February 23 – Case Conference with Lawyer Bob Aaron and Torstar

What both defendants are ignoring is Mr. Aaron’s article about Tina Duncan’s spite fence in which he stated he researched everything in Newmarket court files. This is/was a Toronto Court case.

He claims he just saw some unspecified materials on the case in some unnamed legal journal and he found it interesting. He went on to disparage me for stepping in to help single female Marnee, who is now seen as the victor in the FAILED law suit.

To recap J. Papageorgiou –

[4]               Buckles obtained some assistance from an advocate, the defendant Robert Lepp (“Lepp”).

d.      The proceeding was not as complex as commercial litigation but had many different claims and components, as well as a messy procedural history and evidentiary record. Duncan’s affidavit had 104 exhibits and spanned 3 volumes totaling nearly 1,300 pages.

[29]           However, this claim cannot succeed for the following reasons.

[39]           In my view, Buckles is the successful party in this litigation and presumptively entitled to her costs.

[36]           The main issue in this litigation was with respect to the defamation claim. The majority of the Statement of Claim and efforts in respect of the summary judgment motion were in respect of this issue, although there were also claims of nuisance, trespass, invasion of privacy and the claim for a declaration of property interests. I do not view Duncan’s claim for a declaration over her property rights a significant a part of the claim, and the fact that it has been rendered moot both parties moving does not mean that she was successful in that claim in any event.

[42]           Given all of the circumstances, I view Buckles’ claim for partial indemnity costs of the motion in the amount of $20,532.40 and her partial indemnity costs of the action in the amount of $11,280.12 fair and reasonable.

c.      Duncan claimed $81,412.50 as well as various declarations and has recovered nothing.

e.      Duncan escalated costs and duration of the proceeding through several step

Next, he also completely ignored Tina’s confessions in Small Claims and my email stating that Justice PAPAGEORGIOU ordered Tina to pay Marnee Buckles $31,000+ for building the spite fence and then suing Marnee and me for calling it what it was. Why would he not at least publish an update to show his initial article was based on the assumptions he found in Newmarket case files.

Knowing he was sued for miss-stating that the Plaintiff was correct and I was wrong should have encouraged him to find the truth. He did not.


So, on February 23, 2022, Torstar will move for dismissal of my suit as having no basis in fact. The simple fact that Ms. Duncan lost $31,000 and has collected zero indicates the Newmarket case Mr. Aaron reported is NOT the case litigated in TORONTO COURT.

Law Society of Ontario Employees 646 people

Conservatively, assuming just $50,000 per year, or $25 per hour, per person…. over $32,000,000 is required from YOUR legal expenses JUST to support all the people who license lawyers. At a more realistic $100,000 per year that is $64,000,000 in sunk costs.

Need you ask why you pay a lawyer $200-500 per hour to litigate for you?

Narcissism – Trumpism exists in Aurora as well

To be Trump is to be a pathological narcissist with all of its weaknesses and flaws. It is a valid mental illness.

The interesting trait is the desire for revenge when the narcissist feels wronged… they strike out.

So, when an ex-cop who has spent years masquerading as an internet “Business Expert” to vulnerable woman looking to run a business is finally caught out assaulting me, she went on the attack to prove she is simply the best person in the world.

Lots of interesting articles gives in depth information on the disease: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=narcissism&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safari_group=2

The common message is that narcissists go to extreme lengths when “challenged” or accused of something negative. They go for the jugular out of revenge, and to prove they are superior to their accusers. They do not care about anyone else’s feelings while doing it.

Such a narcissist had me arrested, using her police connections, 7 times on her own and using others as proxies. She did not care about the feelings and legal liabilities of the people she used against me. Ines Donato feels that today, she did not think what would happen when given the idea she could get me arrested for being within 500 meters of her school. On her own, she trespassed me from my own house. When challenged, she claims the Separate School Board trespassed me.

Tina Duncan in her Small Claims defense of Marnee Buckles’ suit did not consider her problems in advance when given the idea she could sue for libel. A judge awarded Marnee $31,000 which Tina must eventually pay.

Both women believed the boasts that I could be sued, arrested, fined, even jailed successfully without repercussions.

