Categories
Business Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄CLXV – Even duct tape can’t fix stupid

We all remember a while back when a baby sex reveal party start a forest fire.

An over privileged MILLENIAL decided to use a rifle to ignite a pyrotechnic Which exploded in a puff of pink powder.

We saw that up here in CANADA. On the news. In the United States the president tells people not to watch the fake news so not very many people saw it down there

Well this week another arrogant over privileged millennial decided he and his buddies could do better and so they too fired an assault rifle at a pyrotechnic in a forest.

Now 7,000 acres of California are on fire and this is in the best country in the world led by the greatest president ever.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/07/us/california-fire-el-dorado-gender-reveal-trnd/index.html

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXI – How Breachy Was I?

All My “Convictions” are breaches. Save one which was an email to police asking for help with a dog attack. Am I TOO breachy?

Breach´y

a.1.Apt to break fences or to break out of pasture; unruly; as, breachy cattle.
Too funny… breaking fences in spite of myself

Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, published 1913 by G. & C. Merriam Co.

“APT TO BREAK FENCES” is just TOO funny.

In the past five months less than 12 people Average per day read my blog.

Three are alleged victims

Three more are me and my family, one more friend

at least three must be lawyers

my probation offocer, that’s 11.

some of 37 cops assigned

And your Attorney General has spent $250,000 conservatively since 2017. Ten trial days. Four inquiry days. A Hundred appearances. Waste.

For one ex cop. And only because of the “Thin Blue Line”.

I spent over $44,000 on lawyers and courts.

For 12 people a day. Ontario paid $228 per viewer per day

I paid another $40 a day per viewer

$268 a day we paid.

Is that “in the public interest?”

$268 a day.. over $10 an hour per person?

Discuss among yourselves.

I’m thinking ex cops are expensive to protect from public opinion. If they don’t want people blogging about them…. stop assaulting me and lying again and again. Two arrests, three charges all withdrawn as false.

When I went to Toronto police the first thing thing they asked ME for was photo ID. “Standard procedure” he said.

Why is it not STANDARD with York Regional Police?

Why can I not be shown PROOF of the name of the person who arrested me twice falsely? 3 charges. All withdrawn. Why can I not be told the legal name of such a person?

Since there was no name change between June 3, 2017 and January 30, 2018 when a married name was renewed as a POA officer in council minutes, she lied about her name in every charge and every lawsuit. Neither of her two lawyers have responded to a legal request to know my accuser’s legal name.

When after 5 days Toronto police called … they IMMEDIATELY opened with..” Why did you try to arrest in Toronto, you’re in Aurora?”

Second thing? She wanted my bank account number.

She’s not even planning to get the “legally executed garnishment from CIBC” to get the account number. She wants it from me?

Nope. I do not Gove my SON or bank account to anyone. Common sense.

If CIBC was legally freezing my account, she can now garnish RBC the same way. If she stole no account number for CIBC she should be able to repeat the process at RBC WITHOUT an account number. I’ve put my cash in the account. Go garnish it without an account number to prove your innocence.

If they give you my money they broke the law in s. 462. I’ve sued two banks already for breaking the Bank Act s.462 and eliminating my account, so to sue a third is easy.

Not garnishing RBC is an admission of guilt.

Your call.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

Protected: BL20-🎄CLX🎄 – Justice Cameron’s Unusual Findings

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXIi – Crown! Heads UP! This is a case about technology, remember?

Dear Crown,

I ask that you take archive copies of every soft copy you have sent me. I ask that the metadata for all Word documents be safeguarded. Or, if you do NOT use MS Office, save every file and tell me what software you used to create them.

Crown Westagte was quite offended II suggested Mr. Elder, Giordano and himself had supplied “DRAFT orders” to Justice Harpur and Justice Cameron for their decisions.

Word metadata

Most Word documents contain hidden metadata that shows the history of the document. Metadata is data about the document or file that is embedded within the file’s details. That data shows when the document was first created, who authored the document, total editing time, and the last time the document was modified.

