Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement Uncategorized

BL20-🎄CL 👁-👁- Canadian Record Flight – 2 seat glider to 31,700 feet

It is my opinion no one will believe this. So few people understand clouds at all. They really don’t know clouds at all.

Rows and floes of angel hair
And ice cream castles in the air
And feather canyons everywhere
I’ve looked at clouds that way

But now they only block the sun
They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way

I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now
From up and down, and still somehow
It’s cloud illusions I recall
I really don’t know clouds at all

I’ve looked at life from both sides now 
From up and down and still somehow
It’s life’s illusions I recall
I really don’t know life at all

Tuesday Oct. 6, 2020 2 Canadians flew a motorless 2 seat glider to an altitude of 31,700 feet over the Rockies south of Calgary.

This is a new record for height gain and absolute altitude for multi-seat gliders in Canada/

https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3.0/gliding/flightinfo.html?dsId=8204904

The ex-RCAF pilot then realized he was hypoxic ands started down… QUICKLY to 25,000 feet where his brain regained enough oxygen to feel normal.

read about it here:

https://us18.campaign-archive.com/?u=72080979ac4fe538a62f765bb&id=5c53ee769e

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book Uncategorized

BL20-🎄CL 👁- Welcome back for the names…. finally

Well, as the masks go ON every day.some are REMOVED forever.

Justice Dawe has called for a retrial of J. Rose’s decision and probation order of December 4, 2019,

Since the “not to mention: clause is also GONE from my Release Order in March, I can mention anyone I want here again. Just like 2017, up until July 14 anyway.

I tend to state facts and not get caught up in emotions. And now there are so many court transcripts to paraphrase so everyone can see the evidence and testimony themselves.

Publication bans have ended. They never did get a ban on the victim impact statements. That would have been too funny. Your honour, our next victim really wants to pass along how she feels about Mr. Lepp. But she asks that no one outside this room listen in.

All 3 women were permitted to trash me December 4, 2019 and now that conviction has been quashed. And the Crown must now, with everyone watching, decide to re-try it. But they have a problem, J Dawe was quite clear the Crown NEVERE EVEN TRIED to prove the mens rea, my state of mind, and THEN the Crown argued they did not have to do that at all. J, Dawe has now written out what they have to do to convict. And THEN he told why no one could prove my mens rea was reckless.

That charge, one of two… the other was “not guilty”… was for an iPhone post of a photo of two stacks of paper from a distance. Get out a huge TV set and a microscope and you may see some words. But no one saw them before posting it.

So, look for there victim impacts… one blames me for her mother dying confused about my motivations.

One says she barfed every time I emailed her about how much more money I got her at Council.

One is an ex-cop telling the court how she feared my name on an email asking for help. A big, bad cop is afraid of the written word.

I had to get ALL my transcripts, so I only need to publish facts with no spin at all to get my point across. All these people made up alternate facts for everything they told police. Now I just get to post them here.

Stand back and stand by.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Uncategorized

BL20-🎄CL – Opinions… All together again

It will be gone in court for the Crown to argue “Your honour, he posted in Bob Lepp’s Opinions again!”

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Police Region Public Service Announcement York Regional Police

BL20-🎄CL4dvii – Police wanted me silenced, not the Crown or courts

Perfecting my appeal of J. Harpur clarifies who wanted me silent and why

I have been reading the trial transcripts. Not one word describes any effects of my blog on anyone.

Yet, from the arrest May 30, 2018 to today the court has silenced me in my blogging, a Charter Right of every Canadian.

But not one word was said to the court that indicated the effect of my blog on anyone. Yet, the justices all picked the same 195 word “Term #6” to shut me up.

Why is that even possible?

Police. It is possible because police tell the Crown what to do. And if they do not do it, then, implicitly, police will not protect the Crowns from all those bad mafia guys they put in prison.

Anyone who does not believe police use a threatened withdrawal of protection to sway the courts is naiive. Of course they do.

Would you be a justice of you knew police would refuse to protect you and your family? No, you would not.

How do we stop that?

By tasking the RCMP to be the protectors of the justices. Without such protection they cannot be expected to order cops guilty or find them guilty of witness tampering, breach of trust or any number of charges only police can accumulate.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-🎄CL4dvi – The Raw Publishing Power of www.boblepp.com

7 months of web activity revealed

If you do not know what these numbers indicate, do some reading.

This next one tell you most everyone uses small display screens. They have to use microscopes to see all the breaches claimed.

On Average… 6 people per day, and, I am one, your are a second…. read my blog

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-🎄CL4dv – If It Were Not For Trump, no one would believe me

Trump epitomizes the politician and the police in power

When such people learn no one will come after them if they lie, they lie.

And it works both ways. Police are notorious liars in court when under oath. To protect one of their own Thin Blue Line, they will say and do anything to defend the “honour” of a fellow police officer.

Politicians do the same. Once they prove to themselves they are protected by lawyers and insurance policies, they will say whatever they want to get their way.

And witnesses, once they are shown by. police that there will be no retribution, they lie to arrest me 7 times on 27 charges.

At least Trump has a feedback loop once every 4 years, and the voters will dispense with him.

But we don’t get to elect sheriffs in Canada. We are stuck with them.

There is no place to go to complain about the police. They are shielded by the OIPRD and that is just “them” investigating each other and finding perfection every time.

And so… thanks Donald!

You have opened eyes by merely being the epitomy of Presidential perfection.

My personal favourite debate question fo Trump?

Q: Will you denounce white supremacists?

Trump: Stand back and stand by!

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-🎄CL4div – Trump zero taxes versus YRP zero officer issues

The NYT yesterday revealed the obvious, Trump paid no income taxes

People get greedy. They get taxes reduced a lot then they shoot for zero to prove they could do it. Better to pay $143,612.98 than ZERO or $750,00

Why attract every eyeball win the world?

So, Trump paid no taxes at all in 10 of 15 years and one year he paid $750

York Regional Police claim ZERO needs to admonish a cop, 2 years out of three. Just one in 3 consecutive years.

These are rookie mistakes. Greedy. Over reaching. Just plain dumb if you are NOT trying to attract attention to your lies.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-🎄CL4d🎄 – York Regional Police… if you read NOTHING else about them…. “any online media” Mass Murderer

Arrest Times: Mass Murderer – 2 days. Lepp – 2 hours

Are York Regional’s Police “biased”, or on a vendetta against me? Or are they treating me like normal, like. a normal mass murderer?

OK, you support your police. But, if you do not think they are perfect…

Read this!


Markham man pleads guilty to murdering his mother, father, sister and grandmother


Menhaz Zaman, 24, on Thursday (September 24, 2020) pleaded guilty to killing his family seen here in Facebook photos, from left: Zaman’s grandmother, Firoza Begum; his sister, Malesa Zaman; his mother, Momotaz Zaman; and his father, Moniruz Zaman.

Read in The Star: https://apple.news/AIZPVqAoPQkmjdCiaB_tSBQ

‘I’ve just slaughtered my entire family’: Markham man pleads guilty to murdering mother, father, sister, grandmother over several hours last summer

In a soft but clear voice, Zaman admitted (Sept. 24, 2020) he first murdered his mother, Momotaz Begum, 50, in their home on Castlemore Avenue at about 3 p.m. on July 27, 2019.

Zaman messaged Devonte Nicholson, a friend from Minnesota at 11:54 p.m. (July 27, 2019) through the messaging app Discord and said: “I’ve just slaughtered my entire family and will most likely spend life in jail if I manage to survive. I hope I made you laugh at one point or another. I hope you remember the good times. I will miss you all.

NEXT DAY: On July 28, 2019, Toronto police informed York Regional Police that they’d received information that someone may have “slaughtered their entire family.”

When the police arrived at the home the day after the killing, Zaman peered out from an upstairs window. 

Jul 31, 2019: Online pal of alleged Markham murderer says dad could have been saved

Author of the article:Aidan Wallace Publishing date: Jul 31, 2019  

It took police from 3 PM July 27, 2-19 until NEXT DAY to get a call from police.

“Police didn’t go there until over 15 hours,” said an online pal said, adding, “in 15 hours he could have killed so many more people. It’s very absurd.”

Back to me.

On July 14, 2017 at 11:39 am Mayor Geoffrey DAWE called police, Jeff Dawe, and he then convened a meeting at town hall. Jeff Brown briefed them all on his arrest plans and left. He drove past my house. Within an hour, the “complainant” was interviewed, and an hour later I was arrested,

2 hours, start to finish, is the service level for an email to a Thin Blue Line alumnus. Instant response.

On the evening of December 5, 2019 I blogged a photo of lawsuit showing a NAME of a woman in a letter from her lawyer threatening my wife.

By 11:00 am NEXT DAY I was arrested INSIDE a court room, incarcerated in the basement and suffered a heart attack.

I was arrested and in jail FASTER than a quadruple murderer who announced his crimes “in any online media”

Too bad none of the murdered family ever worked as a cop. The Thin Blue Line™©️ would have been on it in minutes.

I believe that is proof enough of police bias.

You?

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXI – How Breachy Was I?

All My “Convictions” are breaches. Save one which was an email to police asking for help with a dog attack. Am I TOO breachy?

Breach´y

a.1.Apt to break fences or to break out of pasture; unruly; as, breachy cattle.
Too funny… breaking fences in spite of myself

Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, published 1913 by G. & C. Merriam Co.

“APT TO BREAK FENCES” is just TOO funny.

In the past five months less than 12 people Average per day read my blog.

Three are alleged victims

Three more are me and my family, one more friend

at least three must be lawyers

my probation offocer, that’s 11.

some of 37 cops assigned

And your Attorney General has spent $250,000 conservatively since 2017. Ten trial days. Four inquiry days. A Hundred appearances. Waste.

For one ex cop. And only because of the “Thin Blue Line”.

I spent over $44,000 on lawyers and courts.

For 12 people a day. Ontario paid $228 per viewer per day

I paid another $40 a day per viewer

$268 a day we paid.

Is that “in the public interest?”

$268 a day.. over $10 an hour per person?

Discuss among yourselves.

I’m thinking ex cops are expensive to protect from public opinion. If they don’t want people blogging about them…. stop assaulting me and lying again and again. Two arrests, three charges all withdrawn as false.

When I went to Toronto police the first thing thing they asked ME for was photo ID. “Standard procedure” he said.

Why is it not STANDARD with York Regional Police?

Why can I not be shown PROOF of the name of the person who arrested me twice falsely? 3 charges. All withdrawn. Why can I not be told the legal name of such a person?

