Last update: 10:10 PM
Back in December of 2018, 2 of the 26 criminal charges the gang of 5 brought against me were decided in a trial before Justice Rose. He found me guilty 50% of the time. He gave quite a detailed decision which provides an insight into the legal minds in Ontario courts.
By law, one can report fairly on a criminal trial with no fear of libel or slander. Professor Emma Carver of the prestigious U. of Toronto Law School proved this in my suit of Bob Aaron who unfairly reported on PART of a case.
So, the alleged crimes were “breaches of recognizance”… i.e. allegedly doing what I had promised not to do. In my case of course, as all the charges were, they claimed in my blog I could not blog a picture of my lawsuit against the part of the gang of 5 I could identify at the time. I made up a blog post to demonstrate that I took the correct legal action against the crime of perjury, i.e. lying to a police officer to effect an investigation, or lying to effect an arrest. One cannot simply make up stories to get another person arrested. But the gang had done that on several occasions. One involved the construction of a spite fence in trespass on the neighbour’s land. The builder claimed in her suit and in her calls for arrest of yours truly that she had done nothing wrong building her fence. She swore and her lawyer AGREED that she made no errors at all building the spite fence.
Then, of course, she was given a chance to show off in court. She was asked by her own lawyer questions which clarified her knowledge at the time of drilling the fence holes. To that question she replied she KNEW the holes were not on her land because she described digging out the neighbour’s foundation rocks as a souvenir.
So, that is perjury, saying one thing sworn in one legal document and saying the exact opposite in a court room after being sworn in to tell the truth.
Now, police should arrest people for perjury, it’s an offence in the Criminal Code:
Criminal Code – R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46 (Section 131)
131 (1) Subject to subsection (3), every one commits perjury who, with intent to mislead, makes before a person who is authorized by law to permit it to be made before him a false statement under oath or solemn affirmation, by affidavit, solemn declaration or deposition or orally, knowing that the statement is false.
(1.1) Subject to subsection (3), every person who gives evidence under subsection 46(2) of the Canada Evidence Act, or gives evidence or a statement pursuant to an order made under section 22.2 of the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, commits perjury who, with intent to mislead, makes a false statement knowing that it is false, whether or not the false statement was made under oath or solemn affirmation in accordance with subsection (1), so long as the false statement was made in accordance with any formalities required by the law of the place outside Canada in which the person is virtually present or heard.
So, the builder had her lawyer write out and swear to a lawsuit claiming she built on her own land and then later she testified she KNEW she had not built on her own land.
My lawsuit claims the gang of 3, soon to be the gang of five, committed perjury and should have been arrested but were not. Instead of criminal charges, I can get them to pay me money for breaking the law criminally.
But how do courts get it wrong? How do the make mistakes? How do they correct their mistakes?
Welcome to Appeals Court of Ontario where the real smart justices work. They take a second look at other justices’ work and they decide if that justice got it wrong. This all takes time, but in the end they tend to get it right.
So, December 4, 2018 Justice Raise in Newmarket heard the evidence of the Crown, police and me. He make a decision and write it out for all to read and it is in the public domain. He found me guilty of one breach and innocent of another.. but it was close on the second one as well.
As a public service aid, I have turned his decision into a pair of tables to demonstrate how one justice can mess up and another 3 can fix it.
Again, the charges were blogging photos of names of people I was not supposed to name in any “online media”. Now, some of those names were not even supposed to be in my recognizance since they had no outstanding complaints about me. Senior Regional Justice Fuerst told Crown Elder on November 16, 2018 that he must stop naming them. But he continued and in fact he made up a 72 word term he repeated Rome and tinge again even though ordered not to do so by two Superior Court Justices… Fuerst and Dawe.
Here is the first table which pulls out the criteria J. Rose applied.
The next table looks at the decision form a different angle:
So, I appealed the decision of J. Rose and sure enough, he was wrong. Every guilty filing MUST prove “mens rea”, the guilty mind. J. Rose did not hear ANY evidence of my “mens read” backup no cop asked name a single question before my arrest. Therefore, no cop asked me “So why did you do this?”. And so, they had no proof that I knew what I did would break a law. They MUST prove I KNEW my actions were reassign a law and I did it anyway.
Here is the fun part of the trial. As if by magic, the gang had written up “Victim Impact Statements” to be read into the record. They had them ready just in case I was found guilty. So, they were asked to read them and they did. I was told NOT too look at them as they read them. So much for the right too face your accusers in court. NO, you cannot.
Recall the crime… blogging and showing a photo from 3 feet away of the first page of a legal document in the public domain… and imagine the “impact” of that on these women. THEIR names, on a lawsuit, being shown to Aurorans. Oh, the horror!
But they took the time to look inwards and to carefully describe how it felt to see their names in my blog.
Keep in mind that J. Rose had it wrong. They could read the effects of the “impact” my blog had on them. But they would never be asked to take it all back because no crime had been committed against them.
So, here they are… Impacts which were imagined by people who had no right to refer to them as “impacts”. Not one of the three apologized after the court corrected its error. Not one of them wrote or spoke to me to say they overreacted to seeing their names on a lawsuit served to their lawyers.
No lawyer of theirs apologized on their behalf.
Let me paraphrase instead. The exact text is in the transcript of the decision being read.
One said she was victim of non-stop bullying. And her name was soiled by being displayed on a lawsuit. That I had unsubstantiated disillusions. The process exhausted her. She lost time. She suffered financially, emotionally, psychologically by the online display of her name on my lawsuit. She had been attacked and harassed. She installed a full camera security system in her HOME and in her office (she left out that they are one and the same.) … recall that my alleged crime was blogging page one of my lawsuit. What her security cameras did for her is unknown because when she later called police to come to her home and claimed I killed her dog inside her home, they did not capture my image breaking into her home. Odd. She lost sleep. Had headaches. Muscle pain. AND major SURGERY! because she saw her name “intentionally displayed” on my lawsuit. She perceived a “power imbalance” when she saw her name. I gave her mother “vicarious trauma” and she died. The photo made her feel sad and scared. Unsafe. She wants “remedial programs” for people like her who had to read her name in a photo of a lawsuit. She wants “professional development programs” to assist how negatively such bullying affects….”. She was humiliated. She hurt professionally and personally.
By reading her name in a tiny photo in my blog.
Gang member two had a similar theme.
She cited being a long time volunteer for Aurora. She cited me for helping her when she got sick. But then she claimed I used her illness to gain support for an improved dog park. She used it for sympathy in court, but since I used it to get her a new dog park, I am an evil person. I sued her illness as a “weapon”, her quote. Now, realize the crime I was convicted off at that moment was blogging a photo of page one of my lawsuit. And that became a “weapon” against her. Even when she found it hard to focus, she met with Allan Downey as she had since 2007 with nothing to show of it until 2016 when I helped her. She goes on… she found comfort from her illness at the dog park. The same one I got replaced. It comforted her when it was a muddy dump though. “other members off the voluntary committee” asked her that I stop working for a new dog park. She said I went to the park just to bother her. I guess she failed to see my two 70 pound dogs. She installed a security system as well in her home. Again, how that would stop seeing her name on my lawsuit I cannot imagine. She said I should be punished accordingly.
Number 3 was the most descriptive. Of herself. It began with her resume of various jobs. She described various awards she had won. In “public service” as Bylaws manager she protected the health and safety of townspeople. She cited me for quoting her own blog posts. She tells about how she got the cops to call me and warn me not to email her about dogs and parks. She did not like that I blogged how she lost $350,000 every year by bit selling pet tags like the Bylaw required her to do. (Interesting side not: Techa Van Leeuwen rewrote the bylaw so that that the Director must sell the pet tags, not the manager.) She claimed my emails affected her “employment”. (Note: Her boss testified for me under oath that the town could not afford a full time person, then paid out her contract so she could go home. Her draft then show her listing her “awards” from a consumer magazine, a service club, the “Southern Alberta Flood Medal”… (Note: “Fire chiefs from the Foothills region of Alberta created a medal for those who went “above and beyond” during the floods.” see: https://calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/cochrane-firefighters-honoured-for-flood-work) it was NOT a provincial medal. It was from fire chiefs thanking fire fighters. She claims I said she did not receive these awards… I said the awards are not worded by her to accurately reflect what they are. She went on to call on Justice Rose to “BEGIN the process of “righting the wrongs that have continued to date”…. recall that the charge was blogging a photo of my lawsuit page one. She said I made her unemployable. Admittedly she did not know that Aurora ITSELF would hire her back to design a very prestigious web site when she testified to that fact. And she signed off by asking the COURT to “find a way to stop the bully”. As if courts are not busy enough.
So then, Justice Rose was told by the 3 justices of the Court of Appeal of Ontario he had gotten it all wrong and his decision had many flaws.
So, there was NO impact on any of them.
Did I get to read my victim impact for being falsely arrested, confined and sentenced?
No, I only get to sue them for money. Which is ok by me. But they committed the crime of perjury.
Emma Carver, U.of T. Law Professor, convinces court that no research is required in writing an article for the Star.
Yes, I lost again. J. Jose filed an astonishingly harsh rebuke of my claim that Torstar had 5 writers trash me in multiple publications. Even when I asked only for a telephone interview, with or without publication, Emma Carver, Torstar’s lawyer, who teaches law around Investigative Journalism, told the court that Bob Aaron did not need to double check even one word of the documents he claims to have read in Newmarket court.
