BL20-🥓ꌛ🀛 – Probariations… where I can be

If you see me tonight, with an illegal smile, I didn’t kill anyone!

I’m just tryin’ to have me some fun!

Today I got consent for several changes in my sentence.

I can drive anytime 9:00 to 4:00 to the Probation office on Davis Drive

I can go to medical appointments or issues for myself 9:00 to 5:00 Monday to Friday.

I can go to medical needs any other time by text my PO.

July 31 to August 9 daily I can work at my Google Maps job. For each day I specified an area of Aurora, Newmarket, Alliston, Beeton, Tottenham. If I need to change areas I text where I am going.

So, life is normal again. I can make a living, good thing since CERB has ended or has it?

Yahoo!

BL20-Two six too – Why does Ontario fight Feds wish for televised lawsuits

https://www.lawtimesnews.com/practice-areas/litigation/ontario-courts-should-get-cameras/263496#:~:text=In%20Ontario%2C%20the%20province’s%20Courts,temporarily%20lifted%20the%20blanket%20ban

because they cheat so much.

BL20-⠼⠃⠼⠋⠼⠚ – Why is there ANYTHING WRITTEN about The Braille Code?

OK, off topic. I was reading how to tell jokes because no one gets my sense of humour. I thought I would become conventiopnakl and only tell jokes people get right away. It seems I am too late.

What with 922, COVID-19 and again bad cops, it seems evolution is removing things we are permitted to joke about.

Now, before I continue… do not worry that we cannot tell jokes about idiots. Trump and Trudaeau are still fair game.

No, we cannot longer tell jokes….

Know your audience

Some types of humor only work if you really know your audience well. For instance, you may not want to tell a political joke if you aren’t completely sure of your audience’s leanings. “If it’s your friends and you’re all of the same mind, a good political joke is fine,” says Rosenfield. “If you’re unsure, steer clear of it.”

And one type of humor is definitely on its way out: Jokes about nationalities, types, or ethnicities. “Those jokes make fun of people just for who they are, based on negative stereotypes of groups of people,” Rosenfield says. “No one likes to see a negative stereotype about a group of people.

“No one likes to see a negative stereotype about a group of people.“

Well, that about ends it for me. Newfies, lawyers, cops… they are all “group jokes” by that definition and verboten.

What is left?

BRAILLE! I may NOT make fun of blind people, BUT I can make fun off braille. It’s not much, just a bunch of bumps, but I can make it funny, watch me.

Why does Wikipedia have anything about braille? who is going to read it?

There… LEMONADE!

So, Braille Code is based on 2 sets of 6 dots, numbered… wait for it… 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on the left and the same on the right.

And 1, 2 and 3 are on the left of 4 ,5, and 6.

There are lots of combinations, here they are… a-z and 1-0 are a logical repeat of ten repetitions of patterns.

You can feel that the set of 6 dots FOLLOWING is a number if FIRST you feel the pattern named “Number follows” below. It will be a capital letter if the sequence “Capital follows” is felt first.

And here is my joke “… all of this looks easy to a blind person.” BUT, now I have made fun of a “group of people”.

Tough, it is still funny.

As it was when my childhood blind friend Kathy Nessner nail me in the face for making fun off her. She triangulated (biangulated?) with her ears and determined my cheek was in range of her right hand and she she acceralated it into said cheek before I could get away. Of course, I thought I did not have to hide because, well, she was blind. And THAT is how we learn in life.

We start in ignorance and try shit. If it works, we remember to use it again. If it does NOT work, we forget it… only to do the identical thing later in life so we can say “I KNEW that was going to happen.”

So, now you can read braille, see how easy that was?

BL20-➋𝕃X – Tragically, Guess Who Owns The Jane Street Love Nest? I Shall Never Tell You His name, but…

I will give you a hint!

He is male!

..and he is named in my Law Suit as conspiring to use police and the courts to silence me in my blog.

And he is a softener.

Not stool, Clothing.

BL20-➋𝕃Ⅸ – Winners, Whiners, and Wieners – which are you? (Hint: I could NEVER be a “nark”)

In life, everyone you meet can be slotted into one of 3 those categories.

Last week, I was accused of being a whiner. I had made the “mistake” of filing a complaint or three with the Law Society of Ontario.

That must have been a mistake, because a lawyer accused me of making it and admonished me in front of the several adults in the room.

