HER prevarication. Now, times 18 other fabricated charges.

Even Wheel of Fortune only spends $250 per vowel.

Categories
41.5 Prevarications About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C&1 – Collusion Extrusion

aka “Spitting it out!”

Loyal readers know that EVERYTHING that has happened t0 me in the legal systems of Ontario are interconnected. One person is behind them all as leader of the pack. And the collusion gets squeezed out of the tube all over these people.

There are 7 defendants as I type this, and today I shall add two more for a total of 9.

Why?

If I do not, Aurora’s Chas. Painter will again accuse me of being a vexatious litigant. He hates it when I use Small Claims to start just to reduce costs for the defendants. I did that with the Catholic School Board who claim everything Principal Donato did to get me arrested March 4, 2020 is supported in full by them. They tell me if they had to do it all over again, they would ALSO have had me arrested again.

When asked about trespassing me from my home… the lawyer offered that Ms Donato did not lawn where I lived….. which may make sense until you read my address on her envelop. She knew all along she was trying to get me evicted once she had me falsely arrested <arcyh 4, 2020. And now the Board agrees, they would evict me as well.

I was not even on school property. I was ONLY on the town boulevard at the Town park street curb and bus stop 1208 and the video is on YouTube.

Keep in mind the Catholic Board has seen this video and they think it deserved a 1 km diameter circle around the school where I should not tread. They THINK they can trespass me in my own home WITHIN that circle.

There is only ONE reason they think that.

They had ONE person TELL them it was legal to trespass someone OUT of their home, and they believed that person. And that person was NOT a cop, not a lawyer, not anything really. That person just wanted yet another reason to arrest me. So, Principal Donato then put police on notice to arrest me if I came to the Bus Stop #1208.

I did of course, in late February, and so all 3 of the people who arrested me 6 times, called my Probation Officer for a 7th arrest, which DS Bentham kindly provided for them. My PO ordered me to go to DS Bentham Thursday, February 27, 2020 and I did. She thought about me Friday February 28 and by March 2, 2020 had assigned 4 NEW detectives to take names.

March 4 I was sent to Lindsay prison for 3 days and March 6, 2020 I was released under 100% house arrest and no use of the internet at all in any way. EVERYTHING uses the Internet, so I had no phone, no TV, no cell, no ANYTHING. I sat ion my couch. Period.

So, The Catholic School Board set out to get me arrested and shut up about them, too. I sued that Catholic Board in Small Claims and offed to settle for am apology. They refuse, so I will now add them to the combined suit because it is the identical crowd…. Aurora manager, York police, region and police board, 7 defendants now become 8.

Then, the spite fence matter is till very much live and they claim this winnings from me. I have a motion scheduled to tell the court the entire suit was a lie from day one and the proof is from the Plaintiff herself who on October 29, 2018 in sworn testimony in court admitted she knew the fence trespassed all along because the foundation rocks from her neighbours walls were drilled out o fteh ground before her eyes. She kept a souvenir.

I never countersued because we knew the suit to be suspicious the first day I measured the gap between wall and fence face as one inch north of the property line and one cannot cement in a 4X4 post without a twelve inch diameter hole filled with concrete. And that means the outer surface of the post and sonotube is 3 to 5 inches in trespass.

Today, I will add the spite fence builder to the big suit, making it 9 defendants, $9,000,000 and I can litigate 9 as easy as 7.

Last February, my case management justice Edwards detailed how I was required to amend my claim.

He said:

..until the Court of Appeal has ruled, you are to do nothing. Nothing, sir. It’s that simple. Once the Court of Appeal comes back and renders their decisions, we can move on with the litigation, one way or the other. Do you understand what I’m saying today? You can do absolutely nothing with respect to the litigation as it presently stands with the Town of Aurora. “

..that you will have zero contact with anyone associated with this court. That means court staff and judges of this court, as it relates to the two proceedings that are presently pending in this courthouse. Do you understand that? 

MR. LEPP: I do. May I contact my Town? 

THE COURT: I’m not going to give you any legal advice, sir. 

THE COURT: My order, sir, that I made, if you will look at it carefully, says that you can have correspondence with Mr. Painter that is civil. 

THE COURT: You can settle if you choose to do so, but if you….

THE COURT: And, very often that correspondence, in general terms, does not reflect well on one side or the other, or both. And, I can tell you that when I see that kind of correspondence, it ultimately can have an effect on the ultimate disposition.

So, the Court of Appeal has ruled in my favour in two matters…

  • Aurora’s vexatious claim… I AM NOT VEXATIOUS as confirmed ar Appeal… and the
  • Justice Rose guilty decision of December 4, 2019 was quashed and the probation order was struck and the Crown stayed the charges and will NOT prosecute. AND….
  • Aurora did not agree to extend the J. Deluca appeal so that is the same a closing at appeal. AND
  • J. Harpur is appealed awaiting a decision
  • J. Henschel will be appealed

So, in theory, I can now amend my claim as ordered to add two defendants WITHOUT any implication of wrongful arrest until AFTER November 27, 2020 when the JPT of the 2 breaches is heard. There is no way the LAST 2 of 21 charges will go to trial because the Crown has already been admonished by J. Dawe for REFUSING TWICE to amend the very terms they claimed I breached. It’s complicated.

But, I have no PROOF of that theory since I cannot get ANYTHING scheduled so I cannot get before J. Edwards to ask him if I am correct.

Categories
41.5 Prevarications About Bob Lepp Web Site Development 101

BL20-🏌🏻C – 41.5 Prevarications

Here will be documented each one.

There must be AT LEAST one half truth.

July 14, 2017

Then he began to email me regularly.

Fact: Over 4 years just 18 emails, 6 per year, one each 2 months

2015 – None 2016 – None

2017

  1. January 25
  2. January 27
  3. February 13
  4. March 21
  5. March 22
  6. March 24
  7. March 27
  8. March 29
  9. March 30
  10. May 16
  11. June 3
  12. June 4
  13. June 5
  14. June 10
  15. June 12
  16. July 9
  17. July 13
  18. July 14 (date of my FIRST of 7 arrests, but early morning)

But one of the emails started getting into long dissertations about how we could do our jobs better, so I didn’t respond to any of those

Of course not, why change just because a taxayer takes the time to find out how Aurora lost $300,000 per year NOT SELLING PET TAGS.

One day at a council meeting I introduced myself, and I shook his hand (fearlessly) and I welcomed HIM to the Town of Aurora SO HE WOULD KNOW WHO I WAS.

Fact: Nope. Never happened. This was claimed to explain why one would know me on sight and did not need to bother to talk to me before writing up and sticking a ticket into my body.

Everything escalated with him when we ran an event…

Fact: The OSPCA ran the event I had been told by the person in charge overall.

So I scheduled to be there a couple of hours.

Fact: It had already been FIRST claimed by “I” that Saturday, June 3, 2017 was a scheduled DAY OFF. THEN, it was claimed the attendance was for 4 hours, 11:00 to 3:00. The show was advertised as ending at 2:00.

I was speaking to the K9 officer when the dogs came directly… at him and they wrapped themselves around my legs.

Fact: Fellow officers signed affidavits to the contrary. NO attacking a German Shepherd cop dog, NO wrapping legs, NO almost tripping. The K9 was removed because IF anyone or anything threatened the officer, the K9 would seriously attack as it was trained. This was from the officer to me in an email afterwards.

It could have been a real problem.

Fact: They came to me directly and sat at my feet. I grabbed the rope tying the two together. No “real” problem.. two wimpy female dogs. None of the other officers suggested any problem at all.

I decided to lay a ticket on him.

Fact: No, that took 25 minutes to decide. I had left the scene and was 500 yards away.

And I handed it to him.

Fact: Three officers tracked me far away, 500 meters photographing children soccer teams, and one SHOVED forcibly the ticket into my armpit without warning. NO badges seen or offered, no names offered, no replies to my questions to identify themselves… no words at all and I have the 12 images of them stalking away ignoring me.

He followed me back to where I was going and you know yelling obscenities and everything.

Fact: No obscenities… Seriously? I was swearing LOUDLY enough for her to hear 100 meters ahead of me and NONE of the 3 stopped to discuss swearing in front of children? None of the other officers, including the two bodyguards, back up that story in any way at all. (To be posted soon)

And I just didn’t respond and he actually came up to me and said “Who’s the asshole who wrote this ticket?”

Fact: Yes, no response. Defiant pose among MANY bulletproof vested young, viral, muscled, tattooed MEN… I’m stupid enough to call their senior officer anASSHOLE? of course not… none of the 5 officers who sign affidavits reported hearing any obscenities at any time, from me or anyone else.