Mr. Aaron, for his part, let Ms Carver speak for him and not once did he file any materials on his own. Such is the fellowship of the Law Society of Ontario, that Ms Carver did all his work and then he gets costs from me. J. Jose ignored the fact Ms Carver did all the work and Mr. Aaron makes money on his article.
I had cited the J Papagergiou decision in Duncan V. Buckles. He was the only justice to read every document in the case file. He came to the conclusion you can read online at CANLII.com, see: Tina Jayne Duncan v. Marnee Buckles, 2021 ONSC 291 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jdh4l>, $31,812.50 awarded after a detailed accounting of the legal mistakes made by Ms Adrian, counsel for Ms Duncan.
Now, you have to know that since the matter has ended, I can now file a complaint that Mr. Aaron uses cover of being a journalist for all these years to enhance the size of his practice. In turn, the LSO will state that they do not control how lawyers spend their free time. And his sole practitioner business is referred to as “WE” in his web site. The LSO publishes “rules” for licensees, aka those who pay the membership fee, and one of them is that the size of the firm cannot be exaggerated in print.
When two lawyers took my retainers and ran, the Law Society responded officially to my official complaint by stating the Society does not control the rates lawyers charge. And so my $2,000 retainers were retained…. I should have guessed that from the name of the mandatory payment. The LSO would say that the lawyers simply charged $2,000 to retain the $2,000 retainer.
I got one $2,000 retainer back ONLY by embarrassing her to her new bosses, the partners in the firm that hired her. At no time had she responded to the multiple texts, emails and voicemails I left. Then, she needed money, I suppose, so she went back to work at a new firm and finally returned the cash… without interest of course. By then, her partners got an understanding of what she had done. Does that worry a lawyer? Of course not. Maximizing revenues and maximizing the trust funds makes one money. So that is what they do.
Take It From A Loser… How Not To Sue For Defamation
The Libel and Slander Act sets out the legal requirements for suing a person for what he wrote in a blog or email, i.e. any “broadcast” using wire or optical fibres. Posting to a blog requires a lot of broadcasting. An email uses lots of different wires and fibre links.
The law requires that anyone slighted in print, whether on paper or glass, must first “personally” (just like an actual lawsuit) serve the writer a notice of defamation. And they must do it quickly, within 6 weeks of the alleged defamation coming to the attention of the complainant. That notice is to set out exactly what words were published that is defamatory. The purpose of the notice is to permit the alleged bad actor to correct his words, apologize for the confusion and move on. Legal solutions are avoided.
If the problem is not resolved, the offended party must then sue within “3 months” of the publication coming into the person’s view. 3 31 day months or 3 28 day months are not specified
In the $millon suit against me, there was a bypass of the rules, and so, instead of a “Notice”, I was instead served only a Plaintiff’s Claim. So eager was the lawyer that she failed to follow the law. As many others have tried, the creation of a law suit without the advance notice is a non-starter.
The trouble for her is that she knew that rule when filing suit for Ms Duncan. I got the Notice alleging lies and I made sure I only published the truth from court documents so I was “saved” from the laws.
The only “advance” notice I got was 3 months earlier in the form of an arrest by Det. James Ward on August 23, 2018 under section 301 of the criminal code. FYI, s. 301 was ruled unconstitutional in 1995 in Ontario. He had failed to charge me with something the Crown could win, BUT the Crown accepted the charges for prosecution ANYWAY. So the charge was simply “amended” to s. 302 and THEN SRJ Fuerst suggested in her way that the Crown was out of line, and so, on November 16, 2019 Crown Elder had the charges withdrawn. The same stolen emails were given to police as “evidence”. It is rare that a person complains to police and proves it by stealing emails from the mayors of BOTH Aurora and Erin.
How was it that I was arrested by a person on stolen emails, and then the same person sued me for $1,000,000 before the charges were even shown a court room?
Long ago, 1980 is the one I chose to cite, the courts ruled clearly that a defamation suit without giving the perp an advanced chance to make amends for free is simply NOT a viable suit and it is dismissed upon request. With costs. The moral? People can make mistakes. Say “oops!” and move on.
Punch Line: “In short, unless notice is given in accordance with s. 5(1), no claim is subsequently maintainable.”
Frisina v. Southam Press Ltd. et al., 1980 CanLII 1749 (ON SC), <https://canlii.ca/t/g1b0k>
In his decision, Robins J., wrote at Para 4:
“The first question to be answered is whether the plaintiff is entitled to amend his statement of claim to include a claim for alleged libels in respect of which he did not give the notice provided for in s. 5(1) of the Libel and Slander Act. The next question, assuming s. 5(1) is not a bar, is whether the claim is barred in any event at this stage by the limitation period of s. 6 of the Libel and Slander Act or whether special circumstances exist to permit the amendment.
Sections 5(1) and 6 of the Libel and Slander Act read:
6. An action for a libel in a newspaper or in a broadcast shall be commenced within three months after the libel has come to the knowledge of the person defamed, but, where such an action is brought within that period, the action may include a claim for any other libel against the plaintiff by the defendant in the same newspaper or the same broadcasting station within a period of one year before the commencement of the action.
In my view the plaintiff’s failure to comply with s. 5(1) is fatal to his application to amend. The section is clearly mandatory — written notice must be given within six weeks of the alleged libel coming to the plaintiff’s knowledge or no action lies. The Court is nowhere empowered, on my reading of the Libel and Slander Act, to relieve against or excuse non- compliance with the notice requirements. Notice is a condition precedent to the bringing of the action and want of notice constitutes a bar to the action:
(Citations then included to…)
b) Leslie v. Telegram Publishing Co. Ltd., 1954 CanLII 350 (ON SC),  O.W.N. 122,  3 D.L.R. 317 (Ont. H.C.) [affirmed ibid., p. 300 O.W.N., p. 320 D.L.R.; affirmed 1956 CanLII 23 (SCC),  S.C.R. 871, 5 D.L.R. (2d) 384], and
c) Trottier v. John Blunt Publications, Ltd. et al.,  O.W.N. 678 (Ont. H.C.). (no citation link found)
The fact that the plaintiff seeks to add a claim for earlier related alleged libels to an existing properly-constituted libel action cannot cure the failure to provide the required statutory notice. The amendment sets up additional causes of action based on the alleged defamatory material in the earlier publications and, just as lack of notice would preclude the assertion of such claims by way of separate writ of summons, so also it precludes their assertion by way of amendment to an existing action.”
In short, unless notice is given in accordance with s. 5(1), no claim is subsequently maintainable.
So, standby! See how I lose this one and get hit with a boomerang summary judgement and an order to pay the $1,000,000!
May 25, 2022 – Deadline to submit Arguments To Add Tina Duncan and Ines Donato to Suit
Today I must serve a 15 page Factum outlining the facts for J. Edwards. Then, on May 12 I will argue based on those facts.
When I sued December 2018, it was not obvious how people were involved and why they got involved.
A few facts are very unusual.
Only women accused me of anything prior to accusations from Aurora counsel Charles Painter and York’s counsel Barry Stork. But they accused me of procedural issues, generally, except for March 4, 2021 when then they joined Jaclyn SOLOMON to have me arrested for allegedly speaking to Jaclyn inside an active court room.
My bail terms stated I could only speak to her inside a court room or through a Law Society licensee. So, I spoke to Barry Stork inside a court room and Jaclyn accused me of speaking to her. She told two stories. In each, the justice had just closed my session and I had walked out. In both versions, I walked PAST her and then turned to speak to Barry Stork. Barry heard no words. Charles Painter was facing forward still, organizing documents, and he swears he saw me look over my shoulder and speak to Jaclyn. This is an absurd testimony. I am supposedly BESIDE HIM, yet Jaclyn said I had passed BY her. I cannot be in both places so one of them lied.
Crown Greg Elder dropped the case 2 weeks before trial. I had paid my defence counsel for a trial plan.
So, today they get all the reasons Tina and Ines helped out Mayor Dawe to keep me silenced with improper recognizances of bail.
Ant May 12 you can come to 50 Eagle to watch.
York Regional Police Fabricated Evidence
Do ya think? 7 times they arrested me with fabricated evidence.
Det. James Ward, the most senior, took great care to counsel Helen Clarke to disavow her signed contract, telling her: ”If you received no cash, then you did NOT sign a legal contract. It was just ”a memo of understanding”.
Not once did any of 38 different detectives ask me a single question. there was ZERO investigation to every one of 7 arrests, 26 charges…. 23 were declared false by the court system and were dropped. the last 3 are in the Court of Appeals awaiting a hearing.
Det. Ward told her what to say in court, how to deflect any questions that she signed a contract agreeing to not operate her lucrative dog walking business in any town park…. while all along she ran her business there.
Parks Director Downey told council that the dog park was ”fixed”. Today, he may tell us that Canine Commons is still owned by the Committee and not by Aurora.
The thing is… he had lawyers write up the contract so that the “volunteer”s agreed to manage all aspects, including responding to my email advising them of a child bit by a dog. Helen had me arrested for emailing her that story.
So, cops create false evidence every day since only 25% of all arrests result in a conviction. The rest of the “criminals” have their charges dropped before any trial, or, the trial resulted in an innocent finding.