Now, the Law Society PRIDES (in a NONE sexual connotation) itself on keeping its membership squeaky clean. They decided people prefer to hire lawyers who appear to be legitimate in every regard, and not just tehspeed of their chase car.

But, to the layman, lawyers all look alike… so HOW does the Law Society help us figure out the “good guys”?

Well, they came up with a great idea, kind of like pushing the “Like” or “Follow” buttons… YOU get to decide the good ones by NOT complaining about the bad ones.

One lawyer had used Amazon, and he got the idea from them… let people trash the crappy products so they can tell which products are NOT crappy.

Well, it works for tee shirts and books BUT apparently NOT for lawyers.

Actually, the fact I complained about a lawyer was used as a FACT I was a vexatious litigant.

And, that explained it ALL to me.

To ME, “vexatious” is a nasty thing to be. But, lawyers use “vexatious” to mean “does not respect lawyers enough to NOT complain”.

By complaining, I had become vexatious and I had to be STOPPED!

Luckily, this lawyer’s rule is NOT the politician’s rule.

No one likes politicians, and people everywhere are forever WHINING about them. BUT, that does NOT mean all people are vexatious voters… NO! It is the JOB of a voter to weed out the losers.

BUT, when it comes to lawyering, you do NOT weed out anyone with a complaint. No, you let every single one of them have a chance at YOUR wallet.

So, what have I complained about that a lawyer would get upset with me?

I have complained about lawyers and paralegal alike for;

• Dissuading my surveyor from measuring how much a spite fence was trespassing on the neighbour’s land.
• Emailing police to arrest me for serving a lawsuit.
• Phoning police to arrest # 1 me for speaking to a licensee of the Law Society in a court room.
• Phoning police to arrest # 2 me for speaking to a licensee of the Law Society in a court room.
• Phoning police to arrest # 3 me for speaking to a licensee of the Law Society in a court room.
• Going undercover with police to try to entrap me into bribery.
• Using Twitter to communicate my private emails to police.
• Being Daria Morgendorffer for an evening.
• Illegally garnishing my wife’s Canada Pension and OAS.
• Illegally garnishing MY Canada Pension and OAS.
• Serving garnishments illegally by FAX to a Bank Head Office (times 2) rather than “personal service” to the bank BRANCH.
• Having a bank insider tell her when I opened a new account and THEN NEXT DAY garnisheeing THAT one illegally too.
• Serving a client who lies by suing me for $1,000,000 when the claim was debunked by her own client in MY OWN criminal trial… she testified I had NOTHING to do with her losing her jobs! Then, the lawyer REFUSED to drop the suit when her own client said she had lied in the claim.
• Serving a client who lies by suing me for $80,000 when the claim was debunked by her own client in her OWN Small Claims trial… the client testified she knew EXACTLY where she had built her fence! Then, the lawyer REFUSED to drop the suit when her own client said she had lied in the claim.

It is a refreshing idea that lawyers might one day STOP suing on behalf of a client once the client admits she lied.

I hope to be refreshed one day, because today a lawyer, the SAME lawyer, represents 2 women who lied about me UNTIL they got in front of a judge… THEN they told the truth….

So, this lawyer says to me “You scum, PAY up!” and her client says “My bad!” to a judge.

The Law Society says every lawyer MUST fire a client once their client is caught lying about the claim.

But, IF you choose to make that complaint to the Law Society of Ontario, you are vexatious by definition, and should just pay up and go away.

The LSO has NEVER asked me for more data about a LICENSEE… never.

The ONLY time the LSO asked me for MORE data was when I reported a NON-LICENSEE pretending to be a lawyer. And that is a very difficult differentiation to make. They are like Tussaud wax figures… they all LOOK like perfectly capable lawyers, BUT, they melt when exposed to even modest heat or sunshine.

So, are you a WHINER or a WIENER? You may be BOTH!

BL20-➋𝕃🎱 – Lawyering – the ONLY sport where “being BENCHED!” is a GOOD thing! Law Society of Ontario 2019 5 year “Paralegal Benchers” Vote

You will recall who won in 2014 for 5 years, I won’t because I do not recognize ANY of the names!

Benchers? WHO? WHAT? WHEN?

https://lso.ca/about-lso/osgoode-hall-and-ontario-legal-heritage/collections-and-research/treasurers-and-benchers-of-the-law-society-of-uppe

Lawyering – the ONLY sport where “being BENCHED!” is a GOOD thing!