Since there was no name change between June 3, 2017 and January 30, 2018 when a married name was renewed as a POA officer in council minutes, she lied about her name in every charge and every lawsuit. Neither of her two lawyers have responded to a legal request to know my accuser’s legal name.

When after 5 days Toronto police called … they IMMEDIATELY opened with..” Why did you try to arrest in Toronto, you’re in Aurora?”

Second thing? She wanted my bank account number.

She’s not even planning to get the “legally executed garnishment from CIBC” to get the account number. She wants it from me?

Nope. I do not Gove my SON or bank account to anyone. Common sense.

If CIBC was legally freezing my account, she can now garnish RBC the same way. If she stole no account number for CIBC she should be able to repeat the process at RBC WITHOUT an account number. I’ve put my cash in the account. Go garnish it without an account number to prove your innocence.

If they give you my money they broke the law in s. 462. I’ve sued two banks already for breaking the Bank Act s.462 and eliminating my account, so to sue a third is easy.

Not garnishing RBC is an admission of guilt.

Your call.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

Protected: BL20-🎄CLX🎄 – Justice Cameron’s Unusual Findings

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXIi – Crown! Heads UP! This is a case about technology, remember?

Dear Crown,

I ask that you take archive copies of every soft copy you have sent me. I ask that the metadata for all Word documents be safeguarded. Or, if you do NOT use MS Office, save every file and tell me what software you used to create them.

Crown Westagte was quite offended II suggested Mr. Elder, Giordano and himself had supplied “DRAFT orders” to Justice Harpur and Justice Cameron for their decisions.

Word metadata

Most Word documents contain hidden metadata that shows the history of the document. Metadata is data about the document or file that is embedded within the file’s details. That data shows when the document was first created, who authored the document, total editing time, and the last time the document was modified.

Microsoft Word’s metadata, or document properties, stores details about files. Common metadata entries include the document’s author, company, title and subject. Each time someone edits and saves a file, Word updates the document’s metadata. Comments and revisions logged in the metadata are helpful when several people are collaborating on a document. Reviewing the document’s properties or using the Document Inspector to see if metadata is present and will help you verify what information Word has recorded; remember, though, that the Document Inspector locates the types of metadata recorded in the document but does not reveal what that data contains.

For PDF files..

For PDF files..

View document properties

When you view a PDF, you can get information about it, such as the title, the fonts used, and security settings. Some of this information is set by the person who created the document, and some is generated automatically.

In Acrobat, you can change any information that can be set by the document creator, unless the file has been saved with security settings that prevent changes.

Choose File > Properties.

Click a tab in the Document Properties dialog box.

Document Properties

Description

Shows basic information about the document. The title, author, subject, and keywords may have been set by the person who created the document in he source application, such as Word or InDesign, or by the person who created the PDF. You can search for these description items to find particular documents. The Keywords section can be particularly useful for narrowing searches.

Note that many search engines use the title to describe the document in their search results list. If a PDF does not have a title, the filename appears in the results list instead. A file’s title is not necessarily the same as its filename.

The Advanced area shows the PDF version, the page size, number of pages, whether the document is tagged, and if it’s enabled for Fast Web View. (The size of the first page is reported in PDFs or PDF Portfolios that contain multiple page sizes.) This information is generated automatically and cannot be modified.

I would like all of that for every decision published by the various justices.

In particular:

J. Harpur

  • Findings and assessment of my guilt
  • Sentencing July 17, 2020

J, Cameron

  • Decision on my motion to suspend sentence awaiting appeal

J Rose

  • Decision and sentence
  • Probation Order

Here Mr. Elder , or “elder02” created the PDF in MS Word.

By Elder
By a court reporter

So, the evidence of who wrote these documents is recorded in the soft copy file itself.

I ask for a copy of each Word document so I can see who wrote it.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLnever – Trump builds The Wall in Bradford Canada because that is the ONLY place he found a Mexican desperate enough to pay for it himself

AP – Breaking News – Saturday, September 5, 2020

The Whitehouse today issued a press release bragging that “Trump builds a “‘New” protective wall, on the very land owned by its neighbour even, that no U.S. cash was spent, and only Mexicans had to pay for it!”

One has to dig deep into the narrative to discover that The New Wall is:

  1. Not an international border
  2. Not 30 feet high, just four feet High
  3. Not black, it’s orange
  4. Not in Mexico, it’s in Canada 50 km NORTH of the border
  5. For certain p, it was paid for ONLY by Mexicans

Announcing: “The Wall” at Hay Caramba, Bradford, Ontario… a brand new patio safely surrounded by towering (to children) walls in safety orange.

The “Mexicans” are owners Noe Martinez and Melissa Marques. They paid 100% of the costs.

Trump is now looking into the miles of canal walls built by the large numbers of annual farm workers brought to the Holland Marsh area from Mexico because Canadians do not want to grow food. I’d have thought a pandemic might convince a few people to learn the skills… Just in case. Apparently everyone trusts McDonalds burgers WILL have adequate hormones in the beef to kill COVID-19.

So, each mile of canal is two miles of wall because Mexicans built the canals.

In Toronto, Secret Service suits were seen Laser measuring the Mexican embassy so a space contractor computer simulation could prove the length of all interior walls as well. Dubbed “Trump Mex US Some More Wall”, the app is being deployed to all countries with Mexican embassies and to all border states with Mexican immigrant owned bodegas… each store’s walls will be counted.

Following will be inclusion of all Wahlburgers, Walmart’s, ANYTHING Sam Walton OWN’s, all WonderWalls. All walls in Cornwall, all previously owned furniture of Humpty Dumpty and his progeny, all buildings built by any company trading on Wall Street,

Then, usually dim witted Eric came up with more opportunities when he asked, “What is a wall?” And Dad said.. “ Look it up you you dumb f&*k!” And he found…

All U.S. embassies in the following countries will be asked to donate one city each:

Number of places named Wall per country:

There are 5 places named Wall in Germany.

There are 4 places named Wall in United Kingdom.

There are 3 places named Wall in America.

There is one place named Wall in Vanuatu.

There is one place named Wall in Czech Republic.

Walls Do Not Stop Boy Scouts

There is one place named Wall in Cameroon.

There is one place named Wall in Australia.


Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL8 – Alternative Facts: Maybe she did not steal it!

Better L8 than never! MAYBE I was wrong!

If I had it wrong with Adrian, will CIBC take the blame?

Because, it COULD also have been CIBC lying that they did nothing wrong.

IN FACT, that MAY be a high possibility.

Will I now be arrested for Public Mischief?

A;; I did was report Gwendolyn ADMITTED it was “none of my business” who stole my account number for her.

Have faith Gwendolyn, you have a female officer investigating, and. I am sure you can talk yourself out of it.

Maybe, Gwendolyn is gonna take one for the team, maybe she’ll allow her OWN arrest rather than cost the banking industry a fortune.

If it was Gwendolyn… she gets a knuckle rap.

BUT, if it was CIBC… the resultant CLASS ACTIONS will cost a bundle.

Note: To lawyers reading this… DIBS! on the class actions… I demand a piece!

Read on. Maybe we can pin this on the CIBC acting alone.

Needed: Just get Camilla Latronico (CIBC) and Michael Hamilton (OBSI) to admit they were wrong… that CIBC made a mistake. Again.

And here’s what I base that on. More evidence that CIBC simply cannot properly handle garnish orders. They evolved (see my Darwin posts) into treating them ALL as “child support orders“. By letting ALL LAWYERS fax garnish orders for family support, CIBC let lawyers sneak in the odd shady court order and if needed deny it as a one-off mistake.

Plausible deniability…. always useful, always valuable.

Remember… the POSITIVELY shady $18,000 court order the banks are waiting for was fraudulently awarded. Ms Adrian asked for and got it claiming a motion NEVER heard. $1,800 ALONE was claimed by Gwendolyn for PHOTOCOPIES NEVER SEEN.

That is (in my opinion, see: Rights, Charter Of) fraud.

Anyway, it SHOULD be.

SNIFF- SNIFF!

Let’s Make Like A Canary and Take a Sniff! If we die, we die.

OK, let’s see if my CIBC account is still frozen by an order sent by Gwendolyn Adrian March 4, just about 20 hours after I opened it…

Spoiler alert! It was!

I tried a large Interac from my pension fund account at RBC Aurora

I then switched Apps and tried to deposit it at CIBC Aurora….. NOPE.

Because all of my accounts at CIBC are frozen, I cannot transfer IN any money, I cannot pay my bills.

So, the banks DEFEATED the whole intent of a garnish…. they really just get ONE grab, and if the balance is less than demanded… then the account is useless forever. Forever frozen. It cannot get more money put in.

BUT CPP And OAS will arrive… AND BE SEIZED.

See, there is no capability in this cold banking computer systems IBM sold them in the 70’s to exempt social benefits from being seized. I proved that too, by asking them!

CIBC Refuses To Upgrade Computer Systems

With the BILLIONS taken from the Canadian taxpayer… they will now claim it to have been and TO BE NOW too expensive to change their mainframes to permit meeting REQUIREMENTS clearly define in the Bank ct at s. 462,

I CANNOT be the first to be abused… CLASS ACTION GOLD MINE AHEAD!

Imagine how many people were robbed of their pensions which were then sent to the sheriff!

How long will it take CIBC to just figure out HOW MUCH they OWE these people?

After all if CIBC accepted a $5,000 COURT ORDER (NOT family support related) and then took $1,000 of the last CPP or OAS payments… THEY STOLE them to give the sheriff.

CIBC will have to pay them back once my class action gets rolling.

Oh, BTW, even when frozen.. the $4.95 charge is applied.

YES, I also get a credit of the $4.95 Old Fart Rebate

BUT, if this were a “reglular for fee” account, they would be charging for a withdrawn service. They must pay it back.

THAT’S MORE TO PAY BACK!

I believe CIBC has an expensive problem.

And, once they admit THAT to keep Gwendolyn Adrian from being arrested, they “freeze and seize and never releaze”… I go to TD, RBC, BMO, Tangerine, …. ALL of them will have to take a look whether they seized pension funds in every garnish order EVER! OR charged fees while the account was made useless.

The lawyers will be lining up.

To get me to shut up!

Now, what are the bets I can go in and change my account to a high end, all bells and half whistles version with the highest fee and then watch that accumulate? Think I can do it by Monday morning? I have 1-4 pm out today, I will try.