How can the chief of YRP keep a straight face when he tells reporters he takes such things as fabricated evidence seriously?
I reported my 7 arrests to internal affairs…. they found that all 7 arrests were righteous. Yhey said that they were all legitimate.
38 detectives wasted a lot of time on ”legitimate” arrests when not one minute of investigation was undertaken.
A Reminder Why Mandie Started All This
In 2016, Allan Downey refused multiple polite requests to correct deficiencies at the dog park Aurora claimed was its own. While he was the ONLY person who remembered that the dog park was BUILT by volunteers with just $10,000 donated by Aurora Animal Clinic, the dog catcher at the time.
Mr. Downey had conned the volunteers into getting the money with promises of a sign thanking the Clinic and a ribbon cutting ceremony…. and then HE built the fence backwards on swamp land stolen from the Conservation Authority.
Then, he dumped hundreds of tons of scrap wood from an ice storm on it….
THAT was Allan Downey’s idea of a safe park for 7,000 dogs paying at least $150,000 a year for dog tags. He took the money and did nothing for the taxpayers in return.
That changed ONLY when I advocated for a new park and got $72,000 ordered from his budget to replace them park. It was gutted, levelled, and a new backwards fence was built by Parks employees. A fence post installer did the posts, NOT set in concrete as the bylaws require.
It did not even have a SIGN when I began, and then I embarrassed Mr. Downey into building this one…
What then happened was Mandie helped her new best pal Allan by getting me arrested using Helen Clarke, the SOLE volunteer, who was then permitted to operate her dog walking business unfettered in the park.
I sued Mandie, I sued Helen. I used the court in a legal fashion.
They had police and Crown Prosecutor Greg Elder tale “care” of me. 7 arrests, 26 charges… 23 of them false.
Mandie sued me for $950,000 claiming I lost her two jobs for her when she testified at MY trial that she accepted cash to leave BOTH Aurora and Erin agreeably just months apart in 2018. Now, she sews quilts. Her lawyer, Gwendolyn Adrian of Kramer, Simaan, Dhillon refused service of my counter claim, saying “my client did not approve accepting your suit.” That is NOT how it works. Lawyers are SUPPOSED to act in her best interest and were required to accept, but I had to have Justice Archibald in Toronto court admonish her on the record… only THEN she accepted it.
I sued Aurora, YORK REGION, police, their Board, Mandie Helen and Jaclyn Solomon. Now I am adding Principal Ines Donato and Tina Duncan. $1,000,000 each.
I have lost cash, my wife, my house, my dog. All due to Mandie.
This week, Mandie had her lawyer Charles Painter claim moving trucks removed all my goods. Then she had him lie…
I represent a creditor with a Writ of Seizure and Sale, and my understanding is that there are several others with Writs in place.Charles Painter to Real Estate Agent
Nothing Much Has Changed At Town Hall
Toronto Star Lawyer Emma Carver Defends Defamation Suit in failed Tina Duncan suit article by Lawyer Bob Aaron
On April 5, 2022, lawyer Bob Aaron and the Toronto Star are in Newmarket Small Claims court “charged” with defamation in Mr. Aaron’s article about Tina Duncan.
The Star pleads that Mr. Aaron, who they assure me is just a “freelance writer”, in his very regular bi-weekly column chose to open his story with 2 defamatory words and the WRONG COURT in just ONE sentence.
The case had not ENDED at all until Tina Duncan was found to have attempted to fool the court by counterclaiming a few dollars for fence remove/replace when Marnee Buckles moved for dismissal of the suit for a complete failure to litigate the suit.
Tina Jayne Duncan was then ordered to pay Marnee Buckles the sum of $31,812.50.
In his order, J. Papageorgiou characterized ME as…
Here is where it gets interesting from my perspective. Bob Aaron has been practicing law since 1972. He wrote an article based on Newmarket courts documents…”A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Newmarket provides a compelling lesson…”
J. Papagergiou looked instead at TORONTO documents because that is where Tina filed suit. Yes, she was required to file in Newmarket, but she did not.
That justice had access to more documents than Mr Aaron so he got me figured out correctly.
I was HIRED by Marnee Buckles and his honour saw that in the documents so he knew I had been offered money to advocate, a word similar to what lawyers do every day.
Mr Aaron chose to ignore that fact and he said I “interfered”, meaning, I was NOT ASKED TO HELP MARNEE. So, it appears Mr Aaron wanted people to think I was NOT ASKED TO HELP so that he could blame me for helping Marnee.
Then, he published that the case had ENDED. It most certainly had not.
Tina Jayne Duncan paid Marnee Buckles $31,812 because his honour determined she had sued Marnee and had NEVER litigated it. She never took it to trial.
Here we come to another interesting point.
Tina Jayne Duncan’s lawyer, Gwendolyn Adrian, wanted ONLY to sue me, to appease Aurora perhaps, and so she decided all she need do is finish me off and walk away without a trial for Marnee because she is female. A lawyer cannot file suit and then do nothing to get it tried.
Ms Adrian knew she would be hit with the huge costs Marnee had incurred. So, she filed a counter claim that Marnee had not paid Tina $1,412 to remove the fence so her gas line could be inspected. (She had )
J. Papageprgiou wrote:
e. Duncan escalated costs and duration of the proceeding through several steps. Duncan brought the motion in February 2019 and then after it was fully briefed, she did not pursue it for over a year until Buckles threatened to bring a motion for a declaration that it had been abandoned. Thereafter Duncan chose to only proceed with the claim for $1,412.50. In my view, it is a reasonable inference that Duncan realized her claim had no merit after she received Buckles’ response to the summary judgment motion. In my view, continuing with the claim for $1,412.50, which was so unimportant it had never even been specifically pleaded, was a strategic step taken to try to achieve some success to avoid paying the costs of the summary judgment motion. Buckles proposed that it be heard in writing, but Duncan again drove up costs by insisting on an oral hearing.J. PSCJ Papageorgiou – January 14, 2021
“a strategic step taken to try to achieve some success to avoid paying the costs of the summary judgment motion. “… means she faked a move to try to look like she was pursuing the suit when she was not.
Back to Mr. Aaron… he read the wrong court, did not fact check, did not properly analyze what he read and he defamed me.
As did the other 4 Star reporters. They published only what they were given and ALSO did not fact check.
So, April 5, IN PERSON IN NEWMARKET COURT, J. Jose will decide whether to dismiss my suit for lack of any case.
Bob Aaron is letting Star’s counsel, Ms. Emma Carver, Law Professor at U of T law, represent him in this matter. He has not filed anything himself except a defense. Ms. Carver teaches a course in law for this kind of matter.
Mr Aaron wrote another article about a trespassing fence, again by about 3-5 inches… https://www.aaron.ca/badly-placed-fences-make-angry-neighbours/
Tina also built a fence in trespass as she stated in Small Claims Court.2018-10-29-Tina-Duncan-Confesses-Small-Claims-Court-Transcript-images-annotated
The court can of course dismiss it, for any resason it wishes. But it won’t pass the Appeals Court.
To: My Frequent Viewer (MFV), 8 times yesterday alone…
She likes to stay current with my opinions in case she disagrees with one. So she stops by daily and more depending on how much the last post impressed her.
So, beginning today, I will ONLY post ten minutes AFTER she stops in. She will be forced to be a full day behind all the news.
So, now I wait for her, her last look was 9 minutes ago at 9:55 am.
Yesterday morning, she looked every hour, so I expect her to warm up her VPN out of Kansas and stop by again. THEN, I will post… but not BEFORE she visits.
Torstar Libel Suit – No Other Newspaper Covered Tina Duncan’s suit
Gwendolyn Adrian, Tina’s and Mandies’ shared contingency lawyer, took time to update the press. Or her clients did it on their own. Either way. Torstar and its newspapers decided to publish every article they were given. Amanda Persico, Teresa Latchford, Lisa Queen, Alexandra Heck, Lawyer Bob Aaron…. they all published articles on which they did absolutely NO investigation. Without even trying to phone me or email me, they published what they were given verbatim.
The Globe and Mail, The National Post, Toronto Sun, London Free Press, Orangeville Banner, Newmarket Today…. not even ONE of them contributed an article. Not even the Hamilton Spectator, where Mandie published hundreds of advertorials, carried articles about me. Only the Aurora Banner and the Erin Advocate picked up this “breaking news” from Toronto Civil Court.
There is no doubt why…. Gwendolyn wanted only to embarrass and harass me and my family with the local community where Aurora’s purchase of large volumes of ad space gave it the clout to get the stories published.
I know the rest had no interest because I have sent dozens of “leads” to all the major news outlets, print and TV. Not one has ever replied.
I have always thought an article on a 72 year old arrested 7 times by 5 women all connected by Mandie would be very popular. After all, how many police forces permit one person to come back over and over with more false arrest claims? York Regional Police, and Det. Sgt. Heather Bentham in particular, never once refused a new “complaint” from those who had lied to her before. And in the Newmarket courts, Greg Elder never once refused to prosecute and name Mandie in bail terms even though 21 charges failed and SRJ Fuerst and Justice Dawe ordered him NOT to name Mandie at all in my bail. How much “pull” does one need to have to get numerous unfounded lies turned into 7 arrests with the same Detective Sargeant and the same Crown Prosecutor?
