Home

BL20-🎄CLXtnein – A Sure Fire Class Action Suit Against all Banks

BL20-🎄CLXt🎱 – OIPRD Tosses My Complaint Re: Police in Toronto Decline Data Theft Investigation

OIPRD says Det. Ozretic CAN ask me for My Personal Bank Acct. Number before she will even START to investigate.

So, The Thin Blue Line wanted to protect their own.

All police had to do was phone CIBC and ask how someone could get my bank account number within 24 hours. Just ask, and listen. And decide if they are hiding something.

Instead, she made up an excuse she MUST know my bank account number. Not JUST my:

  • Name
  • Birthdate
  • Drivers’ Licence Number
  • Address
  • Cell Number
  • CIBC Complaint number, name
  • OBSI complaint number, name

Nope, she HAD to know my bank account number or she would NOT lift a handset.

Then, as belt and suspenders, she “parked” my complaint saying CIBC owned my personal data and could give it away if they wanted to.

Which they did.

BL20-🎄CLXt7 – York Declines my FOI on Joy Hulton – FOI 20-128

When I blogged the daily parking inside the bus stop #1208, Ms Hulton adminstered her Workplace Resolution skills

Her “Resolution”? She did not speak to me…then blocked my email address from contacting ANY Region staff, including the Provincial Offences courts.

BL20-CLXXX-Joy-Hulton-ex-Lawyer-for-York-Region-and-Police-Services-Board-Who-Blocked-Me-From-All-of

Joy is now running “Hulton Workplace Resolutions”.

My FOI asked if she took a buyout package to leave and if she now still contracts to York Region. Because after 23 years maybe she does not have any other clients yet.

Adam Briggs, FOI Officer, on October 13, 2020 said I did not specify enough detail to identify the records.

He wants ME to tell HIM “name of firms that you believe Joy Hulton has been working for”…..

So, he expects me to KNOW the details of what I am asking about.

If she was NOT back consulting he would have said “NO”.

Now, this letter seems to say “MAYBE” and asks for proof of what I suspect.

I will tell him her company’s name.

BL20-🎄CLXt6 – Police in Toronto Decline Data Theft Investigation

Det. Ozretic Declares CIBC OWNS My Personal Data Once I Open an Account

So, since they own the data they can do whatever they want with it.

Very logical.

Except…

CIBC obtains your consent before collecting, using or sharing personal information, except where otherwise permitted or required by law.

https://www.cibc.com/en/privacy-security/privacy-policy/privacy-principles.html

CIBC Privacy Principles

CIBC respects the following principles when collecting, using or sharing your personal information:
 

1. Accountability

  • CIBC is responsible for personal information under its control.
  • There are designated individuals within CIBC who are accountable for compliance with these privacy principles.

2. Identifying Purposes and Obtaining Consent

  • CIBC informs individuals, at or before the time it is collected, the purposes for the collection, use and sharing of personal information.
  • CIBC obtains your consent before collecting, using or sharing personal information, except where otherwise permitted or required by law.

3. Limiting the Collection, Use or Sharing of Your Personal Information

  • CIBC limits the personal information it collects to what is necessary for the purposes it has identified. CIBC collects personal information only by fair and lawful means.
  • CIBC does not use or share personal information for purposes other than those for which it was collected except with your consent or where permitted or required by law. CIBC retains personal information only as long as necessary for customer service, legal or reasonable business purposes.

4. Keeping Your Personal Information Accurate and Providing Access to Your Information

  • CIBC takes care to keep personal information as accurate, complete and up-to-date as is necessary for the purposes for which it is to be used.
  • Upon request, and subject to certain exceptions, CIBC will provide you with access to your personal information. You can ask how your personal information is to be used or shared so you can ensure your personal information is accurate and complete and can be updated if appropriate.

5. Protecting Your Personal Information

  • CIBC protects the privacy of personal information through security measures appropriate to the sensitivity of the information.

6. Openness and Addressing Your Concerns

  • CIBC makes available information about its policies and practices related to managing your personal information.
  • CIBC has steps you can follow if you have questions or concerns about your privacy.

CIBC Digital Privacy Statement

Effective May 2018

At CIBC, keeping your personal information in confidence is a cornerstone of our business and an integral part of our commitment to service excellence. This Digital Privacy Statement applies to the collection, use or sharing of any personal information collected by CIBC in the course of conducting its business in Canada. This Digital Privacy Statement explains how we collect, use, share and protect personal information collected through your online and mobile activities, including through the use of any CIBC site or other online or electronic technologies such as email and mobile applications. It is consistent with our CIBC Privacy Principles and is in addition to our Privacy Policy and the terms of your agreements with us.

In this Digital Privacy Statement:

“CIBC,” “we,” “our” and “us” means collectively Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and its affiliates that offer deposits, loans, mutual funds, securities trading, portfolio management, investment counseling, mortgages, credit cards, trust services, insurance and other products or services.

“Digital” means CIBC Online Banking®, CIBC websites, CIBC mobile sites, CIBC mobile apps or our other electronic technologies. 

“Personal information” or “information” means information about an identifiable individual such as name, email or user IDs.

“Site” means a website and mobile site.

What we collect and how we collect it

The type of personal information we collect will depend on various factors, including your digital activities with us. We may collect information in the following ways:

  • Information you provide us, through your digital activities such as, mobile apps, applications for products or services, or information that you have inputted into our online tools or calculators. This may include information such as your name, email address, user IDs, passwords, service preference (e.g., language), age, gender, occupation and income range. If you communicate with us online or by email, mobile app or text message, we may collect information contained in that communication, such as your email address or mobile telephone number.
  • Information that your web browser may provide us, such as the type of web browser you use (e.g., Internet Explorer, Chrome, Safari or Firefox) or the address of the site you came from.
  • Information that your devices may provide us, such as device details (e.g., device ID, model, operating system or device notification status), privacy settings and other device configurations or settings, your geolocation, or your IP address (a number that is automatically assigned to your computer or device when you browse the Internet and from which the general geographical location of the device can be derived).
  • Information obtained using web technologies, such as cookies and web beacons. Refer to the Web Technologies section below for further information.

How we use information

We may use information for the following purposes:

  • Provide you with our digital products, services and support
  • Communicate with you, including providing alerts that you have requested
  • Personalize your user experience including offering you personalized marketing and offers
  • Better understand your interest in other CIBC products and services
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of our sites, communications, marketing, or offers and promotions
  • Measure site and mobile app usage and improve functionality
  • Enhance digital security including preventing and detecting security threats and criminal activities

Using third-party cookies and other web technologies, CIBC may market CIBC products, services or community initiatives on another company’s site (e.g., remarketing). CIBC’s partners and service providers may also use third-party cookies and web technologies to collect and use information from CIBC sites and other third-party sites to assist us in this marketing.  In some cases, the content of this marketing may be based on information we know about you, such as your browsing behavior on CIBC sites and third-party sites where you are shown CIBC ads, your CIBC products and services, and the information you have provided to us. If you access one of these marketing ads, we may also track the response rate, the specific CIBC ad that you selected and the site activity associated with each marketing ad. If you enter a third-party site which has a CIBC ad, we may use cookies to help us identify the site you accessed, but we do not track and create a profile of a user’s behaviour on that site. The response rate data is used to help us plan future online marketing campaigns.

CIBC may offer mobile applications or services that use location information. If you choose to use such applications or services, CIBC may, if your geolocation device settings allow us, collect information about your location to provide you with the applications or services you request.

We may also use location information to personalize your user experience including through site or mobile app content, marketing, or offers for products and services. For example, we may use general geographical location derived from your IP address (e.g., city) to customize CIBC site pages for you.

Some services may involve access to information on your device. For example, accessing your contact list can make it easier to use Interac e-Transfer® banking services, or accessing your photos and camera can make it easier to complete a remote cheque deposit on your mobile device. Some services may allow your device and your wearable to communicate with a CIBC app, such as for Apple Watch®.

Protecting your personal information

Protecting the security of your personal information and the financial transactions you conduct online is of utmost importance. We use multiple layers of protection when you access any of our digital products or services, such as digital banking, including:

  • Web browser encryption: all browsers supported by CIBC digital services offer industry standard encryption. This provides a high level of protection for transmitting confidential data over the Internet.
  • Firewalls: we have secure firewalls designed to prevent unauthorized access to our systems.
  • Monitoring: we monitor activity on CIBC digital services to enhance security and to protect your personal information.

CIBC sites may contain links to non-CIBC sites. CIBC is not responsible for the information and privacy practices of these third-party sites. We recommend that you read any such third-party site’s privacy policy to learn about its information and privacy practices before you provide any personal information.

BL20-🎄CLXt5 – The Star HAS not responded, NOR Bob Aaron, Lawyer

Re: Atkinson… He was particularly concerned about injustice

Throughout his 50 years as publisher of the Toronto Star from 1899 to 1948, Joseph E. Atkinson developed strong views on both the role of a large city newspaper and the editorial principles it should espouse. These values and beliefs now form what are called the Atkinson Principles. For more than a century, they have provided the intellectual foundation on which the Star has operated and have given the paper its distinctive voice.

The editorial principles Atkinson espoused were founded on his belief that a progressive newspaper should contribute to the advancement of society through pursuit of social, economic and political reforms. He was particularly concerned about injustice, be it social, economic, political, legal or racial

Fundamental to his philosophy was the belief that the state has the right, and duty, to act when private initiative fails. While Atkinson’s beliefs were never codified in any set form, the central Principles can be summarized as follows:

Star Principle: Individual and Civil Liberties

Everyone must be equal under the law, and able to enjoy the fundamental freedoms of belief, thought, expression and the press.

https://www.thestar.com/about/liberties.html

Refreshing Your Memory

Gwendolyn Adrian, senior lawyer for Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP and personal lawyer to partner Michael Simaan gave an interview to Alexandra Heck on Adrians’ suit against me litigated for an ex-cop, ex-Aurora Bylaws Manager, ex-Erin contractor. I asked for an opportunity to be interviewed but I got no reply in ten months.

The Toronto Star published her article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site.

This was the first of two misleading articles from The Star. Five days later, they have not responded AT ALL to my defamation notice and I doubt they ever will. The peril in taking that attitude is that it looks bad in court to be shown a pattern of bias spread by lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

Both AURORA and Erin terminated her client early and paid cash to make her go away. Part of ADRIAN‘s lawsuit claims I was responsible despite her client testifying in Newmarket court to exactly the opposite facts. She testified happily that she was terminated without cause in Aurora and paid a cash lump sum to avoid a lawsuit for letting her go “without reason”.

Her manager in Erin also testified in the same proceeding that he paid her two extra unearned months of her contract to leave early after just four months. Erin residents had applied pressure to the mayor for that decision at election time in October 2018.

The Toronto Court told Gwendolyn Adrian that she had not filed a legal lawsuit and that she was required to have filed it within three months of the alleged acts. Since that day ADRIAN has not advanced the lawsuit in any way. The suit has no chance of being litigated.

Gwendolyn Adrian has now been ordered by the court to justify 2 legal actions she took against me. The justice told her she litigated “the worst of the worst” allegations of me on October 14. That her motion was “grossly over reaching”, a “non starter” and “just not going to happen”.. she was ordered to write ten pages explaining why she chose to attack me in this fashion.

I, in turn, will do the same to show the court how she manipulated the press to quote her before the suit was even litigated. That seems inappropriate for a Law Society licensee. They have ethics rules for its members.

The true Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each with Gwendolyn Adrian and others. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. so each article was merely a hit job orchestrated by Gwendolyn Adrian and the Toronto star.

neither Alexandra heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

Well, so did I and now it is payback time. I had to give a DNA sample so maybe that will help.

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

But our great Charter of Rights let’s them do it because we have a legal system designed to keep them honest. I do not need to get upset at all. All I need do is sue them.

And Ontario wonders why its courts are now terminally disrupted by a bat from Wuhan China.

Now, will someone go to bat for me?

BL20-🎄CLXt4 – an Off Fence is a Good De-Fence

I think the day is near that the only solution to a spite fence is removal.

Especially if it is on someone else’s land. IF that ever happens in the future.

It is just a matter of time.

BL20-🎄CLX🎄 – Zoom in on the Ontario Court of Appeal with Gwendolyn Adrian

I like the remote court appearances by Zoom software. They are much less stressful. It is impossible to feel stressed sitting in pyjama bottoms with a shirt, tie and jacket.

I filed a single judge motion to extend my time to perfect my appeal of Gwendolyn Adrian’s client refusing to wait for the SLAPP s.137.1 motion to be heard. I filed May 2019 and it has not yet been heard.

Despite that shortcoming, Ms. Adrian was able to convince several judges to award her massive unearned costs and a default judgement. NOTHING was to happen after May 2019 but so many justices just (pun intended) do not understand SLAPP s. 137.1 and its goal of eliminating EXACTLY this kind of assault on my bank balance.

When I get the extension, my appeal perfection will take maybe a week to finish off. So much happened I can now use as evidence of SLAPP.

Over the weekend I read the Plaintiff’s claim again. The suit was so poorly written. By law, it was to have included EVERY alleged slanderous thing she says I wrote. Instead, it had just 15 quotes, 9 for Buckles in Facebook and 6 for me from my blog and change.org petition and 1100 signatures.

Not one of the 15 alleged quotes is in any way slanderous.

And, more importantly, lawyer Brad T. Cran had no idea how to claim libel. He wrote that I had just made too MANY libellous posts to include and he would reveal them at trial.

Well, it turns out he did not know the law. By failing to cite EVERY alleged statement… he made the suit useless. Because the 15 he picked are simply innocuous. Both Marnee and I simply stated the facts and the history without making any personal comments or casting any aspersions. We both just stated what Adrian’s client had done and had said, and we left it to the reader to make up their minds.

Soon, I will be allowed to post them all here for you to read. Until then, come see me for a hard copy. You will laugh at what they claim was libellous.

Until then, as expected, Ms Adrian served 273 MORE pages in a NEGATIVE response of my motion late Friday for motion to be heard 10:00 am Monday. She expected the justice to read it over the weekend I guess.

Her entire law suit is just 18 pages, and YET, she came up with 255 MORE than that JUST to say NO! to the justice.

if your suit is just 18 pages, and you think it can succeed… why would you need 273 pages to explain how good the 18 were?

So she can claim costs! and sure enough, as I told the justice she would, she asked for $2,000 for the LATE 273 soft copy pages. No photocopying, no couriers, no binding… just a bag of bits and bytes sent with NOT enough time to be read. A waste of data.