I thought it would really have been a serious incident because ten canine officer had to grab his dog and THREW him in the vehicle. I could have been tripped.

Fact: She began yelling, scaring the dog. She said she “stepped out” of the rope. None of her officers supported her.

I called his name, I identified myself as xxxx xxxxxx MANAGER OF BYLAWS.

FACT: She refused to give a name or badge number and just walked off.

He began calling insults at me and then began following me shouting about the dog park, our lack of action with parking and other insults.

Fact: She was a hundred meters ahead of me, I was asking for badge numbers. No other officer supported this claim of “insults” and “shouting”

August 2018 she went to police a second time to arrest me and she recounted on video exactly what she did. She said she found a ticket book from one of her “boys” and made one out to me without asking for my ID, address, postal code… nothing. She wrote from memo2ry and then, according to her OWN words. she shoved it “into the spot where the arm meets the body.” aka ARMPIT.

She admitted, on tape, on questioning BY POLICE…about an assault she committed on my body.

I reported it June 4, 2017 in writing to PC Gaudet at the cop shop on Prospect. It went nowhere, of course, because I asked for it. And I have NEVER been given anything I asked police for.

More tomorrow, tune in!

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9tnein- Canadian Divorce Rates Spike

Are you feeling differently towards your spouse since March?

You are not alone.

Mine has been ongoing since June 2017 when DC Jeff Brown first scared my wife to death. But it is reaching a crescendo in COVID times.

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9tate- This One Writes Itself

On Wednesday, November 18, 2020 Lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian will be sent by her boss Michael Simaan to take me to court and claim I am in contempt of an order she won requiring me to attend an Examination In Aid Of Execution and tell her where all my assets are.

I attended said examination August 28, 2020, and she asked sbopuot or commented on 639 issues. I have the list and answers I gave typed up. That was not enough knowledge for her, so she now claims I did not cooperate at all, and she wants a judge to order me to pay her more costs on behalf of Marnee Buckles’ neighbour.

This is because Mr. Simaan allowed her to sue me “on contingency”, or “free” in the hopes she can win some money to share with him.

Now, anyone who knows me, KNOWS all my assets. They have visited my house, have seen my 50 year old car, and my $10,000 2014 Ford, and my 40 year old Honda motorcycle. And they knew me well enough to know I bought RRSP’s. And they helped celebrate when I retired and bragged of taking CPP early as any idiot would know to do since it is/was going broke. And they understood that at age 70 I MUST by law convert all my RRSP’s to RRIF’s.

Now, CPP and its little brother, OAS, are not seizable in a normal world. Gwendolyn took $4,500 of our CPP/OAS anyway in an illegally executed TD Canada Trust joint bank account garnishment. She tried a second time when I eventually opened a replacement account at CIBC. York and Toronto Police both refused to investigate how she found out and garnished that in less than 18 hours of me opening it.

CIBC then accused ME of fraud, and banned me for life in a letter my CIBC manager is looking into for me.

Third time lucky, I opened an RBC account, Yonge at Aurora Heights next to Shoppers Drugs, thinking that would be safer than both TD and CIBC. And my pension for the past 2 months went there. This money is my only fresh income. The next load is due in less than 2 weeks. I emailed Mr. Simaan asking him to tell Gwendolyn where my income is held so she can legally garnish it, just as she legally garnished both TD and CIBC. She refuses. I think she figured out my catfishing at last.

So, 1 house,1 bank account, 3 old beaters, RRIF’s, CPP, OAS, snowblower, lawn mower. No one hires me for Google Maps work since I am a criminal now and cannot be bonded anymore.

No jewelry, offshore accounts or business income at all anymore since my wife keeps her own income with divorce ongoing.

Mr. Simaan’s employee on Wednesday will ask for costs claiming I did not answer enough of her penetrating questions. Such as “What is the serial number of the $229 Costco freezer AND your push lawn mower?” “What is your SIN?” “When is your mother planning to die?” And “What is her maiden name?”

So, let’s try this…. garnish this bank account like the last two. Please, I beg of you, Mr Simaan, seize this account so she need not go to court Wednesday.

Court proceedings are 99% public so I’ll post the Zoom coordinates as soon as I get them. Peak in for a minute and watch her at work. You will be amazed at her legal finesse.

So desperate is she to get some costs she threatened my wife.

Now, you’re thinking, OR if YOU are Ms Adrian, that I cannot “mention” “Crawford” online. You are wrong.

Friday, November 13, unluckily for you, the Assistant Crown Peter Westgate confirmed “Crawford” is no longer a forbidden word in my blog. All Crawford’s criminal complaints have been resolved in my favour, each and every one was put out to pasture by either J. Johnston November 2017, or by Sr. Regional Justice Fuerst, November 2019.

Further, Superior Court Justice Dawe (no relation to Mayor Geoff Dawe who started all this in an 11:39 am town hall conference with police on July 14, 2017 as he asked DC Jeff Brown to arrest me that afternoon) in June 2020 ordered that the Crown Moull’s “not to mention” bail term was in violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms all along as I have told you all many times. He then found my conviction and probation order of Justice Rose December 4, 2010 was just plain wrong and he struck BOTH of those and ordered a re-trial. Well, Asst. Crown Westgate in writing last week said he STAYED the false breach charges and now REFUSES to retry, the charges were so flimsy.

Am I forgetting anything? Oh, yes, in June 2020, J. Dawe ALSO admonished my prosecutor, Crown Greg Elder, for TWICE refusing his and J. Fuerst’s orders to remove Crawford and the 2 others from the “not to mention” terms, used verbatim repetitively by several justices, on November 16, 2019 and again on December 11, 2019.

I now do not see Crown Elder anymore. His replacement, Frank Giordano, refuses ALL communications with me because I chose NOT to hire my paralegal because she is STILL banned by J. Harpur from defending me. I filed a motions to be able to hire a defence counsel. They refuse to schedule the motion.

See, if Crown Giordano NOW approves my paralegal despite the repeat complainant being a paralegal as well, that means J. Harpur was wrong to have banned her on the promise of an affidavit by Crown Elder. Elder asserted to J. Harpur that he could PROVE my paralegal was in a conflict of interest because the baker once sent a complaint to the Law Society about MY paralegal. Or something like that. He was asked by J. Harpur for documented proof of his legal “conflict of interest for LSO complaint” theory and Elder never provided it, so I had no defence counsel for the entire trial. I appealed on that fact alone, of course.

So, I can continue to serialize my book in this blog, naming names and EVERYTHING!

This leaves 2 charges being heard in a Judicial Pre-trial on December 8, 2020. These were BOTH brought by the baker/paralegal being paid by the Aurora contractor who manages Canine Commons for the Town of Aurora Parks Director Allan Downey who new lives out of wedlock with the Bylaws Manager of Aurora. The baker suspended all makeup and birthday cake sales and faux finishing gigs to go undercover for police on multiple occasions to entrap me.

The last 2 charges allege that 1) I spoke to a Law Society licensee in a court room, and 2) I filed with the court an offer to settle my $7 million suit for $1.

To back her up, Aurora lawyer Charles Painter and York Region’s lawyer Barry Stork offered to back up the baker at my trial. Well, Barry did anyway, he offers in a sworn affidavit that he sat beside her and heard nothing. Mr. Painter has yet to file an affidavit for Crown Giordano to cite Defender 8, 2020. This may be a surprise!

Some may say that the 2 charges the baker laid were a bit flimsy, since my bail terms REQUIRE me to speak to her ONLY in a court room, and COURT DOCUMENTS are actually, by law, allowed to name the defendants. In fact, some court documents REQUIRE naming them ALL on one page.

I enjoy the irony that the baker declined to settle her client’s $1,000,000 share of the lawsuit for 1/7 of $1.00 and instead used the offer as evidence of a breach which basically gets my wrist slapped. The Law Society will find out why she decided to do that to address my complaint about her. She failed to place her client’s interests for settlement for 14 cents ahead of her own desire to see me in handcuffs again.

So, today being November 15, 2020, we have but 23 days to see how the cake comes out. Or, will it be a faux finish?

There were skeptics that said I could not possibly prove collusion, working together to one common goal… of all the 7 defendants to deny my rights by false arrest and imprisonment.