BL20-➋𝕃6️⃣ – The Last 100 RoaringLady tweets in 2013

The last one was April 17, 2017… then silence.

How does link shortening work?

Links shared on Twitter, including links shared in Direct Messages, will automatically be processed and shortened to an http://t.co link. Learn how to shorten links. Please note: anyone with a t.co shortened link will be able to navigate to the destination URL.

BL20-➋𝕃🖐 – We Get Crawfords… We Get Stacks and Stacks of Crawfords! Every Crawford Working For Government In Ontario

In trying to apologize for mistaking Andre Crawford for an ex-husband, I found some more Crawfords on the public teat who may be related….

BL20-➋𝕃🏌🏻‍♂️ – Torstar/METROLAND … This is the post I referred you to broadcast

I will keep adding to the story, you can broadcast some or none of it.

To be detailed:

• Married, Calgary residence after both resigned from Halton Regional police
• Husband and wide interviewed both in video and newspaper
• Wife: Volunteer fire fighter
• PTSD
• Daughter raped by sleep walker 2012, fought courts to 2019 for prison term
• couple moved to Aurora, ON For 2015 hiring by Aurora
• BOTH worked in Aurora
• Husband works for historic boys’ school in Aurora as security guard
• Identified as married signing online obituaries as a couple through February 2017
• Using married name professionally June 3, 2017
• Identifies as maiden name some date after June 3, 2017 until June 14, 2017
• June 14, 2017 simultaneously identifies as maiden name AND as married name in 2 Aurora email addresses
• Identified “separated” in Facebook July 14 2017
• January 30 2018 Aurora renews her license to write bylaws tickets as married name
• Terminated without cause February 28, 2018, name used was refused in FOI request
• Cohabiting King City House registered owned by:
• York tax rolls show home owned by:
• Identifies on Aurora web site as maiden name.
• Email address spelling implies use of maiden name “ again”

BL20-➋𝕃🌲 – CBC… This is the post I referred you to broadcast

I will keep adding to the story, you can broadcast some or none of it.

To be detailed:

• Married, Calgary residence after both resigned from Halton Regional police
• Husband and wide interviewed both in video and newspaper
• Wife: Volunteer fire fighter
• PTSD
• Daughter raped by sleep walker 2012, fought courts to 2019 for prison term
• couple moved to Aurora, ON For 2015 hiring by Aurora
• BOTH worked in Aurora
• Husband works for historic boys’ school in Aurora as security guard
• Identified as married signing online obituaries as a couple through February 2017
• Using married name professionally June 3, 2017
• Identifies as maiden name some date after June 3, 2017 until June 14, 2017
• June 14, 2017 simultaneously identifies as maiden name AND as married name in 2 Aurora email addresses
• Identified “separated” in Facebook July 14 2017
• January 30 2018 Aurora renews her license to write bylaws tickets as married name
• Terminated without cause February 28, 2018, name used was refused in FOI request
• Cohabiting King City House registered owned by:
• York tax rolls show home owned by:
• Identifies on Aurora web site as maiden name.
• Email address spelling implies use of maiden name “ again”

BL20-➋𝕃✌🏼 – TMZ… This is the post I referred you to broadcast

I will keep adding to the story, you can broadcast some or none of it.

To be detailed:

• Married, Calgary residence after both resigned from Halton Regional police
• Husband and wide interviewed both in video and newspaper
• Wife: Volunteer fire fighter
• PTSD
• Daughter raped by sleep walker 2012, fought courts to 2019 for prison term
• couple moved to Aurora, ON For 2015 hiring by Aurora
• BOTH worked in Aurora
• Husband works for historic boys’ school in Aurora as security guard
• Identified as married signing online obituaries as a couple through February 2017
• Using married name professionally June 3, 2017
• Identifies as maiden name some date after June 3, 2017 until June 14, 2017
• June 14, 2017 simultaneously identifies as maiden name AND as married name in 2 Aurora email addresses
• Identified “separated” in Facebook July 14 2017
• January 30 2018 Aurora renews her license to write bylaws tickets as married name
• Terminated without cause February 28, 2018, name used was refused in FOI request
• Cohabiting King City House registered owned by:
• York tax rolls show home owned by:
• Identifies on Aurora web site as maiden name.
• Email address spelling implies use of maiden name “ again”

BL20-➋𝕃 – Looking Baaaaddddd and back!