I asked for $18,000 if I get the extension. I theorized that if Adrian got $18,000 for NOT arguing SLAPP s. 137.1 then I should get $18,000 for WINNING something.

But the justice knows self reps do not get costs compensation as we do not EXPEND any costs…. we magically beat lawyers on a regular basis without having to spend ANYTHING… not one penny….. so we get no costs and the lawyers just laugh at us for working hard enough t beat them and then NOT get paid a penny.

Such is the mystery of Ontario’s legal systems.

The big bucks in law can be made on “costs” alone since they are not audited. And with COVID, Zoom and soft copy everything, the profit on the costs gets better each month.

BL20-🎄CLX👁👁 – Guy Paul Morin’s lawyer Clayton Ruby on False Accusations and Convictions

Full interview:

I am in now way comparing my plight to that of Mr. Morin.

BUT, that said, Toronto Police are seemingly incompetent. They took HOW LONG to check the DNA they stored for decades?

Ruby: “We tend to trust prosecutors… we trust authority… there are mistakes… huge and inexplicable… a more sceptical approach to prosecution claims makes us all safe.”

His summary of the impact of Toronto Police FINALLy doing their job…

Says Clayton Ruby: “Why so long? It’s not tricky… People don’t trust the system…He cannot recover….There is no recovery from false arrest, false imprisonment, bearing false witness.

I now have 21 false charges from York Regional Police.

I defeated 16 without a lawyer. 3 are under appeal. 2 have not been to first appearance after SEVEN MONTHS! 3 lawyer lied to arrest me and send me to Lindsay Prison IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PANDEMIC.

I reported to Toronto Police on August 28 that Gwendolyn Adrian admitted to me in a recorded court ordered session that she obtained my banking data surreptitiously. She said it was “none of your business” who gave her the data required to legally garnish my shiny new, 24 hour old CIBC account.

Detective Nicole Ozretic has now taken 50 days to make one phone call to CIBC to see if there is any truth in her admissions.

So, if Guy Paul Morin is upset at Toronto Police, I am not surprised.

Maybe Mr Ruby should look into all ex-police officers on the suspect lists. Police will NOT investigate their own Thin Blue Line brothers and sisters.

And now they refuse to help those like me who reported crimes by ex-police and her lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

BL20-🎄CLX👁 – The Star would not respond to me in January either

Gwendolyn Adrian, senior lawyer for Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP and personal lawyer to partner Michael Simaan gave an interview to Alexandra Heck on Adrians’ suit against me litigated for an ex-cop, ex-Aurora Bylaws Manager, ex-Erin contractor. I asked for an opportunity to be interviewed but I got no reply in ten months.

The Toronto Star published her article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site.

This was the first of two misleading articles from The Star. They have not responded AT ALL to my defamation notice and I doubt they ever will. The peril in taking that attitude is that it looks bad in court to be shown a pattern of bias spread by lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

Both AURORA and Erin terminated her client early and paid cash to make her go away. Part of ADRIAN‘s lawsuit claims I was responsible despite her client testifying in Newmarket court to exactly the opposite facts. She testified happily that she was terminated without cause in Aurora and paid a cash lump sum to avoid a lawsuit for letting her go “without reason”.

Her manager in Erin also testified in the same proceeding that he paid her two extra unearned months of her contract to leave early after just four months. Erin residents had applied pressure to the mayor for that decision at election time in October 2018.

The Toronto Court told Gwendolyn Adrian that she had not filed a legal lawsuit and that she was required to have filed it within three months of the alleged acts. Since that day ADRIAN has not advanced the lawsuit in any way. The suit has no chance of being litigated.

Gwendolyn Adrian has now been ordered by the court to justify 2 legal actions she took against me. The justice told her she litigated “the worst of the worst” allegations of me on October 14. That her motion was “grossly over reaching”, a “non starter” and “just not going to happen”.. she was ordered to write ten pages explaining why she chose to attack me in this fashion.

I, in turn, will do the same to show the court how she manipulated the press to quote her before the suit was even litigated. That seems inappropriate for a Law Society licensee. They have ethics rules for its members.

The true Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each with Gwendolyn Adrian and others. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. so each article was merely a hit job orchestrated by Gwendolyn Adrian and the Toronto star.

neither Alexandra heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

Well, so did I and now it is payback time. I had to give a DNA sample so maybe that will help.

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

But our great Charter of Rights let’s them do it because we have a legal system designed to keep them honest. I do not need to get upset at all. All I need do is sue them.

And Ontario wonders why its courts are now terminally disrupted by a bat from Wuhan China.

Now, will someone go to bat for me?

BL20-🎄CLX – Finally …the Press is on my story!

Not in a good way… but they are on it and they must now tell the truth.

Dispute over a property line fence stirs up a costly battle at the Superior Court of Justice

Bob Aaron

By Bob AaronContributing Columnist

Click HERE ==> https://www.thestar.com/life/homes/2020/10/14/neighbours-dispute-over-a-property-line-fence-lands-them-in-an-costly-battle-at-the-superior-court-of-justice.html

Now, before Ms Adrian accuses me of publishing more slander of her client… that link is the Toronto Star and they never lie.

the first sentence is a lie: it was Toronto court, NOT Newmarket. How could a lawyer make that “mistake”… by simply taking the email sent to him and publish it as his own work.
No, someone in Aurora wrote that for him. Someone with so little respect for the law she did not even know what court the matter was in.

certainly Mr. Aaoron did not research it, the location of the court is on every piece of paper in the file. One might ASSUME an Aurora battle between two or three people in Aurora would be heard in Newmarket. But if you’re rich and easily embarrassed then you go far from home to litigate your lies.

One of the four women wrote this story and Bob Aaron copy pasted it into an email to his editors and they published it verbatim. So, if you don’t like what it says, go contact the Editor like I did.

“judgment against an online activist who interfered in the dispute.”

bob Aaron

How is blogging considered to be “interfering”?

how is my exercise of my Charter right to my opinions suddenly viewed as interfering by a lawyer like Aaron? Is it proper for a lawyer to dissuade people from expressing their opinions?

Are lawyers not to be “models” for the peasants to emulate? Is suppressing public opinion something a lawyer should be doing as a reporter?

Could anyone read that article and come away educated on how to be a good Canadian? Is this attitude prevalent in the Law Society? Do they want us to stop standing up for ourselves and hire lawyers instead.

is this lawyer really suggesting no one be their own person? Does he really want to jam up the courts with FENCES?

does the Superior Court have to intervene when a landowner disrespects her neighbour’s? Can we mere mortals not pay Bylaws Officers to enforce fence bylaws?

After xxx purchased her house in 2017, she constructed a wooden fence on the property line.

Bob Aaron

NO. She FIRST constructed a pair of huge black steel gates hung on a wooden gate post 100% on Buckles’ land and she was embarrassed to be told to remove it. THEN, she constructed a spite fence.

“Xxx reduced the height of the fence.”

Bob Aaoron

NO! When I was hired January the fence had been too high for five months. Only when I blogged and emailed and photographed the height beside a two meter long stick and threatened to buy a chainsaw did Aurora order it shortened.

“Buckles then went public with her complaints to the local media,”

Bob Aaron

NO! She went to The Star, and a reporter called the neighbour to fact check. The reporter was threatened with defamation if she published so she dropped the story. Now, The Star FAILS to fact check so Aaron could defame me. Irony.

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:46 PM,  <TVanLeeuwen@aurora.ca> wrote:

“He was able to get a measurement. The top rail of the fence is in compliance a few inches under the maximum height, the top of the posts are 2 to 3 inches over maximum. If they cut the posts it will not change the outcome for you. Your view from your windows will be the same unfortunately.”

Director of Legal Aurora Techa van Leeuwenhoek to Buckles

that was months BEFORE I got the posts shortened. I had to get “interfering” and Techa had to order AGAIN.

“He (Lepp) also launched an online petition signed by at least 300 people.”

Bob Aaron

NO! We got over 1,200:signatures.

”Lepp did not defend the action,”

Bob Aaron

NO! I filed my defense in 21 days because I had a vacation in Mexico. I beat Buckles filing by a week. Hers was accepted. Mine was rejected for being one day late and she put me in default and let Buckles defend.

”After a delay, Lepp applied to Superior Court to allow him to file a defence to the lawsuit, but he was turned down and ordered to pay $18,000 in costs.”

Bob Aaron

NO! I filed one day late due to vacation. The Judge, J. Schabas erred and awarded $18,000 for a SLAPP 137.1 challenge which was required to be heard August 26, 2019:but he refused to hear it, he forgot, and then awarded costs for it illegally.

“She found that Lepp accused xxx of deliberately acting illegally, that his statements suggested she received preferential treatment from the town because of political connections, and that she was a liar”

Bob Aaron

NO! Not “accused”. He meant “documented with her own sworn testimony before a judge”. I merely pointed out to the judge she had admitted knowing she drilled into Buckles foundation stones, removed them with the dirt and replace that with a post an concrete. Twice she admitted she built out of spite for having her gates rejected from being bolted to a post on Buckles’ land.

“Lepp has appealed the decision.”

Bob Aaron

NO! I TRIED to appeal. Instead of waiting for me to do that, she garnished our pensions illegally. I then spent a lot of time trying to reverse the illegal garnishment but the court told me I had to sue her. So I sued her boss Michael Simaan for failing to teach her the law. Then she did it again to my brand new CIBC account in less than 24 hours of opening it. So I sued her boss again. Now she refuses to garnish RBC Aurora branch YONGE and Aurora Heights.

today, it is over 7 weeks from telling her I am now at RBC Aurora branch, but she refuses to garnish it.

strange, she illegally garnished two banks but faced with a legal garnishment target she declines. Almost as if she thinks she would be embarrassed to have RBC learn what she has been doing all this time with banks.

Toronto police are investigating Adrian for theft of my CIBC data when no one knew I opened that account.

The timing is interesting. Did Ms Adrian plan it for the SAME day she planned my double contempt motion? Was it her plan next day to offer up I was now even deeper in?

Or, was it some other legal officer of the court? Someone on the periphery who had failed at every other attack on me?

Maybe… it is such a collection of lies that no reporter could have come up them with alone… just statistically, a reporter would have at least come up with ONE truthful sentence. But this time, nothing written is true.

The photo is the funniest part. A guy building a fence. Narrow boards, gaps, low height.

No one who investigated the fence would have chosen that photo. No one who has seen the fence would have chosen that stock photo.

here is Bob Aaron’s Law website tightly integrated with the Star.

So, Mr Aaron uses “articles” he “authors”, presumably for money, which he then uses to promote his law firm.

That’s not typically viewed as proper by the Law Society. Their rules are that any other profession practiced by a lawyer must …

SECTION 2.1 INTEGRITY

2.1-1 A lawyer has a duty to carry on the practice of law and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the profession honourably and with integrity.

Commentary.

[1] Integrity is the fundamental quality of any person who seeks to practise as a member of the legal profession. If a client has any doubt about their lawyer’s trustworthiness, the essential element in the true lawyer-client relationship will be missing. If integrity i s lacking, the lawyer’s usefulness to the client and reputation within the profession will be destroyed, regardless of how competent the lawyer may be.

[2] Public confidence in the administration of justice and in the legal profession may be eroded by a lawyer’s irresponsible conduct. Accordingly, a lawyer’s conduct should reflect favourably on the legal profession, inspire the confidence, respect and trust of clients and of the community, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

[3] Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client’s trust in the lawyer, the Law Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.

[4] Generally, however, the Law Society will not be concerned with the purely private or extra-professional activities of a lawyer that do not bring into question the lawyer’s professional integrity.

[4.1] A lawyer has special responsibilities by virtue of the privileges afforded the legal profession and the important role it plays in a free and democratic society and in the administration of justice, including a special responsibility to recognize the diversity of the Ontario community, to protect the dignity of individuals, and to respect human rights laws in force in Ontario.

Well, by publishing this drivel without one single question to me to verify his claims is a sure sign of dishonorable conduct.

Real reporters MUST fact check.
Lawyers who are also reporters should be very accurate in their claims because they cannot argue they lack the mens rea to defame. He is a professional at knowing the law and whether his actions would break the law.

So he cannot defend his actions by claiming he made a minor mistake.

isn’t it ironic though his title suggests people just shut up about being wronged. That they should hire lawyers instead. He seems to misunderstand the charter and our rights to our opinions.

I’ll let you know what the law society says. This is blatant advertising.

And it is NOT “REPORTING” as the Toronto Star defines it.

I bet Aaoron pays The Star to publish his “contributions“. That would make more sense.

What are the bets The Star calls Bob Aron’s “articles” Infomercials, or “Advertorials”… anything other than reporting.

Stand down and stand back…. it could get noisy!

BL20-🎄CLnein – The Ultimate Solution

This post exists solely to display Snoopy’s ultimate decision.

Words to live by! Here they are… write them down!

My wife’s dog does this to me all the time.

BL20-🎄CL8 – Gwendolyn Adrian (Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP) Forgot To Wear The Flameproof Pantsuit.

Instead of getting scheduling approval for dates for two contempt motions for her two clients, she got handed a new one.

Adrian moves on me for CONTEMPT X 2 for each of her clients.

Her argument to Justice Myers for WHY she wanted a pair of contempt hearings is… wait for it!… “Lepp refused to provide an affidavit of documents... twice!”

The justice reacted “You want TWO contempt hearings for (a failure to provide ) an affidavit of documents?”

“That is the worst (“thing you can move for”) of the worst! CONTEMPT? For (refusing) an affidavit of documents?”

Paraphrasing J. Myers now….”I am ordering a case conference. It is obvious there is a lot more going on here.”

“Mr. Lepp, are you planning or offering to provide evidence? You know you can provide, in addition, oral evidence and you can examine the plaintiff and ask her questions, did you know that?”

Justice Myers paraphrased

I do NOW, I said quietly to myself.

“Yes, your honour I sent you 70 pages for today and I have bails more!”

So…Stand back! and stand by! for his order. He may add in something about how much time and how much exchange of evidence there will be.

Or maybe that is TO MUCH to ask for.

Lastly, he ended with…

“It does not make sense to waste a lot of time on SOMETHING WHICH IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!”

J. Myers paraphrased from memory

In the end, judges “get it”… been there, done that!

They see through the bullshit and act.

Thanks to the Toronto Superior Court!

Until now the Newmarket crowd has not been so helpful. Maybe I should be GLAD she filed in the wrong court!