In JUST these last 2 charges you can hear December 8, 2020:

  • York Region directed the Police Services Board to oversee
  • York Regional Police DS Heather Banthem in assigning 4 detectives March 2, 2020 to imprison me in Lindsay awaiting a bail hearing March 6, 2020 in support of
  • Aurora’s dog park contractor who operates illegally a commercial dog walking business for money in the form of cash for creation and maintenance of a new dog park “owned” by the Canine Commons Committee she heads up. Then,
  • Aurora’s lawyer Charles Painter and
  • York’s lawyer Barry Stork agreed to falsely back up the
  • Baker in arresting me on 3 charges. All the while
  • Aurora Bylaws Manager Crawford arrests me on 3 false charges, and
  • Aurora Bylaws Manager Crawford sues me for $1,000,000, then convinces
  • Catholic School Principal Ines Donato to call for my false arrest for trespassing within 500 meters at
  • York Region Transit bus stop #1208, (and also my home) and
  • Aurora Bylaws ignored the illegal “property line” spite fence built by Mayor Tom Mrakas’ old friend, mother of jeweller Robert Cleeve, who moved back to Aurora, so she could sue me for telling everyone she testified in Small Claims that she knew she drilled into Marnee Buckles’ foundation rocks with NO prior request OR approval planting her gate post fiully 100% on Buckles’ land before planting 6 MORE fence posts ALSO into foundation rocks 5 inches over the property line on Ms. Buckles’ land… a mouthful. Then,
  • Aurora’s Bylaws Manager moved in with
  • Aurora’s Works Director Allan Downey as admitted at my trial. Then,
  • Toronto Police refused to investigate how
  • Mr. Simaan’s employee got my CIBC bank account number almost before I got home from opening it, because
  • Toronto Police Det. Ozretic claimed I did not give her the accunt number (of course I did) so she get going detecting. Meanwhile…
  • Crown Attorneys Moull, Elder and Westgate took up 21 charges over 3 years against me, refused only 5 MORE BREACHES by
  • The Baker because she had to have stolen the email with the “offending url” from
  • Crown Elizabeth Barnier to lay them, with no evidence of any crime and THEN stayed, dismissed or withdrew 16 and lost one on appeal, lost a ridiculously harsh 3 year probation for an unproven breach and now faces appeals on two more convictions, one by
  • Mr. Simaan’s employee who threatened my wife for no reason in writing, and
  • Crown Giordano pursues the ridiculous lies of
  • The baker, and
  • Aurora lawyer Charles Painter, (often pictured side by side chatting in court halls with
  • York Detective James Ward who admitted he persued me for DS Bentham only becuase peace bonds were too short lived at 2 years) and
  • York Police lawyer Barry Stork, as
  • Lawyer/Bencher-for-life Bob Aaron
  • Reporter Alexandra Heck, and the
  • Toronto Star TWICE published lies about me as a favour to
  • The Baker and client Crawford

Or, one could say this is just one big, fat coincidence.

Justice Edwards will look at all of those allegations, and more, once COVID-19 allows normal court proceedings.

“Stand By!” as Trump would tell the white supremacists. You all know how THAT turned out.

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9t7- Trump’s Next Career… Queen Tribute band

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9t6️⃣- Nov. 8 Breakfast on the deck in a tee shirt

OK, it MAY not be global warming.. what is it then?

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9t5- Completely Off Topic

Have you watched “Highway Thru Hell” or “Heavy Rescue 401”?

wreck after wreck of tractor trailers, always the same trouble to right them without falling apart. Can’t get a strap underneath. The sides fall off.

simple question… why has no one modified the design of a trailer to be stronger or easier to hook up to when they fall over?

because they want cheap, light trailers not strong, easy to upright trailers.

there… another problem solved. Products built to be cheap, not safe.

Categories
About Bob Lepp Candy-Abyss Shops Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9t🏌️‍♀️- Jane’s Candy-Abyss Shop – Did Aurora Council REALLY APPROVE This?

Will YOUR kids fall into the Abyss?

Marijuana is a fantastic, legal product I support. It removes pain when no other medications can. It is a fabulous sleep aid. I congratulate our Parliament for legalizing it. I just don’t think they thought through edibles yet.

or CLICK => https://www.janescannabis.ca

I Propose Child-Proof Packaging for ALL Candy-Abyss products sold in Aurora

Watch this space for the petition.

NOT THAT SPACE… this space… ⤵️

or, CLICK => http://chng.it/pH4jDrZJxz

We can’t and do not WANT to stop sales of this very beneficial, legal product, but oxycontin is ALSO a legal product as well and you cannot get it in a takeout bag.

Jane’s Cannabis Shop is located at 160 Wellington St, East.
At the corner of Industrial Pkwy and Wellington St. 

It looks like this on Google Maps Street View…

They say of themselves…


We provide an array of cannabis products and accessories in an environment intended to inspire a sense of wonder and curiosity. This shop is designed to serve both the customer who wants a quick, efficient experience as well as one who prefers to linger over the many delightful products and displays.

Is this a Head Shoppe or is it Mastermind?

Marijoowanna can kill. It is a chemical and in excess amounts can and will kill.

https://nationalpost.com/health/did-a-pot-overdose-kill-a-baby-controversial-paper-on-infants-death-raises-questions

So, when it is shaped to look and taste like CANDY, guess what happens?

RIGHT! Kids eat it just like those multi-coloured Tide laundry detergent capsules. At least they provide a clean kill.

Here is the candy list… would your children like to try these?

Chocolates, Grape Soft Chew, Sparkling WATER?

Would YOUR kids read the labels first?

