Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book The Star - Slandered In Print Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXt4 waiting

I think the day is near that the only solution to a spite fence is removal.

Especially if it is on someone else’s land. IF that ever happens in the future.

It is just a matter of time.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit The Star - Slandered In Print

BL20-🎄CLX👁 – The Star would not respond to me in January either

Gwendolyn Adrian, senior lawyer for Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP and personal lawyer to partner Michael Simaan gave an interview to Alexandra Heck on Adrians’ suit against me litigated for an ex-cop, ex-Aurora Bylaws Manager, ex-Erin contractor. I asked for an opportunity to be interviewed but I got no reply in ten months.

The Toronto Star published her article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site.

This was the first of two misleading articles from The Star. They have not responded AT ALL to my defamation notice and I doubt they ever will. The peril in taking that attitude is that it looks bad in court to be shown a pattern of bias spread by lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

Both AURORA and Erin terminated her client early and paid cash to make her go away. Part of ADRIAN‘s lawsuit claims I was responsible despite her client testifying in Newmarket court to exactly the opposite facts. She testified happily that she was terminated without cause in Aurora and paid a cash lump sum to avoid a lawsuit for letting her go “without reason”.

Her manager in Erin also testified in the same proceeding that he paid her two extra unearned months of her contract to leave early after just four months. Erin residents had applied pressure to the mayor for that decision at election time in October 2018.

The Toronto Court told Gwendolyn Adrian that she had not filed a legal lawsuit and that she was required to have filed it within three months of the alleged acts. Since that day ADRIAN has not advanced the lawsuit in any way. The suit has no chance of being litigated.

Gwendolyn Adrian has now been ordered by the court to justify 2 legal actions she took against me. The justice told her she litigated “the worst of the worst” allegations of me on October 14. That her motion was “grossly over reaching”, a “non starter” and “just not going to happen”.. she was ordered to write ten pages explaining why she chose to attack me in this fashion.

I, in turn, will do the same to show the court how she manipulated the press to quote her before the suit was even litigated. That seems inappropriate for a Law Society licensee. They have ethics rules for its members.

The true Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each with Gwendolyn Adrian and others. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. so each article was merely a hit job orchestrated by Gwendolyn Adrian and the Toronto star.

neither Alexandra heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

Well, so did I and now it is payback time. I had to give a DNA sample so maybe that will help.

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

But our great Charter of Rights let’s them do it because we have a legal system designed to keep them honest. I do not need to get upset at all. All I need do is sue them.

And Ontario wonders why its courts are now terminally disrupted by a bat from Wuhan China.

Now, will someone go to bat for me?

Categories
Public Service Announcement The Star - Slandered In Print

BL20-🎄CLX – Finally …the Press is on my story!

Not in a good way… but they are on it and they must now tell the truth.

Dispute over a property line fence stirs up a costly battle at the Superior Court of Justice

Bob Aaron

By Bob AaronContributing Columnist

Click HERE ==> https://www.thestar.com/life/homes/2020/10/14/neighbours-dispute-over-a-property-line-fence-lands-them-in-an-costly-battle-at-the-superior-court-of-justice.html

Now, before Ms Adrian accuses me of publishing more slander of her client… that link is the Toronto Star and they never lie.

the first sentence is a lie: it was Toronto court, NOT Newmarket. How could a lawyer make that “mistake”… by simply taking the email sent to him and publish it as his own work.
No, someone in Aurora wrote that for him. Someone with so little respect for the law she did not even know what court the matter was in.

certainly Mr. Aaoron did not research it, the location of the court is on every piece of paper in the file. One might ASSUME an Aurora battle between two or three people in Aurora would be heard in Newmarket. But if you’re rich and easily embarrassed then you go far from home to litigate your lies.

One of the four women wrote this story and Bob Aaron copy pasted it into an email to his editors and they published it verbatim. So, if you don’t like what it says, go contact the Editor like I did.

“judgment against an online activist who interfered in the dispute.”

bob Aaron

How is blogging considered to be “interfering”?

how is my exercise of my Charter right to my opinions suddenly viewed as interfering by a lawyer like Aaron? Is it proper for a lawyer to dissuade people from expressing their opinions?

Are lawyers not to be “models” for the peasants to emulate? Is suppressing public opinion something a lawyer should be doing as a reporter?

Could anyone read that article and come away educated on how to be a good Canadian? Is this attitude prevalent in the Law Society? Do they want us to stop standing up for ourselves and hire lawyers instead.

is this lawyer really suggesting no one be their own person? Does he really want to jam up the courts with FENCES?

does the Superior Court have to intervene when a landowner disrespects her neighbour’s? Can we mere mortals not pay Bylaws Officers to enforce fence bylaws?

After xxx purchased her house in 2017, she constructed a wooden fence on the property line.

Bob Aaron

NO. She FIRST constructed a pair of huge black steel gates hung on a wooden gate post 100% on Buckles’ land and she was embarrassed to be told to remove it. THEN, she constructed a spite fence.

“Xxx reduced the height of the fence.”

Bob Aaoron

NO! When I was hired January the fence had been too high for five months. Only when I blogged and emailed and photographed the height beside a two meter long stick and threatened to buy a chainsaw did Aurora order it shortened.

“Buckles then went public with her complaints to the local media,”

Bob Aaron

NO! She went to The Star, and a reporter called the neighbour to fact check. The reporter was threatened with defamation if she published so she dropped the story. Now, The Star FAILS to fact check so Aaron could defame me. Irony.