OTOH how LITTLE management is there of Ms. Bentham and Mr. Elder? Surely their managers must have caught on to multiple failures in my arrests and prosecutions? Apparently not, because 21 charges were found to be falsely laid. 5 arrests never resulted in ANYTHING in court. They just cost me huge amounts of time, money, and a wife and a house.
And at the provincial level, no agency or MPP cared to hear about the obvious abuses. The Judicial Commission whitewashed all complaints about specific abuses by J. Harpur and J. Kenkel.
Newmarket’s justices refused to even HEAR my private prosecution motions for bringing the 4 ladies into court to address their false police report and video recorded testimony. Toronto police refused to investigate Ms. Adrian for obtaining my private banking information through an informer at CIBC.
So, my offer of a story of corruption at all levels of police, courts and the Law Society get no bidders, but Mandie is able to get “coverage” of her collateral attack lawsuit even AFTER my arrest using the identical evidence was tossed out by the Senior Regional Justice.
Was or IS she connected? Or did all these others just take an immediate dislike to me and they cooperated with her to extend my pain.
We will find out soon in Superior Court. Is Mandie’s “pull” strong enough to stop me from adding Tina and Principal Donato to my lawsuit? WIll Senior Regional Justice Edwards even permit me to move for amending my claim to add them?
Does the Catholic church have the ability to quash the call by Ines Donato for my arrest for living in my own house within her self-proclaimed 500-meter radius exclusion zone? If they can quash institutional deaths of hundreds of indigenous school children and the diddling of thousands of altar boys, they can certainly spring Ines loose. The USA had 4,000 priests charged alone in 50 years. French clergy sexually abused ‘over 200,000 children’ since 1950.
So much abuse and so little help. Story of our lives.
How Worried is the Ex-Mayor That It is Documented in Police Notebooks That He Called For My Arrest July 14, 2017?
Ex-Mayor Geoffrey Dawe did not like my blog. Not at all. He did not like me speaking at Council. He had me ejected for a slide that began “Mandies’ trials…” of open parking at the curb in front of all schools in Aurora. He jumped to the conclusion I was referencing the CRIMINAL TRIALS Mandie had put me through.
Councillor Thompson piped up with “These charges (of Bob Lepp by Mandie Crawford) were NOT an issue for the Town… (Youtube: https://youtu.be/osEveTNb_iA )
It struck me as I read Twitter updates from Mr. Dawe that he rarely mentions me anymore. He has an opinion or two DAILY, today it was the “Poo Tin” which amused him) which I assume he feels the world needs to hear, and yet not ONCE has he lamented it may have been a mistake for him to have voted YES to my arrest that day.
When he was first elected, he had to apologize for Mayor Morris who got caught getting rid of HER blogging critics the old-fashioned way with an illicit “private” lawsuit funded by taxpayers (but one wherein SHE would exclusively enjoy ALL of the costs awards.)
Ex-Mayor (beaten by Mrakas to boot) Dawe did not Tweet his apologies then as he would today. Twitter had been around for 5 years at least and he knew NOT to carve his apologies into the rock of time. Twitter never forgets, especially when third parties save EVERY tweet every day for posterity, and for resale.
Instead, he was ordered to write and speak apologies as described herein:
Following his motion to bring that to the fore, Councillor Michael Thompson said it is Council’s role to “represent the public, to maintain the integrity and ensure the accountability of operations of the municipality.” This accountability, he said, extends to standing up to the consequences of decisions made by the municipality, whether or not they were made during their term of office.
Michael Thompson eventually saw HIS mistake to vote to pay Morris’ lawyers. Then, he got all moral on us and demanded that incoming Mayor Dawe must apologize for a soundly defeated Mayor Morris.
Today, would he demand that Mayor Mrakas apologize for Dawe’s decision to trust Mandie’s claim that she could keep me silenced forever in 7 criminal arrests by conning her police friends and abusing the courts?
I hope so, now that Principal Ines Donato and Tina Duncan are up for inclusion in my suit. When Michael Thompson finally opens his eyes and figures out that all of these 4 women were conscripted to be a part of the plan to keep me silenced.Council-issues-apology-to-sued-bloggers-The-Auroran-httpwww.newspapers-online
Conning Torstar Media Group – using the press to embarrass your enemies
6 Star reporters in 3 markets wrote 7 articles alleging illegal acts by me, and not once did they interview me or even ask a single question of me. The articles were in Erin, Aurora and Toronto. They remain online today. And there is no explanation forthcoming how 6 reporters ALL got told about me and the fence.
But of most interest to me, and possibly to Torstar’s lawyers is this…. how and why did Alexandra Heck suddenly become aware of Mandie’s $950K suit 17 months AFTER she stopped working there? She wrote:
And WHO would tell Ms. Heck how it was that the $108,000 Bylaws Manager job in Aurora, managing 18 people, was SIMILAR to her contracted role in Erin?…. “Mandie Eddie, who worked as an Erin bylaw enforcement officer in 2018, held a similar role at the Town of Aurora from 2015 to 2018.
What kind of “investigation” was undertaken by the reporter? Or, did she just write what Ms. Adrian told her without confirming any facts at all? A 6 months contract writing parking tickets in tiny Erin is NOT anything similar AT ALL to managing 18 people daily in a town of 55,000 people.
It is just not possible that Ms. Heck investigated. She just published the words of others who called or wrote to her to get some free newspaper coverage to embarrass me.
Toronto Star and Torstar Media Group Will Argue Their Reporters Need Not Investigate Before They Publish
I know the articles were written by others and simply published as if written by a reporter. So I sued. And now Torstar’s lawyer will come to Small Claims Court and argue that her reporters must be allowed to publish ANYTHING they want without investigation of even one claimed act.
The trouble Torstar has is that they FINANCIALLY supported “Investigative Journalism” education with a $100,000 donation to the U of T Law School to train people how to properly investigate any allegations.
So, when Torstar’s lawyer argues in my suit that no investigation is required… they have a conflict between what they say and what they do.
Stand by for more fun in this regard.
Mandie Continues on July 12-13 her $950,000 suit Filed as a Collateral Attack to her TWO CRIMINAL CHARGES against me from August 23, 2018
…Using, as her ENTIRE evidence, the same two stolen email copies from Allan Downey and Mayor Allan Alls of Erin. Police asked her to go away and to bring back legally obtained copies, i.e. permission to have possession of them… but she never did. Regional Senior Justice Fuerst took one look at the bogus charges and they were withdrawn in 30 seconds.
Why would J. Vella not now dismiss the suit July 12-13 for the same reason?
- The libel and slander suit was NOT preceded by the MANDATORY warning letter to me to apologize and retract. Strike 1.
- There was over 90 days between the date of ALL the alleged comments and the suit being filed. It must have been done within those 90 days. Strike 2.
- The Plaintiff, Mandie Eddie, admitted in criminal court on the stand that she accepted a “Termination without cause” from Aurora, aka “a firing”… and she accepted two months’ pay for months 5 and 6 of her 6 months contract. Strike 3.
Her suit claimed both towns fired her ONLY because I emailed Mayor Alls.
Aurora then HIRED BACK Mandie to create a new town website. “Canada’s Birthday Town” . NOT on the Town’s servers but on a third party commercial site, WEEBLY, which now is outside of the maintenance of town staff.
Mandie To Argue Against Dismissing Her Suit for delay and for lack of merits and for filing a fictitious claim that she did NOT get terminated at Aurora and Erin BOTH after accepting CA$H to do so… as she testified in my trial while sworn in on the stand. Apart from the Est. $80,000 cash and paid time (2 months at Erin) …
All You Need To Know About LAWYERS – in ONE ARTICLE!
All You Need To Know About Cops – in ONE ARTICLE!
They WILL eat their own!
Mandie To Argue Against Dismissal Of Her Suit Copy February 16, 2022 7:40 am before court on Eddie v Lepp
Today, she has me in court again.
When she had me arrested August 23, 2018 using just 2 emails provided by self-confessed boyfriend Allan Downey, she was asked by police to get approval from Mayor Alls and Mayor Dawe to have those same copies of my personal emails in her hand and come back with them. She could not get those legal copies. When SRJ Fuerst got Crown Elder’s false charges in her hands, she had Crown Elder withdrawing charges instantly and removing Mandie from my recognizance terms. But, Elder defied Her Honour and KEPT her name alive. So then December 11, 2018 I had Justice Dawe order Elder to remove Mandie’s name AGAIN, and AGAIN Elder committed a breach of trust and decided to DEFY J. Dawe as well.
It took Crown Greg Elder just TWO defiant acts to get me convicted of a breach by blogging the letter Mandie had sent to my wife which caused her to divorce me.
So, Mandie is responsible for my divorce and loss of my home as well.
Despite police telling her she had illicit copies of the two emails, she talked Gwendolyn Adrian, Tina Duncan’s crack counsel, into suing me without paying her ANY onerous fees except on contingency if she won.
Well, Tina Duncan had Ms Adrian ALSO suing Marnee Buckles, her neighbour. Mandie had approved Tina’s some fence and so to repay her, Tina agreed to sue me, mainly, and to appear to sue Marnee, her neighbour. On contingency as well.
Well! Marnee got even and moved for dismissal for delay. Ms Adrian got so focused on my fat ass that she forgot to get Marnee to a trial. Just plain FORGOT!