BL20-🎄CLViaye- Steganographically speaking…

That is an oxymoron. Steganography is the act of hiding things in plain sight and speaking about it, by definition, is improper and unnecessary because it’s all there in plain sight for everyone to see.

Here is a person who uses Steganography to hide another COMPLETE person…

He was there all the time right in front of you. Did you not see him?

So, do not tell people “Open your eyes!”… say “Look around you!”

Plane’s sight

Plains sight

Play in sight

Playin’ site

Play’n inside

BL20-🎄CLVaye- New Movie: Contemptible Me™©️ aka “Lying To Make Money”

Today, as always, a lawyer for an Aurora employee has me up before a judge to be given 30 days in prison and pay a $10,000 fine.

Lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian, (Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP) claims my 600 answers to her questions about my financial history were inadequate. She says she MUST know the serial number of my lawn mower.

Subliminal Suggestion – Can you find it?

And of course, it is once again the Bible’s fault. I swore at it and look what happened? I mean…. I swore ON it and look…..

Lawyers do not ever swear on the Bible. But we peasants MUST swear on something. And that day, I was asked to swear on a “religious document”. But. it was on Zoom. So I grabbed the closest Torah to me and swore to tell the truth.

From that moment. Ms Adrian did not believe a word I said, and so, she set out to trick me into lying. Cuz that’s what the really good lawyers do. The good lawyers do not need bank account numbers to garnish , they need LIES to make REAL money, because “big money” is made in the game they call “COST-a-Rama”.

At the end of every case each lawyer gets a spin on the giant COSTS-WHEEL. Wherever it stops, that lawyer gets that much from that accused.

It all adds up.

If instead I had NOT sworn on a religious document, no one would trust me of course.

So, a suggestion when asked…. just “attest” to anything you like… they ain’t gonna believe you anyway. And it saves time.

And time is money to any lawyer. It is in their blood. A soaring “Lies per minute” is what they live for. Unless they come from their clients.

In which case, lies ARE money!

http://fitnessexpose.com/saturday-sharing-rant-lying-make-money/

BL20-🎄CLV- Herd Immunity “Trump-Style”

The NY Times is reporting the best news ever! https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/13/world/coronavirus-covid

unnamed White House staffers who say that the new “line” to be spun is that the USA should develop herd immunity…. let millions get COVID-19 and then everyone will be safe from it.

Close your eyes, relax, think about that for 30 seconds….

So, Democrats called for the herd of people who work in the White House to bring every living relative to work on Friday to be injected with the “finest, purest, best ever” strain and get the herd started.

Being Republicans with average IQ’s, White House staffers then resigned and went home to hunker down.

Donald and his entire bloodline came to work Friday and they were injected with DOUBLE doses distilled from pedigreed Wuhan bats in a room filled with actual Wuhan bats, and told to go far and wide and hold indoor rallies. Donald Junior shot a bat to mount on his wall.

…we interrupt this dream

It is good to dream, because only then will we learn what we are capable of.

BL20-🎄CL 👁V- Thanks J. Dow for the inspiration!

Today, Superior Court J. Dow in Toronto cleared it all up for me SLAPP-wise.

Spite fence lawsuits can be APPEALED and he says mine sounds like a SLAM DUNK to him if I told the truth. Of course, Ms Adrian THEN closed off and told him I lied to him so there’s that.

Selfreps are NEVER believed. Lawyers are ALWAYS believed. It’s a neat gig. Keep paying dues and the Law Society of Ontario sells you a franchise worth millions.

He also pointed out the public can get all the dirt on www.canlii.org. The full details of this SLAPP suit are there. You can get all the dirt legally.

So www.canlii.org is where you go.

Here is me beating Charles Painter and Lloyd’s of London.

Here is my winning appeal over Charles Painter and Lloyd’s of London, I beat him before J. Edwards, Painter appealed J. Edwards fine decision and lost again.

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2020/2020onca528/2020onca528.html?resultIndex=9

Here is J. Kenkel telling you how good a job he did in case management. He only ignored my warning May 2, 2019 and set up an indictable charge meant for a jury in a “judge only” Summary charge trial and the charge was dismissed as wrongfully heard. He did not supply the 486 counsel as he ordered and promised. But he did a great job he says. Trump-like in its greatness.

Then you can look up Lepp 2019 ONSC 6946, or Lepp 2020 ONSC 5430.

OR, get them all in one list if you filter correctly.

BL20-🎄CL 👁-👁-👁- Now THIS is a dog park.. artificial turf!

https://calgaryherald.com/life/homes/new-homes/dogs-have-their-day-at-new-currie-bark-park

BL20-🎄CL 👁-👁- Canadian Record Flight – 2 seat glider to 31,700 feet

It is my opinion no one will believe this. So few people understand clouds at all. They really don’t know clouds at all.

Rows and floes of angel hair
And ice cream castles in the air
And feather canyons everywhere
I’ve looked at clouds that way

But now they only block the sun
They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way

I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now
From up and down, and still somehow
It’s cloud illusions I recall
I really don’t know clouds at all

I’ve looked at life from both sides now 
From up and down and still somehow
It’s life’s illusions I recall
I really don’t know life at all

Tuesday Oct. 6, 2020 2 Canadians flew a motorless 2 seat glider to an altitude of 31,700 feet over the Rockies south of Calgary.

This is a new record for height gain and absolute altitude for multi-seat gliders in Canada/

https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3.0/gliding/flightinfo.html?dsId=8204904

The ex-RCAF pilot then realized he was hypoxic ands started down… QUICKLY to 25,000 feet where his brain regained enough oxygen to feel normal.

read about it here:

https://us18.campaign-archive.com/?u=72080979ac4fe538a62f765bb&id=5c53ee769e

BL20-🎄CL 👁- Welcome back for the names…. finally

Well, as the masks go ON every day.some are REMOVED forever.

Justice Dawe has called for a retrial of J. Rose’s decision and probation order of December 4, 2019,

Since the “not to mention: clause is also GONE from my Release Order in March, I can mention anyone I want here again. Just like 2017, up until July 14 anyway.

I tend to state facts and not get caught up in emotions. And now there are so many court transcripts to paraphrase so everyone can see the evidence and testimony themselves.

Publication bans have ended. They never did get a ban on the victim impact statements. That would have been too funny. Your honour, our next victim really wants to pass along how she feels about Mr. Lepp. But she asks that no one outside this room listen in.

All 3 women were permitted to trash me December 4, 2019 and now that conviction has been quashed. And the Crown must now, with everyone watching, decide to re-try it. But they have a problem, J Dawe was quite clear the Crown NEVERE EVEN TRIED to prove the mens rea, my state of mind, and THEN the Crown argued they did not have to do that at all. J, Dawe has now written out what they have to do to convict. And THEN he told why no one could prove my mens rea was reckless.

That charge, one of two… the other was “not guilty”… was for an iPhone post of a photo of two stacks of paper from a distance. Get out a huge TV set and a microscope and you may see some words. But no one saw them before posting it.

So, look for there victim impacts… one blames me for her mother dying confused about my motivations.

One says she barfed every time I emailed her about how much more money I got her at Council.

One is an ex-cop telling the court how she feared my name on an email asking for help. A big, bad cop is afraid of the written word.

I had to get ALL my transcripts, so I only need to publish facts with no spin at all to get my point across. All these people made up alternate facts for everything they told police. Now I just get to post them here.

Stand back and stand by.

BL20-🎄CL – Opinions… All together again

It will be gone in court for the Crown to argue “Your honour, he posted in Bob Lepp’s Opinions again!”

BL20-🎄C4d9 – His Opinions Are Back!

From the vaults come every option he has ever held.

The vaults? Every dog knows how to keep stuff safe.

BL20-🎄CL4dviii – Covid-19 History was made today, but Melania was uncovoidable!

Trump gets a Hicks-ee

A great day to be Melania, the only person in the world guaranteed not to have touched him.

BL20-🎄CL4dvii – Police wanted me silenced, not the Crown or courts

Perfecting my appeal of J. Harpur clarifies who wanted me silent and why

I have been reading the trial transcripts. Not one word describes any effects of my blog on anyone.

Yet, from the arrest May 30, 2018 to today the court has silenced me in my blogging, a Charter Right of every Canadian.

But not one word was said to the court that indicated the effect of my blog on anyone. Yet, the justices all picked the same 195 word “Term #6” to shut me up.

Why is that even possible?

Police. It is possible because police tell the Crown what to do. And if they do not do it, then, implicitly, police will not protect the Crowns from all those bad mafia guys they put in prison.

Anyone who does not believe police use a threatened withdrawal of protection to sway the courts is naiive. Of course they do.

Would you be a justice of you knew police would refuse to protect you and your family? No, you would not.

How do we stop that?

By tasking the RCMP to be the protectors of the justices. Without such protection they cannot be expected to order cops guilty or find them guilty of witness tampering, breach of trust or any number of charges only police can accumulate.

BL20-🎄CL4dvi – The Raw Publishing Power of www.boblepp.com

7 months of web activity revealed

If you do not know what these numbers indicate, do some reading.

This next one tell you most everyone uses small display screens. They have to use microscopes to see all the breaches claimed.

On Average… 6 people per day, and, I am one, your are a second…. read my blog

BL20-🎄CL4dv – If It Were Not For Trump, no one would believe me

Trump epitomizes the politician and the police in power

When such people learn no one will come after them if they lie, they lie.

And it works both ways. Police are notorious liars in court when under oath. To protect one of their own Thin Blue Line, they will say and do anything to defend the “honour” of a fellow police officer.

Politicians do the same. Once they prove to themselves they are protected by lawyers and insurance policies, they will say whatever they want to get their way.

And witnesses, once they are shown by. police that there will be no retribution, they lie to arrest me 7 times on 27 charges.

At least Trump has a feedback loop once every 4 years, and the voters will dispense with him.

But we don’t get to elect sheriffs in Canada. We are stuck with them.

There is no place to go to complain about the police. They are shielded by the OIPRD and that is just “them” investigating each other and finding perfection every time.

And so… thanks Donald!

You have opened eyes by merely being the epitomy of Presidential perfection.

My personal favourite debate question fo Trump?

Q: Will you denounce white supremacists?

Trump: Stand back and stand by!

BL20-🎄CL4div – Trump zero taxes versus YRP zero officer issues

The NYT yesterday revealed the obvious, Trump paid no income taxes

People get greedy. They get taxes reduced a lot then they shoot for zero to prove they could do it. Better to pay $143,612.98 than ZERO or $750,00

Why attract every eyeball win the world?

So, Trump paid no taxes at all in 10 of 15 years and one year he paid $750

York Regional Police claim ZERO needs to admonish a cop, 2 years out of three. Just one in 3 consecutive years.

These are rookie mistakes. Greedy. Over reaching. Just plain dumb if you are NOT trying to attract attention to your lies.

BL20-🎄CL4d🎄 – York Regional Police… if you read NOTHING else about them…. “any online media” Mass Murderer

Arrest Times: Mass Murderer – 2 days. Lepp – 2 hours

Are York Regional’s Police “biased”, or on a vendetta against me? Or are they treating me like normal, like. a normal mass murderer?

OK, you support your police. But, if you do not think they are perfect…

Read this!


Markham man pleads guilty to murdering his mother, father, sister and grandmother


Menhaz Zaman, 24, on Thursday (September 24, 2020) pleaded guilty to killing his family seen here in Facebook photos, from left: Zaman’s grandmother, Firoza Begum; his sister, Malesa Zaman; his mother, Momotaz Zaman; and his father, Moniruz Zaman.

Read in The Star: https://apple.news/AIZPVqAoPQkmjdCiaB_tSBQ

‘I’ve just slaughtered my entire family’: Markham man pleads guilty to murdering mother, father, sister, grandmother over several hours last summer

In a soft but clear voice, Zaman admitted (Sept. 24, 2020) he first murdered his mother, Momotaz Begum, 50, in their home on Castlemore Avenue at about 3 p.m. on July 27, 2019.

Zaman messaged Devonte Nicholson, a friend from Minnesota at 11:54 p.m. (July 27, 2019) through the messaging app Discord and said: “I’ve just slaughtered my entire family and will most likely spend life in jail if I manage to survive. I hope I made you laugh at one point or another. I hope you remember the good times. I will miss you all.

NEXT DAY: On July 28, 2019, Toronto police informed York Regional Police that they’d received information that someone may have “slaughtered their entire family.”

When the police arrived at the home the day after the killing, Zaman peered out from an upstairs window. 

Jul 31, 2019: Online pal of alleged Markham murderer says dad could have been saved

Author of the article:Aidan Wallace Publishing date: Jul 31, 2019  

It took police from 3 PM July 27, 2-19 until NEXT DAY to get a call from police.

“Police didn’t go there until over 15 hours,” said an online pal said, adding, “in 15 hours he could have killed so many more people. It’s very absurd.”

Back to me.

On July 14, 2017 at 11:39 am Mayor Geoffrey DAWE called police, Jeff Dawe, and he then convened a meeting at town hall. Jeff Brown briefed them all on his arrest plans and left. He drove past my house. Within an hour, the “complainant” was interviewed, and an hour later I was arrested,

2 hours, start to finish, is the service level for an email to a Thin Blue Line alumnus. Instant response.

On the evening of December 5, 2019 I blogged a photo of lawsuit showing a NAME of a woman in a letter from her lawyer threatening my wife.

By 11:00 am NEXT DAY I was arrested INSIDE a court room, incarcerated in the basement and suffered a heart attack.

I was arrested and in jail FASTER than a quadruple murderer who announced his crimes “in any online media”

Too bad none of the murdered family ever worked as a cop. The Thin Blue Line™©️ would have been on it in minutes.

I believe that is proof enough of police bias.

You?

BL20-🎄CLXx4deux – CIBC fires me!

I got a letter today from CIBC. They no longer desire my business.

CIBC “Bites the hand that feeds ’em”

CIBC-declines-my-business


I could NOT make this stuff up!

CIBC gives the existence of my bank account, and some data ILLEGALLY to lawyer Gwndolyn Adrian so her client, an ex-RBC pensioner, can garnish it. CIBC says to my complaint that they did nothing wrong.

I escalated to the Provincial OBSI banking complaints and they offered that CIBC would pay me $1,000 for doing everything perfectly, as long as I did not EVER blog or tell anyone they did everything perfectly.

I could not agree to keep CIBC’s perfection private to myself, so I cancelled my OBSI complaint, I forewent the $1,000 pay off, and I sued them for $35,000 in Small Claims and I called for the arrest of Gwendolyn Adrian.