Aurora has put its lawyers behind her for free even Aurora had terminated her 8 months earlier. They must feel tremendous guilt and so they made sure Lloyd’s of London was doing its best to defend the actions taken on their behalf. Aurora claims everything was done “in the line of duty”, so they are picking up the tab for a lawyer even when my suit came almost a year after her termination “without cause” and does not claim anything about a Bylaws infraction.

Only a narcissist would believe that “terminated without cause” means literally that when EVERYONE knows it means “fired, but paid off in cash not to sue”.

Later this month the courts will decide whether I can add Ines and Tina to my suit. What interests me is this… why would Aurora OPPOSE adding ANYONE? Would it not dilute the blame on them?

Would it not mean two more lawyers to help out?

Why would Aurora oppose adding defendants to my suit? If they did nothing wrong, why are they spending a fortune on lawyers to keep me from a trial?

Aurora/Crawford Claim “Too much evidence” from Lepp

Regional Senior Justice Edwards made a ruling to hear my motion to add Tina and Ines as defendants in my suit. Aurora/Crawford filed an appeal of that decision, which was “in the middle of litigation” and so it is an “interlocutory appeal”… “of an order in the middle of a case not yet decided”. Aurora wants an appeals court to reverse RSJ Edwards and NOT permit me to do ANYTHING with my suit because they refused to accept costs from me.

Aurora and Crawford and Duncan ALL refused to accept payment of $125,000 in costs awarded to them. SOOOOOOOO! they refused my payments plan, and THEN lied to the court that I had not even TRIED to pay them. That is lying to the court.

As licensees of the Law Society of Ontario, they are writing to and swearing to lies to an appeals court that I did NOT TWICE make formal written offers to pay them all back.

Aurora THEN claimed that the most senior justice in Ontario’s largest sector is incompetent and ignorant of the law… AND… that he is biased towards getting me a successful decision. And on top, a lot of other very specific failings in character, knowledge and understanding. I don’t think Aurora liked the way RSJ Edwards parks his car. Or his haircut.

I jumped to support the courts. I filed a very detailed response to the appeal, saying there is no way it should succeed since RSJ Edwards is simply the best. And I provided documentary proof that Aurora’s mayor Geoffrey Dawe arrested me.

Well. Aurora now says I submitted TOO MUCH PROOF and they want ALL my evidence excluded IN ITS ENTIRETY…. all of it, they say, should be held back from the appeals court.

They do not ask for my submissions to be pared back to 30 pages. NO! They want the first, the middle and last 30 pages DELETED.

From the outset “LEPP! SHUT THE EFF UP!” about everything. Even about the proof Aurora/Crawford arrested me 7 times.

Just like Mayor Phyllis Morris… shut Lepp up using the courts and THEN lie to get the taxpayers to pay for the lawyers.

What goes around… comes back around… when you are running in circles. And thou shall be called big wheels.

Small Claims Bails On Pension Seizure

In a long-awaited decision J. Pikkov ruled Tina could legally garnish my pension and freeze my bank account totally. He referred to my suit to get our CPP and OAS returned was a collateral attack on the underlying J. Schabas order awarding $16,000 after refusing to hear S. 137.1 SLAPP. I cannot agree it is a collateral attack, I just asked for my pension funds back since they were illegally seized. J. Pikkov also suggests TD did not have to determine the courses of funds in my bank when seized. This is a major error in the law.

He stated only a “Garmishment Hearing” can deal with garnishment errors.

This was to be expected… Newmarket court is particularly biased against self-represented persons. J. Pikkov chose to site the volume of my materials as a negative to my claim. This is odd because both Ms Adrian and Mr Painter specialize in voluminous filings.

Most troubling is his order that Small Claims has no jurisdiction over theft of our pensions. The bank account garnishment law is clear… no social benefits may be seized.


Ontario clearly states how Small Claims works…..


If believe you are owed money for the return of personal property, you can sue that person or business in Small Claims Court for $35,000 or less. For anything over $35,000, you need to go to the Superior Court of Justice.


Costs for the TD motion to dismiss my claim are to be settled between the parties, but the parties have consistently refused to accept payment terms. So the quantum of costs is relatively unimportant.