All Edibles

Bhang -  CBD Milk Chocolate - 1x L4D

BhangBhang – CBD Milk Chocolate – 1x L4D

HIGH CBDTHC: 1 mg  |  CBD: 10 mg$4.80

Tweed - Bakerstreet & Ginger - 1x355ml N3C

TweedTweed – Bakerstreet & Ginger – 1x355ml N3C

INDICATHC: 2%  |  CBD: 1%$3.95

Redecan -  Gems 5:5 - 15 caps U3A

RedecanRedecan – Gems 5:5 – 15 caps U3A

HYBRIDTHC: 4.97 mg  |  CBD: 5.26 mg$17.80

Affirma - Grape Soft Chew - 1x3 N2A

AffirmaAffirma – Grape Soft Chew – 1×3 N2A

HYBRIDTHC: 10 mg$7.70

Everie -  Mango Passionfruit CBD Sparkling Water - 1x269ml M4D

EverieEverie – Mango Passionfruit CBD Sparkling Water – 1x269ml M4D

HIGH CBDCBD: 10 mg$5.90

Houseplant Lemon Sparkling Water M3A

HouseplantHouseplant Lemon Sparkling Water M3A

HYBRIDTHC: 2.5 mg$5.20

Tweed - Deep Space - 1x222ml M3C

TweedTweed – Deep Space – 1x222ml M3C

SATIVATHC: 10%  |  CBD: 1%$9.20

Affirma - Watermelon Soft Chew - 1x3 N2B

AffirmaAffirma – Watermelon Soft Chew – 1×3 N2B

HYBRIDTHC: 10%$7.70

Aurora Drift -  Spearmint Chillers (5-Pieces) - 5x L3D

Aurora DriftAurora Drift – Spearmint Chillers (5-Pieces) – 5x L3D

HYBRIDTHC: 10 mg$11.30

House of Terpenes -  Limonene & Sparkling Tonic - 1x355ml M4C

House of TerpenesHouse of Terpenes – Limonene & Sparkling Tonic – 1x355ml M4C

HYBRIDTHC: 5 mg  |  CBD: 5 mg$7.95

Redecan - Gems 5:0 - 15 caps C3D

RedecanRedecan – Gems 5:0 – 15 caps C3D

HYBRIDTHC: 5.04 mg$11.95

Aurora Drift -  Peppermint Chillers (5-Pieces) - 5x L3F

Aurora DriftAurora Drift – Peppermint Chillers (5-Pieces) – 5x L3F

HYBRIDTHC: 10 mg$11.30

HOUSEPLANT - Grapefruit Sparkling Water - 1x355ml N3B

HouseplantHOUSEPLANT – Grapefruit Sparkling Water – 1x355ml N3B

SATIVATHC: 2.5%  |  CBD: 1%$5.20

Tweed - Houndstooth & Soda - 1x355ml N4A

TweedTweed – Houndstooth & Soda – 1x355ml N4A

SATIVATHC: 2%  |  CBD: 1%$3.95

Everie - Lemon & Lime CBD Sparkling Water - 1x269ml N4D

EverieEverie – Lemon & Lime CBD Sparkling Water – 1x269ml N4D

HIGH CBDTHC: 0.05%  |  CBD: 10% – 11%$5.90

Haven St. Premium Cannabis - No. 550 Rise Tea - 1x N3A

Haven St. Premium CannabisHaven St. Premium Cannabis – No. 550 Rise Tea – 1x N3A

SATIVATHC: 10%$7.45

Tweed - CBD Softgels - 15 caps - J4D

TweedTweed – CBD Softgels – 15 caps – J4D

INDICACBD: 20 mg$42.32

Vertical - THC Softgel 2.5mg - 15 caps J4F

VerticalVertical – THC Softgel 2.5mg – 15 caps J4F

HYBRIDTHC: 2.5 mg  |  CBD: 0.01 mg$10.96

San Rafael '71 -  Pineapple Soft Chews (4-Pieces) - 4x4 L3B

San Rafael ’71San Rafael ’71 – Pineapple Soft Chews (4-Pieces) – 4×4 L3B

SATIVATHC: 10 mg$9.45

Veryvell - Sicilian Lemon Sparkling Water - 355ml N4C

VeryvellVeryvell – Sicilian Lemon Sparkling Water – 355ml N4C

HIGH CBDTHC: 0.5%  |  CBD: 15%$6.65

Mollo - 5.0 - 355ml N4B

MolloMollo – 5.0 – 355ml N4B

HYBRIDTHC: 5 mg  |  CBD: 5 mg$5.95

Strawberry Lemonade 1:1 Sour Soft Chews

WanaStrawberry Lemonade 1:1 Sour Soft Chews

HYBRIDTHC: 10 mg  |  CBD: 10 mg$8.00

Happy Hibiscus Mate Tea

The Green Organic DutchmanHappy Hibiscus Mate Tea

HYBRIDTHC: 10 mg$14.70

Mollo 2.5 Low Dose 1:1 Crisp Beverage

MolloMollo 2.5 Low Dose 1:1 Crisp Beverage

HYBRIDTHC: 2.5 mg  |  CBD: 2.5 mg$4.96

Ripple by TGOD - Dissolvable Balanced Powder 4x0.4 - M2F

OCSRipple by TGOD – Dissolvable Balanced Powder 4×0.4 – M2F

HYBRIDTHC: 2.5 mg  |  CBD: 2.5 mg$19.99

Dissolvable THC Powder

The Green Organic DutchmanDissolvable THC Powder

HYBRIDTHC: 10 mg$7.81

Bytes Milk Chocolate Truffles | 10mg

Edison Cannabis Co.Bytes Milk Chocolate Truffles | 10mg

HYBRID$8.95

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9t🎄- Ever Seen A Venusset?

Categories
About Bob Lepp In the autumn of his life Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9tii – My New COVID-19 Enterprise – Curbside Blowjobs!

I have found a new job!

When life grows lemons all over you, give yourself a squeeze!

You have heard of “Pay it forward!”?? The idea of the random act of kindness encouraging others to do the same and pretty soon we have developed a civilization?

I have just perfected an enjoyable twist on that old idea.

I call it “Blow it forward!”

What you do is buy one of those gas powered suckers at CrappyTire or Home Despot. Then, you pick a neighbour you like, and you reverse the machine so it blows and you go over to his or her home and you give them a free blow job.

Just put the throttle on full and start at the house and blow them all, every last one, down to the street at the curb.

Then, the neighbour cleans up the post-blow mess, and if he/she does that for you, then you come back next day and blow them again.

If your neighbour gets lazy and leaves the leaves, you refuse another blow job. Eventually you find all your neighbours who think like you do, that teams ALWAYS solve problems better than individuals.

See how the neighbours who work as a team do a better job than selfish neighbours?

Blow It Forward!

Categories
About Bob Lepp Evolution - A Book Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C9tJuan – The Power of Fonts

Do you realize how sensitive we all are to the way words are typed online or in an email?

Today I offended a man because I changed the font size of one word of his email when I replied to it. He took the time to point it out to me and I apologized in writing to everyone I had copied.

He typed a 16 point “no” and I changed it up to 36 point so readers would see the context of why I was replying at all. He was saying “no” to mean “no, I do not want to know why you filed what you did” and I enlarged it for effect.

Because he had said he did could not figure out why I filed an application to be allowed to have my paralegal defend me December 8 at pre-trial. I thought the Crown should be able to figure out why I am forced to file stuff… they FORBID me from meeting them outside of a court room. So EVERYTHING must be filed as an “application” or as a “motion”. One day I will ask the difference between the two.

I filed today because his predecessor was much more clever, and he had figured out a surefire way to lie to a justice that I should not be permitted the services of my crack paralegal at trial. It was so slick. He just made up an excuse, the judge asked him to document his theory and he simply refused. So the next trial date the justice forgot he needed an affidavit of that proof and he just assumed the Crown’s theory for exclusion of defence counsel was legally justified.

Which of course it was not.

So, since the identical situation is scheduled for December 8, I thought I would get ANOTHER judge to countermand the first judge… NOW.

I filed an application for “pre-approval” in case Crown Elder is allowed back on my case. He is so skilled he gets all the choice cases and mine was fobbed off to a junior I guess. A trainee?

Uppercase is a SHOUT.

Large font is

emphasis.

Italics is …. sarcasm

Smileys are 🤪 fun!

GIF’s are humour

OK, forewarned. Which is 25% better than threewarned. And so much better than afterwarned.

Categories
Evolution - A Book

BL20-🎄C9t – The Biggest Problem Can Have The Simplest Solution

Biggest Problem: Trump

Simplest solution: Stay home.

Once upon a time I worried about negative stuff happening to me. Finally I found the solution.

Apathy.

Why do I REALLY need to visit the USA?

Answer: I don’t.

Because why would I visit a country where every second person worships the lying scuzzbag who was president?

Where pussy grabbing, crime and corruption exist every day in the White House…. where a President plans to fire the COVID expert who is a Medal of Freedom honoree… where Rush Limbaugh gets a Medal the SAME as Helen Keller, Neil Armstrong and all of the 7, Bob Hope, Duke Ellington, Henry Ford II.Arthur Rubenstein, Martin Luterh King Jr., Walter Cronkite, Anwar el-Sadat, Chuck Yeager, Warren Burger, Lucille Ball, Ted WIlliams, Ronald Reagan, Cesar Chavez, Helmut Kohl, Peter Drucker, Muhammad Ali, B.B. King, Anthony Fauci, Harvey Milk, John Glenn, Tom Brokaw, Meryl Streep, Spielberg, Streisand, Sondheim, Yogi Berra, De Niro, Springsteen, Grace Hopper (programmer!), Gates, Kareem, Jordan, Biden…

RUSH LIMBAUGH?

There is just no need.

I will miss Hawaii!

Darwin is rolling in his grave.

Let the culling of the herd continue without me.

I have bigger worries… how to enjoy 3 lawyers CHOOSING to lose their licenses.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book

BL20-🎄CLXXXnein – It Worked!… They *WANT* a Judicial Pre-Trial!

Mark your calendars… Tuesday, December 8, 2020

9:00 am Room 201

I can now sleep easy knowing December 8 or after I get to embarrass 3 LSO members with their obvious lies. And, of course, the 2 or 3 women in in this round of madness.

I was told by Mr. Westgate in September that a Judicial Pre-Trial was to be in a Zoom court room today, November 3, 2020 before a justice for the very first time.

As usual Mr. Westgate was wrong.

The courts are completely bogged down and this case is one of the reasons. Instead of a 30 minute pre-trial meeting to pass over evidence they insist I just bring it ALL to the JPT on December 8 and introduce it there.

Now, if it is J. Kenkel he will not allow me to say anything. I will object, he will call in the cops and have me ejected. It is so predictable.

But say J. Kenkel gets ill. I may have a chance to speak.

And if my applications get heard, one asks I be allowed to bring my paralegal to represent me. If that gets a green light I can sit back and watch the fun.

But, I know Crown Elder will tell Mr Giordano to not permit my paralegal. She is too good for them so they will continue to keep her out claiming a “conflict of interest” with the paralegal complainant.

June 11, 2019 at trial Greg Elder was TOLD to submit an affidavit explain in legalese why a complainant paralegal can cry “CONFLICT!” and stop me from having my very own defense counsel.

June 11, 2019 J. Harpur (aka THE COURT) at trial:

THE COURT: But in the event that the conflict is one that prevents Ms. Rivet from, in my view, becoming your representative for purposes of cross-examination, then we’re still going to need Ms. Trombly who apparently has spent some time bringing herself up to speed with respect to this case (IN FACT SHE MET ME 10 minutes earlier) although it sounds to me as if you and she still need to have a discussion if she is to act as your 486.3 counsel before the evidence of the people to be cross-examined is called. 

I think the first thing that has to happen, Mr. Elder, is some explanation by affidavit as to why it is that Ms. R is not an appropriate person to proceed with these cross-examinations. 

If that’s presented both Mr. Lepp and to the Court I’ll then consider whether or not, in my view, there is a conflict which prevents Ms. Rivet from proceeding. 