And the CIBC Fraud Department calls that FREAID BY ME and fires me.

CIBC thinks by calling me “fraudulent” I will be embarrassed, it is a “badge of courage” to be fired by a bank

Update October 2, 2020: CIBC Counsel Nick Fitz says

The September 14, 2020 letter from CIBC that you reference speaks for itself. CIBC has never accused you of fraud. The other items you raise regarding CIBC engage the subject matter of your lawsuit against CIBC, and we will respond through our pleading in that action.

Kindly ensure you continue to only communicate with me regarding this matter, and not directly with CIBC.

Nick Fitz October 1, 2020

So, of course, since only the OTHER items are off limits, Fraud Firing is something I can ask CIBC about

BL20-🎄CLXx4i – OPINION PIECE: For a change

In my opinion, the faeces is hitting the rotating, helically inclined plane

My inbox is strangely quiet, ALL the lawyers stopped replying to all my questions and suggestions for a more efficient law suit.

2 Possible Final Outcomes – 1) No guilty charges, or, 2) 1 guilty charge

The mistakes by J, Harpur cannot be reversed, and so those charges will fall. He should have let me use a defence counsel, and he should NOT have agreed with the Crown that a Small Claims appearance by my counsel against his witness should disqualify my counsel to defend me.

Justice Rose’s decision and Probation Order will be reversed

The J. Rose decision WILL fall. The Justice NEVER asked for, nor did he obtain evidence or proof of my mens rea… my mental state on April 2, 2019. J. Rose rubber stamped the decision and the probation order passed up to him by Crown Elder. …WITHOUT showing me first.

J. Rose imposed the SAME 185 word “Not to mention” term that ALL the other judges chose.

The real problem is Crown Draft Orders and Draft Sentencing Orders

No Judge should see drafts unchallenged by the accused.

Elder can and did say WHATEVER lies he wanted about me in the drafts. He biased the judge against me, unchecked.

My mens rea MUST be proven

On appeal, Crown McCallion argued he had no obligation at all to prove my mens rea, that I KNEW I blogged a legible photo of my law suit, he argued as long as I DID THE ACT, the actus reus, that his burden was carried.

J. Dawe straightened him out, but it took 20 minutes and many repeated questions. Every criminal charge DEMANDS that the Crown PROVE the accused’s mens rea. McCallion did not know that.

Only Crowns in Newmarket think they can escape proving mens rea, For a senior Crown to CLAIM he did not KNOW he had to prove mens rea is very revealing of a lager, more institutional failure.

Police DO KNOW they should be able to prove it. BUT, even then, they did not EVER interview or video me BEFORE any arrest to nail it down. Twice, police called me to say I made an obvious mistake in a post and they let me delete it and not face new charges.

So, Cops: 1, Crown: 0

So, the Rose conviction and Probation Order must fall.

And that leaves ONLY the minor breach charge I pled guilty to March 9, 2020, For clarity, I only posted a photo of a letter Gwendolyn Adrian illegally and without provocation threatened my wife with. That she would take my wife’s money AFTER she emptied my accounts. Adrian snuck the name of her SECOND client into the letter, and that upset the client SO MUCH!

And instead of telling ME to not “transfer assets” she CHOSE to illegally contact my wife and to discuss my private legal issues with my wife.

J. Dawe made the point that it will be very tough for me to reverse a guilty plea. He says the probation order existed, with ALL its flaws, and MUST be obeyed.

Probation Orders must be legally formed

I disagree. If the Probation Order asked for an illegal action, it cannot EVER have been in effect LEGALLY. In my opinion, The illegal “Not to mention” term… the 185 canned words rubber stamped by J. Rose, was ruled on June 5, 2020 by J. Dawe to have been illegally assigned, and he struck it in the March 9, 2020 Release Order.

The premise that a justice can put ANYTHING they dream up in a probation order is flawed.

Other conditions sometimes included as part of a probation order are: 

  • report to a probation officer (sometimes every week or month);
  • not buy, carry, or drink alcohol;
  • not have or use drugs that aren’t prescribed by a doctor;
  • not have or carry any weapons (e.g. knives etc.);
  • perform community service;
  • stay away from a certain person or persons, and not go to their house or where they work;
  • not to call, text message or email a certain person or persons;
  • give money back to a victim;
  • go to counselling or rehabilitation.

“Not to mention (in bed)” is NOT a legal probation order

NONE of these is “Not to mention in any online media”… because that is a Charter Right. You are permitted to face your accusers. To know their names. To have an opinion of them and of their illegal motivations. And to publish that opinion on the New York Times front page if desired.

J. Dawe now has the tricky job of deciding how to rule on my plea reversal. He has just 2 choices:

  • Rule the illegal term still applied
  • Rule that obviously an impossible and illegal term cannot lead to a conviction on successful appeal of the underlying charges that caused the order to be created.

Murder convictions are reversible.

A most minor breach plea should be reversible.

I was NOT told or warned before pleading guilty that….

The Crown and my lawyer forgot to warn me of the repercussions of a criminal record for a Canadian… I am blocked from the rest of the world through the USA. They will refuse me entry because I have a criminal record. I was not told my job nd friends would disappear.

I was not told my wife would leave me behind as a criminal so she cam move on to retaining a legal lifestyle.

I was not told I could not possess a forearm.

I was not told my SON cannot get a firearms licence because someone in hs family has a conviction.

I was not told of the high cost of appealing a guilty plea.

What person, faced with the statement from the Crown to my family that if I did not please guilty they would keep me in prison for showing TWO WORDS in a legal document from a complainant’s OWN lawyer meant to anger me, who would NOT plead guilty?

What choice did the Crown leave me?

NONE! They left me no choice. Their STATEMENTS on December 9, 2019 that I would stay in prison unless I pled guilty.

FOR 2 words naming the person, an ex cop from Halton Region who lied twice to arrest me July 14, 2017 and August 23, 2018 And the same woman who CONCURRENTLY sued me for $1,000,000 for losing her two jobs she admits she agreed to leave after accepting cash buyouts to not sue them for firing her.

Gwendolyn Adrian filed the suit with NO EVIDENCE I was able to get her client fired twice. THEN, her client testifies IN MY TRIAL that she was not fired AT ALL. She was offered money to leave and she take it. Twice.

Adrian cannot sue me that I caused her termination, when HER CLIENT caused her OWN termination.

AND, to top it off, when I MENTIONED her by publishing her lawyer’s own letter about her…. I made no editorial comment about her or her actions.

Here is the breach letter, redacted of course so the person is not traumatized to see her name online:

I posted that letter in the evening of December 5, 2020. Adrian’s client went looking for her name and saw t and was petrified. Terrified, And ex street cop FEARED seeing her name in print.

Scopophobiascoptophobia, or ophthalmophobia is an anxiety disorder characterized by a morbid fear of being seen or stared at by others.

Allodoxaphobia. An extremely rare phobia, allodoxaphobia is used to define the fear of opinions. 

Panphobiaomniphobiapantophobia, or panophobia is a vague and persistent dread of some unknown evil.

Gelotophobia is a fear of being laughed at, a type of social phobia.

Perfectionism, in psychology, is a broad personality style characterized by a person’s concern with striving for flawlessness and perfection and is accompanied by critical self-evaluations and concerns regarding others’ evaluations.

Androphobia is defined as a fear of men. The term originated inside feminist and lesbian-feminist movements to balance the opposite term “gynophobia,” which means a fear of women.

Misandry, another term that arose from the feminist and lesbian-feminist movements, is defined as a hatred of men.

Nomophobia (short for ‘no mobile phobia’) is a word for the fear of, or anxiety caused by, not having a working mobile phone.[1][2] It has been considered a symptom or syndrome of problematic digital media use in mental health, ( I just liked this one a lot)

Logophobia or Verbophobia (from the Greek lógos, “word”) is the fear of words. This fear typically originates from childhood, where the frequency of learning new words can cause distress and dread. 

LOGOPHOBIA – the fear of words, names being words… the fear of names

Som the complainant may have a number of the above ailments. She claims perfection in Business in her old women’s support group web site and blog, She and her daughter both fear men. And drunken, horny men in particular.

So, a drunken man blogging words about her lack of perfection may have triggered her lies in an attempt to rid her eyes of seeing her own name.

But WHY would she go searching the Internet for people blogging her own name? That seems pretty odd.

Additional Conditions

The Criminal Code enables the court to require a probationer to “comply with such other reasonable conditions as the court considers desirable for securing the good conduct of the accused and for preventing a repetition of the same offence or the commission of other offences.”

Conditions of probation must:

  • detail precisely what conduct or acts are prohibited, avoiding ambiguous, uncertain or contradictory wording
  • be enforceable
  • be relevant to offence and rehabilitation, as determined by case law.

The same 185 words were ruled by J. Dawe June 5, 2020 as ambiguous, not clear, not understandable even by a justice. he struck them.

The full 185 words CANNPT be enforced since they decree acts in private between me and my family. No one can enforce that when I speak to my wife in bed.

Relevance is not maintained when media OTHER than my blog are banned. It is NOT RELEVANT that I not speak the name of a dog walking company to my son in private.

NO REHABILITATION was ordered or done.

So, the Probation order was illegal AT the outset.

I cannot be convicted of failing, WITHOUT LAWFUL REASON, to follow this probation order.

My “Lawful Reason” may well have been to prove to authorities who refuse to read my emails to read of the illegal threats to my wife.\

I have asked for the arrest of Gwendolyn Adrian. For fraud, for stealing my banking data from CIBC.

BL20-🎄CLXx4 – Perfection nears for James Ward’s charges

I await the last two trial day transcripts the crown and Michael Czuma refused to share.

Then my appeal will get scheduled for a hearing.

This conviction was for the May 30, 2018 arrest when I emailed DS Bentham and PC Brown for help. J. Harpur convicted me after he refused to permit my counsel to defence me because she had opposed the paralegal witness in court one day. NOT a legal reason to exclude her.

AFTER the Crown mixed one indictable charge, all of its evidence and biased the judge with lies to argue it. The Crown often lays extra charges like this to “mistakenly mix them up” with Summary charges so they can lie about serious offences and then they have plausible deniability of they get caught. Crown Elder did get caught. But too late to keep the lies from being heard,

Rubber Stamps are fun for kids, but are illegal for justices

AFTER a long string of other errors in the law and in his decisions. He ruled my alleged charges to go back 18 months in time when 6 is maximum. NOTHIGN happened in the 12 extra months, NOTHING.

AFTER J Harpur read out a sentencing decision written FOR HIM BY THE CROWN.

Yes, and he even failed to fFILL IN THE BLANKS LEFT BY CROWN GIORDANO.

Neither man remembered to modify the published decision and they left the blanks untouched for my son’s name and the day and time for when I could go shopping weekly under house arrest.

And of course, I asked the Crown for copies of all drafts to the judges and they:

  • Accused me of insulting them by suggesting draft orders are EVER passed unchecked to the justice.
  • In the alternative, if they DID wrote some, they refuse me copies

No, what this describes its bad faith by the Crown in not letting me see what they claimed in their draft.

Judges get lazy. Crowns know this. So, a cozy deal exists. The Crown agrees to write up what the judge is required to write in exchange for getting DONE what the Crown wants done.

They literally swap jobs, the Crown makes all the decisions in the law, the judge does nothing strenuous.

NOT all judges of course.

BUT, ALL Crowns draft orders for rubber-stamping,

BL20-🎄CLXXXyixe – PROGRESS! Toronto Judge grants me a conference to discuss theft of my pensions

Frequent readers recall me being hired by a woman whose neighbour confessed in Small Claims court October 2918 that she knew her contractor drilled up the neighbours foundations and trespassed with her new over height fence.

Well, that lady sued me for advocating on a matter of public interest… Ongoing Bylaws enforcement failures.

Her lawyer, Gwendolyn Adrian then went on to commit fraud by accepting $18,000 for work she did not do. She gave ne zero days to pay her and instead illegally garnished $4,500 of our pensions.

Then she stole my banking data at CIBC and admitted it and I have Toronto Det. Nicole Ozretic investigations fraud charges.

Then, she got an order to take me to. an examination for discovery and I told her I had a new RBC account at Aurora Branch and she should garnish that.

She and her boss, Michael Simaan refuse because her client works there for 40 years,

To DO all that Ms Adrian had to ignore that the first line of my defence said I was pleading SLAPP s. 137.1 because the suit sought ONLY to silence me,. She then lied to J. Schabas that he and she HAD argued it. he gave her $18,000 and NEVER DID hear my filed s. 137.1 which was to be heard August 26, 2019,

So, I filed an application to have the s. 137.1 heard finally after a year. When I win, everything is reversed.

AND I WON A CONFRENCE before a judge to explain all that.

Yes, Ms Adrian has chosen to let me detail in the public record how she violated Laws Society rules and the law accepting costs she did not earn.

In exchange for $4,500 of our pensions, she is willing to lose her licence…. for a day or two,

BL20-🎄CLXXXvayeayei – ANNOUNCING!: The York Regional Police Page

Det. Sgt, Bentham’s force needs a spot light, so now at the top and bottom of every page, you can use the new menu item:

Or, click HERE.