By the time she noticed, Marnee was awarded OVER $30,000 from Ms Adrian. NOT from Tina of course because Ms Adrian was on contingency, positive or negative.
So, today, an angry, poor Ms Adrian will have me before another justice where I will show that Mandie’s suit of me is all based on lies and her lawyer knows it.
Mandie quit voluntarily at Aurora and took $80,000 in property taxes home for agreeing.
Now, why are those two acts important?
Ms Adrian believed Mandie when she claimed she had evidence of libel against me. She got so excited to come after me again that Ms Adrian forgot to get the evidence IN HAND BEFORE she filed suit.
However the stress of the internal politics depressed me and stressed me out to the point I took stress leave and eventually quit. I left feeling like a failure – unable to take the pressure. Unable to harden myself to the politics of the workplace. I left broken.http://roaringwomen.blogspot.com/2007/
THEN, consider her words…
I have spent many years in relationships peppered with abuse of all kinds. Outwardly fighting for the rights and safety of other – inwardly – denying my own situations and needs.
How very sad. The woman who needed to be loved and protected the most – curled up in a fetal and protective position – praying for a hero. So yesterday – on behalf of that woman – the kinder gentler way got tossed out the window. The time has come to speak up on behalf of women all over the world – who fight for others and neglect their own needs.http://roaringwomen.blogspot.com/2010/10/roaring-woman-coming-clean.html
THEN, consider all the statements of defiance and anger at men in the rest of her blog and on her old Roaring Women of Canada site. Here she declares she can no longer continue… http://www.roaringwomen.shuttlepod.org
THEN we have evidence the head of the Aurora Library was fired because she gave Mandie a job AFTER SHE QUIT and took $80,000 of taxpayers’ hard earned cash.
THEN, despite all of these illegalities, Aurora takes MORE of my taxes and they DEFEND Mandie against my PERSONAL law suit of her and her girl friends. If Mandoie were to join money from me she would keep it even though Aurora defends her at its expense. Sweet deal eh?
Mandie assaulted me June 4, 2017 says the Tannery courts’ justice who heard my story of being snuck up on and a ticket being fisted into my armpit by Mandie. The only people who did NOT think she assaulted me were her Police buddies in Newmarket when I filed for her arrest.
THEN, February 27, 2020 Det. Sergeant Heather Bentham declared in a recording that no YRP cop EVER even knew Mandie was a Halton Region cop with still-husband Strath Crawford, a security guard at the posh private boys’ school at St Andrews College.
NOTE: How nice is it to be connected to modern day Prince Andrew?
Yes, even though Mandie IN BOTH OF HER COP INTERVIEWS clearly explained her 10 year Halton police career to BOTH Jeff Brown and YRP’s most senior detective James Ward. IN PERSON both men heard of her career. So Jeff and James work for Heather and so she fibbed a bit and declared in my audio that “NONE of the YRP knew Mandie had been a cop”.
Can you say “Thin Blue Line”??
THEN… well, tune in tomorrow to see if I needed any more proof.
TODAY, I offered to let her out of her suit so Ms Adrian will not be cited by the Law Society for mounting an illicit law suit for her firm Kramer, Simaan, Dhillon. I am not hopeful at all she will accept to drop the suit.
Thanks to Rome!
Sunday morning about 8:30 am, the Catholic School Board’s lawyer emailed me asking if I had more evidence to file in my arguments to add Principal Ines Donato to my suit.
This seemed odd, that a Catholic lawyer defending a Catholic principal on behalf of a Catholic School Board should work on the Sabbath instead of attending church. Maybe he did both.
Anyway, since this came AFTER Tina Duncan’s defense counsel asked the SAME question… “Got anything more to serve us?”… I paid more attention.
Now, what lawyers SAY and what lawyers DO are three different things. Both lawyers will eventually file a defence denying each and every claim I make about their clients. ABSOLUTELY nothing to see here, folks! Move along!
BUT, then those SAME lawyers have done NOTHING but delay getting my case in front of a justice. Because they hope I will die first. Their defences are so weak their only chance of success is that I stop breathing.
So, they file delay after delay to extend the time. JUST to extend the time…..
So, when TWO of them check me that I am finished filing… that got me thinking, and sure enough, there have emerged many more facts about the two ladies calling for my arrest… to my PROBATION OFFICER….. all at the same time on the same day claiming the same “police want to arrest you” as Marie put it.
The most recent delay was again by Aurora which claimed that the Senior Regional Justice (SRJ) case managing my suit is 100% incompetent. This comes AFTER the same Aurora claimed I was a vexatious litigant. My same SRJ found I was NOT such a person. So, Aurora appealed and I won in the Court of Appeals self represented.
One would think two such defeats were enough and we should get to trial.
But now, BOTH of them want me to say I have finished serving materials so when I try later to file something they will claim I already said I was done. So, of course, I told them both that I am not done.
After a day of thought, Detective Sergeant Heather Bentham presented to me the best evidence for my case… she spit out that:
“No one in the YRP even KNEW Mandie was once a cop!”.DS Bentham, audio recording February 27, 2020, in her office
Mandie let EVERYONE know she had been a Halton Regional cop alongside her husband. IN her blog, in her business “Roaring Women of Canada”, in her podcasts, in her newspaper articles.
But, the best was of course in her interviews with Det. Brown and Senior Detective James Ward. She was barely warned up making her accusations for my arrest when she tosses in that she was a cop. And of course, why would she NOT? She wanted me arrested again and again, 7 times. and anything she can do to convince the detectives was fair game for her.
So, did DS Bentham not even READ the evidence against me?
Or, did she not order a background check when I charged Mandie with assault June 4, 2017?
Likely both… so she would have plausible deniability.
But, failing to even check the simplest of searches when I accused her is misfeasance and breach of trust. After all, I accused her in writing and swore to it. Surely police would at least make sure she was not a mass murderer… or did they?
No, because Mandie KNEW all the cops in her role as Bylaws Manager. She called them in to block Denis Van Decker and Anne Marie Finn from coming to speak about her to council on open mic night. DS Bentham and her cronies sent two uniforms to block them, denied them their rights, based ONLY on a verbal assurance by Mandie…. this is an unusual power to have over police.
Without a single minute of research, police believed Mandie when she told them Denis and his wife were troublemakers. Police did not do background checks on Denis, Anne-Marie OR Mandie Crawford.
So, today’s job is to expand on my filings about Ines Donato and Tina Duncan.
Speaking of Ms Duncan… another justice awarded her money from ME if you can believe it. One justice just found Tina owed Marnee over $30,000 for filing a suit without merits and yet this second justice ruled exactly the OPPOSITE.
Tina wants her money of course and as soon as the law permits me a second consumer Proposal to pay her… well I will take it under advisement. Tina’s refusal to accept the money I owed her already means she does not really want the cash, she wants the INDEBTEDNESS so she can tell every justice I refuse to pay her.
Telling these facts to the next justice is so critical. Why would Tina refuse to be paid? Except that she WANTS me to be in arrears so she can tie me up somehow in our faulty legal system over a p received failure to pay.
Luckily, the Licences Insolvency Trustee A Farber is an officer of the court and so their refusals are documented in court documents already.
Aurora refuses to accept Consumer Proposal March 2021 so that it can “swear” in future court documents such as these that I did not pay.
That May Be Legally Correct, It Is Just Not MORALLY correct
Tell Truckers: “There are more of us than there are of you!” Donate one loonie, $1.00 to UHN for Toronto’s health care workers
Spend a loonie to tell the truckers where YOU stand…
“Guilty” does not always mean guilt was proven
It only means one judge or 12 jury members found you guilty. Often, it means a judge made mistakes… LOTS Of mistakes as in my trial. But, here is an interesting example of what happens when judges err or are biased…
It’s difficult to imagine a more heinous act, sexual assault on your daughter…. but what is more disturbing is the finding of guilt after so many indications of bias were found.
Keep that in mind. “Guilty” can often mean innocent. Until the appeal is over.)
Alienation of Affection?
For those few of you who have yet to be divorced, know that your spouse will tell you in great detail WHY he/she is quitting you. In my case , my soon-to-be-ex wife cited the acts of Tina Duncan and Mandie Crawford as being the initiation to the idea of divorce. Each woman had their lawyer, the SAME lawyer just by chance, Gwendolyn Adrian, send my wife letters designed to scare her by demanding that she must pay off my debts to her. My wife read them, then had to hire a lawyer for a full day to attend court, only to be told the law does NOT allow Ms Adrian to attack my wife for money she claims I owe her.
So, my wife cites to HER lawyer that the 2 letters are why she asked for a divorce. And why she demands my house be sold immediately. And that is why the letters were sent. The 3 women I sued and the 2 extras I will add soon to my suit wanted me punished. They filed 26 charges with police for the same reason, 21 were false. I have their lies to police on video from their interviews.
This was two acts by a lawyer who claimed the law was on her side, and it was not.
She will pay at some point for her mistakes.