Elder NEVER did produce the affidavit and yet she remain banned for the entire trial. THIS is why my appeal is pretty strong.


Today November 3, 2020 was just a “To Be Spoken To” appearance meaning “We don’t know what’s up either,,, come back December 8 and we will try again.”

So, my “If I don’t want something to happen I just ask for it and POOF! It doesn’t happen!” is 100% successful, Don’t tell them.

The two charges are the remains of 3 complaints brought by the same woman 19 days AFTER the alleged incident of February 14, 2020.

3 Law Society members were brought together March 2, 2020 by DS Bentham and asked to put together more charges. She created a new incident, GO# 77377 to charge their time to.

Right away that proves the complainants did not call in. They were canvassed to come up with some dirt and they chose 19 days earlier.

Now, these women did NOT wait 19 days to jail me. They have DS Bentham on speed dial and I am usually cooling my heels in jail within a day or two. Why 19 days THIS time.

But there’s more.

All 3 swore they were with me in room 405. 

Independently they stated that very SAME but WRONG room number.

So urgent was DS Bentham to see me sent to Lindsay during COVID-19 that she did NOT give them time to verify ANYTH(NG the ladies told DC Goobie. He just wrote down whatever they said and went with it.

Of course, they never called me. They knew I would have evidence of the lies once more. All I did was check my transcript of J. Edwards on February 14 and the docket from the night before.

Both documents said Room 401.

2 of the women brought in 11 breach charges to police March 2, 2020 after being called in to do so by Det. Sgt, Heather Bentham. Loyal followers will recall that on February 28, 2020 I blogged about recording secretly the confessions of DS Bentham right in her own police offices on Prospect Street.

3 DAYS earlier, on February 28, I had blogged…

She admitted and I recorded:

  • My Probation Officer who sent me to be arrested was wrong, I was not under ANY investigation
  • Specifically, I was NOT under any investigation of trespass on a Catholic elementary school yard claimed by Principal Ines Donato
  • If she ever wanted to arrest me, she would call me in for my side FIRST
  • Neither she nor ANY York Region cop knew that the fired Bylaws Manager of Aurora had ever been a Halton Region cop.
  • She questioned why I FIRST blogged about her in 2017 after the cop she assigned, Jeff Brown, arrested me falsely, and she clearly indicated she was not pleased.

So, on cue, as soon as I had the nerve to blog the truth Friday, Feb. 28, bright and early on Monday March 2 she assigned 4 more detectives to create a reason to arrest me and send me to Lindsay Prison during COVID-19. The weekend strengthened her resolve to put me behind bars for good… or worse… CORONAVIRUS was here to help her.

March 2 at around 9:00 pm, my accuser came in with her client and with 11 brand new charges from 19 days ago. She had a sudden recollection of what she saw February 14, 2020 in Court Room 401. She miraculously recalled I spoke to her in a court room in front of her two chosen witnesses, lawyers Barry Stork (York) and Charles Painter (Aurora).

She explained to the cop how her interpretation of my extensive, complicated bail terms was that I was not to speak to her in court, nor was I to ever write her name on any court filings or on any papers passed up to the judge in court.

Now, keep in mind as the complainant, she was required to testify in court in person, and I was theoretically permitted to question my accusers. So how she convinced officer Goobie I could not speak to her in a court room is a leap of faith at best.

Yes, she convinced a trained detective to arrest me on bail terms which did not exist. She convinced him to pick any 3 of the 11 charges she held out and to get them ready for a 7:00 am March 4 arrest.

The time from recording an interview the evening of March 3 to my arrest March 4 was just 33 hours.

And, NO!, DS Bentham did NOT call me first to get my side of the allegations. No, she simply ordered me to come in early next day March 4 at 7:00 am in to be arrested… with no explanation.

Once again, as in all 7 arrests, police decided they had enough evidence to convict me without having to waste time hearing my alibis. My alibis went all bye-bye. Not one cop asked me one question before arresting me 7 times. Surely this is NOT in their training manuals.

DS Bentham was anxious for revenge, and so, despite having a full court day available to her, DS Bentham had me sent directly to Lindsay prison, where hand soap is banned, to wait for 3 days to Friday March 6 and court. I was placed under 100% house arrest with no access to any device that could use the internet.

And the charges?

I allegedly spoke to a paralegal accuser in room 405. And I allegedly filed in the Superior court scheduler’s office a document February 13, 2020 that had the paralegal’s name on it. The cop declined to charge me with passing a piece of paper to the justice with her name on it. Maybe he was growing a conscience he had just bought on Amazon or eBay.

Several questions arose in my mind when I was eventually informed of the charges. As always, I wonder why these questions only arose to me.

Who gave her the copy of my private Superior court filing?

Why did she wait 19 days? She had never awaited more than a few minutes in the past when she saw a breach. December 5, 2019 I was arrested 14 hours after the alleged breach. Why had she forgotten these 11 for 19 days? Alien abduction, maybe?

H0w could she suddenly recall she forgot to complain about 11 breaches by the most arrested person in York Region? After all, she was trained for this work and she in turn trained others for the Law Society of Ontario to be as ethical as she is.

Why did the cop believe her when this was just the latest of over 20 lies she used to get me arrested on 16 PREVIOUS false charges?

Oh, she is a paralegal I suddenly recalled, and that is why the cop believed every word. The Law Society would not just license anyone. Well, they will, and the DO, but they lose their licence if jailed for pedophilia. Briefly. While they are in jail. Once they get out their licence is returned. Neat and simple. Minimal impact on their bank accounts.

Why did she claim I spoke to HER in room 405 when I was in Court Room 401 before J. Edwards being convicted of contempt for filing a letter to Superior Court scheduler Llyshelle Barrett?

Apart from these few discrepancies she had followed her Law Society of Ontario ethics oaths.

And, of course, Stork and Painter signed on as exceptionally cooperative, willing witnesses. This was Painter’s second accusation to police that I had breached. The first failed when the cop simply called Aurora’s front desk,,, NO, it was NOT me who served a lawsuit to an ex-employee… it was my son. To these two lawyers,I represented $4,000,000 in an unbeatable law suit. They had lost all Painter’s initial 4 filings, 4 assaults on my rights I was easily able to defeat, and they were desperate to get ANY judge to find me guilty of ANYTHING.

So, this arrest and charges are an obvious COLLATERAL ATTACK.

So, 2 more “full stripe” lawyers swore they were ALSO in room 405 February 14, 2020 seeing me and hearing me breach at least 11 times. And they ALSO forgot to complain for the exact same 19 days until DS Bentham phoned them up for help.

And BOTH lawyers agreed to the WRONG room number the paralegal suggested to them. After all, as Law Society “friends” they implicitly trusted each other. They stuck together to send me to prison.

So, today I thought was to be the first time any judge would hear this crap, and I now I have until December 8, 2020 to get ready,

My request to pass along proof NOW of my innocence was refused.

I “expected” fairness. But I expect will get what I have been getting since June 3, 2017… abuse by York Region Police and the “Thin Blue Line”.

See, the original complainant was once a Halton Region cop and I charged her June 4, 2017 with Assault for June 3, 2017 when in plainclothes without any badge she shoved her hand fully into my armpit without warning from behind.

But I had no way to know who her family was. Bruce Crawford was the very FIRST police chief in York Region after leaving Metro Toronto police where lots of Crawfords still work today. Andre Crawford is Deputy Chief today. This woman had married a Crawford, one of which was ALSO coincidentally and concurrently a Halton Region cop until they both had emotional episodes leading to resigning together and moving to Calgary to start over.

Despite the obvious lineage, DS Bentham failed to know of any of her “Crawford” connections. But, even not knowing that, she refused to prosecute the June 3, 2017 assault. Months later I was simply phoned that they declined to investigate my assault.

Now, when a person is investigated for assault, one may assume cops do a background check on the “perp”. So we know THAT never happened because Bentham says she did NOT know of her police career,, and so they simply killed my complaint anyway.

And we know DS Bentham NEVER viewed any of my multiple arrest witness interviews, in which the Halton Region experience was described by my assailant to DC Jeff Brown.

So, DS Bentham BOTH rejected my assault complaint without a background check, AND, she also approved my arrest July 14, 2017 without once seeing with her own eyes what the complainant said about anything.

And not one of 34 cops she assigned EVER looked into the background of my accusers.

And so, May 30, 2018 when Bentham had me arrested after she got my email asking for police help with a dog attack.. she still did not think the Crawford clan had anything to do with it.

Yet, all 34 assigned detectives were so convinced of my guilt they did not even need to interview me even ONCE in 39 months now.