More for Mandie and Allan

Upcoming is my motion to dismiss Mandie’s $950,000 suit for lack of any valid claim NOT admitted as a lie already by Mandie in my trial and hearings.

Once issued, the order will name every AURORA participant in the justice’s summary of the issues in my motion.

Geoffrey, Mandie, Allan, Doug, Sandra… all will be immortalized, just as was Tina Duncan on February 2, 2020. Following.

I have made a formal offer to settle with Mandie but I know I will not even get a reply.

So, if you or a loved one is named in the motion, CANLII will record the resultant orders forever in perpetuity for use by other lawyers in other matters. Now is your time to advise Ms Adrian of your feelings towards that fact.

More for Bob Aaron

If it was not clear enough, if a seasoned lawyer had actually researched “Duncan v. Buckles and Lepp”, THEN published it, THEN been challenged as to its authenticity…. he would have searched again by now to make sure he found every case law entry in CANLII.

He should have found Tina’s $31,000 costs award to Ms. Buckles on February 2, 2021 by now.

And since that loss was huge in that the justice declared she had no chance of success and there were no merits to the suit… he should have considered a follow-up article.

Such an article is all I asked for… interview me… then write whatever you want.

The Star has refused a follow-up article. It would not be sued if it did a follow-up. I do not want to limit the press, I just want fairness.

But, on February 2021 Tina lost big time in a “default judgment” she herself asked for.

Now, that February 2, 2021 admonishment is case law for me to refer to in Crawford/Eddie v. Lepp.

Me: “Your honour, just as it was ruled that there was no basis in fact for Tina Duncan’s suit against me, there are also no merits to her friend Mandie’s $950,000 suit either.”

And so her suit will end in the same fashion with a justice reading J. Papageorgiou.


Open Letter To Bob Aaron, Toronto Star Columnist

Dear Mr. Aaron,

Your paper has published a number of articles about me:



This Next One Was Written By You – you swear, on October 20, 2020


And I asked the Star to interview me, and then to publish whatever they wanted about me, and they refused, so I sued you both in Small Claims. The article stated that you researched it ALL in Newmarket Court. Which is impossible of course because Ms Duncan sued me in Toronto court.

But you know all that. What you MAYBE do not know is that NINE months EARLIER… January 2020, Tina Duncan had to pay her neighbour $31,000 for suing her and then abandoning the suit.


YES! Tina Duncan Was Ordered by J. Papageorgiou To Pay her Neighbour, Marnee Buckles, $31,000 For Building a Spite Fence, Suing Her When Called Out, Then Abandoning The Suit

So, I was thinking, maybe you could NOW interview me and report whatever you want about me.

It’s all up to you to make this right.

And keep an eye on the space. Mandie sued me for $950,000 and abandoned it too. Let’s see what happens when I move for dismissal.

Toronto Public Health recommends a Catholic school in Etobicoke dismiss in-person learning as it reports eight new COVID-19 cases on Friday evening.

Can God and the Pope and all those priests not strike some fear into their followers at all?


Need a bag? Leave a bag!… Use B.O.B… Bob Offers Bags…aka “Trash Averaging” and “Bags On Bags” January 1, 2022

Coming soon! Three bags a pickup are free, $5 each after 3… so, a new web page lets you report you are putting out 1 or 2, so that a neighbour needing a tag can simply use your boulevard instead. Then, you have a right to leave a bag at his house when you have been real trashy. Everyone saves because we pay enough taxes already and a bag tax is absurd. Supported by voluntary donations.

Put Out 3 Bags This January!

On your first trash pickup of 2022, put out the maximum 3 bags with 50 pounds in each for the maximum 150 pounds. Each 2 weeks, we Aurorans pay for about 65,000 50 pound bags at about 22,000 homes at 3 bags each. That ‘s 3.25 million pounds of trash. Aurora says the average cost is $5 each, or about $325,000 every two weeks which we know without checking is an absurd amount. SO… Aurora is trying to make a PROFIT on trash day.

If all 22,000 homes are ALLOWED 3 bags EVERY SECOND week, that means the budget is 26 x 65,000 x $5 = $8,450,000/year. For trash.

So, we put out the 65,000 50 pound bags, and then we see how Aurora responds. It’s like chess.