January 31, 2022 – Lepp 2, Aurora 0
Today the interlocutory appeal mounted by Aurora and Lloyd’s of London’s best crack attorneys at PMLaw were again beaten by me, high school educated self rep. They wanted some other judges somewhere to tell Senior Regional Justice Edwards, number one justice in Ontario East that he was wrong in granting me a case conference to address my amended claim as he ordered some time ago and to consider the merits of adding Tina Duncan and Ines Donato as Defendants in my $7,000,000 suit. Both ladies had occasion to go to police to request that they arrest me for trespass. Once on Tina’s driveway and once in the bus stop boulevard on town land not even owned by the Pope. Ines Donato trespassed me for 500 meters from HER school. Trespassed in my own home just 380 meters away because Mandie forgot to tell her the law only permits issuing trespass on private lands.
The really great thing about the women going to my Probation Officer and police en masse in February 2020 is that my P.O. ORDERED me to go turn myself in to police because all these women were calling her in succession to whine that police were about to arrest me. So, when I was ORDERED to go chat with Det Sgt. Bentham, I went immediately and I recorded her admissions on my phone for over an hour. She claimed she told my P.O. that I was NOT under suspicion at all. Yet, she had not yet called me to go surrender so there had to be some truth to that. Then, DS Bentham made a wide range of admissions on how and why I was investigated. And finally, she claimed, (and I shiver as I type this again) she claimed clearly that NO COP knew Mandie Crawford had been a Halton Region cop alongside her husband, Strath. She added that ONLY when I stated this factin court at my trial did ANY of her 38 cops assign to my 7 arrests even KNOW she was once a cop…. now, can you imagine Mandie not telling a cop she had been a cop? No, you cannot , and sure enough on BOTH interview videos Mandie tells the arresting officer that she was a cop too. And people like Mandie, who claim MULTIPLE times falsely that I was a bad boy, get interviewed to assess their motivations. Is YORK REGIONAL POLICE really going to tell a judge they did NOT interview Mandie at least twice. July 14, 2017 and August 23, 2018 found Mandie being recorded. 3 charges were made on HER evidence only, and all 3 never saw a court room. That is how good the cops interviewed her for assessment of her motive.
That “chat” with DS Bentham was February 27 2020, 10:06 am.
and within 2 business days I WAS arrested despite her recorded protests to the contrary. When she heard I had surreptitiously recorded her, something she is REQUIRED to be aware of, she all of a sudden came up with several NEW verbal suggestions from Mandie et al for my arrest. The 4 women got 3 charges made. 3 lawyers testified to my crimes. 4 different stories of ONE 5 second event in a court room. I spent 3 days in jail in Lindsay during COVID with no mask and no hand soap. The charges were dropped weeks before trial for lack of evidence. It was a “roust”. Where cops just cause you to bleed time and money and maybe die of COVID-19.1
January 25, 2022 – Thanks To My Site Members!
As I announced here on this page back on November 11, 2021, I changed this site to be for registered users only. I want to thank all 79 off you who signed up with pseudonyms. You have been able to read my most personal thoughts. I thank you for having an interest.
February 23 – Case Conference with Lawyer Bob Aaron and Torstar
What both defendants are ignoring is Mr. Aaron’s article about Tina Duncan’s spite fence in which he stated he researched everything in Newmarket court files. This is/was a Toronto Court case.
He claims he just saw some unspecified materials on the case in some unnamed legal journal and he found it interesting. He went on to disparage me for stepping in to help single female Marnee, who is now seen as the victor in the FAILED law suit.
To recap J. Papageorgiou –
 Buckles obtained some assistance from an advocate, the defendant Robert Lepp (“Lepp”).
d. The proceeding was not as complex as commercial litigation but had many different claims and components, as well as a messy procedural history and evidentiary record. Duncan’s affidavit had 104 exhibits and spanned 3 volumes totaling nearly 1,300 pages.
 However, this claim cannot succeed for the following reasons.
 In my view, Buckles is the successful party in this litigation and presumptively entitled to her costs.
 The main issue in this litigation was with respect to the defamation claim. The majority of the Statement of Claim and efforts in respect of the summary judgment motion were in respect of this issue, although there were also claims of nuisance, trespass, invasion of privacy and the claim for a declaration of property interests. I do not view Duncan’s claim for a declaration over her property rights a significant a part of the claim, and the fact that it has been rendered moot both parties moving does not mean that she was successful in that claim in any event.
 Given all of the circumstances, I view Buckles’ claim for partial indemnity costs of the motion in the amount of $20,532.40 and her partial indemnity costs of the action in the amount of $11,280.12 fair and reasonable.
c. Duncan claimed $81,412.50 as well as various declarations and has recovered nothing.
e. Duncan escalated costs and duration of the proceeding through several step
Next, he also completely ignored Tina’s confessions in Small Claims and my email stating that Justice PAPAGEORGIOU ordered Tina to pay Marnee Buckles $31,000+ for building the spite fence and then suing Marnee and me for calling it what it was. Why would he not at least publish an update to show his initial article was based on the assumptions he found in Newmarket case files.
Knowing he was sued for miss-stating that the Plaintiff was correct and I was wrong should have encouraged him to find the truth. He did not.2021-01-14-Duncan-ordered-to-pay-Buckles-31000-4
So, on February 23, 2022, Torstar will move for dismissal of my suit as having no basis in fact. The simple fact that Ms. Duncan lost $31,000 and has collected zero indicates the Newmarket case Mr. Aaron reported is NOT the case litigated in TORONTO COURT.
Law Society of Ontario Employees 646 people
Conservatively, assuming just $50,000 per year, or $25 per hour, per person…. over $32,000,000 is required from YOUR legal expenses JUST to support all the people who license lawyers. At a more realistic $100,000 per year that is $64,000,000 in sunk costs.
Need you ask why you pay a lawyer $200-500 per hour to litigate for you?
Narcissism – Trumpism exists in Aurora as well
To be Trump is to be a pathological narcissist with all of its weaknesses and flaws. It is a valid mental illness.
The interesting trait is the desire for revenge when the narcissist feels wronged… they strike out.
So, when an ex-cop who has spent years masquerading as an internet “Business Expert” to vulnerable woman looking to run a business is finally caught out assaulting me, she went on the attack to prove she is simply the best person in the world.
Lots of interesting articles gives in depth information on the disease: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=narcissism&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safari_group=2
The common message is that narcissists go to extreme lengths when “challenged” or accused of something negative. They go for the jugular out of revenge, and to prove they are superior to their accusers. They do not care about anyone else’s feelings while doing it.
Such a narcissist had me arrested, using her police connections, 7 times on her own and using others as proxies. She did not care about the feelings and legal liabilities of the people she used against me. Ines Donato feels that today, she did not think what would happen when given the idea she could get me arrested for being within 500 meters of her school. On her own, she trespassed me from my own house. When challenged, she claims the Separate School Board trespassed me.
Tina Duncan in her Small Claims defense of Marnee Buckles’ suit did not consider her problems in advance when given the idea she could sue for libel. A judge awarded Marnee $31,000 which Tina must eventually pay.
Both women believed the boasts that I could be sued, arrested, fined, even jailed successfully without repercussions.
Aurora has put its lawyers behind her for free even Aurora had terminated her 8 months earlier. They must feel tremendous guilt and so they made sure Lloyd’s of London was doing its best to defend the actions taken on their behalf. Aurora claims everything was done “in the line of duty”, so they are picking up the tab for a lawyer even when my suit came almost a year after her termination “without cause” and does not claim anything about a Bylaws infraction.
Only a narcissist would believe that “terminated without cause” means literally that when EVERYONE knows it means “fired, but paid off in cash not to sue”.
Later this month the courts will decide whether I can add Ines and Tina to my suit. What interests me is this… why would Aurora OPPOSE adding ANYONE? Would it not dilute the blame on them?
Would it not mean two more lawyers to help out?
Why would Aurora oppose adding defendants to my suit? If they did nothing wrong, why are they spending a fortune on lawyers to keep me from a trial?
Aurora/Crawford Claim “Too much evidence” from Lepp
Regional Senior Justice Edwards made a ruling to hear my motion to add Tina and Ines as defendants in my suit. Aurora/Crawford filed an appeal of that decision, which was “in the middle of litigation” and so it is an “interlocutory appeal”… “of an order in the middle of a case not yet decided”. Aurora wants an appeals court to reverse RSJ Edwards and NOT permit me to do ANYTHING with my suit because they refused to accept costs from me.
Aurora and Crawford and Duncan ALL refused to accept payment of $125,000 in costs awarded to them. SOOOOOOOO! they refused my payments plan, and THEN lied to the court that I had not even TRIED to pay them. That is lying to the court.
As licensees of the Law Society of Ontario, they are writing to and swearing to lies to an appeals court that I did NOT TWICE make formal written offers to pay them all back.
Aurora THEN claimed that the most senior justice in Ontario’s largest sector is incompetent and ignorant of the law… AND… that he is biased towards getting me a successful decision. And on top, a lot of other very specific failings in character, knowledge and understanding. I don’t think Aurora liked the way RSJ Edwards parks his car. Or his haircut.
I jumped to support the courts. I filed a very detailed response to the appeal, saying there is no way it should succeed since RSJ Edwards is simply the best. And I provided documentary proof that Aurora’s mayor Geoffrey Dawe arrested me.
Well. Aurora now says I submitted TOO MUCH PROOF and they want ALL my evidence excluded IN ITS ENTIRETY…. all of it, they say, should be held back from the appeals court.