Alert! Bob Lepp is coming to CIBC to catfish them into charging fees for a frozen account. I’ll send my OAS there Direct Deposit, and keep CPP as a paper check I can tender at RBC. THEn, I have it all. End to end.

Since I just published the BUGS in CIBC systems, and emailed the Ombudsman, and if they STILL ignore me, and STILL LET me upgrade the account to a high fee… is THAT fraud as well?

Knowingly charging a monthly fee for a completely disabled account…

I’ll check with a lawyer.

Gwendolyn? Any time on your hands? Or are you NOT doing time yet?

See, more humour. I win again.

This is difficult for me…

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL7️⃣ – “Tied Up With A Bow(Wow)”: Putting it all together with RBC’s help

See what I did there? Humour!

I love the idea that in the end RBC is my safe place to bank.

and they are the key to how I avoid Ms Adrian until my appeal can be perfected.

Ms Buckles’ neighbour, and she has two, worked at RBC for forty years and now they will keep her talons off my money.

A wonderful young man there tied it all up with a bow.

He asked head office how they garnish an account. Simple. Direct.

I had no idea to ASK TD before they took our $4,500. Poof! It was gone.

And CIBC shut me down in half a day.

So, I assume those two would say the same as RBC…

  1. The bank gets garnished by fax…. because child support garnishments CAN be faxed to head office. Since they can’t tell the REASON for the garnish… or at least will claim they can’t .. they accept court orders too.
  2. Head office then FREEZES the accounts of the named person BECAUSE a deadbeat Dad or Mom will NOT be providing a bank account number.
  3. The “freeze” is due to systems so old it has no OTHER way to keep you from your money. The old mainframe COBOL programs are simply ALSO frozen since all of us COBOL programmers retired. Only the glitzy PC-based front ends get modifications now.
  4. So, the overall freeze takes away your pension payments. After all, deadbeat Dads are scum.
  5. If you happen to read this post you will now know that to get your CPP released … visit the branch and ask them to release your CPP.
  6. They give you the cash IF it has not been given to
  7. Your account is still frozen but you have cash.
  8. Mail cash to pay your cable bill.

So, if I MUST go to my bank to argue for my CPP…

I may as well get a paper check and cash it and save the argument.
BUT will they SEIZE it instead, put it in my account anyway…THEN, I get to argue for it.

WOW, so many options to mess me up.

Thus, a false garnish ALWAYS stops me getting my pension.

JUST like Adrian asked the judge to do.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🃕 – Do you know anyone whose Bank Account was garnished? They may have been scammed

Banks are permitting lawyers to circumvent the Bank Act.

To collect debts, they can “garnish” the debtor’s bank account. The Bank Act S. 462 tells them how.

They need your name, account number, branch number and branch address. Then they courier the order to the branch. And the bank branch is supposed to do the rest. They compare the account and name to the name and account on your signature card, then take your cash. If you still owe money, they take any cash you are silly enough to deposit.

Until recently….

Today, Lawyers now ignore all that and just fax the debtor name to every bank head office and they do the rest, Each head office finds and freezes the account and sends the cash to the sheriff,

Until all the debt is paid, you CANNOT use your account.

So, you lose your money AND the ability to day your bills.

And nome of that is legal.

Call YOUR bank and ask their routines. You will be amazed,

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🃕 – Do you know anyone whose Bank Account was garnished? They may have been scammed

Banks are permitting lawyers to circumvent the Bank Act.

To collect debts, they can “garnish” the debtor’s bank account. The Bank Act S. 462 tells them how.

They need your name, account number, branch number and branch address. Then they courier the order to the branch. And the bank branch is supposed to do the rest. They compare the account and name to the name and account on your signature card, then take your cash. If you still owe money, they take any cash you are silly enough to deposit.

Until recently….

Today, Lawyers now ignore all that and just fax the debtor name to every bank head office and they do the rest, Each head office finds and freezes the account and sends the cash to the sheriff,

Until all the debt is paid, you CANNOT use your account.

So, you lose your money AND the ability to day your bills.

And nome of that is legal.

Call YOUR bank and ask their routines. You will be amazed,

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL❻ – Proof Ms. Adrian lied

Ms Adrian and Mr Painter OFTEN forget I am not a lawyer. They then expect I know all the secret handshakes.

The both enjoy whining to justices that I do not play by unwritten lawyer rules developed over the centuries to make their lives even easier. This makes tech judge biased against me.

To be honest, if a self rep actually finds himself standing before a justice then he has moved heaven and earth. It is not trivial to schedule a motion. To be able to produce the paperwork takes a lot of learning, effort and mistakes.

Below is Ms Adrian’s signature under paragraph 10) in which she claims:

“…Lepp increased costs by unilaterally scheduling the SLAPP relief motion…Increased costs were incurred. Had Lepp acted REASONABLY, a motion to deal with the preliminary issue of default could have been scheduled before a master…..”

G. Adrian Costs submission to J Schabas

I “reasonably” plead 137.1 in my Defence and on May 21, 2019… EXACTLY as I am supposed to. Ms Adrian filed for “Default Judgement” WHILE I filed 137.1 WITH HER on May 21, 2019

She refused ALL communication while I was in default. I emailed her several times citing PPPA, COJA and SLAPP 137.1 rules.

Framers of the PPPA despised SLAPP suits. They are predatory and allow wealth to defeat dissent through false suits JUST to cost MONEY and l its of it.

SLAPP suits are oppressive and illegal now and Ms Adrian has STILL not “got” it.

DEFAULT” means NOTHING when 137.1 is moved.

The whole idea of the PPPA is to cut off SLAPP suits at the knees, AND at NO COST TO THE DEFENDANT.

Before the PPPA, MONEY was simply the weapon to shut up the dissenter.

Adrian refused to understand that 137.1 SUPERCEDES EVERYTHING ELSE ABOUT A CASE. The PPPA’s purpose is to DISCOURAGE exactly the kind of suit Duncan brought. To do that, the Defendant can challenge it ANYTIME under 137.1. He can be assured of NOT PAYING ANY COSTS. He can win UNCAPPED damages if he proves SLAPP.

FACT: On May 21, 2019 we BOTH stood before J. Archibald and HE ordered us back August 26, 2019 for the 137.1 hearing… a date acceptable to BOTH of us.

There was NO unilateral “scheduling” of anything. I had ALREADY pled 137.1 IN SENTENCE ONE OF MY DEFENCE TO Brad Cran.

There is NO REQUIREMENT for a self represented person to beg a lawyer for a date. Lawyer “friends” do that as a nicety to fellow union members. I have it from Llyshelle Barrett, Superior Court Scheduler Newmarket that no “consultation” is required.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🏌️‍♀️ – To: Michael Simaan – Things to ponder

As you consider the revenue streams from the lawsuits of TD and the other one, think about how…

Ms. Adrian submitted costs stating she worked seven 8.5 hour days, or 60 hours at $300 per hour, defending her client’s suit from SLAPP s.137.1 of the PPPA and the COJA and NEVER ONCE read the section to see what she was trying to defeat.

If she HAD read the s. 137.1 it states clearly it can be moved at ANY TIME, when in default, or NOT in default, BEFORE filing a defence, AFTER filing a defence.. there is NO TIME when it cannot be moved.

FACT: There is NO TIME when SLAPP s. 137.1 cannot be moved.

  1. A woman who falsely arrested me on three criminal charges, the crown withdrew on all 3, she sues me for her losing her two town jobs… and yet she testified at MY trial it was her choice to leave each and she was paid “cash on lieu of notice” by both Aurora and Erin.
  2. A trained lawyer can claim to J. Schabas she worked 60 hours at $300 an hour on defending SLAP 137.1 BUT she never actually read the section in either the PPPA or the Courts of Justice act.

She denies knowing:

  1. 137.1 can be moved WITHOUT filing a defence, therefore, everyone who moves 137.1 IS IN DEFAULT.
  2. That defending 137.1 CANNOT BE AWARDED costs.. EVEN IF SUCCESSFUL.
  3. The meaning of SLAPP… as defined in the PPPA and 137.1
  4. She denies her client claimed she built 100% on her own land, right up until Ms Adrian got her to admit she knew it all along to beat Ms Buckles in Small Claims. That was brilliant of her. She won $2,000 by admitting her suit was FALSE all along… and forgot she now LOSES her $80,000 suit of two people.

Now, if she had NOT STOLEN MY CIBC DATA,.. she might convince a judge she was just sloppy, but once she committed a crime the judge SHOULD lose all respect for her.

But, she did steal my account number. And I can prove it.

CIBC said their staff ALL did a perfect job, just like they worked for Trump.

That MEANS, there was a match between the account Ms. Adrian submitted on the garnishment order and the account number on my still wet signature card.

CIBC would not lie to police, correct? They would say they did not Gove the number away. And then the police ask for the garnishment order, point to the account number and say “Well how did Ms Adrian get it legally?”

So, Ms Adrian somehow got knowledge of my account number to be able to write it on the order to the court and to CIBC. And I can state I did not give it to her.

ONLY CIBC knew my account number when I opened the account March 3, 2020 and BEFORE she garnished it March 4. So, in those 24 hours, Ms. Adrian stole it from someone.

AND, someone told her I was in that CIBC branch March 3. She could NOT know to go steal the account UNLESS a co-conspirator saw me there and phoned her up. THEN, she could go steal the account number.

So, she had TWO helpers, one playing lookout and one on the INSIDE of CIBC to print out my banking data for her. Its a long number, plus the TRANSIT code… she could not just be told it, someone printed it out or wrote it down for her.. and that piece of paper is evidence she now cannot destroy.

CIBC logs EVERY access to my profile data. They can be subpoena’d, ALL of the staff… to ask each one to confess.

And then August 26, Ms Adrian tried to elicit all my password hints. Wife’s name. birthday, mother’s name, son’s name, birthday…. she got EVERYTHING she needed to log in as me and take my money directly. Was she planning to do that? Or were the improper Discovery questions part of her thievery?

And imagine how much time CIBC wil spend backing away from claiming they did everything legally when they decide its easier to just charge Adrian for theft and let police figure it out. Not great press, but all press is good press.

The cost of all these suits to taxpayers is unfortunate.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🎄 – To: Michael Simaan – It’s easy as RBC…Why Ms. Adrian SHOULD be able to garnish RBC, too

On August 26, 2020 I was ordered by Ms Adrian to attend Discovery in aid io execution. She repeatedly asked me for ALL the accounts I had beyond the two she had ALREADY garnished so she could garnish it.

I told her “RBC Aurora”… why is it NOT garnished yet?