Before Aurora started using police to arrest me to shut up my blog, they used a $6,000,000 SLAPP suit aimed ONLY to silence Bill Hog, Dick Johnson and Elizabeth Bishenden.

December 15, 2012 Living In Aurora Community FOCUS BLOG

In light of Councillor Michael Thompson’s upcoming motion, I’d like to take this opportunity to offer my opinion on aspects of the SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation) lawsuit and ruling.

1. Regarding the recent statement by Councillor Ballard referring to “those responsible for allowing possible defaming postings on the Aurora Citizen blog”:

a) On July 20, 2011, Superior Court Justice Carole Brown found that Morris had “failed to identify the specific words alleged to be defamatory” in the six postings she submitted in her statement of claim.

b) In her ruling, Justice Brown wrote “It is not the role of the Court to parse the impugned articles and blogs before it to attempt to determine, by divination or divine inspiration, which statements it should assess“.

There is no “possible” about it. She was unable to prove defamation.

2. In a recent letter to The Auroran; “Costs were awarded against Ms. Morris on account of that action (the lawsuit) having been judged procedurally incorrect”:

a) On October 27, 2012, Master Thomas Hawkins ruled that: “Morris has offered no evidence as to why she discontinued this action (the lawsuit). In that situation I regard Johnson and Hogg as successful defendants, entitled to the costs of defending this action“.

This is not a procedural error; she dropped the lawsuit, and the defendants won. That’s why she has to pay up.

Councillor Ballard goes on to make the assertion that “the community has had enough with the matter”. While I am certain the Councillor, along with a small bitter group in our town are desperate to have us forget about this egregious action, let me share with you why I feel we must not.

It could have been any one of us.

This time, Morris pulled the names Johnson, Hogg, and Bishenden. Rather than seek to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the matter, Morris instead lobbed a six-million-dollar cluster bomb into the lives of three innocent families. Master Hawkins wrote “Morris was not prepared to wait and see if a demand letter would have the desired effect“, and that she “wanted to hit Johnson, Hogg, and Bishenden quickly and hard, in order to silence them as her critics“. So she moved swiftly to secure enough council votes to launch her assault, and did so funding it with town money.

Meaning, as an Aurora taxpayer, Morris used my money in an attempt to deliver a lethal blow to my neighbours, and threaten my right to free speech.

Not a day goes by that I don’t think about that, and not a day goes by that I don’t think that it could happen again.

Through the landmark and precedent-setting rulings of Justice Brown and Master Hawkins, we have confirmation of what many had suspected; that the Morris lawsuit was without any merit whatsoever.

Facing these hard facts, Councillor Ballard is now attempting to defend his old friend.

His frantic and ultimately fruitless attempt to have Councillor Thompson’s motion quashed shows me he has no concept of the role to which he has been entrusted. He has stated that the motion is “designed to further humiliate Ms Morris”, a claim I’m not certain is even possible at this stage. He goes on to question as to whether this motion could put the Town of Aurora in jeopardy, conveniently overlooking the fact that the Town of Aurora was put in jeopardy some time ago courtesy of the ex-Mayor, and we are paying for that action to the tune of $55,000.

“RATHER THAN SEEK TO NEGOTIATE A PEACEFUL RESOLUTION TO THE MATTER, MORRIS INSTEAD LOBBED A SIX-MILLION-DOLLAR CLUSTER BOMB INTO THE LIVES OF THREE INNOCENT FAMILIES.”

Councillors Gallo and Gaertner, who voted in favour of the initial motion which lit the fuse on that bomb, were nevertheless presented with the opportunity to redeem some measure of their integrity when the motion to cease taxpayer funding of the lawsuit was tabled.

But they, along with Councillor Ballard voted against this motion, telling us that while they were aware three Aurora families were suffering both emotionally and financially as a result of Morris’ town-funded lawsuit, they were still in favour of using our tax money to continue its funding.

When these three Councillors swore their oath of office, they promised to first protect the interests of the town and its citizens. Again, from Master Hawkins ruling, “Morris brought this action expressly in her capacity as Mayor of the Corporation of the Town of Aurora“, and, “had access to Aurora municipal money to fund this litigation“. The fact that these three continue to defend the actions of the ex-Mayor leaves me stunned.

Through their actions, Councillors Ballard, Gallo, and Gaertner have failed in the most basic and important trust they hold as our elected representatives. I believe they haven’t earned the right to seek that honour from the electorate again (SLAPP).