They do not ask for my submissions to be pared back to 30 pages. NO! They want the first, the middle and last 30 pages DELETED.
From the outset “LEPP! SHUT THE EFF UP!” about everything. Even about the proof Aurora/Crawford arrested me 7 times.
Just like Mayor Phyllis Morris… shut Lepp up using the courts and THEN lie to get the taxpayers to pay for the lawyers.
What goes around… comes back around… when you are running in circles. And thou shall be called big wheels.
Small Claims Bails On Pension Seizure
In a long-awaited decision J. Pikkov ruled Tina could legally garnish my pension and freeze my bank account totally. He referred to my suit to get our CPP and OAS returned was a collateral attack on the underlying J. Schabas order awarding $16,000 after refusing to hear S. 137.1 SLAPP. I cannot agree it is a collateral attack, I just asked for my pension funds back since they were illegally seized. J. Pikkov also suggests TD did not have to determine the courses of funds in my bank when seized. This is a major error in the law.
He stated only a “Garmishment Hearing” can deal with garnishment errors.
This was to be expected… Newmarket court is particularly biased against self-represented persons. J. Pikkov chose to site the volume of my materials as a negative to my claim. This is odd because both Ms Adrian and Mr Painter specialize in voluminous filings.
Most troubling is his order that Small Claims has no jurisdiction over theft of our pensions. The bank account garnishment law is clear… no social benefits may be seized.
Ontario clearly states how Small Claims works…..
If believe you are owed money for the return of personal property, you can sue that person or business in Small Claims Court for $35,000 or less. For anything over $35,000, you need to go to the Superior Court of Justice.https://www.ontario.ca/page/suing-someone-small-claims-court
Costs for the TD motion to dismiss my claim are to be settled between the parties, but the parties have consistently refused to accept payment terms. So the quantum of costs is relatively unimportant.
More for Mandie and Allan
Upcoming is my motion to dismiss Mandie’s $950,000 suit for lack of any valid claim NOT admitted as a lie already by Mandie in my trial and hearings.
Once issued, the order will name every AURORA participant in the justice’s summary of the issues in my motion.
Geoffrey, Mandie, Allan, Doug, Sandra… all will be immortalized, just as was Tina Duncan on February 2, 2020. Following.
I have made a formal offer to settle with Mandie but I know I will not even get a reply.
So, if you or a loved one is named in the motion, CANLII will record the resultant orders forever in perpetuity for use by other lawyers in other matters. Now is your time to advise Ms Adrian of your feelings towards that fact.
More for Bob Aaron
If it was not clear enough, if a seasoned lawyer had actually researched “Duncan v. Buckles and Lepp”, THEN published it, THEN been challenged as to its authenticity…. he would have searched again by now to make sure he found every case law entry in CANLII.
He should have found Tina’s $31,000 costs award to Ms. Buckles on February 2, 2021 by now.
And since that loss was huge in that the justice declared she had no chance of success and there were no merits to the suit… he should have considered a follow-up article.
Such an article is all I asked for… interview me… then write whatever you want.
The Star has refused a follow-up article. It would not be sued if it did a follow-up. I do not want to limit the press, I just want fairness.
But, on February 2021 Tina lost big time in a “default judgment” she herself asked for.
Now, that February 2, 2021 admonishment is case law for me to refer to in Crawford/Eddie v. Lepp.
Me: “Your honour, just as it was ruled that there was no basis in fact for Tina Duncan’s suit against me, there are also no merits to her friend Mandie’s $950,000 suit either.”
And so her suit will end in the same fashion with a justice reading J. Papageorgiou.2021-01-14-Duncan-ordered-to-pay-Buckles-31000-4
Open Letter To Bob Aaron, Toronto Star Columnist
Dear Mr. Aaron,
Your paper has published a number of articles about me:
This Next One Was Written By You – you swear, on October 20, 2020
And I asked the Star to interview me, and then to publish whatever they wanted about me, and they refused, so I sued you both in Small Claims. The article stated that you researched it ALL in Newmarket Court. Which is impossible of course because Ms Duncan sued me in Toronto court.
But you know all that. What you MAYBE do not know is that NINE months EARLIER… January 2020, Tina Duncan had to pay her neighbour $31,000 for suing her and then abandoning the suit.2021-01-14-Duncan-ordered-to-pay-Buckles-31000-2
YES! Tina Duncan Was Ordered by J. Papageorgiou To Pay her Neighbour, Marnee Buckles, $31,000 For Building a Spite Fence, Suing Her When Called Out, Then Abandoning The Suit
So, I was thinking, maybe you could NOW interview me and report whatever you want about me.
It’s all up to you to make this right.
And keep an eye on the space. Mandie sued me for $950,000 and abandoned it too. Let’s see what happens when I move for dismissal.
Toronto Public Health recommends a Catholic school in Etobicoke dismiss in-person learning as it reports eight new COVID-19 cases on Friday evening.
Can God and the Pope and all those priests not strike some fear into their followers at all?
Need a bag? Leave a bag!… Use B.O.B… Bob Offers Bags…aka “Trash Averaging” and “Bags On Bags” January 1, 2022
Coming soon! Three bags a pickup are free, $5 each after 3… so, a new web page lets you report you are putting out 1 or 2, so that a neighbour needing a tag can simply use your boulevard instead. Then, you have a right to leave a bag at his house when you have been real trashy. Everyone saves because we pay enough taxes already and a bag tax is absurd. Supported by voluntary donations.
Put Out 3 Bags This January!
On your first trash pickup of 2022, put out the maximum 3 bags with 50 pounds in each for the maximum 150 pounds. Each 2 weeks, we Aurorans pay for about 65,000 50 pound bags at about 22,000 homes at 3 bags each. That ‘s 3.25 million pounds of trash. Aurora says the average cost is $5 each, or about $325,000 every two weeks which we know without checking is an absurd amount. SO… Aurora is trying to make a PROFIT on trash day.
If all 22,000 homes are ALLOWED 3 bags EVERY SECOND week, that means the budget is 26 x 65,000 x $5 = $8,450,000/year. For trash.
So, we put out the 65,000 50 pound bags, and then we see how Aurora responds. It’s like chess.
Either, they are FINE… and they budgeted enough for 65,000 50 pound bags 26 times per year… OR, they are NOT fine and have to pay a lot EXTRA to pay for 3 bags each.
So, if the new rule is “3 bags full sir”, and yet they did NOT budget for 3 bags full from every home then they lied to us. If they DID budget for 3 bags full, then they OVER budgeted by a LOT… either way, they are screwed as far as honesty goes.
Think how unfair this is. I am single and struggle to fill a bag every second pickup. A family of 4 with a basement apartment with 3 more means 7 people are limited to the same 3 bags as me. I can fill up all of the 35 gallons of trash for one person, the 7 people in the rental home each can fill up one jerry can of trash every two weeks.
Catholic School Full Of Priests In Training
Next: Timeline for Our Lady of Grace Principal Ines Donato to call for my arrest along with the others.
Aurora claims I am “associated” with evil “bloggers” who criticize Aurora Councillors. This is so much better than being “associated” with the Catholic church.
If you flunk out as a priest, you can always sweep the floors, but one should not be “sweeping”
9 year old girls off their feet.
November 11, 2021 – Site is now :”Membership Only” for my real thoughts and feelings….
After today, you will read only the very safest materials here if you did not register. I keep the good stuff for registered users.
Click here to register.
Analysis: Number of police reports made by or referenced by for each person
FEBRUARY 2017 – Mandie Executes a Trial of Removing ALL “No Parking Signs” in front of Our Lady of Grace School and in YRT Bus Stop #1208
Later she will write out and swear to police that she NEVER met principal Ines Donato. Meanwhile, my Probation Officer calls me and tells me Ines and the “other women” have all gone to police to have me arretsed for trespass in the bus stop #1208 off scholl property.
MARCH 2020 – Mandie admits false arrests, then writes, swears and signs that she does NOT KNOW Principal Ines Donato. Claims my probation order includes orders to not “mention” her name… which was DELETED by Justice Fuerst November 16, 2019 and by Justice Dawe December 11, 2019, and Justice Dawe cited Crown Elder for contempt of both judges in his bail review May 22 2020.
Note that she seems quite proud that her false charges were “stayed”. As if that meant they had some validity. She knows from her police career that a “stay” happens when the Crown cannot make its case. It then REQUIRES the Crown to to reactivate charges within ONE YEAR. There was no evidence.
How could Ms. Crawford plan and execute covering over every No Parking sign without consulting on SAFETY with the principal? Think about that. Mandie just covers over all the signs and sits back and watches what happened, and we are supposed to believe she never spoke to the principal?
Google Maps Offers Best Advertising Bang For The BuckYour-reported-problem-is-making-a-difference
July 14, 2017 he is arrested. As the report details, police THEN asked him his side of the story. He has never been questioned BEFORE an arrest
Sandra McKenzie, Pat De Sario complain about Bob Lepp July 13, 2017
Mandie Crawford, defended today by PMLaw’s Charles Painter paid by town’s liability insurance reported for assault on Bob Lepp June 3, 20172017-06-04-GO-162063-Mandie-Crawford-for-assault
Mandie inspected/approved Tina Duncan’s fence – Fall 2017, BOTH woman used Kramer Simaan Dhillon lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian to sue Bob for $1,100,000 combined
Tina Duncan ordered to pay Marnee Buckles over $31,0002021-01-14-Duncan-ordered-to-pay-Buckles-31000-4
Imagine, a person with a CV as strong as this claiming losing a job because she was caught not selling pet tags for $350,000 annually. Certainly, the best businesswoman in Calgary could easily have known to read her job description and the Pets Bylaw where it names the QUOTE “Bylaws Manager” as the one responsible for the entire pet tag program. Surely a comment by me could not dislodge a person with such skills.