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL-aye-aye – CIBC Prefers To Be Sued

If you have read what the function of various levels of Ombudsman inside and outside CIBC, you know:

  • They will never admit they made a mistake
  • They will never offer compensation for abuse and withdrawal of service
  • Their “Top Guns” at OBSI take over to silence you JUST to open a file.
  • The range OBSI states they pay for silence to continue to infinity is $1,000 to $5,000
  • You will never know how much or how often people are paid to shut up about Bank Misconduct because a non disclosure starts at minute one off your complaint
  • You can accept $1-5,000 and play that game, or you can sue
  • I can clone my Michael Simaan and TD Bank to Michael Simaan and CIBC Bank in an eyeblink
  • This time Ms Adrian cannot represent him as she is udder investigation for theft of my banking data at CIBC

I will post the Small Claims Suit Number HERE >>>>________________________

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL – CIBC Ombudsman Camilla Latronico Tells Me How to Unfreeze My Account

Dear Mr. Lepp,

 I am writing in response to your email of today’s date regarding your bank accounts

 In order to access funds in your accounts, you need to contact CIBC at (905) 727-4248 X 222 (660 Wellington Street East Aurora Ontario L4G 0K3).  Thank you, Regards,

Camilla Latronico, CFP STI | Senior Manager | Office of the Ombudsman 

P.O. Box 342, Commerce Court, Toronto, ON  M5L 1G2 | Tel: 416-980-3755 | Fax: 416-980-3754 |

September 2, 2020 at 4:29 pm

Hear the results here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QNWhqlc05eCj7Pct_pVEhc2nfPncnDYY/view?usp=sharing

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄Cli – OBSI Michael Hamilton invokes SILENCE so I dump him

Recall that OBIS exists to pay off people who get screwed over by a bank.

As soon as you start not the process, the “Cone of Silence” drops over you. Then, whatever they tell your whatever the solution is you must shut up. You cannot use the admissions of OBSI that a bank screwed you over to sue that bank.

So, in essence, OBSI is just a muffler for complaints. Only the serious errors and omissions would be brought to them and they INSTANTLY have you wrapped in sound absorbing legal instruments.

If you get screwed over, just go straight to a law suit, because OBSI tops out at $1,000 anyway. Chump change.

CIBC broke the Bank Act was, specifically s. 462, but accepting a garnishment order at head office as a fax. They did not require Ms Adrian to courier it to my branch for comparison of the account number she had to the one on my signature card.

Because CIBC then froze my account to all uses for the last 5 months, they still assert they did nothing wrong.

So, if on September 2, 2020 (today) CIBC asserts they have done nothing illegal, why os my account not of any use to me?

 Mr. Lepp,

 Thank you for the update. At this time, I am required to remind you and bring your attention to the consent you signed with OBSI on July 7, 2020. Specifically:

Information you receive from us is confidential

You cannot share the information you get from us with anyone except the firm’s regulators and anyone who has also signed this agreement. You cannot use information you get from us in any legal action. 

You agreed to the terms set out in the consent. In particular, you agreed that:

OBSI’s correspondence, files, and any discussions we have during the review of your complaint are confidential;  

Sincerely,

Michael Hamilton

Senior Investigator

———————————————————————

OBSI / OSBI

T: 1.888.451.4519 x 2262

F: 1.888.422.2865

mhamilton@obsi.ca

September 2, 2020 at 4:29 pm

SO, I guess the OBSI will sue me now.

So far, what I got from the OBSI is “We need another 60 days to take us out to our maximum of 120 days to come back with a result.

Well, CIBC already telegraphed the result… a frozen account.

Did anyone see or notice that lawyers and government and bankers EVERYWHERE want to shut me up?

Aurora wants me shut up about the illegal business and education tax exemption for Terry Redvers and his soccer dome and maybe his tennis club by now.

York Region wants me shut up about Bus Safety.

the Catholic School Board wants me SiLENTLY to stay off public land at the bus stop.

York Region police want me shut up about Det. Sgt Bentham in my blog

The Police services Board want me to shut up and not demand they control the Thin Blue Line mentality of the Crawford family.

All of this silencing will come with a cost. Which is pretty cool, I will get paid for shutting up!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️9 – To: Michael Simaan – I demand you garnish my RBC account where my CPP pension and OAS goes

UPDATE: September 3, 2020 – I met the RBC Aurora staff and set it all up for garnishment, They will let me know September 4 whether they can guarantee they will not take CPP and OAS if I direct it there

On August 26, 2020 I was ordered by Ms Adrian to attend Discovery in aid io execution.

She repeatedly asked me for ALL the accounts I had beyond the two she had ALREADY garnished so she could garnish it.

I told her “RBC Aurora”… way is it NOT garnished yet?

This is all she had, if police believe her, to garnish me at CIBC. She said she did not get my actual real account number or anything else REAL about me.

I challenge her NOW to prove it. And it is dead easy to prove.

I DEMAND she garnish it today September 2, 2020 a week LATER.

But you KNOW NOW she will not, don’t you?

Because, without an account number and a branch address and then registered mail or courier personal service TO the branch address, my signature card account number cannot be compared to the account number in the garnishment order.

Aurora RBC is at: 15408 Yonge St, Aurora, ON L4G 1N9 (905) 841-2020 Closes 5:00 pm today.

And because you would FAIL to prove that, she must have broken the law getting “Ms. Nunhov U.R. Business!” to give her my account details.

She is in a corner now. Backed in real tight.

If she DOES garnish my RBC Aurora pension money, she will break the law.

If she does NOT garnish RBC Aurora, she is admitting she can find no legal way to do that.

So, what shall it be?

I have already offered settlement in my suit of you and TD Bank. You declined. So at trial the justice can go nuts with a cash award. Especially when I tell him the same lawyer you hired AGAIN illegally garnished Canada Pension and OAS at CIBC.

My conundrum is what do I DO?

  • Do I sue CIBC for $35,000?
  • Do I sue you again for $35,000
  • Do I sue her client for $35,000

Any free legal advice for me?

I thought not. I have GoogleLaw, don’t worry about me.

Te following article is from 2017

GoogleLaw and creative destruction of the legal profession

Google and artificial intelligence may not be the end of the legal profession, but, boy, can you see it from here. 

Gary Goodwin

By Gary Goodwin

OPINION 06 Nov 2017

Google and artificial intelligence may not be the end of the legal profession, but, boy, can you see it from here. 

I anticipate encountering what Joseph Schumpeter euphemistically called creative destruction. Innovation destructs archaic business models and creatively releases capital to be deployed elsewhere — a benign description of being out on the street with your law degree.

Perhaps it’s too hyperbolic, but, for example, Google has made a database of federal and state case law and legal journal articles available via its Google Scholar search. In their defence, lawyers can now purchase on Amazon the “Please Do Not Confuse Your Google Search With My Law Degree” coffee mug. 

For a simpler DIY approach, YouTube displays more than 146 videos on family law. This also includes shuffle playlist for greater variety. 

For comparison, AI factors into more than 38 per cent of regular enterprise planning for mainly customer interfaces. As for law firms, it’s likely not so much. Most of law firm and in-house planning centres on how to augment regular legal work with new AI tools to make this more effective and efficient. 

JPMorgan Chase & Co., apparently, eliminated 360,000 hours of legal work creating legal security documents by the use of COIN, for Contract Intelligence, to review commercial loan agreements. The bank plans to use AI to analyze credit default swaps . . . since things worked out so well last time. 

Other forms of AI can review entire contracts, interpret sections and even recommend sections that are not there. These recommendations can depend on which side of a particular transaction you happen to be. Similar to customizing streaming music systems, one can imagine the type of customization that can occur as you adjust the lever from buyer focused over to seller focused. We await the ultimate customization that includes sliding the scale either to the far left or far right into the “jerk” setting. 

I tried a contract review application one time with a simple release. No comments came back. I imagine legal associates would be ecstatic to receive something back from a senior lawyer without any comments. I was hoping for at least one “atta boy” type of meme.

Instead of augmenting legal practice, another perspective suggests a client-based focus where the system asks questions and directs the client to certain resources. For example, The DoNotPay website helped users successfully appeal hundreds of thousands of parking tickets by having the client answer a number of questions. The system then interprets the situation and prints out a draft letter to send to the authorities.

I tested DoNotPay over the weekend and can confidently assert that the experience replicated that of retaining some legal firms. The site took in my request, said it was sorry to hear that and told me if I could email more information it would get back to me in 24 hours. Nice immediate reply, but a solution may come a bit later. Notwithstanding the delay, the value proposition — benefits divided by total costs — cannot be beat. The system is free. 

So, where do the law societies stand among all of this creative destruction? Their mandate includes the protection of the public. However, the other two mandates generally include advancing the cause of justice and the rule of law, which requires the public disclosure of legal codes and processes. Societies also facilitate access to justice. This suggests making it as easy as possible for the general public unable to afford a lawyer access to some form of legal information. 

This type of access does not mean providing paper or online brochures but a more customized response. In other businesses, chatbots can ask an advancing series of questions and provide a more “intelligent” and applicable answer. This forms the entire basis behind a customer-focused type of interface.  

A new client-driven model suggests perhaps an Uber approach. Uber does not own cabs and tries not to employ drivers. The courts have imposed some obligations here. Generally, Uber is a simple platform that connects customers and drivers. A similar approach could connect a client and a lawyer providing the most cost-effective service. Cost is not everything, but as the law becomes more commoditized, then perhaps being “the better lawyer” may not carry the day if everyone uses the same type of AI platform to research and provide a result. And, yes, everyone shall likely have their respective settings maximized over to jerk, so there will still be plenty to argue about. 

From a policy analysis perspective, one appreciates the different approaches each law society brings to the table and the complicated socio-economic analysis that would be required to balance justice access and public protection. The 2014 CBA Legal Futures Initiativeoutlined a number of areas that the legal profession could take to remain relevant. Implementation of the recommendations may be slow in coming. 

The various law societies currently have authority over who can practise law. One can easily imagine a public lobbying effort to storm the ramparts to allow some form of AI system that can ask questions and guide the individual to a possible area where help could be found.

There is nothing like a bit of urgency to assist in the legal change management process. 

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️8 – To: Toronto Police Services – The Law of Garnishment

Dear PC Mohammed

When and if your detectives speak to Ms Adrian, she will impress u[on them her superior knowledge of the law.

She will say: “Detective, I know the law and I did what it said to do.”

Well, faced with that assault on the competence of a highly trained Detective in Canada’s most sophisticated city… he or she may crumble and give up.