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:46 PM,  <TVanLeeuwen@aurora.ca> wrote:

“He was able to get a measurement. The top rail of the fence is in compliance a few inches under the maximum height, the top of the posts are 2 to 3 inches over maximum. If they cut the posts it will not change the outcome for you. Your view from your windows will be the same unfortunately.”

Director of Legal Aurora Techa van Leeuwenhoek to Buckles

that was months BEFORE I got the posts shortened. I had to get “interfering” and Techa had to order AGAIN.

“He (Lepp) also launched an online petition signed by at least 300 people.”

Bob Aaron

NO! We got over 1,200:signatures.

”Lepp did not defend the action,”

Bob Aaron

NO! I filed my defense in 21 days because I had a vacation in Mexico. I beat Buckles filing by a week. Hers was accepted. Mine was rejected for being one day late and she put me in default and let Buckles defend.

”After a delay, Lepp applied to Superior Court to allow him to file a defence to the lawsuit, but he was turned down and ordered to pay $18,000 in costs.”

Bob Aaron

NO! I filed one day late due to vacation. The Judge, J. Schabas erred and awarded $18,000 for a SLAPP 137.1 challenge which was required to be heard August 26, 2019:but he refused to hear it, he forgot, and then awarded costs for it illegally.

“She found that Lepp accused xxx of deliberately acting illegally, that his statements suggested she received preferential treatment from the town because of political connections, and that she was a liar”

Bob Aaron

NO! Not “accused”. He meant “documented with her own sworn testimony before a judge”. I merely pointed out to the judge she had admitted knowing she drilled into Buckles foundation stones, removed them with the dirt and replace that with a post an concrete. Twice she admitted she built out of spite for having her gates rejected from being bolted to a post on Buckles’ land.

“Lepp has appealed the decision.”

Bob Aaron

NO! I TRIED to appeal. Instead of waiting for me to do that, she garnished our pensions illegally. I then spent a lot of time trying to reverse the illegal garnishment but the court told me I had to sue her. So I sued her boss Michael Simaan for failing to teach her the law. Then she did it again to my brand new CIBC account in less than 24 hours of opening it. So I sued her boss again. Now she refuses to garnish RBC Aurora branch YONGE and Aurora Heights.

today, it is over 7 weeks from telling her I am now at RBC Aurora branch, but she refuses to garnish it.

strange, she illegally garnished two banks but faced with a legal garnishment target she declines. Almost as if she thinks she would be embarrassed to have RBC learn what she has been doing all this time with banks.

Toronto police are investigating Adrian for theft of my CIBC data when no one knew I opened that account.

The timing is interesting. Did Ms Adrian plan it for the SAME day she planned my double contempt motion? Was it her plan next day to offer up I was now even deeper in?

Or, was it some other legal officer of the court? Someone on the periphery who had failed at every other attack on me?

Maybe… it is such a collection of lies that no reporter could have come up them with alone… just statistically, a reporter would have at least come up with ONE truthful sentence. But this time, nothing written is true.

The photo is the funniest part. A guy building a fence. Narrow boards, gaps, low height.

No one who investigated the fence would have chosen that photo. No one who has seen the fence would have chosen that stock photo.

here is Bob Aaron’s Law website tightly integrated with the Star.

So, Mr Aaron uses “articles” he “authors”, presumably for money, which he then uses to promote his law firm.

That’s not typically viewed as proper by the Law Society. Their rules are that any other profession practiced by a lawyer must …

SECTION 2.1 INTEGRITY

2.1-1 A lawyer has a duty to carry on the practice of law and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the profession honourably and with integrity.

Commentary.

[1] Integrity is the fundamental quality of any person who seeks to practise as a member of the legal profession. If a client has any doubt about their lawyer’s trustworthiness, the essential element in the true lawyer-client relationship will be missing. If integrity i s lacking, the lawyer’s usefulness to the client and reputation within the profession will be destroyed, regardless of how competent the lawyer may be.

[2] Public confidence in the administration of justice and in the legal profession may be eroded by a lawyer’s irresponsible conduct. Accordingly, a lawyer’s conduct should reflect favourably on the legal profession, inspire the confidence, respect and trust of clients and of the community, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

[3] Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client’s trust in the lawyer, the Law Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.

[4] Generally, however, the Law Society will not be concerned with the purely private or extra-professional activities of a lawyer that do not bring into question the lawyer’s professional integrity.

[4.1] A lawyer has special responsibilities by virtue of the privileges afforded the legal profession and the important role it plays in a free and democratic society and in the administration of justice, including a special responsibility to recognize the diversity of the Ontario community, to protect the dignity of individuals, and to respect human rights laws in force in Ontario.

Well, by publishing this drivel without one single question to me to verify his claims is a sure sign of dishonorable conduct.

Real reporters MUST fact check.
Lawyers who are also reporters should be very accurate in their claims because they cannot argue they lack the mens rea to defame. He is a professional at knowing the law and whether his actions would break the law.

So he cannot defend his actions by claiming he made a minor mistake.

isn’t it ironic though his title suggests people just shut up about being wronged. That they should hire lawyers instead. He seems to misunderstand the charter and our rights to our opinions.

I’ll let you know what the law society says. This is blatant advertising.

And it is NOT “REPORTING” as the Toronto Star defines it.

I bet Aaoron pays The Star to publish his “contributions“. That would make more sense.

What are the bets The Star calls Bob Aron’s “articles” Infomercials, or “Advertorials”… anything other than reporting.

Stand down and stand back…. it could get noisy!