Here you will find in one neat place how since June 4, 2017 York Regional Police:

  • Protected an ex-cop by mkaing my written assault complaint of June 4, 3017 to PC Gaudet disappear
  • Assigned Jeff Brown to put my wife in tears by telling her I “have a problem with the Town of Aurora”, She orally divorces me.
  • Had Brown and others phone me saying “Do not email the Aurora Bylaws Manager, email Techa Van Leeuwen instead.”
  • Sent Brown and his partner to Aurora Town Hall to brief Mayor Dawe, CAO Nadorozny, Legal Director Tech Van Leeuwen, the ex-cop on how he would arrest me 2 hours later,
  • Sent Brown to interview the Bylaws Manager BUT NEVER checks her photo id to know who she is.
  • Since on February 27, 2020 Bentham claims NO COP knew of the ex-cop’s jobs, yet on July 24, 2017 SHE DOES NOT PROVE THE IDENTITY OR LEGAL NAME of the accuser,
  • Had Brown arrest me July 14, 2017 WITHOUT a single question,
  • Told me to contact the OIPRD to complain about Brown, not her or headquarters or Profession Standards
  • Had the OIPRD issue a whitewash after 4 hours of conversation with me,,, despite BOTH charges being false and dropped, Brown did NOTHING wrong… ie: Even if a cop falsely arrests on no evidence, he has not made a single reversible mistake,
  • Continues to manage officers to be wrong on. fully 75% of all arrests, Only 1 arrested person in 4 is convicted in Ontario. 47% of arrested people never even SEE a court room, They take peace bonds and Ms Bentham counts that as a CONVICTION.
  • Read my May 11, 2018 email to Brown and to her asking for her help with a dog attack May 10, 2018,,,, and instead of helping, assigned the most senior Detective in York Region, Det James Ward, to go CREATE a case against me for reporting the dog attack.
  • Supported Det Ward when he created a plan to make the dog park contract PKS-011-15 disappear between the dog attacker and Parks Director Allan Downey, married, who was having an intraoffice affair with his subordinate Bylaws Manager… so I would be “harassing” her if I asked her to not let her dogs attack me.
  • Tells Ward to NOT ask me a single question and do not video me after arrest, so I cannot trip him up like I did Jeff Brown
  • Again told me the OIPRD is the only place to complain, threw Ward under the bus… but the “bus” turns out to be made of marshmallows, the OIPRD now refuses ALL of my reports.
  • Assigned her friend, a paralegal, Officer of the Court (OOTC)/Cosmetics sales rep to come up with 19 more charges, starting August 23, 2018 up to and including March 4, 2020.,,,so James Ward could just type them up. Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • Bentham does NOT ask the OOTC for a photo ID before accepting her complaint about me. Just as for July 14, 2017 in the very first arrest,
  • Assigned the OOTC again a week later to complain 5 times August 31, 2018 and put me in jail over night. Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • Assigned Det, John Loughry to work with the same OOTC to arrest me on 5 MORE charges based on an email from me to Crown Elizabeth Barnier STOLEN by the OOTC December 2018. Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • Sent 2 officers to the OOTC’s house, while the OOTC was en route to Florida, to arrest me for defeating two security cameras, break, enter, dog murder by auto glycol, house repair November 2018,
  • Sent officers to the spite fence lady’s home to have me arrested for measuring how much her fence was built in trespass on Buckle’s land
  • December 2-3, 2019 trial, Ms Bentham testifies she had nothing to do with my arrests. February 27, 2020 she will be recorded claiming that this date is the first ANY OFFICER knew the ex-cop Bylaws Manager had EVER been a cop, Despite sharing the SURNAME of first police chief 1971 Bruce Crawford and current Deputy Chief Andre Crawford,
  • Despite EVERY arrest interview of the Bylaws Manager bragging about her police career, Bentham swears NO COP knew of the Crawford family name.
  • April 2, 2019 assign Det Loughry to enlarge, to blow up an iPhone photo to a 60 inch TV set in court of my $7,000,000 law suit for her pervious arrests and charge me with breach heard by J. Rose December 2-4 2019 and be appealed September 18, 2020, Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • December 6, 2019 assigns multiple officers to arrest me INSIDE Justice Haprurs court room as I was leaving for blogging a threatening letter from the Ex cop Bylaws manager to my wife saying she was going to take her money too.
  • December 6-9, 2019 I have heart attack and spend 4 days on Southlake Hospital after Bentham had officers force court records that I was sent to Lindsay Prison with all my effects. Does not tell my wife. Or son,
  • December 6, 2019 leaves my family to find my car abandoned at court, where the Crown tells then I was sent to Lindsay.
  • My family and counsel track me to the cardio ward and tries to visit.
  • Det Sgt Bentham orders guards to keep my family AND COUNSEL away from me for 26 hours,
  • MS Bentham forges police records to show I had a telephone bail hearing on hospital, and they I was sent to Lindsay prison
  • February 27, 2020 Ms Bentham is recorded in her station admitting her motivations for all of the above.,, she disliked me blogging her name complaining about poorly managing Jeff Brown.
  • March 2, 2020 assigned 4 cops to get the OOTC to make up another false charge or 3,
  • March 4, 2020 assigns John Loughry to arrest me on 3 lies from 3 OOTC”s, two of which do NOT sell cosmetics, that I can tell.
  • Calls the two lawyers PERSONALLY to solicit their statements of support for the OOTC’s fabricated lies of “speaking to her in a court room”.
  • March 4, 2020 in the midst of COVID-19 and a time of releasing convicts from prison for safety, sends me to Lindsay prison for 2 nights. Lindsay tells me this is my SECOND stay and I now get frequent incarceration points and no hand soap. Prison guards photograph my face bloodied in the very FAST and BUMPY truck ride in a stainless steel box.
  • March 6, 2020 has officers swear for my Release Hearing, I am put under house arrest and forbidden from using the internet,
  • June 5, 2020 Justice Dawe orders bail terms are illegal, strikes them from my probation order.

BL20-🎄CLXXXvayeaye – ANNOUNCING!: The Det. Sgt Bentham Page

Ms Bentham deserves a spot light, so now at the top and bottom of every page, you can use the new menu item:

Or, click HERE.

Here you will find in one neat place how since June 4, 2017 Ms Bentham:

  • Protected an ex-cop by mkaing my written assault complaint of June 4, 3017 to PC Gaudet disappear
  • Assigned Jeff Brown to put my wife in tears by telling her I “have a problem with the Town of Aurora”, She orally divorces me.
  • Had Brown and others phone me saying “Do not email the Aurora Bylaws Manager, email Techa Van Leeuwen instead.”
  • Sent Brown and his partner to Aurora Town Hall to brief Mayor Dawe, CAO Nadorozny, Legal Director Tech Van Leeuwen, the ex-cop on how he would arrest me 2 hours later,
  • Sent Brown to interview the Bylaws Manager BUT NEVER checks her photo id to know who she is.
  • Since on February 27, 2020 Bentham claims NO COP knew of the ex-cop’s jobs, yet on July 24, 2017 SHE DOES NOT PROVE THE IDENTITY OR LEGAL NAME of the accuser,
  • Had Brown arrest me July 14, 2017 WITHOUT a single question,
  • Told me to contact the OIPRD to complain about Brown, not her or headquarters or Profession Standards
  • Had the OIPRD issue a whitewash after 4 hours of conversation with me,,, despite BOTH charges being false and dropped, Brown did NOTHING wrong… ie: Even if a cop falsely arrests on no evidence, he has not made a single reversible mistake,
  • Continues to manage officers to be wrong on. fully 75% of all arrests, Only 1 arrested person in 4 is convicted in Ontario. 47% of arrested people never even SEE a court room, They take peace bonds and Ms Bentham counts that as a CONVICTION.
  • Read my May 11, 2018 email to Brown and to her asking for her help with a dog attack May 10, 2018,,,, and instead of helping, assigned the most senior Detective in York Region, Det James Ward, to go CREATE a case against me for reporting the dog attack.
  • Supported Det Ward when he created a plan to make the dog park contract PKS-011-15 disappear between the dog attacker and Parks Director Allan Downey, married, who was having an intraoffice affair with his subordinate Bylaws Manager… so I would be “harassing” her if I asked her to not let her dogs attack me.
  • Tells Ward to NOT ask me a single question and do not video me after arrest, so I cannot trip him up like I did Jeff Brown
  • Again told me the OIPRD is the only place to complain, threw Ward under the bus… but the “bus” turns out to be made of marshmallows, the OIPRD now refuses ALL of my reports.
  • Assigned her friend, a paralegal, Officer of the Court (OOTC)/Cosmetics sales rep to come up with 19 more charges, starting August 23, 2018 up to and including March 4, 2020.,,,so James Ward could just type them up. Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • Bentham does NOT ask the OOTC for a photo ID before accepting her complaint about me. Just as for July 14, 2017 in the very first arrest,
  • Assigned the OOTC again a week later to complain 5 times August 31, 2018 and put me in jail over night. Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • Assigned Det, John Loughry to work with the same OOTC to arrest me on 5 MORE charges based on an email from me to Crown Elizabeth Barnier STOLEN by the OOTC December 2018. Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • Sent 2 officers to the OOTC’s house, while the OOTC was en route to Florida, to arrest me for defeating two security cameras, break, enter, dog murder by auto glycol, house repair November 2018,
  • Sent officers to the spite fence lady’s home to have me arrested for measuring how much her fence was built in trespass on Buckle’s land\
  • December 2-3, 2019 trial, Ms Bentham testifies she had nothing to do with my arrests. February 27, 2020 she will be recorded claiming that this date is the first ANY OFFICER knew the ex-cop Bylaws Manager had EVER been a cop, Despite sharing the SURNAME of first police chief 1971 Bruce Crawford and current Deputy Chief Andre Crawford,
  • Despite EVERY arrest interview of the Bylaws Manager bragging about her police career, Bentham swears NO COP knew of the Crawford family name.
  • April 2, 2019 assign Det Loughry to enlarge, to blow up an iPhone photo to a 60 inch TV set in court of my $7,000,000 law suit for her pervious arrests and charge me with breach heard by J. Rose December 2-4 2019 and be appealed September 18, 2020, Told him to NOT ask me any questions first, add do not video me after arrested,
  • December 6, 2019 assigns multiple officers to arrest me INSIDE Justice Haprurs court room as I was leaving for blogging a threatening letter from the Ex cop Bylaws manager to my wife saying she was going to take her money too.
  • December 6-9, 2019 I have heart attack and spend 4 days on Southlake Hospital after Bentham had officers force court records that I was sent to Lindsay Prison with all my effects. Does not tell my wife. Or son,
  • December 6, 2019 leaves my family to find my car abandoned at court, where the Crown tells then I was sent to Lindsay.
  • My family and counsel track me to the cardio ward and tries to visit.
  • Det Sgt Bentham orders guards to keep my family AND COUNSEL away from me for 26 hours,
  • MS Bentham forges police records to show I had a telephone bail hearing on hospital, and they I was sent to Lindsay prison
  • February 27, 2020 Ms Bentham is recorded in her station admitting her motivations for all of the above.,, she disliked me blogging her name complaining about poorly managing Jeff Brown.
  • March 2, 2020 assigned 4 cops to get the OOTC to make up another false charge or 3,
  • March 4, 2020 assigns John Loughry to arrest me on 3 lies from 3 OOTC”s, two of which do NOT sell cosmetics, that I can tell.
  • Calls the two lawyers PERSONALLY to solicit their statements of support for the OOTC’s fabricated lies of “speaking to her in a court room”.
  • March 4, 2020 in the midst of COVID-19 and a time of releasing convicts from prison for safety, sends me to Lindsay prison for 2 nights. Lindsay tells me this is my SECOND stay and I now get frequent incarceration points and no hand soap. Prison guards photograph my face bloodied in the very FAST and BUMPY truck ride in a stainless steel box.
  • March 6, 2020 has officers swear for my Release Hearing, I am put under house arrest and forbidden from using the internet,
  • June 5, 2020 Justice Dawe orders bail terms are illegal, strikes them from probation order.

BL20-🎄CLXXXvaye – Ruth Bader Ginsburg – 1933-2020

The Diamond Standard for women litigators

If the world had more RBG, it would NOT need so many courts.

I have never seen a person who quite simply EXUDED sympathy and fairness. Just to see her was to be re-assured that Canada can amend its legal systems to be fair to its citizens. She gave me hope that one day I could convince her to take on Canada just in her spare time.

How would RBG compare to female legal minds I know personally?

Let’s do a chart for RBG and a female lawyer and a paralegal, those I have litigated against

Name/AttributeParalegal XRBGLawyer -Gwendolyn Adrian
Respected (0-10)0110
Other Jobs500
Websites Owned5+01
Undercover Informant?YesNever??
Public Mischief190yes
Awards0Innumerablenope
Sued by Lepp102
Memorable?
(0-100)
-1009990
Score of 10001500

BL20-🎄CLXXXv – September 18, 2020 – A BIG day!

aka “Your honour….May I Please Have A Do-Over?.. of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020?”

What would I have to do today to get a do-over?

Crown Loses Sobriety Test

Yesterday, I made fun of the fantastic Ms. Rivet. I feel terrible now.

Not terrible enough to apologize, no one has EVER made me feel THAT bad.

I had asked her for the privilege of paying HER to go find out A’s legal name, I had come up dry, and BOTH her lawyers refused, and police refused…. I was stuck and I HAD to call for legal assistance.

She told me to get lost and do it my own self.

Well, not in so many words… actually not is so FEW words..

Divorce records, which was her speciality, would not prove a legal name, they only prove… well, a divorce.

So, she said ask the court.

So, I did.

I filed an application to J. Dawe, who I see in Zoomcourt today, to order the simply order the Crown to verify the past and current legal name of the main person who put me in prison.

Without THIS person being rock solid, the 7 arrests and 27 charges would be a sham. If she did not LEGALLY change her name from A as married to A’ as her maiden name again that means she lied and that means NOTHING she said could be trusted. And police should not have arrested me omg her complaint August 23, 2018.

So, it would seem the Crown would or should want to prove they had another rock solid witness before J. Harpur

not so much…

Crown Westgate refused to accept that was a. real need at appeal today. He would ALLOW my application to be seen BUT he would NOT support it,

Let’s see what he refused to do:

  • Pick up phone
  • Dial phone
  • Tell Det Sgt Bentham to verify and document the ;egal name cages of since June 3, 2017
  • Go back to sleep

No, that was simply too large a burden, especially during the extra work of COVID-18.

I replied who and why that it was important to me, but he was unmoved.

So, guess what kids?

He fell for Ms Rivet’s trap. She spun a web and he stuck like velcro.

J. Dawe will hear the story of the ensnarement.

She created an admission from the Crown verifying they often prosecute when asked by police on behalf of anonymous complainants

This is how the Thin Blue Line “protects” its own, by false prosecution

They take the trust if the people and BREACH it, such a coincidence. They have been OVERWHELMING courts with bogus breach charges and now the BREACHED the public trust.

Police have weaponized Ontario’s judicial systems for their personal benefit and pleasure.

I cannot even go file an online OIPRD complaint anonymously, BUT, after verifying with my driver’s licence number I can complain an anonymous person arrested me 7 times.

‘Do yu haf papers, ja?” “Nein?” lights out

So, I sent BOTH her lawyers a simple request that THEY have a photo id copy from signup day.

I think the Law Society suggests a Driver’s Licence so you can sue the client for not paying up.

So, if both counsel swear They have copy, I am happy.

I will worry whose name is on it at the law suit. They should match.

After J. Dawe hears that. I think I can do a mic drop. 🎤⤼

Imagine now a cartoon of Snoopy doing a mic drop.

Got it?

Now, how can he NOT drop it? he has no opposable thumb.