Either, they are FINE… and they budgeted enough for 65,000 50 pound bags 26 times per year… OR, they are NOT fine and have to pay a lot EXTRA to pay for 3 bags each.

So, if the new rule is “3 bags full sir”, and yet they did NOT budget for 3 bags full from every home then they lied to us. If they DID budget for 3 bags full, then they OVER budgeted by a LOT… either way, they are screwed as far as honesty goes.

Think how unfair this is. I am single and struggle to fill a bag every second pickup. A family of 4 with a basement apartment with 3 more means 7 people are limited to the same 3 bags as me. I can fill up all of the 35 gallons of trash for one person, the 7 people in the rental home each can fill up one jerry can of trash every two weeks.

Catholic School Full Of Priests In Training

Next: Timeline for Our Lady of Grace Principal Ines Donato to call for my arrest along with the others.

Aurora claims I am “associated” with evil “bloggers” who criticize Aurora Councillors. This is so much better than being “associated” with the Catholic church.

If you flunk out as a priest, you can always sweep the floors, but one should not be “sweeping”
9 year old girls off their feet.

Analysis: Number of police reports made by or referenced by for each person

FEBRUARY 2017 – Mandie Executes a Trial of Removing ALL “No Parking Signs” in front of Our Lady of Grace School and in YRT Bus Stop #1208

Later she will write out and swear to police that she NEVER met principal Ines Donato. Meanwhile, my Probation Officer calls me and tells me Ines and the “other women” have all gone to police to have me arretsed for trespass in the bus stop #1208 off scholl property.


MARCH 2020 – Mandie admits false arrests, then writes, swears and signs that she does NOT KNOW Principal Ines Donato. Claims my probation order includes orders to not “mention” her name… which was DELETED by Justice Fuerst November 16, 2019 and by Justice Dawe December 11, 2019, and Justice Dawe cited Crown Elder for contempt of both judges in his bail review May 22 2020.

Note that she seems quite proud that her false charges were “stayed”. As if that meant they had some validity. She knows from her police career that a “stay” happens when the Crown cannot make its case. It then REQUIRES the Crown to to reactivate charges within ONE YEAR. There was no evidence.


How could Ms. Crawford plan and execute covering over every No Parking sign without consulting on SAFETY with the principal? Think about that. Mandie just covers over all the signs and sits back and watches what happened, and we are supposed to believe she never spoke to the principal?

Mandie’s name had been removed from Recognizances and bail terms since November 16, 2019. A second order from J. Dawe came December 11, 2019. And yet, 3 MONTHS later, Mandie is going to police to arrest me for blogging her name.

Google Maps Offers Best Advertising Bang For The Buck


July 14, 2017 he is arrested. As the report details, police THEN asked him his side of the story. He has never been questioned BEFORE an arrest

Sandra McKenzie, Pat De Sario complain about Bob Lepp July 13, 2017


Mandie Crawford, defended today by PMLaw’s Charles Painter paid by town’s liability insurance reported for assault on Bob Lepp June 3, 2017


Mandie inspected/approved Tina Duncan’s fence – Fall 2017, BOTH woman used Kramer Simaan Dhillon lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian to sue Bob for $1,100,000 combined

Tina Duncan ordered to pay Marnee Buckles over $31,000


Imagine, a person with a CV as strong as this claiming losing a job because she was caught not selling pet tags for $350,000 annually. Certainly, the best businesswoman in Calgary could easily have known to read her job description and the Pets Bylaw where it names the QUOTE “Bylaws Manager” as the one responsible for the entire pet tag program. Surely a comment by me could not dislodge a person with such skills.

1st Mandie Crawford Peace Bond Motion Dismissed out of hand, 2nd rejected, cited lack of PHYSICAL injury… mental stress/harassment rejected as POSSIBLE causes for a Peace Bond … MUST BE A PHYSICAL HARM THREAT. So forget a PB for say, publishing nude photos of an old girlfriend. Or constant phone calls or uninvited visits. Or written threats to my family. Or Daria’s taunting emails to my wife. Or sending couriers to my son’s house with voluminous court documents.

Bylaws Manager is explicitly named as responsible for ALL tag sales
The Actual Bylaw follows for you to browse.