Microsoft Word’s metadata, or document properties, stores details about files. Common metadata entries include the document’s author, company, title and subject. Each time someone edits and saves a file, Word updates the document’s metadata. Comments and revisions logged in the metadata are helpful when several people are collaborating on a document. Reviewing the document’s properties or using the Document Inspector to see if metadata is present and will help you verify what information Word has recorded; remember, though, that the Document Inspector locates the types of metadata recorded in the document but does not reveal what that data contains.

For PDF files..

For PDF files..

View document properties

When you view a PDF, you can get information about it, such as the title, the fonts used, and security settings. Some of this information is set by the person who created the document, and some is generated automatically.

In Acrobat, you can change any information that can be set by the document creator, unless the file has been saved with security settings that prevent changes.

Choose File > Properties.

Click a tab in the Document Properties dialog box.

Document Properties

Description

Shows basic information about the document. The title, author, subject, and keywords may have been set by the person who created the document in he source application, such as Word or InDesign, or by the person who created the PDF. You can search for these description items to find particular documents. The Keywords section can be particularly useful for narrowing searches.

Note that many search engines use the title to describe the document in their search results list. If a PDF does not have a title, the filename appears in the results list instead. A file’s title is not necessarily the same as its filename.

The Advanced area shows the PDF version, the page size, number of pages, whether the document is tagged, and if it’s enabled for Fast Web View. (The size of the first page is reported in PDFs or PDF Portfolios that contain multiple page sizes.) This information is generated automatically and cannot be modified.

I would like all of that for every decision published by the various justices.

In particular:

J. Harpur

  • Findings and assessment of my guilt
  • Sentencing July 17, 2020

J, Cameron

  • Decision on my motion to suspend sentence awaiting appeal

J Rose

  • Decision and sentence
  • Probation Order

Here Mr. Elder , or “elder02” created the PDF in MS Word.

By Elder
By a court reporter

So, the evidence of who wrote these documents is recorded in the soft copy file itself.

I ask for a copy of each Word document so I can see who wrote it.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLnever – Trump builds The Wall in Bradford Canada because that is the ONLY place he found a Mexican desperate enough to pay for it himself

AP – Breaking News – Saturday, September 5, 2020

The Whitehouse today issued a press release bragging that “Trump builds a “‘New” protective wall, on the very land owned by its neighbour even, that no U.S. cash was spent, and only Mexicans had to pay for it!”

One has to dig deep into the narrative to discover that The New Wall is:

  1. Not an international border
  2. Not 30 feet high, just four feet High
  3. Not black, it’s orange
  4. Not in Mexico, it’s in Canada 50 km NORTH of the border
  5. For certain p, it was paid for ONLY by Mexicans

Announcing: “The Wall” at Hay Caramba, Bradford, Ontario… a brand new patio safely surrounded by towering (to children) walls in safety orange.

The “Mexicans” are owners Noe Martinez and Melissa Marques. They paid 100% of the costs.

Trump is now looking into the miles of canal walls built by the large numbers of annual farm workers brought to the Holland Marsh area from Mexico because Canadians do not want to grow food. I’d have thought a pandemic might convince a few people to learn the skills… Just in case. Apparently everyone trusts McDonalds burgers WILL have adequate hormones in the beef to kill COVID-19.

So, each mile of canal is two miles of wall because Mexicans built the canals.

In Toronto, Secret Service suits were seen Laser measuring the Mexican embassy so a space contractor computer simulation could prove the length of all interior walls as well. Dubbed “Trump Mex US Some More Wall”, the app is being deployed to all countries with Mexican embassies and to all border states with Mexican immigrant owned bodegas… each store’s walls will be counted.

Following will be inclusion of all Wahlburgers, Walmart’s, ANYTHING Sam Walton OWN’s, all WonderWalls. All walls in Cornwall, all previously owned furniture of Humpty Dumpty and his progeny, all buildings built by any company trading on Wall Street,

Then, usually dim witted Eric came up with more opportunities when he asked, “What is a wall?” And Dad said.. “ Look it up you you dumb f&*k!” And he found…

All U.S. embassies in the following countries will be asked to donate one city each:

Number of places named Wall per country:

There are 5 places named Wall in Germany.

There are 4 places named Wall in United Kingdom.