BL20-🎄CLXXX🚢 – Making 3 Years Appeal-ing To The Audience

Friday, September 18, 2020 – Appealing J. Rose and J. Henschel convictions of December 4-9, 2019 and the Probation Order

If my “rule” works, asking for a reversal will only assure they will NOT let it happen.

My Wish For September 18, 2020

So, I insist I be left alone with my criminal records and let me retire totally defeated so my DNA sample, prints and photos live on forever! My future ancestors may want to clone me and they would NEVER think to ask for my blood now. Well… blood yes! but “sample size” no!

Listing is NOT sinking

Listing, but NOT sinking yet

So, in what sequence do I orally argue my case?

3 Years of false arrests started with an assault by A

A had police whitewash the assault with the OIPRD

B arrested me May 30, 2018

C arrested me August 23, August 3i, December 2018 ( 5 X Attempts failed), March 2, 2019, December 6, 2019, March 4, 2020

Not one charge of 17 by C was successful.

Only 1 charge by B succeeded, got a probation order with an illegal “Not to mention” term, and both are appealed today.

Both of the other convictions were breaches complained by A. Both are appealed today.

Keeping ABC on recognizance of bail terms illegally began Nov. 12, 2017 when Crown Moull stayed July 14, 2017 charges, but left “bail” in place illegally until July 14, 2019. 12 month is maximum, he went 24 months and then told Greg Elder the trick.

Crown Greg Elder kept ABC in “Term #6” ever as each charge was disposed of.

Elder’s Contempt #1 was refusing J, Fuerst in November 16, 2019 when she ordered him to drop ABC,

Elder’s contempt #2 was drafting a copy of “Term #6: for publishing by J. Rose December 4, 2019.

Elder’s contempt #3 was drafting a copy of “Term #” for publishing by J. Henschel December 6, 2019. J Fuerst had told him NO and he did it anyway.

Elder’s contempt #4 was December 4, 2019 when he forged court records and Lindsay prison records to show I had a telephone bail appearance from my Newmarket Emergency bed, and that I was sent there December 4, 5, 6, 7 2019 when I was still in Newmarket. How could I have been in HOSPITAL and at Lindsay on the sae days?

Elder’s contempt #5 was telling hospital guards from YRP to NOT let my family visit me in emergency December 4, 2019

Elder’s contempt #6 was telling hospital guards from YRP to NOT let my lawyer visit me in emergency until 26 hours had passed.

Elder’s contempt #7 was December 11, 2019 when J. Dawe ordered him to correct ABC in “Term #6: just as J. Fuerst told him in November.

Elder’s contempt #8 was March 4, 5, 6 2020 when he drafted the identical 185 words of Term #6 for J.P. Premji without telling him he had twice been ordered NOT to do so.

Elder’s contempt #9 was from May 30, 2018 to March 6, 2020 when he refused to follow the law and place a copy of orders. from J, Kenkel, J, Fuerst and J. Dawe INTO ny case paper file folder so future judiciary would NOT notice his contempt.

Elder’s contempt #10 was June 5, 2020 when J. Dawe ordered Term #6 STRUCK and he failed to go back “with consent” to change December 4, 9 and March 6 and remove and replace probation and release orders containing one or more of ABC.

Det. Sgt Bentham recorded an admission February 27, 2020 that she was upset back in 2017 that I blogged her name and that may have made her seek revenge setting 37 different officers in me,

She came out unsolicited claiming A was never known by ANY police as being an ex police officer. This lies was quickly. proven by simply reviewing the video and transcript of A on July 15, 2017 in which she related her career at Halton Region. Every video and interview has A declaring her police background. DS Bentham also KNEW the correct Dep, Chief as Andre Crawford and she knew YRP history has Chief Bruce Crawford STARTING the force in 1971. Many of Chief Crawford’s progeny work for Toronto Police and Fire. A married Strath Crawford. There may be. a family link which got her preferential treatment when I reported the assault.

Aurora’s HR Manager Sandra McKenzie was FIRST to meet with A and together they called in police. In the days that followed, multiple YRP officers called me to tell me to not email A anymore. I asserted the Charter but they persisted.

DC Brown and partner can to my wife and told her “Bob has troubles with the Town of Aurora”. she collapsed.

Both cops came to meet Mayor Dawe, CAO Nadorozny, Legal Dir. Techa Van Leeuwen and A in town Hall at 11:39 am, and DC Brown detailed his plans to arrest me that day.

ON my arrest July 14, 2017 DC Brown asserted A came as a private citizen to complain earlier that day, NOT as an employee. he said “This is NOT what Aurora wants me to do!”

112 days later, Crown David Moull was forced to agree he had no evidence of any crimes. No lawyer was required.

3 people, ABC, were allowed REPEATED kicks at my can as they returned 7 times and claimed 27 charges. Even though the previous charges were lies, police accepted more and more.

Culminating March 4, 2020 when DS Bentham assigned 5 more officers including herself to get C to make up 3 more charges. All were breaches and all were based on the contempt of Crown Greg Elder who kept naming ABC in bail terms and approving arrests when the term #6 wording could NOT be understood as eventually ruled by J. Dawe June 5, 2020.

C lied to police that 19 days EARLIER I had spoken to her in a court room witnessed by two other lawyers. Both lawyers consented to back her up, one wrote an affidavit saying heat beside her and heard nothing at all, and the other refused to wrote an affidavit. J. Dawe June 5, 2020 ruled the ONLY place I was permitted to speak to her was in that very court room.

Elder’s contempt #11 was on June 5 2020 when he failed to correct the March 6, 2020 charges, the 2 December convictions and he failed to admit his contempt to me. Frank Giordano replace him.

Elder’s contempt #12 March, 2020 was NOT coming clean to Frank Giordano about contempt’s #1 through #11.

Elder’s contempt #13 March, 2020 was NOT coming clean to Peter Westgate about contempt’s #1 through #12.

To this day NO CROWN has admitted contempts by Greg Elder. Bit even one, They all tell judges that Greg Elder acted honourably at all times.

At least 12 Crowns signed my case file. Not one has come forward to attempt to purge the contempt of Greg Elder in the smallest way.

Elder’s contempt #14 September 2020 was REFUSING to provide his PDF’s of my trial transcripts beginning June 2019 transcripts as ordered by J, Harpur to his amicus curiae Michael Czuma. This forces me to pay all over again for them. Then, I will recover those costs plus interest when I sue for wrongful arrest. This makes no sense, to pay TWICE using taxpayers money. But reduction of waste is not a job requirement in the court systems where 75% of arrests fail to convict anyone.

Contempt #1 of David Moull is his refusal to implements BILL C-75 Judicial Referral Hearings (JRH) to de-emphasize constantly expanding numbers of breaches and simplify prosecution. He simply adds a “local practice’ to NOT have JRH’s, to his list which includes “:NO Crown Pretrials for self reps.”

Illegible, illogical, vague bail terms are the “weapons of choice” for poles AND Crowns. Breach convictions make them look “efficient”. In fact, they can manufacture convictions simply be drafting nebulous terms no one can obey.

As real crime drop, police and Crowns inspire to bulk up their statistics with breaches no ne can follow to the letter because no one understands the language.

My current Probation Order Term #6 has 185 words. J. Dawe could NOT decide what it said. He struck it entirely in a subsequent Release Order, and on September 18, 2020 I hope to finally get corrections made which David Moull, Greg Elder, Frank Giordano and Peter Westgate should have consented to months back.

If any of these men had respect for the law, they would have proactively fixed the mistakes of Greg Elder. Instead, they venerate him by simply refusing to correct anything, he messed up, even when ordered by multiple Superior Court justices since November 16, 2019… TEN months ago.

They refuse to give me any evidence of collusion with police I can use in my law suit. And, making corrections unasked would be admitting defeat,.

The Crown forces the judiciary to waste THEIR time with lengthy and expensive motions, when they KNOW Elder messed up badly.

I am fortunate the Crown took this “head in the sand” approach. It proves my collusion theory. Think about it.

The only reason the Crown will not remedy Elder’s contempt on its own is to “protect” police. If, instead, the Crown were to simply fix their own mistakes to save ME the trouble of more motions, it would signify police NEVER had ANY basis for the 7 arrests.

BL20-🎄CLXXX🎄 – Gwendolyn Adrian – Get on with the show! Garnish my RBC Aurora account… CPP and OAS coming THIS month!

Proof: If there is something I don’t want to happen… I ask for it, and POOF! they won’t do it.

She knew how to “legally: garnish TD Bank.

She knew how to get a CIBC employee to tell her I opened a new account, next day she garnished it “legally” without having an account number.

So, her client worked at RBC for decades…. why does she now REFUSE to garnish RBC so we can all watch it happen?

BL20-🎄CLXXX👁👁 – Gwendolyn Adrian on the move!

So, she sees a nickel and bends over to pick it up.

I sued her client WAY BACK for lying about her fence. I was correct since she admitted it to the judge.

Anyway, my suit got “rolled up” into the BIG ONE for $7,000,000. I did not name fence lady in it then, but now I know she was a pro f the collusion bu Bylaws and Police… she will be added as an eighth million. As soon as Justice Edwards starts to hear motions again.

Gwendolyn saw a chance for $150 from me, I told her she would not qualify, and in the MIDDLE OF COVID told a judge she was in desperate financial stress and she wanted that money NOW!

I told her that the suit had been purged July 18, 2020 as abandoned after 24 months, actually it is 26 months now. She would not hear of it, because, of course, I am an unwashed self rep.

So, the judge told her off!

BL20-🎄CLXXX – Joy Hulton No Longer Head of Legal for York Region

BL20-CLXXX-Joy-Hulton-ex-Lawyer-for-York-Region-and-Police-Services-Board-Who-Blocked-Me-From-All-of

BL20-🎄CLXXX👁 – I served my time

The Crown successfully delayed ALL of my motions to suspend sentence awaiting appeal.

So, now I have served all 60 days, and, when the appeal is successful,, they owe me.

Benefits?

I made more Google Maps money in 60 days than I have in 3 years.

I had more work scheduled while incarcerated than when I was free.

Since I am too old to risk going out and getting COVID-19 anyway, the sentence had the expected impact.

I will make a lot of money for staying home as ordered.

BL20-🎄CLXX👁X- Michael Simaan – I Demand You Garnish My RBC Account

Open Letter to Boss of Lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian

You and Ms Adrian took an entire day away from me in an Examination in Execution or whatever. You belittled me from 10 am to after 2 pm asking repeatedly where I move my money.

I moved it to RBC Aurora branch. And I told the CRA to send my CPP And OAS monthly beginning with THIS month.

So, soon there winkle beaver $1,000 here for you.

I demand you now garnish RBC just as you did TD Bank and CIBC,

You declared BOTH TD and CIBC filings as legally obtained and executed,

You are now REQUIRED by the Law Scciety to continue collecting your clients winnings, You cannot stop just because I sued you.

I know you client worked for RBC for 40 years and she may not want to be embarrassed by garnishing her old employer. That does not matter.

I have it set up to track and document everything you do at RBC and therefore I can compare that to what you dud at TD and CUBC and if you changed your approach, maybe my law suits will succeed,.

So, let’s get to it. Garnish me at RBC!

BL20-🎄CLXXV👁👁👁- Why 3 People and A Company Name Should Stop My Appeal Friday

Because, the transcript will be made public and the CANLII case as an appeal will be online forever.

And every time they Google themselves, this appeal will pop up at the top of Google results, And second in those results will be the complete transcript on my blog.

And it will be factual, just the transcript and the unavoidable ruling. No editorial comments. No comments at all. No personal opinions, just pure court documents ANYONE can get and post.

The 3 Victim Impact Statements (The Company Name was not allowed one) allowed on an inappropriate guilty finding will look real funny when the underlying conviction is reversed. The death bed questioning will look a little fraudulent, but maybe that is how she wants to remember her mother… being mad at ME.

The Crown is PROVEN in contempt ALREADY by J. Dawe’s June 5, 2020 decision. Twice. He clearly explains how Greg Elder was ordered TWICE to stop including the same 185 words “not to mention A, B, C, D” in EVERY DRAFT order he passed to EVERY justice illegally.

Well, passing it was not illegal, but as soon as each justice rubber stamped the Crown’s draft terms, each breached the public’s trust in the judiciary.

Thanks to Crowns Westgate and Giordano I will immortalize in Google those who abused me in the Ontario legal systems… JUST because they could.

And every email I ever send to A, B, C AND D,,,, will be published here for eternity showing how a judge can be fooled by the Crown into believing they saw something that did not exist.

Hi Bob, I will always tell the truth. Not to worry about that. Merry Christmas
and Happy New Year.
Thank you for the gift card.
Hi Bob, thank you for everything. I am confused as to the design of the new gate. I just want to make sure we still have an airlock


Love it!!! Thank you!!!

Thank you. My husband and I said the same thing. Good cop/bad cop.

Let’s see what happens now. Monday morning should be interesting.

Hi Bob, go ahead. It looks like we finally have the town’s attention.


At this point I don’t know what to say. I am not yet in a position, health wise, where I am comfortable meeting in a professional
setting.
I think the best way to approach this now is to start seeing some work done by the town.
I think we can devise a plan, timeline and budget over email for now.
If we start with the worst areas and some of the lower cost items, I think we can calm things down. The Facebook page …It is not my temperament. I do not like conflict but I also believe in freedom of speech.
If we could please start with getting more wood chips right away. We need them inside and outside the gate area from the parking lot
to the big tree on the west side.
Then we need to worry about the removal of the dead tree in the north east corner and repair the gate right away.
We can plan for a new fencing either late in the year 2017 or as part of the 2018 budget.
We also, need to have a plan in place for next year for the paving of the parking lot.
Other items not as urgent include better lighting, drainage, a small dog area.
Users have also requested running water. Signage for Canine Commons(so you can see that is a dog park from the street). We are
currently in need of additional blue bins(way down on the list), help with weeds and grass cutting.
If timelines and budget numbers are communicated to the user community then people will see the town’s commitment to the park.
What do you think of my plan? When can we get started? I can mobilize the user community if you need bodies to assist in any
project you feel we can contribute.
I look forward to working with to create a dog park our town can be proud of.
Thank you,


I think you are saying things we all feel. I think all the town staff needs time to absorb our demands and emails. They will have areas
with budget money left over they can allocate to us. Honestly, the really important things to us do not cost the town that much.
I will send a note to Tom directly. I think he will be our most helpful person in the town. See if we can’t move this forward.
It should be a no brainer.
The one councillor who hate us (dog owners) is Evelyn Buck. She constantly puts up barriers to us getting anything at all.
I am sure that now that you have lit a fire under their arse we will see at least the bare minimum of the work done before the new year.
And now they know what we want more than ever.