They may want us all to forget about the SLAPP lawsuit, and the roles they all played in it.

The families of Richard Johnson, Bill Hogg, and Elizabeth Bishenden will certainly never forget, and as their neighbours and fellow Aurorans, neither should we.

Matt Maddocks
Aurora, ON 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slapp_Happy_(album)

BL20-⚔️🏪nope – Rainbow Crosswalks on every corner? Sell Pet Tags! “TAG” is almost “GAY” Spelled Backwards (*UNBLOCKED*)

Aurora will spend thousands on one Rainbow Crossing instead of one in 62 parks

NOTE: This is an experiment. Aurora CANNOT say “Yes” to any idea of mine… so watch them wiggle on this one.

By selling pet tags, the LGBTQ community could raise a lot of project money AND put a Rainbow Pole poop bag dispenser in every park.

NOTHING will cause more Q-uestioning than a rainbow logo poop bag dispense in EVERY park. Young people, old people, in between people ALL go to parks so the entire demographic is covered, choice wise.

Bags Logo: “We don’t have to take this crap anymore! But, you do!”

Imagine this one BIGGER.

6-10 feet tall, disco ball on top

Aluminum, 6 inch diameter.

66% of Canadian homes have at least one pet.

For free, 5.3% of Aurora got a crosswalk

That is 2,915 people got a crosswalk, 36,000 got zero.

Why not do both?

Why do 2,915 people not just help organize 36,000 to buy 14,000 pet tags and raise $300,00 for Aurora and $200,000 for the LGBTQ community? Huh? Why Not?

All the LGBTQ community need do is go door to door, be paid $20 per home that buys at least one pet tag.

The $20 is a canvas fee the Pets Bylaw allows for. Owners pay normal price for the tag, but then they pay $20 for that service brought to their door after being given 6 months to be honest and buy one without a canvas.

WIN-WIN-WIN.

LGBTQ gets $200,000 minimum and a rainbow in every park.

Aurora gets $300,000 a year forever.

Pet owners get free poop bags and peace of mind about rabies.

BL20-⚔️🏪ATE – “Mea Copa”…maybe… STRATH CRAWFORD?

if the complete marriage history of Deputy Chief Andre Crawford were known… IT MAY SHOW NO RELATIONSHIP!

“STRATH” CRAWFORD was also a HALTON REGION cop until 2003… and married/lived in Calgary

https://theworx.org/userfile/file/Ad50Plus%20-%20Calgary%20Inc%20June%202007.pdf

With the courts closed, even provateinvestogators are blocked from Fam

He was 52 on 2007, so born 1955 and is 65 now in 2020.

AHA!

1982

So, Strath came last with her and live-in Alliston. He drove school bus.

Then he got on at St. Andrews college on Security at the start of 2016 in January.

I began dog park advocating that summer and was pretty much done by December 2016.

Then, Strath and Mandie together signed an obituary.

2013

2017

2015

March 3, 2015 they were in or around Canmore, and were mentioned in:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjn8PL71uvqAhWroHIEHegODTIQFjABegQIBRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcanmore.ca%2Fdocuments%2F1753-human-use-management-review&usg=AOvVaw0RdaMWKYHZwGP6rZGiGdRD

2003

March 2003 worked for Halton Region Police

https://collections.ola.org/mon/28003/326330.pdf

2004

2004 Moved to Calgary

https://theworx.org/userfile/file/Ad50Plus%20-%20Calgary%20Inc%20June%202007.pdf

2006

ShOuld bean actor

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2972535/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

BL20-⚔️🏪♂♀ – This stuff will help

BL20-⚔️🏪🖐 – Ooohhh, ooohhhhh I forgot about court photos!

Aurora lawyer ill-informed on court hours photography

It is totally legal to take photos in court!

But, Lloyd’s lawyer wants me arrested for doing it.

Is it not possible I am working undercover for the Attorney General and all the justices are helping me out?

Is it truly IMPOSSIBLE that

I have permission to take photos?

Also, the law is quite clear you can take photo INSIDE a court building IF…

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a photograph, motion picture, audio recording or record made with authorization of the judge,

Courts of Justice Act: 136 (3) (a)

(a)  where required for

the presentation of evidence or

the making of a record or

for any other purpose of the court hearing;

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c43#BK182

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c43#BK182

NOW…… is that not as clear as mud?