There are 3 places named Wall in America.

There is one place named Wall in Vanuatu.

There is one place named Wall in Czech Republic.

Walls Do Not Stop Boy Scouts

There is one place named Wall in Cameroon.

There is one place named Wall in Australia.


Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL8 – Alternative Facts: Maybe she did not steal it!

Better L8 than never! MAYBE I was wrong!

If I had it wrong with Adrian, will CIBC take the blame?

Because, it COULD also have been CIBC lying that they did nothing wrong.

IN FACT, that MAY be a high possibility.

Will I now be arrested for Public Mischief?

A;; I did was report Gwendolyn ADMITTED it was “none of my business” who stole my account number for her.

Have faith Gwendolyn, you have a female officer investigating, and. I am sure you can talk yourself out of it.

Maybe, Gwendolyn is gonna take one for the team, maybe she’ll allow her OWN arrest rather than cost the banking industry a fortune.

If it was Gwendolyn… she gets a knuckle rap.

BUT, if it was CIBC… the resultant CLASS ACTIONS will cost a bundle.

Note: To lawyers reading this… DIBS! on the class actions… I demand a piece!

Read on. Maybe we can pin this on the CIBC acting alone.

Needed: Just get Camilla Latronico (CIBC) and Michael Hamilton (OBSI) to admit they were wrong… that CIBC made a mistake. Again.

And here’s what I base that on. More evidence that CIBC simply cannot properly handle garnish orders. They evolved (see my Darwin posts) into treating them ALL as “child support orders“. By letting ALL LAWYERS fax garnish orders for family support, CIBC let lawyers sneak in the odd shady court order and if needed deny it as a one-off mistake.

Plausible deniability…. always useful, always valuable.

Remember… the POSITIVELY shady $18,000 court order the banks are waiting for was fraudulently awarded. Ms Adrian asked for and got it claiming a motion NEVER heard. $1,800 ALONE was claimed by Gwendolyn for PHOTOCOPIES NEVER SEEN.

That is (in my opinion, see: Rights, Charter Of) fraud.

Anyway, it SHOULD be.

SNIFF- SNIFF!

Let’s Make Like A Canary and Take a Sniff! If we die, we die.

OK, let’s see if my CIBC account is still frozen by an order sent by Gwendolyn Adrian March 4, just about 20 hours after I opened it…

Spoiler alert! It was!

I tried a large Interac from my pension fund account at RBC Aurora

I then switched Apps and tried to deposit it at CIBC Aurora….. NOPE.

Because all of my accounts at CIBC are frozen, I cannot transfer IN any money, I cannot pay my bills.

So, the banks DEFEATED the whole intent of a garnish…. they really just get ONE grab, and if the balance is less than demanded… then the account is useless forever. Forever frozen. It cannot get more money put in.

BUT CPP And OAS will arrive… AND BE SEIZED.

See, there is no capability in this cold banking computer systems IBM sold them in the 70’s to exempt social benefits from being seized. I proved that too, by asking them!

CIBC Refuses To Upgrade Computer Systems

With the BILLIONS taken from the Canadian taxpayer… they will now claim it to have been and TO BE NOW too expensive to change their mainframes to permit meeting REQUIREMENTS clearly define in the Bank ct at s. 462,

I CANNOT be the first to be abused… CLASS ACTION GOLD MINE AHEAD!

Imagine how many people were robbed of their pensions which were then sent to the sheriff!

How long will it take CIBC to just figure out HOW MUCH they OWE these people?

After all if CIBC accepted a $5,000 COURT ORDER (NOT family support related) and then took $1,000 of the last CPP or OAS payments… THEY STOLE them to give the sheriff.

CIBC will have to pay them back once my class action gets rolling.

Oh, BTW, even when frozen.. the $4.95 charge is applied.

YES, I also get a credit of the $4.95 Old Fart Rebate

BUT, if this were a “reglular for fee” account, they would be charging for a withdrawn service. They must pay it back.

THAT’S MORE TO PAY BACK!

I believe CIBC has an expensive problem.