I ask that you do a couple of things for me:

  • Always read www.boblepp.com for the truth
  • The Bank Act section 462 is the law, and it says the garnishment must include the branch address and account number and be served to the BRANCH, NOT head office so the account number submitted can be compared to the one on the signature card in the branch
  • Did I mention www.boblepp.com?

I have done few related posts already. I created a new “category” ‘Whither Goest Gwendolyn Adrian?” for all such commentary on the Bank Act.

Just click HERE and see ALL posts about the legalities of Garnishment

and of course, get them to ask THE experts.. their credit union, because I am guessing NO ONE illegally garnishes them! 

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️7 – Bradford’s “Hay! Caramba!” as it joins my extensive Google Maps portfolio of 360 degree visual tours


Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️6 – The “Bought ’em” Line

Gwendolyn CANNOT have BOTH served a legal garnishment notice AND served it legally

WHO/DecisionYESNO
MEX
CIBCX
OBSIX
Toronto PoliceX

The choices above do NOT result in a possible solution.

BECAUSE…EITHER

  • She served a legal garnishment using my stolen bank identity, and
  • The CIBC PERMITTED it to happen

OR

  • She served an illegal garnishment WITHOUT my account number AND
  • The CIBC PERMITTED it to happen

AND, THEREFORE

CIBC is wrong REGARDLESS

CIBC is responsible for BOTH choices police make

  1. leaking my personal data AND
  2. acting on an illegally served garnishment.

Ms. Adrian REQUIRED my account number on the order which HAD or be served “personally” at my branch, not faxed to EITHER the branch OR head office

SO THAT

My CIBC ***BRANCH*** could MATCH it to their signature card.

So, now the OBSI will do its thing and recommend CIBC pay me money to stay silent about their illegal mistakes,

Oopsie… TOO LATE!

They missed their chance to avoid “Death by BLOGGER BOB”.

Can you say “Catch 22”?

Catch-22 (logic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to navigationJump to searchA flowchart showing how Catch-22 works

catch-22 is a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations.[1] The term was coined by Joseph Heller, who used it in his 1961 novel Catch-22.

An example is:In needing experience to get a job…”How can I get any experience until I get a job that gives me experience?” – Brantley Foster in The Secret of My Success.

Catch-22s often result from rules, regulations, or procedures that an individual is subject to, but has no control over, because to fight the rule is to accept it. Another example is a situation in which someone is in need of something that can only be had by not being in need of it (e.g.: the only way to qualify for a loan is to prove to the bank that you don’t need a loan). One connotation of the term is that the creators of the “catch-22” situation have created arbitrary rules in order to justify and conceal their own abuse of power.

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

to justify and conceal their own abuse of power.

THAT sums up the Newmarket version of justice.

Newmarket Crowns make up arbitrary rules all the time.

  • NO Crown Pre-Trial (CPT) meetings, the time to exchange evidence and discuss options to a trial, despite the Attorney General mandating Self reps should get MOPRE CPT’s than a represented accused so teycna be given some training in court room procedures. Crown Moull WANTS want EVERY self rep to look like a RUDE RUBE to a justice. He wants mistakes made, rudeness, anger fro the self rep FLOUDERING in a strange land
  • (Note: Over 50% of cases now self represent due only to HIGH COSTS of lawyer.)
  • NO Consent for obvious motions…Like: Suspend sentence for a first time criminal who appealed the DECISION…. should be automatically consented to.
  • NO Consent for obvious motions… Consent to Strike “term 6” as J. Dawe ordered in every OTHER active order, release order, probation order, conditional release order… WITHOUT FORCING AN EXPENSIVE MOTION.
  • NO paper given to the accused facing a trial on 8 Summary charges and a Preliminary Inquiry 3 Indictable charges within a week of each other June 11 to 18, 2019 so he cannot know WHEN to hire a paralegal
  • MIX an Indicatable charge in with 7 summary charges in a SUMMARY trial to bias the justice to evidence unrelated to the Summary charges
  • PRESENT to J.P. Premji March 6, 2020 for a REVERSE ONUS bail release …a list of DISPOSED CHARGES ALREADY WITHDRAWN OR DISMISSED, JUST to BIAS JP Premji to think I had all of those as CONVICTIONS.
  • Accuse me of “filing too many motions on the wrong day” and THEN order that I NOT FILE ANYTHING AT ALL.

Until last week, I could NOT have won for trying.

Today, I CANNOT POSSIBLY LOSE even if I tried.

Watch THEM lose ME now! They have it ALL figured out, I only have half.

The fact they will now screw me again is an:

Immutable truth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In philosophy and logic, an immutable truth is:

an unchanging universal fact

or reality

that is NOT influenced by human opinion.

(According to positivismobservation and experience are the only ways for immutable truths to become fully realized or understood.)

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️5 – CIBC/Garnishment… an arrestingly simple decision chart

Do we arrest Gwendolyn Adrian for stealing my banking data from CIBC in less than one day?… or do we forgive her?

https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/how-to-make-a-decision-matrix

There are now THREE entities examining their options. Each has just two options, YES (Arrested, Adrian erred) or NO (No arrest, Adrian did everything correctly)

So, in the end, we will have 4 YES/NO’s

ALL WILL most likely say NO!

WHO/DecisionYESNO
MEX
CIBCX
OBSIX
Toronto PoliceX

Depending on the mix of answers, I will take the next actions. I will do what every organization I asked said to do: “Sue ’em!” is all you CAN do.

Then, Charles Painter will have FRESH evidence of my vexatious tendencies.

See how they all work together? “They” force me to sue, so Aurora can defeat my $7 million suit claiming I overuse and abuse the courts.

“…🎶 and the painted ponies go round and round..♬”

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️4 – Road Trip!

You may “proceed directly to any medical…approved in advance by the Conditional Sentence Supervisor”

Signed july 18, 2020 by D Whitman for J. Harpur

I have a lab test requisition, which I believe is “any medical” in nature.

I must get approval from my CSS to go a lab test. He will ask where, I will say “Lifelabs Aurora, or an alternate if it is closed.”

He will say yes.

I will go to Lifelabs Aurora.

If it is closed, I will got to another Lifelabs at: 1040 Oliver Rd #101

If you Google that, it is in Thunder Bay.

I’ll be back Sunday morning Sept. 6. I have surgery, a secondary repeat of last time next week and according to probation I will get advanced approval.

Lord Tunderin’ Jeezuz... he’s going to go to Tunder Bay, by Jeezuz... how clever is that b’y?

I’m jest about gutfounded.

I’ll put da ol’ slut on and have me a yarn.

When the lab returns results showing I had ingested 4 beers and a martini minutes before the Dracula’s me.. I wil be asked to go to any Lifelab for a repeat.

That’s where St. John’s comes in.

I love the idea of “Lacey’s Blood Work”… I found no Lifelabs there so I substituted…

Driving just 10 hours a day, I can be back by the end of my sentence.

I booked the Ferry in case there is a Labour Day rush.

For those a little bit short of any such sense, this is called humour.

I have a permit for a “concealed carry LOADED” at all times. Fully Automatic, the large clip, no silencer, water cooled (well iced Martini-cooled, belt loaded (one belt 🍸 per load), 10X scope, crosshairs, laser pointed, accepts bayonet, integrated brass knuckles for larynx-to-ear combat, body camera Bluetooth linked while firing.

Virtual Reality playback enabled. Real time publishing on YouTube.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️3 – Here, My Crystal Ball Tells How The OBSI Will Whitewash CIBC

The OBSI exists to mediate to pay off people to NOT tell the public when banks break the law. Period.

They “Spoke and offered to think about ” paying me $1,000 to NOT talk more about how CIBC accepted and implemented an illegal garnishment in less than 24 hours of a brand new account.

CIBC pays OBSI to pay people off when its member has paid the current year dues, and broke a law

OBSI exists to negotiate to buy its members silence from those it abuses.
OBSI exists to subvert the law behind closed doors in silence so the Federal government does not cancel its charter

The dues CIBC paid for 2020 is “hush money” so no one knows they illegally removed my new bank account from my use, froze it March 4 without waiting 2 days, kept it frozen as I write September 2 four months later even though not one penny was deposited or garnished.

Are You A Logical Thinker?

Follow this closely and tell me why I am wrong.

The Bank Act is the law banks must follow.

s. 462 defines to the bank when and how to Legally garnish an account.

If a bank claims it acted legally, it can display the evidence of EACH and EVERY one ofthose actions.



Because, s. 462 says the entire process must be Properly documented documented.

CIBC, therefore, can show me NOW, TODAY these proofs

  • The carrier or postal registered mail receipt showing the exact branch address matching mine
  • A log or register from the branch
  • The paper letter from Gwendolyn Adrian being received AT MY BRANCH.
  • The name and account account number Ms Adrian specified to garnish
  • An image of the signature card used to verify that the correct account number matched what Ms Adrian wrote
  • The affidavit of service proving I was served the NEW garnishment order for the new account
  • The date of the request, the total to be garnished, and the date AFTER waiting 2 days to take money.
  • Proof that the account was left in a status which does NOT prevent me from using it to receive my CPP and OAS direct deposits
  • Proof I can still deposit online or accept transfers of money INTO my account
  • Proof that my CPP and OAS deposits will NOT BE GARNISHED
  • Proof that EVERY garnishment they acted on is now properly documented showing compliance with s. 462

It is designed only to satisfy the Bank Act.

CIBC will stick to its position they did nothing wrong despite the fact they have none of the documented evidence

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️2 – OBSI Provincial Ombudsman is run by the banks.

OBSI is a structure mandated by the law. It is just a necessary “last chance” when the bank says no.

OBSI is NOT on the side of the bank customer, nor is it biased to the bank. But, it IS funded by the banks and that answers the question. The Bank Act says they need to fund the OBSI, so they do, but it is NOT designed to help customers.

It is designed to be impartial enough tp satisfy the Bank Act.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-241 – There IS a doG!

Attributed to The Rev. Bob Dod, aka: “The Deacon of Dyslexia”

My dog, Scheibe was killed as a direct effect of Det. Sgt. Bentham’s push to punish me for blogging about her. By banning me from the dog park, she forced me to the forest where she impaled herself, March 2019.

So, she’s in heaven. Yup, there is one. It is populated ONLY with our dead dogs. They are the only creatures deserving of heaven. No cats, except to lick up after serving the meals.

Anyway I ask her to do stuff for me. She does them, and I give my wife’s dog, Coco, extra treats.