Was this because the previous complaints by the paralegal would ALWAYS result in clear convictions of serious crimes?

Well, simply put, no.

Not even ONE charge by this paralegal was EVER found to be true. Every single one failed, the most serious charges never got past the Judicial Pre-Trial by Senior Regional Justice Fuerst.

J. Fuerst took a 30 second look at the most serious indictable charges and called in the Senior Crown, Peter Westgate,who then very quickly had the charges stayed.

So what were the “most serious charges”?

Extortion, witness tampering, harassment… 2 had life sentences as options. Not one of these survived a 30 second look by the most senior justice in Ontario,

But, the same paralegal did not lose hope, and when DS Bentham called on her March 2, 2020 once more for arrest #7, she concentrated,,, she dug REAL deep, and her memory rewarded her with 11 complaints she had inexplicably missed 19 days previous.

So exceptional was the return of her memory, that she convinced BOTH Stork and Painter to ALSO recall the same place, events, dates and my actions that day.

So, now all 3 Law Society of Ontario (LSO) licensees placed their bet that I was in room 405 and not 401 where the transcript placed ME February 14, 2020.

Normally, I would complain about such LSO licensees to the LSO. But I have learned. I cannot complain if I am in a “matter” involving the licensee. So, they would simply delete my complaint.

Instead, I must wait until after the matter is resolved to complain. That should be in December now, maybe the 9th, and so I have them all written up.

After all, Stork signed an affidavit… the most cherished document in a court trial, that, yes, he was ALSO in room 405 and YES! he WAS seated right beside the paralegal, in the next seat, yet, NO! he heard nothing said by me. He swears he heard nothing the paralegal reported. He is the best witness of the two, of course.

Because, Painter was clever enough to NOT sign an affidavit since he knows I check them for accuracy ever since his assistant lied in one that a fax I sent HIM was instead a TRUE COPY of some other hand delivered letter to Aurora.

My problem, as always, is to figure out how to succinctly relate all of this to a busy justice in court. Maybe I should write it all down and then simplify and shorten it by removing excess words.

I think I just did,,,, “Your honour, I submit my blog post of November 3, 2020 wherein I summarize the facts in this matter.”

“Could my client be innocent? Probably not. My point is it’s interesting to think about.”

Categories
Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄CLXXXate – OTHER cartoon characters who ran for president BEFORE trump

This deserves its own post. I had forgotten…

https://money.com/10-cartoon-characters-who-ran-for-president-before-donald-trump/

I remember Snoopy and Alfred E. Neuman For President, of course.

But Mutt and Jeff? Dogbert? Yogi and Huck?

Walk down memory lane and know that any other cartoon could have done as good a job.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄CLXXXvIi – Trump Just Outdid Himself…TWICE!

Maybe he simply sees his time as limited and he has pulled out all the stops.

  • He promised to fire Dr. Fauci if re-elected. (To capture the millions of Fauvci haters out there)
  • He applauded the pickemup trucks, flags and brain dead supporters who terrorized the Biden/Harris bus on a highway, and encouraged more.

At a rally on Sunday, President Trump praised a caravan of his supporters who surrounded a bus belonging to the campaign of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, which prompted an FBI investigation. 

“You know they were protecting [Biden’s] bus yesterday — because they are nice. They had hundreds of cars,” Trump told rallygoers in Washington, Mich.

Videos of the incident involving the bus showed about 10 cars with Trump flags attached to them positioning themselves around the bus. Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), were not on the bus.

Speaking to the audience, Trump made note of the line of cars, saying, “Trump. Trump. Trump and the American flag. That’s it. You see Trump and the American flag. You ever notice when you see the other side — I don’t even see much of the other side. You don’t see any — they have no spirit. They have no enthusiasm. They have no nothing.

So, the President of the USA ENCOURAGES road rage?

And he thinks firing the most knowledgeable virus expert HE provided will fix things.

Dr. Fauci’s approval rating is 32% across all voters for doing an EXCELLENT job. Trump got 2o% saying “excellent job”.

79% of Democrats said Fauci has done a good or excellent job handling the pandemic, compared with 56% of independents and 54% of Republicans.

54% of REPUBLICANS adore Dr. Fauci so Trump rewards them by promising to fire Fauci if they will JUST give him a second term.

Can someone get Trump a calculator?

So he can figure out if 46% can beat 54% at the polls.

He not only thinks outside the box, he thinks outside the mathematics… and outside the known universe.

Anyone up for a Zoom group-watch of the election results tomorrow night?

COVID-19 leadership

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book

BL20-🎄CLXXXvI – Tomorrow my last charges come before a justice

A Judicial Pre-Trial is in a Zoom court room tomorrow, November 3, 2020 before a justice for the very first time. Well, the first SINCE a justice dropped one of the 3 false charges police chose from a total of 11 offered by a paralegal on March 4, 2020.

That justice’s job is now is to decide whether the matter, or more precisely.. the 2 surviving charges…goes to a trial.

It has been great fun for all the women in my life. With everyone in law enforcement and the Crown’s office helping them, they have had me arrested 7 times… wrote up 26 charges, prosecuted me on 21, lost 16 outright and the last 5 are appealed or get seen first time tomorrow.

The two charges tomorrow are the remains of 3 complaints brought by the same woman 19 days AFTER the alleged incident of February 14, 2020.

She brought 11 breach charges to police March 2, 2020 after being called in to do so by Det. Sgt, Heather Bentham. Loyal followers will recall that on February 28, 2020 I blogged about recording secretly the confessions of DS Bentham right in her own police offices on Prospect Street.

3 DAYS earlier, on February 28, I had blogged…

She admitted and I recorded:

  • My Probation Officer who sent me to be arrested was wrong, I was not under ANY investigation
  • Specifically, I was NOT under any investigation of trespass on a Catholic elementary school yard claimed by Principal Ines Donato
  • If she ever wanted to arrest me, she would call me in for my side FIRST
  • Neither she nor ANY York Region cop knew that the fired Bylaws Manager of Aurora had ever been a Halton Region cop.
  • She questioned why I FIRST blogged about her in 2017 after the cop she assigned, Jeff Brown, arrested me falsely, and she clearly indicated she was not pleased.

So, on cue, as soon as I had the nerve to blog the truth Friday, Feb. 28, bright and early on Monday March 2 she assigned 4 more detectives to create a reason to arrest me and send me to Lindsay Prison during COVID-19. The weekend strengthened her resolve to put me behind bars for good… or worse… CORONAVIRUS was here to help her.

March 2 at around 9:00 pm, my accuser came in with her client and with 11 brand new charges from 19 days ago. She had a sudden recollection of what she saw February 14, 2020 in Court Room 401. She miraculously recalled I spoke to her in a court room in front of her two chosen witnesses, lawyers Barry Stork (York) and Charles Painter (Aurora).

She explained to the cop how her interpretation of my extensive, complicated bail terms was that I was not to speak to her in court, nor was I to ever write her name on any court filings or on any papers passed up to the judge in court.

Now, keep in mind as the complainant, she was required to testify in court in person, and I was theoretically permitted to question my accusers. So how she convinced officer Goobie I could not speak to her in a court room is a leap of faith at best.

Yes, she convinced a trained detective to arrest me on bail terms which did not exist. She convinced him to pick any 3 of the 11 charges she held out and to get them ready for a 7:00 am March 4 arrest.

The tome from recording an interview the evening of March 3 to my arrest March 4 was just 33 hours.

And, NO!, DS Bentham did NOT call me first to get my side of the allegations. No, she simply ordered me to come in early next day March 4 at 7:00 am in to be arrested… with no explanation.

Once again, as in all 7 arrests, police decided they had enough evidence to convict me without having to waste time hearing my alibis. My alibis went bye-bye. Not one cop asked me one question before arresting me 7 times. Surely this is NOT in their training manuals.

DS Bentham was anxious for revenge, and so, despite having a full court day available to her, DS Bentham had me sent directly to Lindsay prison, where hand soap is banned, to wait for 3 days to Friday March 6 and court. I was placed under 100% house arrest with no access to any device that could use the internet.

And the charges?

I allegedly spoke to a paralegal accuser in room 405. And I allegedly filed in the Superior court scheduler’s office a document February 13, 2020 that had the paralegal’s name on it. The cop declined to charge me with passing a piece of paper to the justice with her name on it. Maybe he was growing a conscience he had just bought on Amazon or eBay.

Several questions arose in my mind when I was eventually informed of the charges. As always, I wonder why these questions only arose to me.

Who gave her the copy of my private Superior court filing?

Why did she wait 19 days? She had never awaited more than a few minutes in the past when she saw a breach. December 5, 2019 I was arrested 14 hours after the alleged breach. Why had she forgotten these 11 for 19 days? Alien abduction, maybe?