Crown Giordano, who has been “behind” several false arrests, today came out of the chute dressed for bear, he immediately said the 6 months limitation in criminal charges applies to my peace bond application. He fell right into the trap. Now the Crown cannot claim my May 30, 3018 arrest and J Harpur’s trial could NOT have legally tried me for alleged acts BEYOND 6 months. Police and the Crown did not have any alleged acts in the 6 months prior on May 30, 2018. SO the entire trial was based on an illegal charge now CONFIRMED by Crown Giordano himself.

If Newmarket insists on running a court in this manner, it has to be consistent. I hope.

To make matters worse for Crown Giordano, he misled the JP. He told the JP that the “six months” back on a summary charge applied to a peace bond. It does not.

What is a Peace Bond?From https://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/files/guides/guide-peace-bond-EN.pdf

A peace bond is a court order that requires another person to “keep the peace and be of good behaviour” and obey conditions such as not to contact you or your children or to come near your property. The peace bond can be in place for up to one year. The person who enters into a peace bond does not receive a criminal record. However, if one of the conditions imposed is breached, the person may be charged with a criminal offence.

A peace bond is NOT a restraining order. Restraining Orders are obtained through the Family Court for married, separated, divorced or common-law couples. A peace bond Information is NOT an Information alleging that another person has committed a criminal act. That is a different process.

So, lets see where r=that takes us!

Thanks to all who played along this time.


Here is all you need to read about prisons in Ontario and their use of Solitary Confinement…



Here is What We Know:



J. Goldstein knew that and STILL sent me inside. And, I spent 16 of 21 days in “Administrative Segregation” for which Ontario JUST spent $30,000,000 through Koskie Minsky LLP.

The Court reluctantly sentenced me to 21 days for contempt of J. Favreau, who ordered… “No more lies, no more defamation, just cut it right out NOW!”

In recognition that my new criminal law firm needs to recover from the murder in their offices last week, I have not yet sued or filed an appeal. I have waited several days, 5, so that my anger would not be so readily apparent

The Most Liberating Experience Of My Life

I took over 200 pages of handwritten notes using stubby pencils. Dated. Timed. Detailed.

You can tell the MTEDC is out of control BEFORE you enter. They point to the bottle of hand sanitizer bolted to the wall and say “Clean your hands!”. You follow their order precisely, BUT it is empty. The hand sanitizer is gone. Then, inside, they gang up 8 or 9 guards and talk you out of reporting symptoms. They quarantined me for 14 days, and when I did not die, they moved me to the open population.

They posted the current COVID guidelines from the Solicitor General… dated June 2020. Last year. Nothing more recent… it tells inmates: “There is no vaccine.” I get a copy for myself.

Then another court was petitioned by Tina Duncan claiming that what I blogged AFTER the order of J. Favreau were lies. That SECOND court, despite being shown NOT even a single quoted lie and the truth behind it… a SECOND COURT found me guilty. Then that second court recused itself saying it “saw something it should not have seen.”

So, a THIRD COURT then read out its sentencing order. But, it had chosen the draft of an order dreamed up by Tina Duncan and Mandie Crawford, instead.

There are many “tells” as I recall, several places where he seemed unfamiliar with his own next sentence. He would then stop, frown, stutter, ignore footnotes… and ultimately, he would unbelievably…

EXTEND his sentence a full 50% in the last minute of the appearance.

To analogize, a brain surgeon says to the Inquiry: “I had 12 leads attached to his cortex, fully 11 were giving a red warning on the display panel, but that 12th one was just bright green. So, I may not know what caused the 11 bad signals, but I KNOW I am sure as heck that I am going to cut at the green lead.

Or, the Westjet pilot: “Welcome to direct flight 911, Vancouver to Honolulu. We are just finishing up the pre-takeoff checklist. The left engine is all in the green. We have 11 red lights on the right engine, but there is a bright green light says “Engine Started” so get ready to get lei’d! We’re pushing on!

The Court who sentenced me had been told I was 72, obese, had hypertension, gout and the other usual senior’s ailments requiring 11 pills a day. He had considered that statement for many weeks as he formulated his sentence. Balancing punishment with basic consideration for life.