Seems Coco has a lot of sway with heaven too. She asked Scheibe for our back yard to be filled with rabbits, tender ones, for her to chase.

Poof! Rabbits are nesting in a large flower pot.
So, Darwin had to know this strain of rabbit had to be removed from the gene pool and a Scheibe gave him a paw.


Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️ – “Branching Out” for LEGAL Garnishment

It’s Time to Amend the Bank Act So Clients Can Collect on Judgments

Ontario utilizes a “loser pays” legal system in which the losing party is usually ordered by the court to pay a portion of the successful party’s legal fees. As a result, regardless of who wins, someone ends up with a piece of paper requiring the other party to pay money.

Assuming that the losing party does not voluntarily cut a cheque, a bank garnishment oughtto be the most straightforward and direct means to collect. I emphasize the word “ought”.

Put simply, once a bank is served with a Notice of Garnishment it is required to seize any funds the debtor holds at the bank and pay those funds (up to the amount owed to the creditor) to the sheriff. Ultimately the sheriff hands the money over to the creditor.

The catch is that in order to garnish the account, the creditor must serve the Notice of Garnishment at

the branch where the debt is payable.

If the creditor does not know the branch location then they are out of luck.

For example, the debtor may have $1 million dollars in a savings account at TD Canada Trust. However, if the creditor serves the Notice of Garnishment at the main branch, and the debtor’s “branch of account” is actually a different branch just around the corner from the main branch,

then the bank is not required to garnish and pay the funds over to the sheriff.

From a practical perspective, this means that if the creditor does not have any banking information for the debtor they have limited options.

The creditor can require the debtor to attend an examination and disclose his/her banking information. However, debtors often fail to show at these examinations and when they do they are often not very forthcoming. The result is more time and money wasted while the creditor returns to court to compel proper answers.

The creditor could also take a shot-gun approach and try to garnish different branches. While this may work in small rural areas, in larger urban centers there can be hundreds of bank branches which makes this approach cost prohibitive.

All of this got me to thinking, why on earth is it necessary to locate a specific bank branch.

The answer, it seems, was that this was initially required to make lives easier on the banks!

This case from 1981 discusses why the Bank Act created this requirement. At paragraph 32 the court states

“The subsection was necessary to protect the bank against garnishing orders issued, say, in Victoria when there was an account, say, in Halifax. The bank would be bound, upon receiving each garnishing order, to search the records of every branch in Canada and probably out of Canada, a quite impractical proposition. What need be done now is to search only the branch at which the garnishing order is served. If there is found to be neither property in the possession of the bank belonging to the person garnisheed nor moneys to the credit of that person, the bank need not search further.”

I agree that in 1981 having a bank search the records of every branch in Canada was likely “a quite impractical proposition”. However, over 30 years later one has to think that banks could, from a central location (or any location for that matter), easily search all of their records to see if the debtor has any accounts at any branch across the Province or Canada.

A simple amendment to s. 462 of the Bank Act could radically improve the way that litigants are able to recover sums of money that the courts have awarded to them. Instead of hunting for specific branches, litigants could easily take a shot-gun approach and serve all of the major banks.

Recovery prospects would increase dramatically. Enforcement costs would be reduced drastically given that litigants would only be paying fees associated with issuing 5 Notices of Garnishment as opposed to 500.

s. 462 of the Bank Act

Branch of account with respect to deposits

  • 461 (1) For the purposes of this Act, the branch of account with respect to a deposit account is
    • (a) the branch the address or name of which appears on the specimen signature card or other signing authority signed by a depositor with respect to the deposit account or that is designated by agreement between the bank and the depositor at the time of opening of the deposit account; or
    • (b) if no branch has been identified or agreed on as provided in paragraph (a), the branch that is designated as the branch of account with respect thereto by the bank by notice in writing to the depositor.
  • Where debt payable(2) The amount of any debt owing by a bank by reason of a deposit in a deposit account in the bank is payable to the person entitled thereto only at the branch of account and the person entitled thereto is not entitled to demand payment or to be paid at any other branch of the bank.
  • Idem(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2), a bank may permit either occasionally or as a regular practice, the person to whom the bank is indebted by reason of a deposit in a deposit account in the bank to withdraw moneys owing by reason of that deposit at a branch of the bank other than the branch of account or to draw cheques or other orders for the payment of such moneys at a branch other than the branch of account.
  • Situs of indebtedness

Situs of indebtedness

  • (4) The indebtedness of a bank by reason of a deposit in a deposit account in the bank shall be deemed for all purposes to be situated at the place where the branch of account is situated.

the place where the branch of account is situated.

Effect of writ, etc.

  • 462 (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the following documents are binding on property belonging to a person and in the possession of a bank, or on money owing to a person by reason of a deposit account in a bank, only if the document or a notice of it is served at the branch of the bank that has possession of the property or that is the branch of account in respect of the deposit account, as the case may be:
    • (a) a writ or process originating a legal proceeding or issued in or pursuant to a legal proceeding;
    • (b) an order or injunction made by a court;
    • (c) an instrument purporting to assign, perfect or otherwise dispose of an interest in the property or the deposit account; or
    • (d) an enforcement notice in respect of a support order or support provision.
  • Notices(2) Any notification sent to a bank with respect to a customer of the bank, other than a document referred to in subsection (1) or (3), constitutes notice to the bank and fixes the bank with knowledge of its contents only if sent to and received at the branch of the bank that is the branch of account of an account held in the name of that customer.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C💩enein – And the winner is “Toronto Police Services”

It saddens me to say I snitched. I have a report number # is 2020-1645xxx

I snitched on CIBC and Kramer Dhillon Simaan. It took at least one from each company to collude and breach the trust of clients.

I think they all have reasonably good connections to various police forces, they are “in the biz” and nothing much will happen.

CIBC will now have to be sued since I did not get a final payoff amount from them. We verbally discussed $1,000 – 10,000 as a range of payoff, but I heard nothing from either CIBC or the OBSI today.

No one got back to me.

If no charges are laid, it seems easiest to just add Ms. Adrian and both her clients to my suit if they are not there already.. They are ALL working in concert, And Ms Adrian bridges the Civil-Criminal gap nicely, interfacing with Charles Painter and the Crown.

How Could She Legally Know of My New Bank Account – a theory

There is ONE possible way she got the data WITHOUT breach of trust and theft. A “system” all banks set up quietly in back rooms.

Banks lose money to deadbeats, as do lawyers.

If the majors wanted to collect MORE money MORE often, they need to know what deadbeat MOVED around. All Banks would ALL contribute THEIR deadbeats to a common, shared database of “Known DeadBeats”.

So every bank puts in their new garnishments. And every bank can inquire when they need to see who has failed t okay… A credit check maybe…..

Then, all the banks ALSO would share “new accounts” with each other, and then, daily, someone would “run” the new accounts names against the database of “Known DeadBeats”, and spit out matches back to every bank.

When they match on name, address, or SIN, or Driver’s Licence… they know someone skipped out at one bank and JUST that day went to another. BANG! GARNISH!… they get that account frozen again instantly.

That would do what happened to me.

It also smacks of illegal use of personal data.

So, if the major banks are “sharing deadbeats” like that, she did not steal my data.. Maybe CIBC just GAVE it to her.

But, that illegal system would need to keep a whole LOT of people silent about its existence, like covering up failed moon landings or Trade Center collapses.

Maybe some clever nerd figured out how to get “deadbeats; from some OTHER legal source, and maybe banks only submit NEW accounts.. .under the guise of making sure …like a credit check… to a Credit Rating Company.

Maybe the banks got one of them to write a new system.

Maybe “Return of the DeadBeats”.. or “UndeadBeats”, or “DeadBeats Arose”.

That is all its takes. A third party willing to get each bank to feed it garnishments and new accounts and it just innocently says…”Hey, DeadBeat Lepp at TD Aurora just opened a new account at CIBC Aurora.” And maybe banks PAY an amount per “hit”.

Maybe Equifax is tracking them. After all, Equifax tracks EVERYONE and maybe banks feed Equifax new accounts and maybe Equifax does the matching so it looks to be at “arms length.”

The banks will never tell us.

But it may be proven anecdotally. If a LOT of garnished people report their second attempt at a new bank account ALSO froze next day… we are onto something.

A rainy day project.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C💩e8 – 3 lawyers arrested me for speaking to them in court, I attempt to arrest 1 lawyer for speaking to me OUT of court

OK, this is a fun thought for ME to start the day, Monday, August 31, 2020

I bet, that while 3 of “them” with no evidence of any illegal act on my part, were able to put me in Lindsay for 2 nights IN THE MIDDLE OF COVID-19… I will NOT be able to arrest ONE lawyer for ADMITTING she stole my identity under the guise of an “examination for discovery”.

I contend that this time Tuesday, she will still not be arrested.

Within a few hours of being asked by Det. Sgt. Bentham March 2, 3, 4 …THEY successfully arrested me and put me in prison for 2 nights and had me under house arrest and a $15,000 bond

March 2 thru 4, 2020 … Within just hours of starting out, YRP Lawyer Barry Stork, and Aurora Lawyer Charles Painter, and a 3rd ringleader, SIGNED (or WOULDN’T SIGN) affidavit(s) and were ABLE to arrest me on JUST the CROWN’s trust of their friend’s words, telling police I merely spoke to the ringleader in a court room, precisely where J. Dawe ordered me to talk to her.

August 31, I WILL ATTEMPT to arrest just ONE of “them” for ADMITTING to stealing my personal banking data ON VIDEO with a court reporter as witness

August 31, 2020 I ask to arrest Lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian for SPEAKING to me in a COURT ordered Zoom meeting, and saying she got and garnished my brand new banking data from CIBC in less than 24 hours … and then she asked me for EVERY answer for EVERY question one must use to secure a bank account for online access. She had everything needed to directly take my money with even needing a garnishment order.

What are the bets police WILL REFUSE?

“FILM at 11:00” as they once said, today it is “Check your Twitter feed”

I will bet you they will claim (all of):

  • The Zoom meeting was implicitly “without prejudice”
  • There was only one eye and ear witness
  • The video quality is 540P and not 720P for courtroom use
  • I had caught her in a tired and confused state after being exposed to MY VOICE from 10:00 to 2:07 without earmuffs
  • I cheated her into admitting it by asking her outright if she had done it
  • I’ve been harassing Gwendolyn Adrian since December 1, 2016
  • Ms Adrian does NOT have an ethics contract as an LOS licensee, it is merely a “memorandum of understanding” to be trustworthy and honourable
  • It was a on a day with a “Y” in it and there is a Y in “lawyer” specifically for that matching purpose. Because, if a man who farms is a farmer, why is a man who practices law not a LAWER? Why did they get the “privilege” of an EXTRA letter?
  • I was involved in a “matter” against her in court
  • That would be a collateral attack. (I say it is a colawyeral attack)
  • It’s a P.D. day. Not a Professional Development day, Police Domination day.
  • And the ever popular… “NO, just no.”