🐛

My bass has become rest-less…

BL20-⚔️🏪🏌️‍♀️ – I forget – Did I already brag about this?

Did I show you a new word?

If someone lies about everything including what her legal name is, does she retain RIGHTS I do not have?

I rest my bass… AGAIN!

BL20-⚔️🏪🌲 – Married? When you reclaim a maiden name do you have to tell your husband?

Should you tell him? or surprise him?

If someone lies about everything including what her legal name is, does she retain RIGHTS I do not have?

I rest my bass… AGAIN!

BL20-⚔️🏪2 – Law: NOT TO MENTION “Meghan Markle”.. may I blog “Meghan Mountbatten-Windsor” instead?

If a person NEVER changed her name… can I blog her married name?

If someone lies about everything including what her legal name is, does she retain RIGHTS I do not have?

I rest my bass

BL20-⚔️🏪🏁 – How’re Ya Gonna Keep’ em Up in The Farm After They Been to La Cour D’appel?

The Court of Appeal of Ontario appears to self represented person as an idyllic isle tossed upon cloudy seas, if you can excuse a mild poemaphore.

You cannot imagine how good it feels to find a place where things make sense again. It’s kind of like going to Disneyworld before Donald Trump destroyed it.

Newmarket does what it can, but let’s face it, the police decide who gets prosecuted, not the Crown, because the Crown is just the YRP’s B*&^ch when it comes to picking who to take to court.

Anything police write up in York Region gets prosecuted. Anything.

In fact, I will prove that by submitting an FOI for the “uptake rate”, the percentage of cases police propose which get assigned to Crown prosecutor.

It would seem that there should be a tangible percentage of cases police are just shoving along to keep up their performance statistics.

I’ll ask YRP what their success rate at submitting charges was in an FOI as well and compare the two.

If police say 99% of what the submit gets accepted, and the Crown says they cull out 19% as unfounded, well we can talk about it.

Overall, Newmarket succeeds 25% of the time. If it prosecutes 100 charges, 75 are false and 25 are true.

That is a pathetic success rate not permissible in rocket science, airline pilots, surgeons or proctologists.

If 75% of your students fail , you are NOT a good teacher.

If 25% of your parachutes open when the ripcord is pulled, you are NOT a good packer. Even if your name is Bart Starr.

So, what do you think? What percentage of police charges are NOT acceptable to prosecute?

Stay tuned.

poemaphore n.

What you create when you use a line or two from a poem as a metaphor for something you are trying to explain to another person.

I get it… he used “The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas.” to express to me desolation and despair, but his mixed poemaphore lost me when he added on “There’s something happening her, what it is ain’t exactly clear.” Of corse its not clear, its cloudy!

Urban Dictionary

OR, jump straight to Neil here:

Stiils: “It all came as a piece, and it took about fifteen minutes.”

For What It’s Worth

Written by Buffalo Springfield guitarist Stephen Stills, this song was not about anti-war gatherings, but rather youth gatherings protesting anti-loitering laws, and the closing of the West Hollywood nightclub Pandora’s Box. Stills was not there when they closed the club, but had heard about it from his bandmates.
In the book Neil Young: Long May You Run: The Illustrated History, Stephen Stills tells the story of this song’s origin: “I had had something kicking around in my head. I wanted to write something about the kids that were on the line over in Southeast Asia that didn’t have anything to do with the device of this mission, which was unraveling before our eyes. Then we came down to Sunset from my place on Topanga with a guy – I can’t remember his name – and there’s a funeral for a bar, one of the favorite spots for high school and UCLA kids to go and dance and listen to music.

[Officials] decided to call out the official riot police because there’s three thousand kids sort of standing out in the street; there’s no looting, there’s no nothing. It’s everybody having a hang to close this bar. A whole company of black and white LAPD in full Macedonian battle array in shields and helmets and all that, and they’re lined up across the street, and I just went ‘Whoa! Why are they doing this?’ There was no reason for it. I went back to Topanga, and that other song turned into ‘For What It’s Worth,’ and it took as long to write as it took me to settle on the changes and write the lyrics down.
It all came as a piece, and it took about fifteen minutes.”

BL20-⚔️🏪🙀 – The Jury Was Never “IN”! So It Can’t Be Out…BUT I loved the experience, the “bench strength”

The Court of Appeal of Ontario sat or Zoom’d today in Court Room #1 to let me argue Aurora’s appeal of Justice Edwards order last September that:

I am not a vexatious litigant

On the Bench were:

• J. Huscroft
• J. Zarnett
• J. Coroza

C67682 – Painter appealed The Corporation of the Town of Aurora v. Lepp

No audio, video or other media about an Appeal can be published.