He was kind enough to voice his concerns: “I would have liked to see you agreeably provide exact details for the reason for taking each of the 11 pills…. you know?… to make sure you’re not likely to die in 21 days of prison. I would listen to the name of each disease, the dosage, your physical state, then I would apply my expert knowledge of geriatric medicine for old people like you, and then I would have all the data I need to sentence you.”

“But you declined to provide the PRECISE and extensive details of your medical ailments. So, I tried, I really tried, and I tried to impress on you how important personal medical details are to a court like mine and to the other client Ms. Adrian represents. You did not sign an affidavit. So, I shall presume you have made up the whole story about the 11 pills and 11 illnesses and I am putting you in a building full of young anti-vaxxers, people who are not EVEN PERMITTED to wear masks.

Yes, the court wavered, it admitted it did not have adequate knowledge of my health, it preferred more, and it sent me to Metro East anyway.

Justices talk to people every day who have been inside MTEDC. The prisons are controlled by the Solicitor General. Powerful people. And so, justices KNOW… THIS COURT KNEW FULL WELL THAT…..

No one in the open population of Metro Toronto East Detention Centre wears a mask

And if you snuck one in like I did, you get it taken away from you. Ask a nurse for more?: EWe do npot supply masks to inmates.

So, on balance, the court did right putting me there since it wants me dead anyway.

The Court added 50% MORE sentence AFTER he read the sentence he had written.

Ms Adrian, in her draft sentencing order, called for “21 days” in prison. Everyone gets a 1/3 reduction, 7 days, for good behaviour. So you serve 14 of a 21 day sentence.

Unless you are 72, take 11 pills or more, of unclear medical history, obese… 2 stents, THEN YOU GET TO SERVE ALL 21 and it does not matter one iota that you may have been unruly for all 21 days. NOTHING keeps you past 21 though.

The Prison Doctor, Dr. Kerr, overrides my medication details

The highlight of this prison is its single septgenarian doctor. He has my detailed list of all 11 bottles I brought in. He tells me I cannot have them. He says “I will decide what medications you get in here.”

So, he ordered up 11 pills that HE liked for me, had a nurse bring them each morning and say: “Dr. Kerr says you are to either take all 11 in front of me now, or I will return the pills to Dr. Kerr.”

I had been forced each day to make a decision, “Take them all and live, or take none and die.” So I took 11 pills, 4 of which are for blood pressure. I knew my heart would be overcome by their combined effects and I would suffer. But, I would live.

Then, my Doctor prescribed daily blood pressure monitoring, take it 3 times 5 minutes apart and select the lowest to report to him. I asked for daily assessment of my pressure, even if just once per day. The prison has a BP moinitor with a Label saying “DAILY ASSESSMENT” on it. I saw it only once.

Of 21 days where they were asked by me each day for a BP, I got the following:

DateOut of Cell 2.0 Hrs?Shower?
Clean Clothes?
Blood Pressure
August 17Solitary ConfinementNo
18Solitary ConfinementNo
19Solitary ConfinementNo
20Solitary ConfinementNo
23Solitary ConfinementNo
24Solitary ConfinementNo187/107
25Solitary ConfinementNo
26 Solitary ConfinementNoalleged faked “suicide, still did not get a doctor
27YesNoLawyer sends letter of medical concern
28Solitary ConfinementNo97/71
29Solitary ConfinementNo186/93
30YesNoDr. Kerr asks me to refute my lawyer’s complaints in detail.
I refuse, he gets revenge…
heforges a Sergeant’s signature claiming
puts me in the Psych Range
31Solitary ConfinementNoPsych range 175/94
Sept. 1Solitary ConfinementNoOpen Population, no masks permitted
2YesNoOpen Population, no masks permitted
3Solitary ConfinementNo170/98 (cuff backwards)
Open Population, no masks permitted
4Solitary ConfinementNo189/101 (cuff backwards)
Open Population, no masks permitted
5Solitary ConfinementNoOpen Population, no masks permitted
6Solitary ConfinementNoOpen Population, no masks permitted
Totals5 times (20%) YES, 21 times NO (80%)None7 BP in 21 days, 33%, 6 days NO MASK PERMITTED