Categories
Business Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Town Hall staff Town of Aurora York Regional Police

BL20-🥓8️⃣T7 – This is what cops are deep down…. George Floyd being murdered from cop body cam

http://www.tmz.com/videos/081420-george-floyd-bodycam-alternate-4834840-0-uyfh1jp6

The onlookers knew he was dying. This is the most disgusting thing I’ve ever seen.

and these guys get their union reps trying to get their jobs back.

And there’s not one thing different about Canadian cops.

they are simply inhuman, ignorant, self centered pond scum.

and if that cop died tomorrow 20,000 would take your taxes and go kiss the widow and tell her what a hero her husband was.

I’ve dealt first hand with this mindset for three years. Lawless. Absolutely convinced they are God’s soldiers or some crap. They see themselves above the law and they have absolutely no fear they will ever be brought to justice.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Business Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Town Hall staff Town of Aurora York Regional Police

BL20-🥓8️⃣T❻ – Cops Say The Darndest Things

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/12/us/sheriff-no-mask-ocala-trnd/index.html

Florida sheriff bans his deputies and office visitors from wearing masks on a day his county broke records for Covid-19 deaths

Categories
Business Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Town Hall staff Town of Aurora York Regional Police

BL20-🥓8️⃣T🃕 – Just Bidening my time

 

 

Defeat! I must serve my sentence even if the appeal reverses the decision.

So, I have 32 more days of living exactly as I have since the pandemic began.

I can go out every day 9-5 working. I am in bed by 8 anyway, and restaurants are closed.

I have 1-4 pm on Saturdays to do Costco. Lord knows their packages last a week.

I really find house arrest.. well, arresting, but of little different to my sad way of life.

If later I prove the convictions should be reversed, then sue for false detention, I may get 60 days pay.

My arguments fell flat. The ruling was that my chances of a successful appeal are “trivial”.. the court’s word.

So, that says the fact I was denied defence counsel by the false complaint of a paralegal that my OWN paralegal had a conflict of interest WITH HER???

I just am trying to imagine how I wrote so poorly.

Say I complain you assaulted me. And you hire the best lawyer, Charles Painter, to defend you. You think you have man easy win.

When the trial starts, day one, minute one.. all I need do is say to the Crown.. “Hey! I met Mr Painter at trial last month. It is a conflict of interest for him to defend the person who assaulted me.” You then get to try to hire and educate a new lawyer.

So, who is the most famous criminal lawyer, Eddie Greenspan?

So, same scenario, you assaulted me, I complain, you get arrested and YOU hire Eddie.

As an aggrieved party, I just hire me a hopeless lawyer who once LOST to Eddie Greenspan and I point him at the Crown.

He says to the Crown “Hey! Mr. Greenspan has a conflict of interest here, I was at trial against him once!”

and POOF goes Eddie!

Sweet.

or, put another more logical way:

IF – all of my convictions are due directly to breaching bail

AND – if the same Bail term breached in every guilty finding is “not to mention…”

AND – Justice Dawe was required to assess the legality of all bail terms

AND – Justice Dawe ruled that only the “not to mention” term was illegal

AND – Justice Dawe ordered that only the “not to mention” term be STRUCK

THEN – an appeal of such convictions must be based on the judge having improperly applied the struck term

AND – that appeal cannot be characterized as “trivial”

AND – that appeal cannot fail

so, I need a do over…. I’ll find out what judicial level handles appeals to J Cameron’s decision

its only logical that I do that

 

and Biden was not kissing Kampala’s hair in that photo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Business Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Town Hall staff Town of Aurora York Regional Police

BL20-🥓8️⃣T4 – Prison is just “Trade School for Crooks”, Court is just “Trade School for Self-Reps”

 

 

 

It is true, ask any crook.

IN 1946, MACLEANS magazine KNEW this story be true.

Ask any lawyer if a self rep gets any better the more he is arrested.

In July 2017 I was first arrested in just 2 charges, and it took me just 112 days without counsel to prove the charges false.

My next 6 arrests gave me a wealth of knowledge…. on HOW to be arrested for YOUR OWN benefit.

July 14, 2017 I already knew to demand a video interview so you can ask police embarrassing questions for the law suit. So I asked “Who complained? Aurora? or just a citizen?” and Jeff Brown said “PLAIN OL’ CITIZEN!… this is NOT what Aurora wants me to do!”

Why would he even  SAY or even IMPLY Aurora MIGHT ask him to do something?

Did he not just admit Aurora DID ASK him to do something, just NOT to arrest me IN THEIR NAME?

But what he said, thinking it HELPED him, hurt him.. as in…

Civil Suit…Lepp to Brown: “So, you say Aurora did NOT ask you to arrest me. What DID Aurora ask you to do instead? What did THEY want you to do? since you now say they asked you to NOT arrest ME?” 

After that first arrest, police no longer allowed me a SINGLE video interview, not even an audio interview.

To underscore that, police arrested me 6 more times one 25 more charges and never ONCE asked me why I did it.

So, now, they get to explain to a civil suit justice why, on the first 2 SIMPLE lies they asked me questions and taped me, but a year later with 5 SERIOUS LIFE-IN-PRISON indictable charges August 23, 2018 they REFUSED to interview me.

How can that happen? 

Well, they cannot afford being embarrassed like THAT again, and they prefer NEW embarrassments.

So, I gotta give ’em what they asked for...”Book ‘I’m, Danno! He needs more education!”

Categories
Business Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Town Hall staff Town of Aurora York Regional Police

BL20-🥓8️⃣T3 – Attorney General announced an investigation into the Aurora Police Department

 

Colorado’s attorney general announced an investigation into the Aurora Police Department, which has been a focus of recent protests against police violence. The probe will examine whether “patterns and practices” at the department are unconstitutional. The city has also commissioned an independent investigation of the 2019 in-custody death of 23-year-old Black man Elijah McClain, as well as a “comprehensive review” of the police department. McClain’s family recently filed a civil rights lawsuit against the city, saying officers’ conduct the night he died was unconstitutional. McClain is one of many Black Americans whose cases have served as a rallying cry in the period of protest and change following the May death of George Floyd.

 

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Pause-4-Walkies

BL20-tu-፵ꗀ – Announcing: NEW Dog Walking Service!

My sentence and my probation permit me to make a living, I can “proceed to and from” my place of employment for “employment approved in advance” by my Probation Officer Ms. Bedford.

I think my Street View photography business is safe, and I anticipate daily shoots and promotions and cold calling is certainly allowed.

But, I really would like to see the old gang at the dog park and I know my wife’s dog misses the ONLY place in town she can run.

So, I plan to open a dog walking service at the Canine Commons park site where the Town already permits commercial operations every day.

Mine will be different. I will provide custom, one on one, with pick UP and DROP off service. Socially distanced dog walking.

I will pick up your dog in an air conditioned SUV We will proceed to the dog park and walk around with your dog.

Now, here is the wrinkle I think most people will enjoy.

If you miss the pickup, simply drive to Canine Commons and I will be there waiting for you.

I have my first contract with my soon to be ex wife. She works and cannot just drop things to walk her dog so she is hiring me and I will charge her commercial rates. She can then deduct that amount from my alimony.

Yes, I do not have gainful employment at a volume I can live on and so she has agreed to pay me alimony. But, to be fair, I will let the dog walking expense be deducted from alimony. I think that is only fair. and if there are other jobs she needs done, the same would apply. Pay me cash for doing nothing, or come up with jobs to pay me for.

I need a clever name for my new company. Something descriptive. Funny.

” Pause-4-Walkies” maybe….

e

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Criminal Code 101 Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-tu-፵ – YRP: York Regional Police win again

Deputy Chief Crawford got his way again in his 3 year battle to protect his extended family.

Despite my filing to the court yesterday on the details of how he directed DS Heather Bentham to assign 37 officers to investigate me, the court went ahead and sentenced me for sending Ms Bentham and DC Jeff Brown an email asking for help with a dog attack and a lawbreaker.

He asked Crown Moull’s mouthpiece to suggest to Justice Harpur that I go to prison for 6 months because I asked police for help when Bylaws refused to act or to even reply.

The contract signed by ALL one volunteer in Canine Commons required them to deal with all dog issues, and I think “attacking dog” fits the bill. Instead of dealing with the attack and speaking to he dog owner, every volunteer called police and, using Deputy Chief Crawford, had me arrested 7 times on 27 charges.

Not all 27 are from the volunteers, some are from their lawyer. In fact their lawyer has her name on all but 6 of the charges. Yes, the lawyer and the police chief used the courts to take $44,000 from my bank. THEN, the lawyer hired by Chief Crawford’s family then took another $4,500 of my Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security payments deposit date day before.

$50,000, give or take… enabled by Chief Crawford. For personal gain. And I have it all on film and audio actually being enacted or confessed to.

Why would J. Harpur find me guilty then?

Well, police need the Crown for that. So they had Crown Moull assign 14 different people to my arrests. Just so EVERY Crown developed the same disdain for my dastardly deeds. And also because they needed to divert the judges from the truth. If my criminal paper file were neat and tidy, any Crown or Justice could read it. Instead, they regularly dropped, shuffled and randomly put the paper back together.

When a paper criminal case file is NOT in sequence, it CANNOT be understood. And the reason is simple. Nowhere does a page identify what “Information number” it speaks about. And without an information number, judges cannot figure out a file. I got my file one day and scanned each page in physical sequence, It was just random papers and because of that, I was tried illegally on a MIX of indictable and summary charges.

Indictable charges require a jury for me. I did not get one. But to make up for that they also denied me a lawyer. Each day I paid my lawyer to come to court and each day Crown Elder said “NO, Bob, not today!” and he sent her packing. He did that to appease Chief Crawford’s lawyer who convinced Crown Elder my lawyer might get me freed and so she was banished.

Trial transcripts are not private. Anyone can order a copy. Any rich person of course, they cost over $1 a page, run to hundreds of pages per day and cannot legally be photocopied. But you can read any copy of mine here, just email me

So, the judge is not THE problem, just a PART of the problem, when he or she fails to read the evidence.

