BL20-🏌🏻CπŸ₯‚β›ΉπŸ»- Caught! A witness waits 8 months to make a statement.

image_pdfimage_print

Q. Why would his memory improve by waiting 8 months?

A. Because he allowed me to catfish him again.

Back on Monday, March 2, 2020, DS Bentham came to work set to have me in Lindsay prison by Wednesday. I had upset her on the previous Friday, February 28, 2020 by blogging her confession to me she had me arrested a total of 7 times because she did not like seeing her name written in my blog, and that HAD to have been read by anywhere from 8 to 17 people every day. So, on the Monday March 2, she assigned 4 detectives and told them to go find some complainants.

Det. Goobie called one, an LSO licensee and asked her if she had any dirt on me. She did! And she suggested 2 other LSO Licensees would also help him out if DS Bentham were to call them. She did so.

Barry Stork, the straight shooter ,told the truth, He heard nothing at all. He swore:

“On March 3, 2020, X e-mailed me advising that I may hear from a detective with respect to whether I heard Mr. Lepp state “glad to see you are not afraid of me anymore” at the conclusion of the February 14, 2020 motion. I did not have any communications with X respecting the contents of her aforementioned e-mail. At the conclusion of the motion, as Mr. Lepp was exiting the courtroom, I heard him direct a comment to X. I do not recall the exact words used by Mr. Lepp.”

Affidavit of Barry Stork

Note he admits he was given the quote in ADVANCE, and asked to agree, and he still could not. That does not bode well.

Note also that he said BOTH:

  1. “I heard him” and
  2. I do not recall the exact words”

How could he say WHAT occurred if he cannot recall the words he heard? If he heard no words, and recalled no words…how did he deduce who was speaking to whom? About what?

Chas. Painter, even further away towards the front of the room, offered NOTHING to the Crown from March 2 to November 24, 2020… 3 days before Judicial Pre-Trial. Now he suddenly recalls everything. He was facing ahead he swears, and before I even turned to go, while I was “packing up”…he suddenly dreamed I did not leave at all, but rather, I stood still and just spoke over my shoulder somehow.

I was at counsel table at the front packing up, as was Bob Lepp, standing to my left at the other counsel table.

Barry, a lawyer from Clyde and Co. was in the gallery, as was X. I don’t recall anyone else sitting in the body of the courtroom at that point.

Mr. Lepp was standing at the counsel table and I recall him saying over his shoulder, turning his head towards where X was sitting, that it was nice to see people were not afraid of him anymore.”

email of Chas. Painter November 24, 2020

This a miracle.

By cleverly waiting for my blog, he read what I said happened, and he took THAT and changed a few elements and swore in an email, (Q. “If this email is sufficient,” ummm,… No!) ) it was NOT an affidavit, that I stood BESIDE him and I spoke BEHIND HIM as he observed an LSO Licensee way back in the gallery, just as Superior Court Justice Dawe told me to do.

Here’s the problem… he FORGOT to read what X spun as her own TWO stories. Why tell one story when two is better than one?

So, on page 37 of disclosure is her first story:

X – Story #1

“X states that at the conclusion of the contempt hearing in Superior Court on February 14, 2020 in courtroom 405, when court adjourned, the suspect walked past where she was seated in the body of the court, looked at her and stated “good to see you’re not scared of me anymore”. X advised that counsel Charles PAINTER and Barry STORK were witness to this exchange. Accordingly, X contends this amounts to a breach of the Probation Order. Copies of the letter and blog posts were seized.”

So, the justice on Friday will believe one or the other, but cannot believe both.

One says I walked PAST her and THEN spoke to Barry.

X, who must have been looking at Painter’s back, looking towards the bench, says Painter was a good witness anyway.

Mr Painter says I did not walk away, I did NOT even turn around, but instead, I was able to detect Barry Stork BEHIND me and I simply stood still and just turned my head to Barry and spoke.

X, OTOH, says I walked PAST her and THEN spoke to her FIRST, and only to her.

X – Story #2

But wait, there is a third possibility. X underwent a full video interview because they had such strong evidence they wanted to record it for court.

The notes of the police observer tells this 3rd version.

“(X said she was ) … in court on motion. Court adjourned. (I) always wait with another lawyer, Barry Stork sitting beside me and he (Lepp) walked past, in court room 405. Mr. Lepp stopped, ‘Barry always nice to see, looks at me and says “glad YOU’RE not afraid of me anymore.”

X as noted by DC Rosenthal

Painter: that it was nice to see people were not afraid of him anymore.”

X Version 2.0: “‘Barry always nice to see, looks at me and says “glad YOU’RE not afraid of me anymore.”

X Version 1.0: …(Lepp) looked at her and stated “good to see you’re not scared of me anymore”

glad/good

afraid/scared

people/her

No one told the same story twice. And all 3 stories differ on key elements such as my position, my movement, my stopping, etc.

Painter now swears what he could NOT swear 8 months back. Back in March he offered no stories at all.

All 3 lawyers waited 3 WEEKS after watching me breach 11 times, a new record for me in one day. Instead of calling out at the moment on February 14, they ALL went home and forgot about it until DS Bentham called them all up and asked them to cooperate on testifying to arrest me again,

At the 3 week mark March 4, X documented ELEVEN breaches. Stork documented one. Painter offered nothing at all. They would not have been in agreement even ON February 14.

Now 8 months later, they have sworn to 3 very different versions.

Painter HEARD but did not SEE.

Stork SAW but did not HEAR.

X says I was already PAST her and on my way out the door when I stopped and spoke to her. If that were true, she would have had me arrested at home that day.

But, it did not happen and the three of them will perjure themselves, a crime in Ontario. Stork signed an affidavit. Painter sent an email which today is taken as gospel axxriding to the Attorney General.

And I was in room 401 just as the docket AND the transcript proclaim.

That said, I am sure it will be set for trial and I can do a better job of pointing out the flaws in their logic.

Author: Bob Lepp

Leave a Reply