I am not sure.

I still need to ascertain specific dates and locations of marriage and divorce paperwork if any one can offer such materials.

https://www.lawtimesnews.com/news/general/court-pushes-back-around-vexatious-litigation/262658

J. Huscroft is not new to vexatious litigancy. In 2017 he rendered judgement that one does not look so much at the person as at the lawsuit.

Timothy Duggan, a lawyer with Horlick Levitt Di Lella LLP, who was not involved in the case, says the decision is a reminder that rule 2.1 is reserved for only cases where the claim is manifestly devoid of merit on its face.

“What this case brings back home is that the application of rule 2.1 requires the court to focus on the pleadings and to focus on what the face of the pleadings say rather than the underlying information about the litigant and the fact that the claim might be farfetched,” he says. “Something may be farfetched, but [it] could also be true.”

He adds that the decision shows that the Court of Appeal will push back on the expansion of rule 2.1 beyond the grounds that have already been accepted.

https://www.lawtimesnews.com/news/general/court-pushes-back-around-vexatious-litigation/262658

so, Mr Painter, had he done his research, would have learned that focusing on me was a tactical error. J. Edwards knew this law and he ignored my many flaws as a pretend lawyer and he found my suit to have merit.

Aurora should have tried to prove my suit vexatious… and not me… because if the suit fits, wear it!

The following link is fun. High fees and lowered demand for lawyers…

https://www.lawtimesnews.com/resources/practice-management/beware-the-end-of-the-sellers-market-in-legal-services-says-panel/323479

BL20-🌲🌲nein – The Lineup Card July 22, 2020

The Court of Appeal of Ontario sits today in Court Room #1 to let me argue Aurora’s appeal of Justice Edwards order last September that:

I am not a vexatious litigant

On the Bench:

• J. Huscroft
• J. Zarnett
• J. Coroza

C67682 – Painter appealed The Corporation of the Town of Aurora v. Lepp

No audio, video or other media about an Appeal can be published.

Partner. Practises as trial and appellate counsel, emphasizing commercial cases involving public companies, financial institutions and governments. Has practised before the SCC, FCC, all levels of courts in Ontario and many administrative tribunals. Lead counsel in some of the most important, high-profile cases that have recently been decided in Canada, including the litigation involving the restructuring of the Asset-Backed Commercial Paper market, the contest over the acquisition of BCE, the Danier Leather class action, the Indalex priority dispute and the Nortel asset allocation dispute. Awarded 2006 Law Society Medal (highest honour) by LSUC, the 2007 Award of Distinction by TLA for outstanding contributions to the legal profession and the 2009 OBA Award for Excellence in Civil Litigation. Named “Toronto Litigator of the Year” for Bet-the-Company (2013/2010), Corporate/Commercial (2012), Class Action (2011/2015), Product Liability (2016) and Director/Officer Liability (2017) by Best Lawyers in Canada. Recognized as 1 of 3 “Star Individuals” for dispute resolution by Chambers.

Check CANLII for the ruling

The Ontario Bar Association (OBA) would like to congratulate Benjamin Zarnett for his appointment as Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Justice Zarnett is a former recipient of our Award for Excellence in Civil Litigation.

Born and raised in Toronto, Justice Zarnett is graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School. He was admitted to the Ontario Bar in 1977. Aside from practising trial and appellate advocacy, he has also been counsel in 15 appeals in the Supreme Court of Canada and numerous cases before Ontario’s appellate and trial courts, as well as appeals in the Federal Court of Appeal.

Justice Zarnett is a former President of the Advocates’ Society and a member of the Supreme Court Advocacy Institute. In addition to the OBA Award for Excellence in Civil Litigation that he received in 2009, he was also awarded the Law Society of Ontario Medal in 2006 and the Toronto Lawyers Association Award of Distinction in 2007.

His advocacy and contributions to our legal system have been far-reaching, and he is a welcome addition to the Court of Appeal.

BL20-🌲🌲🐾 – “Chair Girl” v. Lepp

Chair Girl drops chair on busy highway from 200 feet up. No jail. Fine. Community service

Lepp emails police for help… 2 months 24/7 house arrest equals eight months jail.

fair?