And, once they admit THAT to keep Gwendolyn Adrian from being arrested, they “freeze and seize and never releaze”… I go to TD, RBC, BMO, Tangerine, …. ALL of them will have to take a look whether they seized pension funds in every garnish order EVER! OR charged fees while the account was made useless.

The lawyers will be lining up.

To get me to shut up!

Now, what are the bets I can go in and change my account to a high end, all bells and half whistles version with the highest fee and then watch that accumulate? Think I can do it by Monday morning? I have 1-4 pm out today, I will try.

Alert! Bob Lepp is coming to CIBC to catfish them into charging fees for a frozen account. I’ll send my OAS there Direct Deposit, and keep CPP as a paper check I can tender at RBC. THEn, I have it all. End to end.

Since I just published the BUGS in CIBC systems, and emailed the Ombudsman, and if they STILL ignore me, and STILL LET me upgrade the account to a high fee… is THAT fraud as well?

Knowingly charging a monthly fee for a completely disabled account…

I’ll check with a lawyer.

Gwendolyn? Any time on your hands? Or are you NOT doing time yet?

See, more humour. I win again.

This is difficult for me…

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL7️⃣ – “Tied Up With A Bow(Wow)”: Putting it all together with RBC’s help

See what I did there? Humour!

I love the idea that in the end RBC is my safe place to bank.

and they are the key to how I avoid Ms Adrian until my appeal can be perfected.

Ms Buckles’ neighbour, and she has two, worked at RBC for forty years and now they will keep her talons off my money.

A wonderful young man there tied it all up with a bow.

He asked head office how they garnish an account. Simple. Direct.

I had no idea to ASK TD before they took our $4,500. Poof! It was gone.

And CIBC shut me down in half a day.

So, I assume those two would say the same as RBC…

  1. The bank gets garnished by fax…. because child support garnishments CAN be faxed to head office. Since they can’t tell the REASON for the garnish… or at least will claim they can’t .. they accept court orders too.
  2. Head office then FREEZES the accounts of the named person BECAUSE a deadbeat Dad or Mom will NOT be providing a bank account number.
  3. The “freeze” is due to systems so old it has no OTHER way to keep you from your money. The old mainframe COBOL programs are simply ALSO frozen since all of us COBOL programmers retired. Only the glitzy PC-based front ends get modifications now.
  4. So, the overall freeze takes away your pension payments. After all, deadbeat Dads are scum.
  5. If you happen to read this post you will now know that to get your CPP released … visit the branch and ask them to release your CPP.
  6. They give you the cash IF it has not been given to
  7. Your account is still frozen but you have cash.
  8. Mail cash to pay your cable bill.

So, if I MUST go to my bank to argue for my CPP…

I may as well get a paper check and cash it and save the argument.
BUT will they SEIZE it instead, put it in my account anyway…THEN, I get to argue for it.

WOW, so many options to mess me up.

Thus, a false garnish ALWAYS stops me getting my pension.

JUST like Adrian asked the judge to do.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🃕 – Do you know anyone whose Bank Account was garnished? They may have been scammed

Banks are permitting lawyers to circumvent the Bank Act.

To collect debts, they can “garnish” the debtor’s bank account. The Bank Act S. 462 tells them how.

They need your name, account number, branch number and branch address. Then they courier the order to the branch. And the bank branch is supposed to do the rest. They compare the account and name to the name and account on your signature card, then take your cash. If you still owe money, they take any cash you are silly enough to deposit.

Until recently….

Today, Lawyers now ignore all that and just fax the debtor name to every bank head office and they do the rest, Each head office finds and freezes the account and sends the cash to the sheriff,

Until all the debt is paid, you CANNOT use your account.

So, you lose your money AND the ability to day your bills.

And nome of that is legal.

Call YOUR bank and ask their routines. You will be amazed,

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🃕 – Do you know anyone whose Bank Account was garnished? They may have been scammed

Banks are permitting lawyers to circumvent the Bank Act.

To collect debts, they can “garnish” the debtor’s bank account. The Bank Act S. 462 tells them how.

They need your name, account number, branch number and branch address. Then they courier the order to the branch. And the bank branch is supposed to do the rest. They compare the account and name to the name and account on your signature card, then take your cash. If you still owe money, they take any cash you are silly enough to deposit.