Yesterday the judge cited 2 emails I sent May 10 and 11, 2018 as my downfall. Each is included below. Each asks the entire volunteer group at the dog park to speak to the owner of the dog that attacked two of us. Well, the other guy, “Greg” may have been an undercover cop setting me up to email Bylaws asking for help so they could arrest me. I shall never know.

Because the judge refused to actually read the email, he did not believe it was written for police to read.

Instead, Crown Elder told him these 2 emails harassed the volunteers needlessly and persistently for 18 months. Why 18 months? Does the law not require people being harassed to call police within 6 months? Otherwise, they are admitting they enjoyed the emails. And, yes, 6 months is as far back as police can go to charge me. But Justice Harpur tripled that to make it easier for Chief Crawford to get his revenge.

Day one of trial I asked J. Harpur to drop the charges because they cited 18 months instead of 6. He declined my offer. I said fine, I have never filed an Appel before and I would like to learn.

So, as soon as he read his decision December 6, 2019 I appealed. Well, I waited for him to hire a lawyer to tell him what to do next. I do not get permitted a lawyer and the judge gets to have Legal Aid PAY FOR ONE FOR HIM because he was not sure what to do.

To say that British Common Law is weird is an understatement. All he had to do was read up on www.CANLII.org and he could have found 233 years of decisions to follow. Nope, he wanted to blaze his own trail. So he hired his very own lawyer to bring the matches.

So I got LESS than the 6 months requested, politely I might add, by Crown Moull. Actually, I got zero months in prison. Not even a fine!… because he heard me say I already paid $44,000.

What DID I get then?

I haven’t looked yet. I heard him rattle it off, but it is so detailed I will need it in writing.

I did hear “house arrest” again though.

Now, that is odd because Crown Westgate already decided house arrest was too severe for me when Chief Crawford had me picked up in March 2020. Mr Westgate “consented” to drop that just for me asking politely He can hardly argue NOW that he was WRONG back then. Or, can he?

I think they will tell me the right house to stay inside of this time too. The judge read it out LOUD. Last time they ordered me to live in a neighbour’s house.

And probation of course. 2 years. Concurrent with my 3 year version from J. Rose last December 6. So that seems to have been a bit of a waste of breath.

I think I can try to earn money to pay back the $44,000. I am not sure. I will wait for the paper copy.

And where does that lead you, Bob, charge-wise, arrest-wise. Sum it up for us.

Well, the 7 arrests seems to be the peak right now.

Of the 27 charges, just the 3 from March are left. It’s funny though, these 3 are brought by 3 lawyers. There is not a single civilian required. 3 of them got together and fabricated 3 charges by using the old “You sign my affidavits and I’ll sign yours.” trick.

If lawyers want to use a shakey fact on paper in a trial, they have to convince ONE other lawyer to sign it and say it is true. As far as they know.

So, one lawyer made up a story. Just straight out lied. Not once, but twice, because this lawyer told two completely different stories to 2 different cops. THEN… and here is the key… this lawyer had to get at least one other lawyer to sign their versions of the story. Barry Stork of York Region’s legal staff happily signed saying as far as he knew what she said was true.

And that makes my March 4, 2020 charges real. 2 lawyers made up and signed a story. And they will get up before a judge and swear, that as FRIENDS of the court, they would never lie and the judge will find me guilty again.

Simple.

But, guilty of what? Here it gets a bit fuzzy…. because the lawyers told 2 stories… but let’s eliminate one and “rule” on the other. The lawyer says I spoke to the lawyer in a court room.

Yes, the Law Society now has such a grip on the wallets of all Canadians, they now forbid anyone from speaking to a lawyer inside a court room without paying for the one hour minimum.

Luckily though, in June 3, 2020 a Superior Court justice ruled that not only am I permitted to speak to lawyers in court, that turns out to be the ONLY place I can speak to them.

So, why did Chief Crawford pick on me? Why did he tell Bentham to arrest me for something legal?

Well, it’s a job. Not a great one, but it’s a job and someone has to do it. Until he retires in October, I can expect constant arrest and prosecution. Then, he will train the new guy or gal replacing him on my evil nature. I do not expect his retirement will end my grief.

If I ever get my paperwork I will let you know.

We’ll wait by the box.

e

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Criminal Code 101 Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-tu-🌲 ⛔ – OPP: How they can help me

The Police Act establishes how the OPP can be used by the Ontario Government, I think they can help me.

So, all I need to do I ask the Crown to have the OPP investigate York Regional Police.

The Ontario Government says at: https://www.mcscs.jus.gov.on.ca/english/police_serv/about.html

Simple.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Criminal Code 101 Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-tu-🌲 🎱 – Hang ‘im High!

Today July 17, 2020 at noon I will be sentenced for my guilt. I want as many of you there as possible so check back about 11:45 for a dial in number. Or I will tell you they refused me one.

I repeat now my post on how long it takes to reclaim a maiden name for get a name changed I any other way. It takes weeks, not days. I do not think this was done in my case.

My case is 36 month long, 7 arrests, 27 charges, 14 days incarcerated already. It killed my dog, my wife is divorcing me, my son is leaving me, I have to lose half my house, I have no friends and less relatives… all because of false arrests.

No one can pick up the details of 36 months in Criminal Court quickly. Please, just know that the original complainant had me arrested because I asked her when she reverted to using her maiden name in the office at the Town of Aurora. She issued me a ticket June 3, 2017 as Jane Doe, and when I went tp fight it there was no “Jane Doe” at Aurora, just a “Jane Fawn” doing a similar job, as if she had arbitrarily gone back to her birth name. She refused to tell me the name change date, and instead, somehow she was able to convince police to arrest me July 14, 2017 JUST for asking. Turns out a Dep. Chief has the SAME last name Fawn as her, or as she HAD…because she claimed she got it legally changed with Ontario for her Provincial Offences Act License between June 3 and June 14, 2017 when I asked. She can write $300 tickets on a whim. The province requires she have a “POA licence” in her name. I contend she never changed the name between June 3 and 14, 2017…, that she lied about that in an attempt to conceal a past relationship to a man of the same surname, “Fawn”. She tried to cover up her past life for some reason.

So, this one little episode documents how LONG it really takes and where we go to confirm the change was legally completed. The rest of the 36 months you can get from me IF I am permitted to tell you by police.

Go here for the procedures; https://www.ontario.ca/page/change-name#section-0

Delivery time

If your application is complete, accurate and you were born in Ontario, we will mail you a certificate of name change and your new birth certificate in 6-8 weeks. It may take longer if you have requested a change to a single name or reclaimed name.

Once you get your certificate of name change, you can update your other government-issued identification (e.g. driver’s licence, health card, Ontario Photo Card).

6-8 weeks AFTER a Police Records Check comes back… THEN you can apply for new ID cards.

June 14, 2017 I had a person claim in writing to me and orally to police that they got their “reclaimed maiden” name “Fawn” LEGALLY changed in JUST 11 days. Now maybe they had the submissions in process for months ahead of June 3, 2017. Maybe not.

But a name change ALSO requires a police records check.

AND, Aurora proved one person never DID change the name because the OLD NAME was sent to Ontario to get a new POA licence January 30, 2018… 7 MONTHS after it was claimed as changed June 14, 2017.

I am forbidden by my probation order to type her name here so I ty[ed a faked names an example. The bylaw containing the real name is available (CLICK HERE) from Aurora Clerk Mike De Ronde. mderonde@aurora.ca

And I was sued under the “alleged NEW” name FAWN. So, if the name never got changed, maybe none of these claims are legally filed? I hope we can find out for sentencing TOMORROW, otherwise it will be delayed again. I asked this same thing back January 6, 2019 and no one cared back then either.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Criminal Code 101 Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham York Regional Police

BL20-tu-🌲 🕢 – Steps To Legally Change Your Name – Start NOW! It takes 6-8 weeks!

Go here for the procedures; https://www.ontario.ca/page/change-name#section-0

Delivery time

If your application is complete, accurate and you were born in Ontario, we will mail you a certificate of name change and your new birth certificate in 6-8 weeks. It may take longer if you have requested a change to a single name or reclaimed name.

Once you get your certificate of name change, you can update your other government-issued identification (e.g. driver’s licence, health card, Ontario Photo Card).

6-8 weeks AFTER a Police Records Check comes back… THEN you can apply for new ID cards.

June 14, 2017 I had a person claimed they got their “reclaimed maiden” name LEGALLY changed in JUST 11 days. Now maybe they had the submissions in process for months ahead of June 3, 2017. Maybe not.

But a name change ASLO requires a police records check.

AND, Aurora proved one person never DID change the name because the OLD NAME was sent to Ontario to get a new POA licence January 30, 2018… 7 MONTHS after it was claimed as changed June 14, 2017.

And I was sued under the “alleged NEW” name. So, if the name never got changed, maybe none of these claims are legally filed? I hope we can find out for sentencing TOMORROW, other wise it will be delayed again. I asked this same thing back January 6, 2019 and no one cared back then either.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Criminal Code 101 Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement York Regional Police

BL20-tu-🌲sex – First, errr, *SECOND* Canadian Criminal Sentencing *AT* The Scene of The Alleged Crime

I have no idea how to confirm this, but I cannot imagine it has ever happened.

I WAS WRONG! I am second at BEST… as usual.

March 18, 1982: Kuldip Singh Samra fatally shot two people and paralyzed one man in Toronto’s Osgoode Hall law courts after losing a voter-registration related legal battle. Samra testified that he sensed he was losing his legal case and left court to retrieve a loaded .357 Magnumhandgun from his car. He then shot Amarjit Singh Tatla in the head, before killing Tatla’s friend, Bhupinder Singh Pannu, and his lawyer, Oscar Fonseca.

https://www.pressreader.com/canada/national-post-latest-edition/20070119/281655365597858

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/faint-hope-dashed-for-toronto-courtroom-killer-1.655334

At Osgoode Hall a man was was sentenced for shooting 2 religious opponents in that very court room. And *THAT*( is why we have security at every court now.

But, here WAS my boast, as wrong as it was..

Friday July 17 at noon I will be sentenced on 3 criminal charges while I attend FROM the scene of the alleged crimes.

Not like these two reprobates!

I am being allowed to teleconference due to my age and susceptibility to COVID-19.

I promise to wear pants.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Criminal Code 101 Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement York Regional Police

BL20-tu-🌲🃕 – OIPRD Complaint filed File number E-202007160844301689, Heather Bentham, Paulo Da Silva, Andre Crawford

I know it will be deep-six’d BUT it feels good to do.