I think it is a good idea. I may even do the post myself. Most of the dog park group is very quiet.

She called me. I told her no way they can close it now. To much focus on it. They would look worse than they do now.


It’s all good. Have a great night.

That’s great. We can do a lot with that.
Hi Bob,
Thank you for everything that you have done. We have renewed the communication with the town and things are progressing.
I actually asked that recognition be kept limited as I am not comfortable with publicity.
I appreciate you not putting my name in further posts.
Thank you.
Christmas 2016

Christmas 2016

Hi Bob, I will always tell the truth. Not to worry about that. Merry Christmas
and Happy New Year.
Thank you for the gift card.
The park isn’t moving. That has not been decided.
That’s enough. You don’t know what’s going on. You are merely speculating and it’s not helping now.

Here, she admits she is my conduit to the Town, through HER I can ask for improvements.

Dear Bob, there are plenty of signs. People are aware of the rules. They choose not read them or to follow them. Not my problem.
I will work with the town to see if some kind of first aid kit is in order. And what they do in other Parks around town.
If you have an issue with a town please follow the proper procedures in filling your complaints/comments.

May 10, 2018: I have reported you to the police. I have blocked you from contacting me. The fact that you have changed you email to get through to me is a cyber crime.
This email is slander and defamation of character.
I do not have a contract with the town. I am not the lead volunteer for the park. Therefore, you have no reason to contact me. Never contact me again for any reason and stop following me.
That is Public Mischief… accusing me in lies to get police to arrest me May 30, 2018

BL20-🎄CLXXVayeayeCap’n- As SIMPLE as I can make it:

J. Rose: I read your blog last night. What did you mean by saying “If there is something I don’t want to happen, I just ask for it and Poof! It’s not done!

J. Dawe:

There was NEVER a legal need for a “not to mention” term ANY TIME, especially NOT one exactly 185 words long.

Rose J. suspended the passing of sentence and placed Mr. Lepp on probation for three years. This probation order includes a term stating that Mr. Lepp is:

“Not to mention, that is speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method onsocial media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method A, B, C, D in any online media, Except in a court room or on court documents in a courtroom or through a member of the Law Society for purposes of matters before the court.”

While the record before me is not entirely clear, Rose J. appears to have copied the wording of this term from the bail recognizance that was in force against Mr. Lepp in December 2019. Mr. Lepp advised me that this term was first added to his bail in or around May 2019 in place of the earlier version that prohibited him from mentioning the listed names “in any on-line media”. I was not given any information about the circumstances that led up to Mr. Lepp’s release terms being varied in this way.

On December 11, 2019 I varied Mr. Lepp’s bail to delete references to charges and complainants that were no longer before the courts. This resulted in B and C names being removed from the terms of Mr. Lepp’s bail recognizance. However, their names remained in Rose J.’s probation order.

The second count of breaching the terms of probation is based on an allegation that on February 14, 2020, when Mr. Lepp and B were both at the Newmarket courthouse “in regards to a civil matter”, he approached her and spoke to her while the court was not in session, thereby allegedly contravening a term in his probation order that prohibits him from communicating with A, B or C.

Justice of the Peace Premji’s release order named Mr. Lepp’s wife as his surety in an amount of $15,000. The terms of release included a house arrest condition (Term 3) that required Mr. Lepp to remain in his residence at all times except when in the company of his wife or in the event he experienced a medical emergency. It also included non-contact and non- attendance terms in relation to A, B and C (Terms 4 and 5), as well as a term stating that Mr. Lepp is:

“Not to mention, that is speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method onsocial media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method A, B , C, D, in any online media, EXCEPT in a court room or on court documents in a courtroom or through a member of the Law Society for purposes of matters before the court.”

This latter term, Term 6, is identical to Term 10 of Rose J.’s probation order. Finally, Term 7 of Justice of the Peace Premji’s bail order directed that Mr. Lepp:

“… not possess or use any computers or any other device that has access to the Internet or other digital network.”

First, the Crown has already consented to substantial changes to the bail terms that were set by the Justice of the Peace, deleting the house arrest condition entirely and substantially loosening the restrictions on Mr. Lepp’s ability to use computers and the internet. As a result, Mr. Lepp’s current release order can no longer be accurately characterized as reflecting a judicial officer’s “delicate balancing of all the relevant circumstances”.12 Rather, the current terms of Mr. Lepp’s bail have effectively been set by the Crown. Accordingly, in my view, no judicial deference to these terms is warranted.

Indeed, by agreeing to eliminate or relax some of the very stringent restrictions the Justice of the Peace placed on Mr. Lepp’s liberty, the Crown is effectively acknowledging that these restrictions are no longer necessary or appropriate, if they ever were. As I see it, this opens the door to the other terms that were imposed by the Justice ofthe Peace also being judicially reassessed.

There has also been a potentially material change of circumstance, insofar as Justice of the Peace Premji releasedhis decision a week before the courts were shut down in response to

(12 St-Cloud, supra at para. 22.) the COVID-19 public health crisis. As I will explain, the COVID-19 shutdown would have made it necessary for me to reassess the severe restrictions Justice of the Peace Premji placed on Mr. Lepp’s ability to use computers and the internet (Term 7), even if the Crown had not already opened the door to judicial review of this term by agreeing to substantially vary this condition.

As noted above, Term 6 of the current release order provides that Mr. Lepp is:

“Not to mention, that is speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method onsocial media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method A, B , C, D in any online media, EXCEPT in a court room or on court documents in a courtroom or through a member of the Law Society for purposes of matters before the court.”

[38] In my view, this term is problematic in at least three different respects. First, the wording is opaque and extremely difficult to interpret. In particular, it is far from clear whether the term is meant to only restrict Mr. Lepp’s ability to“mention” the named persons and the business online, or whether the restriction is meant to apply more broadly toall uses of these names by him out of court or outside of court documents. Different aspects of the wording of Term 6 point in different directions. On the one hand, the phrase:

“… speak, write, email, post or mention in any other manner or by any method on social media, online media, video, printed blog, online blog, or otherwise mention in any other manner or by any method …” can be read as modified by the subsequent limiting expression “in any online media”, with the result that the term as a whole only applies to Mr. Lepp’s “mentioning” these names online. However, on this comparatively narrow reading of the term the complexity and breadth of the earlier phrase make little sense, as does the exception permitting Mr. Lepp to “mention” these names “in a courtroom or on court documents”. This latter exception would seem to be completely unnecessary if the term as a whole is understood as only applying to Mr. Lepp’s online communications.

[39] The reference to a “printed blog” as something apparently distinct from an “online blog” is also puzzling, since in ordinary usage a “blog” is by definition something that appears online.14

Mr. Lepp advised me that he understands Term 6 to mean that he “cannot say or write the [four] names unless he is in a court room”, and I am unable to say that his broad reading of the term is plainly wrong.

[41] Trotter J.A., one of the leading Canadian authorities on the law of bail, notes extrajudicially in his text The Law of Bail in Canada that “[t]he most important feature of conditions of release is that they must be certain. That is, they must be understandable to the accused.”15 In my view, Term 6 of Mr. Lepp’s bail utterly fails to meet this very basic threshold requirement for any proper bail condition.

A second problem with Term 6 as worded is that it includes A and B’s names, which I specifically ordered on December 11, 2019 should be removed from Mr. Lepp’s bail order because he was no longer facing any charges in which they were the complainants. Crown counsel (Greg Elder) who appeared before me on December 11, 2019 (again, not Mr. Westgate), and who opposed my order removing A and B’s names, also appeared at Mr. Lepp’s March 6, 2020 bail hearing. He presented Justice of the Peace Premji with a draft release order that re-inserted these names, without informing the Justice of the Peace that I had previously deleted them from Mr. Lepp’s previous bail. While it would have been open to Crown counsel to argue to the Justice of the Peace that there had been material changes of circumstance that allowed the Justice of the Peace to depart from my ruling and re-insert these names, he was not entitled to simply ignore my previousorder as he did.

The third and most fundamental problem with the Term 6 condition is that regardless of whether it is interpretedbroadly or narrowly, it is not carefully tailored to advance legitimate bail objectives. In Antic, supra, Wagner J. explained (at para. 67(j)):

Terms of release imposed under s. 515(4) may “only be imposed to the extent that they are necessary” to address concerns related to the statutory criteria for detention and to ensure that the accused can be released. They must not be imposed to change an accused person’s behaviour or to punish an accused person.

In Mr. Lepp’s case, the Crown has relied exclusively on the secondary ground in s. 515(10)(b) of the Criminal Code as a reason to put restrictions on his liberty. This section provides:

10. For the purposes of this section, the detention of an accused in custody is justified only on one or more of the following grounds

(b) where the detention is necessary for the protection or safety of the public, including any victim of or witness to the offence, or any person under the age of ( (15 G. Trotter, The Law of Bail in Canada, at §6.5(b)(ii).) 18 years, having regard to all the circumstances including any substantial likelihood that the accused will, if released from custody, commit a criminal offence or interfere with the administration of justice; …

Accordingly, any bail condition that is imposed on Mr. Lepp must be directed at “the protection or safety of the public” and must be demonstrably necessary to achieve these objectives. Term 6 places sweeping restrictions on Mr. Lepp’s ability to “mention” the complainants’ names, without regard to the content of his communications or to their surrounding context. As discussed above, the extent of these restrictions is unclear, since the Term 6 condition can be understood broadly as applying to all communications that take place outside a courtroom or in court documents, but can also be read more narrowly as applying only to Mr. Lepp’s communications on the internet. On either reading, however, the term captures a vast range of expressive activity that is not likely to cause any identifiable harm to anyone, including the persons named in the order. While protecting these named persons from being harassed by Mr. Lepp would be a legitimate secondary ground objective, a term that bars Mr. Lepp from simply “mentioning” their names in any and all circumstances seems on its face to be somewhat like trying to swat a fly by shooting at it with a blunderbuss. The potential overbreadth remains striking even if Term 6 is interpreted as being limited to Mr. Lepp’s online communications.

In my view, Term 6 could only be found to be “necessary for the protection or safety of the public” if there were some cogent reason for believing that no more carefully crafted restrictions could be devised that would be effective at stopping Mr. Lepp from harassing the complainants.

The evidence before me falls well short of the mark. While Mr. Lepp has been found guilty of one count ofsending “harassing telecommunications” to B, this charge was laid in May 2018, at a time when Mr. Lepp does not appear to have been facing any criminal charges or to have been subject to any bail orders. There is no evidence before me that he has ever engaged in any similar conduct after he was charged.16

The record before me also contains no evidence that Mr. Lepp has ever blogged about the complainants in a way that might raise legitimate concerns about their psychological health or personal safety. I recognize that when Rose J. sentenced Mr. Lepp for breaching the earlier version of this bail term, he described Mr. Lepp as having “engaged in a pattern of online postings, which constitute bullying” and declared that the bail term at issue had been imposed “to prevent him from online blogging in a manner which is hurtful and demeaning to A, B, C”. These conclusions may very well have been justified on the evidence that was before Rose J. However, the problem I face is that they are not supported by the record that has been put before me. To the contrary, the only specific

(16 Mr. Lepp was charged with sending harassing emails to B in July 2018, but was acquitted of this charge by Harpur J.)

information I have been given about Mr. Lepp’s blogging and other online activity is that he has “mentioned” the complainants’ names by posting documents from his civil case and other documents relating to the operations of the dog park, and once when responding to a negative “Google review” that attacked him personally. Nothing about the content of these posts as they have been described in the materials before me would appear to raise any secondary ground concerns.

Mr. Westgate argues that since any “mention” by Mr. Lepp of the complainants’ names captured by Term 6 would now also be a breach of the identically-worded term of the probation order imposed by Rose J., 

Term 6 can now be seen as directed towards preventing the commission of further criminal offences under s. 733.1 of the Code (fail to comply with a probation order). I do not accept this argument, for two main reasons. First, probationary terms, unlike terms of a bail order, can properly be crafted “to change an accused person’s behaviour or to punish an accused person”. I do not think the restrictions Antic places on including such terms in a bail order can be circumvented simply by pointing to the presence of a similar term in a probation order. Second, the existence of a “substantial likelihood that the accused will … commit a criminal offence” is only one of the factors bearing on the key question of whether a bail condition is “necessary for the protection or safety ofthe public”. In my view, conduct by Mr. Lepp that does not in and of itself pose any substantial risk of harm to the complainants or to the public will not give rise to a genuine secondary ground concern merely because it has already been prohibited by the terms of his probation. If Mr. Lepp violates these latter terms he can be charged and prosecuted for the breach whether or not the terms are duplicated in a bail order.

Mr. Westgate submitted further that if I am not satisfied that the Term 6 order as it is currently worded isproperly supportable as a bail condition, I should vary it to make it more closely resemble the term that was included in several of Mr. Lepp’s previous bail orders, which provided that he was:

Not to mention A, B, C, D, in any on-line media.

Mr. Westgate suggests that the wording of the term should be modified to specify that it includes “social media, online media, video, printed blog or online blog”.

While varying Term 6 along these lines would address some of the vagueness concerns that I discussed earlier,17 it would not deal with the more fundamental problem of overbreadth. While I appreciate that the judicial officers who previously barred Mr. Lepp from even “mentioning” the complainants’ names online likely had some reason for taking this approach, I simply do not know what this reason was. I do not know when this term was first added to Mr. Lepp’s bail conditions, who first imposed it, or why he or she did so. Moreover,

17 I remain puzzled by the proposed reference to a “printed blog” as something distinct from an “online blog”.

it is of some potential significance that this term may have been first added to Mr. Lepp’s bail at a time when he was facing much more serious charges than he now faces.18

  1. On the record before me, I am unable to conclude that a bail term with the sweeping reach the Crown proposes is justifiable under Antic as “necessary for the protection or safety of the public”. Moreover, the necessity of such a bail term as a practical matter is made even more questionable by the fact that Mr. Lepp is currently under a probation order that replicates the language of the existing Term 6. Accordingly, striking Term 6 from Mr.Lepp’s bail entirely will have no immediate impact on his permitted online activities. If the charges against Mr.Lepp to which the bail order applies are still before the courts when his probation order expires or is varied or set aside on appeal, this will in my view constitute a material change of circumstance for the purposes of St-Cloud, supra that will allow the prosecution to apply to have the terms of Mr. Lepp’s bail reviewed under s. 521 of the CodeThe Crown can then seek to present a proper evidential record to support its contention that an order prohibiting Mr. Lepp from even “mentioning” the named persons online or elsewhere is necessary for the protection or safety of the public.
  1. Accordingly, I am directing that Term 6 be struck from Mr. Lepp’s release order in its entirety.
Crown Westgate Lost Every Argument

BL20-🎄CLXX❻ – The Best Fun in The J. Rose Appeal are the 3 Victim Impact Statements

J. Rose was SUPPOSED to be shown ONLY the blog page alleged to have breached my bail.

This one:

Imagine it on a small iPhone screen.. could YOU read anything? No, of course not.