Until recently….

Today, Lawyers now ignore all that and just fax the debtor name to every bank head office and they do the rest, Each head office finds and freezes the account and sends the cash to the sheriff,

Until all the debt is paid, you CANNOT use your account.

So, you lose your money AND the ability to day your bills.

And nome of that is legal.

Call YOUR bank and ask their routines. You will be amazed,

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL❻ – Proof Ms. Adrian lied

Ms Adrian and Mr Painter OFTEN forget I am not a lawyer. They then expect I know all the secret handshakes.

The both enjoy whining to justices that I do not play by unwritten lawyer rules developed over the centuries to make their lives even easier. This makes tech judge biased against me.

To be honest, if a self rep actually finds himself standing before a justice then he has moved heaven and earth. It is not trivial to schedule a motion. To be able to produce the paperwork takes a lot of learning, effort and mistakes.

Below is Ms Adrian’s signature under paragraph 10) in which she claims:

“…Lepp increased costs by unilaterally scheduling the SLAPP relief motion…Increased costs were incurred. Had Lepp acted REASONABLY, a motion to deal with the preliminary issue of default could have been scheduled before a master…..”

G. Adrian Costs submission to J Schabas

I “reasonably” plead 137.1 in my Defence and on May 21, 2019… EXACTLY as I am supposed to. Ms Adrian filed for “Default Judgement” WHILE I filed 137.1 WITH HER on May 21, 2019

She refused ALL communication while I was in default. I emailed her several times citing PPPA, COJA and SLAPP 137.1 rules.

Framers of the PPPA despised SLAPP suits. They are predatory and allow wealth to defeat dissent through false suits JUST to cost MONEY and l its of it.

SLAPP suits are oppressive and illegal now and Ms Adrian has STILL not “got” it.

DEFAULT” means NOTHING when 137.1 is moved.

The whole idea of the PPPA is to cut off SLAPP suits at the knees, AND at NO COST TO THE DEFENDANT.

Before the PPPA, MONEY was simply the weapon to shut up the dissenter.

Adrian refused to understand that 137.1 SUPERCEDES EVERYTHING ELSE ABOUT A CASE. The PPPA’s purpose is to DISCOURAGE exactly the kind of suit Duncan brought. To do that, the Defendant can challenge it ANYTIME under 137.1. He can be assured of NOT PAYING ANY COSTS. He can win UNCAPPED damages if he proves SLAPP.

FACT: On May 21, 2019 we BOTH stood before J. Archibald and HE ordered us back August 26, 2019 for the 137.1 hearing… a date acceptable to BOTH of us.

There was NO unilateral “scheduling” of anything. I had ALREADY pled 137.1 IN SENTENCE ONE OF MY DEFENCE TO Brad Cran.

There is NO REQUIREMENT for a self represented person to beg a lawyer for a date. Lawyer “friends” do that as a nicety to fellow union members. I have it from Llyshelle Barrett, Superior Court Scheduler Newmarket that no “consultation” is required.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🏌️‍♀️ – To: Michael Simaan – Things to ponder

As you consider the revenue streams from the lawsuits of TD and the other one, think about how…

Ms. Adrian submitted costs stating she worked seven 8.5 hour days, or 60 hours at $300 per hour, defending her client’s suit from SLAPP s.137.1 of the PPPA and the COJA and NEVER ONCE read the section to see what she was trying to defeat.

If she HAD read the s. 137.1 it states clearly it can be moved at ANY TIME, when in default, or NOT in default, BEFORE filing a defence, AFTER filing a defence.. there is NO TIME when it cannot be moved.

FACT: There is NO TIME when SLAPP s. 137.1 cannot be moved.

  1. A woman who falsely arrested me on three criminal charges, the crown withdrew on all 3, she sues me for her losing her two town jobs… and yet she testified at MY trial it was her choice to leave each and she was paid “cash on lieu of notice” by both Aurora and Erin.
  2. A trained lawyer can claim to J. Schabas she worked 60 hours at $300 an hour on defending SLAP 137.1 BUT she never actually read the section in either the PPPA or the Courts of Justice act.