1st Mandie Crawford Peace Bond Motion Dismissed out of hand, 2nd rejected, cited lack of PHYSICAL injury… mental stress/harassment rejected as POSSIBLE causes for a Peace Bond … MUST BE A PHYSICAL HARM THREAT. So forget a PB for say, publishing nude photos of an old girlfriend. Or constant phone calls or uninvited visits. Or written threats to my family. Or Daria’s taunting emails to my wife. Or sending couriers to my son’s house with voluminous court documents.Bylaw-5642-14-animal-bylaw-with-set-fines
Crown Giordano, who has been “behind” several false arrests, today came out of the chute dressed for bear, he immediately said the 6 months limitation in criminal charges applies to my peace bond application. He fell right into the trap. Now the Crown cannot claim my May 30, 3018 arrest and J Harpur’s trial could NOT have legally tried me for alleged acts BEYOND 6 months. Police and the Crown did not have any alleged acts in the 6 months prior on May 30, 2018. SO the entire trial was based on an illegal charge now CONFIRMED by Crown Giordano himself.
If Newmarket insists on running a court in this manner, it has to be consistent. I hope.
To make matters worse for Crown Giordano, he misled the JP. He told the JP that the “six months” back on a summary charge applied to a peace bond. It does not.
What is a Peace Bond? – From https://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/files/guides/guide-peace-bond-EN.pdf
A peace bond is a court order that requires another person to “keep the peace and be of good behaviour” and obey conditions such as not to contact you or your children or to come near your property. The peace bond can be in place for up to one year. The person who enters into a peace bond does not receive a criminal record. However, if one of the conditions imposed is breached, the person may be charged with a criminal offence.
A peace bond is NOT a restraining order. Restraining Orders are obtained through the Family Court for married, separated, divorced or common-law couples. A peace bond Information is NOT an Information alleging that another person has committed a criminal act. That is a different process.So, lets see where r=that takes us!
Thanks to all who played along this time.
21 DAYS IN PRISON IN TORONTO EAST
Here is all you need to read about prisons in Ontario and their use of Solitary Confinement…2021-09-14-Corrections-class-action-Minsky-Success-at-appeal-Decision
Here is What We Know:Toronto-East-Detention-Centre-—-Prison-Dispatches
J. Goldstein knew that and STILL sent me inside. And, I spent 16 of 21 days in “Administrative Segregation” for which Ontario JUST spent $30,000,000 through Koskie Minsky LLP.
The Court reluctantly sentenced me to 21 days for contempt of J. Favreau, who ordered… “No more lies, no more defamation, just cut it right out NOW!”
In recognition that my new criminal law firm needs to recover from the murder in their offices last week, I have not yet sued or filed an appeal. I have waited several days, 5, so that my anger would not be so readily apparent
The Most Liberating Experience Of My Life
I took over 200 pages of handwritten notes using stubby pencils. Dated. Timed. Detailed.
You can tell the MTEDC is out of control BEFORE you enter. They point to the bottle of hand sanitizer bolted to the wall and say “Clean your hands!”. You follow their order precisely, BUT it is empty. The hand sanitizer is gone. Then, inside, they gang up 8 or 9 guards and talk you out of reporting symptoms. They quarantined me for 14 days, and when I did not die, they moved me to the open population.
They posted the current COVID guidelines from the Solicitor General… dated June 2020. Last year. Nothing more recent… it tells inmates: “There is no vaccine.” I get a copy for myself.
Then another court was petitioned by Tina Duncan claiming that what I blogged AFTER the order of J. Favreau were lies. That SECOND court, despite being shown NOT even a single quoted lie and the truth behind it… a SECOND COURT found me guilty. Then that second court recused itself saying it “saw something it should not have seen.”
So, a THIRD COURT then read out its sentencing order. But, it had chosen the draft of an order dreamed up by Tina Duncan and Mandie Crawford, instead.
There are many “tells” as I recall, several places where he seemed unfamiliar with his own next sentence. He would then stop, frown, stutter, ignore footnotes… and ultimately, he would unbelievably…
EXTEND his sentence a full 50% in the last minute of the appearance.
To analogize, a brain surgeon says to the Inquiry: “I had 12 leads attached to his cortex, fully 11 were giving a red warning on the display panel, but that 12th one was just bright green. So, I may not know what caused the 11 bad signals, but I KNOW I am sure as heck that I am going to cut at the green lead.
Or, the Westjet pilot: “Welcome to direct flight 911, Vancouver to Honolulu. We are just finishing up the pre-takeoff checklist. The left engine is all in the green. We have 11 red lights on the right engine, but there is a bright green light says “Engine Started” so get ready to get lei’d! We’re pushing on!
The Court who sentenced me had been told I was 72, obese, had hypertension, gout and the other usual senior’s ailments requiring 11 pills a day. He had considered that statement for many weeks as he formulated his sentence. Balancing punishment with basic consideration for life.
He was kind enough to voice his concerns: “I would have liked to see you agreeably provide exact details for the reason for taking each of the 11 pills…. you know?… to make sure you’re not likely to die in 21 days of prison. I would listen to the name of each disease, the dosage, your physical state, then I would apply my expert knowledge of geriatric medicine for old people like you, and then I would have all the data I need to sentence you.”
“But you declined to provide the PRECISE and extensive details of your medical ailments. So, I tried, I really tried, and I tried to impress on you how important personal medical details are to a court like mine and to the other client Ms. Adrian represents. You did not sign an affidavit. So, I shall presume you have made up the whole story about the 11 pills and 11 illnesses and I am putting you in a building full of young anti-vaxxers, people who are not EVEN PERMITTED to wear masks.
Yes, the court wavered, it admitted it did not have adequate knowledge of my health, it preferred more, and it sent me to Metro East anyway.
Justices talk to people every day who have been inside MTEDC. The prisons are controlled by the Solicitor General. Powerful people. And so, justices KNOW… THIS COURT KNEW FULL WELL THAT…..
No one in the open population of Metro Toronto East Detention Centre wears a mask
And if you snuck one in like I did, you get it taken away from you. Ask a nurse for more?: EWe do npot supply masks to inmates.
So, on balance, the court did right putting me there since it wants me dead anyway.
The Court added 50% MORE sentence AFTER he read the sentence he had written.
Ms Adrian, in her draft sentencing order, called for “21 days” in prison. Everyone gets a 1/3 reduction, 7 days, for good behaviour. So you serve 14 of a 21 day sentence.
Unless you are 72, take 11 pills or more, of unclear medical history, obese… 2 stents, THEN YOU GET TO SERVE ALL 21 and it does not matter one iota that you may have been unruly for all 21 days. NOTHING keeps you past 21 though.
The Prison Doctor, Dr. Kerr, overrides my medication details
The highlight of this prison is its single septgenarian doctor. He has my detailed list of all 11 bottles I brought in. He tells me I cannot have them. He says “I will decide what medications you get in here.”
So, he ordered up 11 pills that HE liked for me, had a nurse bring them each morning and say: “Dr. Kerr says you are to either take all 11 in front of me now, or I will return the pills to Dr. Kerr.”
I had been forced each day to make a decision, “Take them all and live, or take none and die.” So I took 11 pills, 4 of which are for blood pressure. I knew my heart would be overcome by their combined effects and I would suffer. But, I would live.
Then, my Doctor prescribed daily blood pressure monitoring, take it 3 times 5 minutes apart and select the lowest to report to him. I asked for daily assessment of my pressure, even if just once per day. The prison has a BP moinitor with a Label saying “DAILY ASSESSMENT” on it. I saw it only once.
Of 21 days where they were asked by me each day for a BP, I got the following:
|Date||Out of Cell 2.0 Hrs?||Shower? |
|August 17||Solitary Confinement||No|
|26||Solitary Confinement||No||alleged faked “suicide, still did not get a doctor|
|27||Yes||No||Lawyer sends letter of medical concern|
|30||Yes||No||Dr. Kerr asks me to refute my lawyer’s complaints in detail. |
I refuse, he gets revenge…
heforges a Sergeant’s signature claiming
I ASKED TO BE KEPT EXTRA DAYS,
puts me in the Psych Range
|31||Solitary Confinement||No||Psych range 175/94|
|Sept. 1||Solitary Confinement||No||Open Population, no masks permitted|
|2||Yes||No||Open Population, no masks permitted|
|3||Solitary Confinement||No||170/98 (cuff backwards)|
Open Population, no masks permitted
|4||Solitary Confinement||No||189/101 (cuff backwards)|
Open Population, no masks permitted
|5||Solitary Confinement||No||Open Population, no masks permitted|
|6||Solitary Confinement||No||Open Population, no masks permitted|
|Totals||5 times (20%) YES, 21 times NO (80%)||None||7 BP in 21 days, 33%, 6 days NO MASK PERMITTED|