On a tiny iPhone where it was created not ONE WORD can be read. Only the microscope Greg Elder constructed revealed it, And NONE of the 3 women desired using a microscope to read it

Sad note: The 4 inch stack of paper is Aurora’s argument that I’, vexatious and I talk too much in my blog..

Instead J. Rose was shown my ENTIRE blog the night before he read his draft decision from the Crown. And he asked me questions about posts not introduced into evidence. This is illegal. Judges CANNOT look outside the evidence presented for their decision.

So, it was not surprising he asked for all 3 victim impact statements. As if all 3 of them could read their names in the photo above.

One complained her mother could read her name in that post on her deathbed and she asked her daughter when I was going to stop terrorizing her daughter by writing her name on counter suits.

Did the main complainant of the May 30, 208 arrest truthfully describe how reading her own name affected her?

No, she related that she got ill to the stomach every time I showed up in her inbox, I have published EVERY email I sent her. Not one response from her indicated her stomach condition. EVERY one thanked me for getting her $70,000 for HER business to use free daily.

Did that retching happen in person? Like the day she invited me ALONE to her home when she was considering quitting her volunteering after Jim Tree bribed her to disparage me in writing?

No, I witnessed no retching as I sat at her dining room table. And she happily played along as Mayor Tom Mrakas repeated the EXACT same bribe offer for free wood chips next day on her cell as I watched.

Did the ex-cop try to cover up her past career as Det Sgt Bentham claimed she had done onFebruary 27, 2020? No, she OPENED with her “first responder” career. This trained street cop then swore to the trauma of seeing her name on my $1 million counter suit of HER $1 million suit. She told J. Rose that seeing her name on a counter suit brought back horrible memories. I guess her lawyer had not told her one day she may read her name on a countersuit.

Why did J. Rose permit such wide ranging statements not limited to the charges?

Because he was reading the script prepared by Crown Greg Elder. And that “draft” order led him to say everything at sentencing.

Luckily for me, it is illegal for a justice to rubber stamp the words of the Crown given to him on paper. He could NOT have written 185 IDENtICAL words and commas to those of Greg Elder,

Proof? Simple… J. Rose read into the record his recognizance of bail… exactly 185 words, punctuated IDENTICALLY to the one J. Dawe ordered eliminated December 11, 2019. And it was IDENTICAL to the one J. Fuerst ordered hm to delete November 16, 2019.

By keeping that set of 185 words and getting J. Rose to read it into the record AGAIN in ANOTHER charge is all the evidence required to prove SEVERAL breaches of trust by J. Rose.

And the double contempt of Greg Elder would go on into TWO MORE courts, J. Henschel Dec. 6, 2019 and JP Premji March 6, 2020 where the same 185 words were AGAIN imposed.

So, Crown Elder had confidence. His contempt before J. Fuerst November 16, 2019 did not slow him down. Contempt before J Dawe December 11, 2019 did not slow him down, and on March 6, 2020 Greg Elder AGAIN [\passed the 185 words to JP Premji for his rubber stamped release order.

What else could possibly be needed to prove J. Rose erred in his December 4, 2019 decision in my charges?

  • A copy of the draft order from Crown Greg Elder to J. Rose December 4, 2019
  • A copy of J. Rose’s reasons for sentencing where he quotes Greg Elder’s illegal terms,
  • Transcripts showing J, Rose admitting MULTIPLE TIMES that he read my entire blog when he went outside the evidence to conduct his own private investigation.
  • The questions J. Rose asked me about my BLOG, something NOT in evidence.

What was fun was listening as J. Rose read Greg Elder’s “draft” admonishment to the three that they should not stray beyond the charge at hand in their statements.

Snoopy’s Victim Impact Statement

Then, read the transcript as he ordered me to NOT even glance or look on my accusers as they recited their life stories. I was to turn away, shut up and listen he said.

When the appeal Friday is successful, the 3 victim impacts will be published here in their entirety, and you can judge fairness for yourself.

Protected: BL20-🎄CLXXV – 2 Appeals (Rose/Henschel) To Be Heard September 18, 2020

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

BL20-🎄CLXX🏌️‍♀️ – 911

A date? or an emergency phone number?

Both, and that is called irony. because calling 911 did not stop 911.

Nor is calling 911 even a guarantee of being left alive. Just ask any of the U.S. blacks murdered by police in theist year,

At least for me, they planned only humiliation and impoverishment.

June 4, 2017 and May 30, 2017 I made the normal, safe, recommended SIMPLE of writing to the police and asking for help.

2017-06-03 0 I was assaulted by an Aurora employee June 3, 2017 at her own promotional event to woo dog owownhers ;ole me into not calling the mayor so often about her/

2017-06-04 – I wrote up the assault and handed it to PC Gaudet. He got me arrested by July 14, just 40 days to create a crime for me.

2017-07-14 – Employee makes 2 complaints

2018-05-10 – I was attacked by a dog in Aurora’s dog park. I wrote it up and emailed Council and Bylaw and all the volunteers at the park. It only took one of the volunteers who me back I was harassing her, top have me arrested by…

2018-05-30 – I am arrested on 2 counts of for harassing all the volunteers

2018-08-23 – The volunteers got a paralegal and she wrote up 4 new charges, the Aurora employee kicked in one more and Det. James Ward rubber stamped them all..

2018-08-31 – The same paralegal wrote up 5 breaches and Det Ward stamped this as well.

Score Employee 3, Paralegal 9

“MENTIONING in my law suit first page

2017-12-04 – Paralegal steals, in the my pre enquet against her, an email O sent ONLY to the Crown about her lies, and she has Det. John Loughry write up 5 more breaches based on the information I gave ONLY TO CROWN ELIZABETH BARNIER only,

Paralegal Total 14,,, Crown Moull regains his sanity and refuses to prosecute these 5

April 2, 2019 – paralegal added 2 more for 16….

2019-12-04 – paralegal added 2 more for 18….

2019-12-06 – paralegal added 2 more for 20….

2020-03–04 paralegal added 3 more for 23…. minus 5 of Dec/18 = 18

And throughout, Det Sgt Bentham assigned 37 different officers to rubber stamp what the paralegal wrote up.

She just “wound up” the paralegal and pointed her at me to make stuff up.

So my call to 911 backfired a bit

But it hit me like 911 did to the USA… changed it for the better

BL20-🎄CLXX🎄🎄🎄 – I have to contact Kramer Simaan Dhillon and Jody Johns, Lloyd’s of London adjuster, for the new lawyers’ names

I told the lawyers they gad a conflict of interest one they had me arrested. It is hardly fair that they can BOTH represent Lloyds of London against my suit AND arrest me. It took Charles Painter two police reports to get me arrested. I forgave him that one false attempt when he claimed I had “gotten close: to his client… in fact, my son did that.

So, I have waited for new names and none are forthcoming, despite J. Edwards ordering Mr Painter to use only email with me.

So, I will email Jody Johns and ask.

I will ask Michael Simaan who will litigate for her two ladies acting to sue me, I called for the arrest of Ms Adrian when she admitted stealing my CIBC bank account number,

Some fresh faces may be more willing to settle.

BL20-🎄CLXX🎄i – Open Letter to Justice Favreau and Justice Schabas

You have both acted to enable Gwendolyn Adrian to seize my pension. Then, you ordered I answer her questions to collect that $18,000 despite her not giving me one day to pay it.

She asked for my answers to all the online banking security checks, SIN, birther date, wife’s full maiden name, mothers full name and age. All of the extra password protection we set up.

I refused.

Then, she admitted how she had stolen my CIBC banking data to garnish it legally. She admitted she did not use her client’s 40 years’ of banking career in Aurora, but stopped short of naming the person. She then admitted “None of your business” stole it.

Toronto police are being offered a far bigger raise than other city workers
By Jennifer PagliaroCity Hall Bureau
Wendy GillisCrime ReporterAccording to the police association, the Toronto police board was unable to extract any major concessions during negotiations.

So I reported her to Nicole Ozretic, Toronto police detective, but her FIRST question to me was “Why not report in Aurora to YRP” and then “What is your bank account number?”. When I refused because it had no value to her investigation, she refused to investigate at all. So I emailed Mayor Tory and he advised some senior police official. Dead end.

Today, I told the Canada Pension folks to direct deposit at RBC Aurora. I opened it so I could get cash nmonethly so Ms Adrian could not take it again.

I sued CIBC and Ms Afrian’s biss Michael Simaan for failing to train her.

I will ask YRP to investigate instead. They will decline, and wil claim it is a Toronto crime.

Then I wil try the OPP and RCMP. Then I will fond someone else.

Justices, you created and enabled this mess and I ask you to fix it,

Thanks if you can.

Bob

BL20-🎄CLXX🎄 – Second and last surgery on my head

I’m amazed to have received surgery BEFORE any mental health referrals, I would have thought that should be reversed.

Anyway, the laser excised the last piece of anatomy causing the loss of the usual normal “clarity” in our day to day interactions.

Am I healed? Time will tell…. when the pain and inflammation retreat.

All I can do is promise that I will try to see both sides of everything before I make a reaction. Or even just ONE side they tell me will help guide me to. better resolution. I intend to go for “high resolution” in all the rest of y life.

Wish me luck. I am doing my best here,

BL20-🎄CLXX2 – Google says” 3 ways brands can continue to comfort consumers in the ‘new normal'”

CANADA

Behzad Ghotb/August 2020Share

Companies should stay empathetic right now, and plan experiences that help comfort today’s nervous consumers. Behzad Ghotb, consumer research and insights lead at Google Canada, sheds light on ways brands can respond to how consumers are feeling now.

With economies now open across Canada, many marketers are eager for data that sheds light on what the “new normal” may look like for consumers. The future remains to be seen, but recent research shows that this summer, consumer behaviour shifted. The way people shop — and feel about shopping — has changed.

Marketers need to recognize the sentiment and adapt campaigns to address current needs, or risk an experience that falls flat — or worse — offends.

Consumers are feeling nervous. They’re still feeling concerned about their health, safety, and their finances. They’re still turning to contactless experiences like delivery and curbside pickup.

Marketers need to recognize the sentiment and adapt campaigns to address current needs, or risk an experience that falls flat — or worse — offends.

The consumer mindset has changed

Many consumers are returning to old habits. In Canada, in-store shopping has increased throughout the summer, with 75% of Canadians surveyed saying they are shopping for the majority of their needs in-store.1 This is exciting news and many businesses are eager to welcome customers back to the pre-pandemic experiences of dining in restaurants, heading to attractions, wandering aisles, or filling fitting rooms with clothes to try on.

However, that old carefree consumer isn’t back just yet.

  • Many shoppers are anxious: 29% of Canadian consumers say they’re nervous about shopping in stores,2 and 42% say shopping in person is more stressful than shopping online.3
  • They’ve picked up new online habits: Over half of consumers globally discovered at least one form of online shopping — like purchasing products online or through smartphone apps, ordering items online and picking them up in stores—and claim they plan to continue.4
  • Shoppers are still making fewer trips and are looking for online solutions: 73% say they are consolidating their shopping trips,5 and 56% think buying online and picking up in-store/curbside will be a beneficial way for them to shop even when there are no restrictions.6

Recognizing the shopper mindset has changed — and may continue to change — is critical.

As the consumer mindset changes, marketers must:

in-article (2).jpg

Recognize many shoppers feel vulnerable and are looking for options

A marketer’s first order of business should be to address today’s challenges, brought on by COVID-19. People’s feelings have changed and so should the experience you deliver.

Trying to upsell isn’t as important as offering them an experience that meets their needs. Customers don’t want to hear “look what you need”— they want to hear “we recognize your needs and we’re here to help you.” Research shows 65% of consumers say that how brands behave now will have a “huge impact” on what they will buy in the future after the COVID-19 crisis subsides.7

At the start of the summer season, Dairy Queen (DQ) and their agency partner denstu xquickly shifted DQ’s traditional messaging from trying to drive in-store to reminding customers that they have options. Instead of “visit a DQ now,” they shifted messaging and video end cards with voiceovers highlighting access options like takeout, delivery and drive-through. They also adapted their online to offline strategy to include local campaigns, so customers could easily understand how their local DQ was adapting to the current situation.

Comfort consumers before trying to ’wow’ them

Think about experience and all of the barriers along the way. Are there ways to address them? Tell them how you made them safer. They need to hear another voice, grounded in values of caring and empathy. Let them know their health is more important to you than their wallet.

Early on during the pandemic, adidas adapted its digital marketing efforts to highlight how their products are supporting “staycations” and activities like home workouts, nature hikes, and days spent with the kids. The brand also built an at-home workout community #hometeam, featuring video workouts, inspiring stories from professional athletes, and curated collections of adidas workout gear. This summer, as restrictions eased in many places and sports teams began to play again, their “Ready for Sports” video series has continued to reassure and encourage people to return to sports at their own pace and focus on personal training and goals.

Solve for the range of emotions they feel

Consumer behaviour is part of a larger picture, and must be assessed in relation to how customers are feeling — even if those emotions aren’t positive. It’s essential that marketers realize that consumer comfort levels have changed.

Marketers need to ask what consumers are feeling and respond accordingly. Keep an eye on the pulse of both consumer behaviour and feelings, and land on messaging that feels right for their brand right now, and for their customers

Behzad-headshot_.jpg

Behzad Ghotb

Consumer Research and Insights ManagerGoogle Canada

BL20-🎄CLXX👁 – Street View – Google’s COVID-19 Solution

What happens when 295,000 people want a nice pub in Cookstown?

They find my photos in Street View….

Decent response

and there are more in that range…

Google Maps is what EVERYONE uses to find new places to visit.

OK, not QUITE everyone!

BL20-🎄CLXX -Let me understand this… teachers claimed they had to buy their own supplies

and now suddenly they have enough money to protect children from COVID-19?

what did I miss??