She denies knowing:

  1. 137.1 can be moved WITHOUT filing a defence, therefore, everyone who moves 137.1 IS IN DEFAULT.
  2. That defending 137.1 CANNOT BE AWARDED costs.. EVEN IF SUCCESSFUL.
  3. The meaning of SLAPP… as defined in the PPPA and 137.1
  4. She denies her client claimed she built 100% on her own land, right up until Ms Adrian got her to admit she knew it all along to beat Ms Buckles in Small Claims. That was brilliant of her. She won $2,000 by admitting her suit was FALSE all along… and forgot she now LOSES her $80,000 suit of two people.

Now, if she had NOT STOLEN MY CIBC DATA,.. she might convince a judge she was just sloppy, but once she committed a crime the judge SHOULD lose all respect for her.

But, she did steal my account number. And I can prove it.

CIBC said their staff ALL did a perfect job, just like they worked for Trump.

That MEANS, there was a match between the account Ms. Adrian submitted on the garnishment order and the account number on my still wet signature card.

CIBC would not lie to police, correct? They would say they did not Gove the number away. And then the police ask for the garnishment order, point to the account number and say “Well how did Ms Adrian get it legally?”

So, Ms Adrian somehow got knowledge of my account number to be able to write it on the order to the court and to CIBC. And I can state I did not give it to her.

ONLY CIBC knew my account number when I opened the account March 3, 2020 and BEFORE she garnished it March 4. So, in those 24 hours, Ms. Adrian stole it from someone.

AND, someone told her I was in that CIBC branch March 3. She could NOT know to go steal the account UNLESS a co-conspirator saw me there and phoned her up. THEN, she could go steal the account number.

So, she had TWO helpers, one playing lookout and one on the INSIDE of CIBC to print out my banking data for her. Its a long number, plus the TRANSIT code… she could not just be told it, someone printed it out or wrote it down for her.. and that piece of paper is evidence she now cannot destroy.

CIBC logs EVERY access to my profile data. They can be subpoena’d, ALL of the staff… to ask each one to confess.

And then August 26, Ms Adrian tried to elicit all my password hints. Wife’s name. birthday, mother’s name, son’s name, birthday…. she got EVERYTHING she needed to log in as me and take my money directly. Was she planning to do that? Or were the improper Discovery questions part of her thievery?

And imagine how much time CIBC wil spend backing away from claiming they did everything legally when they decide its easier to just charge Adrian for theft and let police figure it out. Not great press, but all press is good press.

The cost of all these suits to taxpayers is unfortunate.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL🎄 – To: Michael Simaan – It’s easy as RBC…Why Ms. Adrian SHOULD be able to garnish RBC, too

On August 26, 2020 I was ordered by Ms Adrian to attend Discovery in aid io execution. She repeatedly asked me for ALL the accounts I had beyond the two she had ALREADY garnished so she could garnish it.

I told her “RBC Aurora”… why is it NOT garnished yet?

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL-aye-aye – CIBC Prefers To Be Sued

If you have read what the function of various levels of Ombudsman inside and outside CIBC, you know:

  • They will never admit they made a mistake
  • They will never offer compensation for abuse and withdrawal of service
  • Their “Top Guns” at OBSI take over to silence you JUST to open a file.
  • The range OBSI states they pay for silence to continue to infinity is $1,000 to $5,000
  • You will never know how much or how often people are paid to shut up about Bank Misconduct because a non disclosure starts at minute one off your complaint
  • You can accept $1-5,000 and play that game, or you can sue
  • I can clone my Michael Simaan and TD Bank to Michael Simaan and CIBC Bank in an eyeblink
  • This time Ms Adrian cannot represent him as she is udder investigation for theft of my banking data at CIBC

I will post the Small Claims Suit Number HERE >>>>________________________

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CL – CIBC Ombudsman Camilla Latronico Tells Me How to Unfreeze My Account

Dear Mr. Lepp,

 I am writing in response to your email of today’s date regarding your bank accounts

 In order to access funds in your accounts, you need to contact CIBC at (905) 727-4248 X 222 (660 Wellington Street East Aurora Ontario L4G 0K3).  Thank you, Regards,

Camilla Latronico, CFP STI | Senior Manager | Office of the Ombudsman 

P.O. Box 342, Commerce Court, Toronto, ON  M5L 1G2 | Tel: 416-980-3755 | Fax: 416-980-3754 |

September 2, 2020 at 4:29 pm

Hear the results here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QNWhqlc05eCj7Pct_pVEhc2nfPncnDYY/view?usp=sharing

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄Cli – OBSI Michael Hamilton invokes SILENCE so I dump him

Recall that OBIS exists to pay off people who get screwed over by a bank.