H0w could she suddenly recall she forgot to complain about 11 breaches by the most arrested person in York Region? After all, she was trained for this work and she in turn trained others for the Law Society of Ontario to be as ethical as she is.

Why did the cop believe her when this was just the latest of over 20 lies she used to get me arrested on 16 PREVIOUS false charges?

Oh, she is a paralegal I suddenly recalled, and that is why the cop believed every word. The Law Society would not just license anyone. Well, they will and do but they lose their licence if jailed for pedophilia. Briefly.

Why did she claim I spoke to HER oijn room 405 when I was in Court Room 401 before J. Edwards being convicted of contempt for filing a letter to Superior Court scheduler Llyshelle Barrett?

Apart from these few discrepancies she had followed her Law Society of Ontario ethics oaths.

And, of course, Stork and Painter signed on as exceptionally cooperative, willing witnesses. This was Painter’s second accusation to police that I had breached. The first failed when the cop simply called Aurora’s front desk,,, NO, it was NOT me who served a lawsuit to an e-employee… it was my son. To these two lawyers,I represented $4,000,000 in an unbeatable law suit. They had lost all Painter’s initial 4 filings, 4 assaults on my rights I was easily able to defeat, and they were desperate to get ANY judge to find me guilty of ANYTHING.

So, 2 more full stripe lawyers swore they were ALSO in room 405 February 14, 2020 seeing me and hearing me breach at least 11 times. And they ALSO forgot to complain for the exact same 19 days until DS Bentham phoned them up for help.

And BOTH lawyers agreed to the room number the paralegal suggested to them. After all, as Law Society “friends” they implicitly trusted each other. They stuck together to send me to prison.

So, tomorrow is the first time any judge has heard this crap, and I fully expect the charges to be dropped.

I “expect” fairness. But I expect will get what I have been getting since June 3, 2017… abuse by York Region Police and the “Thin Blue Line”.

See, the original complainant was once a Halton Region cop and I charged her June 4, 2017 with Assault for June 3, 2017 when in plainclothes without any badge she shoved her hand fully into my armpit without warning from behind.

But I had no way to know who her family was. Bruce Crawford was the very FIRST police chief in York Region after leaving Metro Toronto police where lots of Crawfords still work today. Andre Crawford is Deputy Chief today. This woman had married a Crawford, one of which was ALSO coincidentally and concurrently a Halton Region cop until they both had emotional episodes leading to resigning together and moving to Calgary to start over.

Despite the obvious lineage, DS Bentham failed to know of any of her “Crawford” connections. But, even not knowing that, she refused to prosecute the June 3, 2017 assault. Months later I was simply phoned that they declined to investigate my assault.

Now, when a person is investigated for assault, one may assume cops do a background check on the “perp”. So we know THAT never happened because Bentham says she did NOT know of her police career,, and so they simply killed my complaint anyway.

And we know DS Bentham NEVER viewed any of my multiple arrest witness interviews, in which the Halton Region experience was described by my assailant to DC Jeff Brown.

So, DS Bentham BOTH rejected my assault complaint without a background check, AND, she also approved my arrest July 14, 2017 without once seeing with her own eyes what the complainant said about anything.

And not one of 34 cops she assigned EVER looked into the background of my accusers.

And so, May 30, 2018 when Bentham had me arrested after she got my email asking for police help with a dog attack.. she still did not think the Crawford clan had anything to do with it.

Yet, all 34 assigned detectives were so convinced of my guilt they did not even need to interview me even ONCE in 39 months now.

Was this because the previous complaints by the paralegal would ALWAYS result in clear convictions of serious crimes?

Well, simply put, no.

Not even ONE charge by this paralegal was EVER found to be true. Every single one failed, the most serious charges never got past the Judicial Pre-Trial by Senior Regional Justice Fuerst.

J. Fuerst took a 30 second look at the most serious indictable charges and called in the Senior Crown, Peter Westgate,who then very quickly had the charges stayed.

So what were the “most serious charges”?

Extortion, witness tampering, harassment… 2 had life sentences as options. Not one of these survived a 30 second look by the most senior justice in Ontario,

But, the same paralegal did not lose hope, and when DS Bentham called on her March 2, 2020 once more for arrest #7, she concentrated,,, she dug REAL deep, and her memory rewarded her with 11 complaints she had inexplicably missed 19 days previous.

So exceptional was the return of her memory, that she convinced BOTH Stork and Painter to ALSO recall the same place, events, dates and my actions that day.

So, now all 3 Law Society of Ontario (LSO) licensees placed their bet that I was in room 405 and not 401 where the transcript placed me February 14, 2020.

Normally, I would complain about such LSO licensees to the LSO. But I have learned. I cannot complain if I am in a “matter” involving the licensee. So, they would simply delete my complaint.

Instead, I must wait until after the matter is resolved to complain. That should be Wednesday, November 4, and so I have them all written up.

After all, Stork signed an affidavit… the most cherished document in a court trial, that, yes, he was ALSO in room 405 and YES! he WAS seated right beside the paralegal, in the next seat, yet, NO! he heard nothing said by me. He swears he heard nothing the paralegal reported. He is the best witness of the two, of course.

Because, Painter was clever enough to NOT sign an affidavit since he knows I check them for accuracy ever since his assistant lied in one that a fax I sent HIM was instead a TRUE COPY of some other hand delivered letter to Aurora.

My problem, as always, is to figure out how to succinctly relate all of this to a busy justice in court. Maybe I should write it all down and then simplify and shorten it by removing excess words.

I think I just did,,,, “Your honour, I submit my blog post of November 2, 2020 wherein I summarize the facts in this matter.”

“Could my client be innocent? Probably not. My point is it’s interesting to think about.”

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book

BL20-🎄CLXXX5️⃣ – Kentucky State Police Used Hitler, Robert E. Lee Quotes for Training

https://www.tmz.com/2020/11/01/kentucky-police-hitler-rober-e-lee-training-slide-show/

Kentucky State Police used to train their cadets with inspiration from 2 infamous leaders … Robert E. Lee and Adolf Hitler.

One of the training slides had the title, “Violence of Action,” and instructed cops to be “ruthless killer[s],” like Robert E. Lee and imploring officers to have, “a mindset void of emotion” and,,,

to “meet violence with greater violence,” like Hitler.

Luckily, we had Snoopy on our side and Adolf’s “greatest violence” was defeated handily

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book

BL20-🎄CLXXX🏌️‍♀️– Calgary Defence lawyer Wilson said that Dunn was justified in his use of a “dynamic takedown” because he feared that Kafi had managed to slip off her handcuffs and was possibly able to use them as a weapon

Check out this story from TMZ Trial Starts for Cop Who Slammed Handcuffed Woman’s Face Onto Concrete Floor

This speaks for itself when it comes to cops and lawyers

A Canadian judge has released video of a police officer slamming a woman in handcuffs face-first onto the concrete floor, resulting in serious injuries … and now he’s on trial for it.

Constable Alex Dunn is charged with assault causing bodily harm for a December 2017 incident with Dalia Kafi, who he had arrested for breaking a court-ordered curfew.

As you can see in the surveillance footage … Dunn walks Kafi, already in handcuffs, into the police station for a booking photo … but then it appears he attempts to take off a head scarf she’s wearing.

Kafi flinches and leans away, and after a few seconds of struggling to remove her scarf, Dunn violently flips her forward … slamming her face and head on the hard floor. Blood can be seen immediately dripping from her face onto the floor.

Staff Sgt. Gordon Macdonald, who witnessed the incident and tended to Kafi afterward, referred to Dunn’s move as a “judo-style throw” … and called it “the worst use of force” he had ever seen during his testimony this week in Dunn’s case.

Macdonald testified, “There’s only one type of sound when somebody’s bone hits the floor and that’s what I heard.” Kafi was taken to the hospital and needed surgery for a broken nose and stitches in her lip.

Dunn was reportedly suspended with pay for a year after he was charged for the incident, but has been brought back in an administrative role with the Calgary Police Service.

CPS says it is awaiting the outcome of his trial to determine if there will take any additional action. However, they also tell us … “Police officers are trained to deescalate conflict and to use the least amount of force necessary to safely resolve a situation. We expect them to follow the law, our policies and our training.”http://www.tmz.com/2020/10/29/calgary-cop-slams-handcuffed-woman-face-first-assault-trial 

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXXX🎄– Can You DESIGN a Viral Video?

NO… but if you know a nice piece of tail in Saskatoon, you just might!

https://saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/i-just-couldn-t-believe-it-photographer-captures-saskatoon-beaver-bursting-through-ice-like-superman-1.5168813

Now, go out there and chat up a beaver!

BTW… The next time you feel a bit chilled in winter… you WILL remember this beaver!!

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXXXII – WWII killed one person every two seconds

In the USA alone, one person contracts COVID-19 EVERY second

One American dies every two minutes.

Trump’s solution?

Blame the high numbers on greedy doctors.

Bask in the glow of admiration of Bobby Orr and Jack Nicklaus….

And you believe you live in a rational Christian world?

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXXXi – Urgent! Trump Runs Out of Groups to Insult

He insulted the last group on earth he’d avoided ‘til now.. doctors

He told the crowd that because doctors are paid more to treat pandemic victims HE created, that doctors claim EVERY patient suffers and that’s why the numbers are at record heights.

if that is not enough to upset you, consider that Bobby Orr and Jack Nicklaus wrote in the same flowery language how they support Trump.

How much money was paid for those two idiots to piss off 57% of their fans?

Did you answer “Not enough!”?

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXXX – Imagine your family LYING for you!

Don JR yesterday in an interview told the public the pandemic is OVER.

1,047 Americans died of COVID-19 YESTERDAY

Imagine being this idiot’s father watching him blatantly lie.

How do the Trumps plan to survive the remainder of their lives once the lawsuits start and the banks get smart?

Have they hidden away piles of cash offshore?

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXXiX – Gwendolyn! You mi$$ed it!

I withdrew my CPP and OAS

AT THE ONLY RBC Aurora BRANCH ON EARTH!

Let me show you again!

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXXViII – Gwendolyn! It is PAYDAY!

My CPP and OAS was deposited

AT THE ONLY RBC Aurora BRANCH ON EARTH!

Let me show you again!

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book

BL20-🎄CLXXvii – SUED! The Star and Bob Aaron SERVED!

The Star would not relent and publish a simple correction or interview me

The Toronto Star published one article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site. “Bob Aaron” wrote another $70,000 shot in October, 2020.

They responded to my October 27, 2020 defamation notice saying they will change just one word, the name of the court.

That is a cover up. How could the name of the court be the ONLY error? Everything AFTER that statement MUST be lies.

No! Bob Aaron sticks by HIS story. This is one he wrote HIMSELF, ALL from court records… not a single interview or phone call or typed transcript in hand… I guess because I certainly did not get a call,

The two Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each, likely with Gwendolyn Adrian and/or her clients. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. So, each article was merely a hit job enabled by the Toronto Star.

Neither Alexandra Heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

I grant The Star access to the Charter of Rights. And I grant them access by a judge to make a decision.

Maybe one will go to “bat” for me!

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book The Story - 6/3/17 to now

BL20-🎄CLXXv – The Star and Bob Aaron SERVED! Refuse Retraction or Rewrite

So much for “Atkinson… He was particularly concerned about injustice

The Toronto Star published one article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site. “Bob Aaron” wrote in October, 2020.

They have responded to my defamation notice saying they will change just one word, the name of the court.

The Toronto Court told Gwendolyn Adrian that she had not legally filed one of her two lawsuits against me and that she was required to have filed it within three months of the alleged acts. Since that day ADRIAN has not advanced the lawsuit in any way. The suit has no chance of being litigated.

Gwendolyn Adrian has now been ordered by the court to justify the second legal action she took against me. The justice told her she tried to litigate “the worst of the worst” allegations of me on October 14. That her motion was “grossly over reaching”, a “non starter” and “just not going to happen”.. she was ordered to write ten pages explaining why she chose to attack me in this fashion.

The two Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each, likely with Gwendolyn Adrian and/or her clients. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. So, each article was merely a hit job enabled by the Toronto Star.

Neither Alexandra Heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

Well, so did I and now it is payback time. I had to give a DNA sample so maybe that will help.

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

But our great Charter of Rights let’s them do it because we have a legal system designed to keep them honest. I do not need to get upset at all. All I need do is sue them.

And Ontario wonders why its courts are now terminally disrupted by a bat from Wuhan China.

Now, will someone go to “bat” for me?

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLXX🏌️‍♀️ – Crazy Priest Tricks

For Those Following the “far out” 500 meter radius Trespass Notice of Principal Ines Donato….

You will recall I sued for slander, and we had a settlement conference. The justice encouraged us to settle out of court. I agreed and asked for the simplest “I’m Sorry” letter signed by MS Donato.

The Catholic School Board will not let her sign an apology, The Board wants to sign it for her without her name being mentioned. so we are stalemated again.

The Bible mentions forgiveness here and there, so I thought they understood the cleansing effect of a simple “Sorry, eh?”

Then, I read about THIS priest and I see why they automatically have to think “cover up”….

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ohio-priest-michael-zacharias-preyed-on-teen-drug-addicts-for-decades-department-of-justice-says?source=articles&via=rss

or, watch it here

Categories
Business Google Maps Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLXX🎄 – Un-De-Leaf-able – Even The Neighbour’s Leaves Have Been Caught Piling On

Aurora has made it certain that everyone knows I am disgraced by being arrested by their ex-cop. Then by their dog park contractor. Then by HER paralegal and by her old school principal. And the ex-cop’s lawyer, of course, same one as the spite fence specialist.

Once she made that first arrest July 13, 2017 she and Aurora encouraged everyone to take a piece of me… to pile on complaints about me while the cops were hot to keep me under bail conditions to shut up about her. So she assaults me, cops whitewash it and then it has been classic Thin Blue Line payback every since. 6 MORE arrests and 19 MORE charges because I just did not take the hint and shut up about her. She even faked changing her name.

Today, I stand accused of killing dogs with antifreeze and “serial harassment” of multiple women. Luckily I ended 16 charges outright, never went past the first justice who read the allegations.

Cops were so anxious for more charges after I recorded them February 27, 2020 admitting the collusion they convinced 3 lawyers to lie about something they never saw, never heard and definitely never happened. But all 3 swore to testify against me March 6, 2020. And if they do, they lose their licences for lying and public mischief. No one can lie to police JUST to get a person arrested. No one. In this case all 3 witnesses are licensed by the Law Society of Ontario with their myriad regulations and ethics standards and complaint mechanisms. When my charges are prosecuted, they lose their incomes. And to them it is a risk worth taking. After all, I am defeating them in court. Charles Painter was beat twice. Gwendolyn Adrian has to answer to a justice why she took $18,000 illegally in costs for a motion NOT EVEN HEARD. And an appeal.

Her response has been to publish hundreds of pages to support her 18 page claim against me. Just 6 sentences I spoke are in contention. Ms. Buckles was accused of 9 slanderous sentences, 509% MORE than me.

But now, even my west side neighbour knows he can treat me like shit now, and Bylaws will support him.

Lasy year, his retaining wall collapsed onto my land and much of his dirt washed out through it onto and under my interlocking stones. So I shovelled some of it back into the washed-out holes on his side, lest he think I threw it out. He came screaming to my door in the middle of a dinner party accusing me of putting his soil back on his land. I called police and trespassed him. I am a quick study. I threw out his dirt as my contractor had a dumper on site. 229 had the dumpster at the curb ticketed that day, but I got it rescinded like the off leash dogs tickjet for $1.

Parents can park INSIDE a bus stop at 3:00 pm daily, but I cannot park a dumpster at the curb to take away my neighbours washed out soil.

This week, his campaign is leaves. Or more accurately, ME and MY leaves. I noticed that he has been studying me, taking videos of my blowing style. I hoped it was to learn, but I think he was fixing to report me. Now he stands on his side deck and screams something at me. I think he has determined how I get rid of my back yard leaves… he thinks I blow them all under the fence into his yard. He thinks this because I pile them in my southwest corner and my son eventually bags them up. Or used to.

I finally figured out that he must jealous of our team, me and the 3 eastern neighbours, and our system. They work days, I do not. I like BLOWING leaves, not gift wraapping them. So, they bag what I pile up. And the whole street in front of our 4 homes. I even do the far side curbs.

So,

  1. I blow all 4 houses down to the curb mid-day.
  2. They come home from work and bag em up.
  3. Weekends we work together. Like today. I blew. They bagged

So, I can see my western neighbour at 229 figures to take a photo between 1 and 2 and send it to Bylaws or the cops, your guess is as good as mine.

Anyway, our Assuredly De-leaf-able Club at 221-227 Orchard Hts. Blvd. keeps the entire width of street clean and the folks from 229 and west just leaf them at the curb in huge piles to blow back east at us in the prevailing winds.

Revenge. Seems to be a bit kindergartenish, but what do I know?

So, 229 + west Orchard Hts… stop piling at the curb! Pick ’em up!