As soon as you start not the process, the “Cone of Silence” drops over you. Then, whatever they tell your whatever the solution is you must shut up. You cannot use the admissions of OBSI that a bank screwed you over to sue that bank.

So, in essence, OBSI is just a muffler for complaints. Only the serious errors and omissions would be brought to them and they INSTANTLY have you wrapped in sound absorbing legal instruments.

If you get screwed over, just go straight to a law suit, because OBSI tops out at $1,000 anyway. Chump change.

CIBC broke the Bank Act was, specifically s. 462, but accepting a garnishment order at head office as a fax. They did not require Ms Adrian to courier it to my branch for comparison of the account number she had to the one on my signature card.

Because CIBC then froze my account to all uses for the last 5 months, they still assert they did nothing wrong.

So, if on September 2, 2020 (today) CIBC asserts they have done nothing illegal, why os my account not of any use to me?

 Mr. Lepp,

 Thank you for the update. At this time, I am required to remind you and bring your attention to the consent you signed with OBSI on July 7, 2020. Specifically:

Information you receive from us is confidential

You cannot share the information you get from us with anyone except the firm’s regulators and anyone who has also signed this agreement. You cannot use information you get from us in any legal action. 

You agreed to the terms set out in the consent. In particular, you agreed that:

OBSI’s correspondence, files, and any discussions we have during the review of your complaint are confidential;  

Sincerely,

Michael Hamilton

Senior Investigator

———————————————————————

OBSI / OSBI

T: 1.888.451.4519 x 2262

F: 1.888.422.2865

mhamilton@obsi.ca

September 2, 2020 at 4:29 pm

SO, I guess the OBSI will sue me now.

So far, what I got from the OBSI is “We need another 60 days to take us out to our maximum of 120 days to come back with a result.

Well, CIBC already telegraphed the result… a frozen account.

Did anyone see or notice that lawyers and government and bankers EVERYWHERE want to shut me up?

Aurora wants me shut up about the illegal business and education tax exemption for Terry Redvers and his soccer dome and maybe his tennis club by now.

York Region wants me shut up about Bus Safety.

the Catholic School Board wants me SiLENTLY to stay off public land at the bus stop.

York Region police want me shut up about Det. Sgt Bentham in my blog

The Police services Board want me to shut up and not demand they control the Thin Blue Line mentality of the Crawford family.

All of this silencing will come with a cost. Which is pretty cool, I will get paid for shutting up!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️9 – To: Michael Simaan – I demand you garnish my RBC account where my CPP pension and OAS goes

UPDATE: September 3, 2020 – I met the RBC Aurora staff and set it all up for garnishment, They will let me know September 4 whether they can guarantee they will not take CPP and OAS if I direct it there

On August 26, 2020 I was ordered by Ms Adrian to attend Discovery in aid io execution.

She repeatedly asked me for ALL the accounts I had beyond the two she had ALREADY garnished so she could garnish it.

I told her “RBC Aurora”… way is it NOT garnished yet?

This is all she had, if police believe her, to garnish me at CIBC. She said she did not get my actual real account number or anything else REAL about me.

I challenge her NOW to prove it. And it is dead easy to prove.

I DEMAND she garnish it today September 2, 2020 a week LATER.

But you KNOW NOW she will not, don’t you?

Because, without an account number and a branch address and then registered mail or courier personal service TO the branch address, my signature card account number cannot be compared to the account number in the garnishment order.

Aurora RBC is at: 15408 Yonge St, Aurora, ON L4G 1N9 (905) 841-2020 Closes 5:00 pm today.

And because you would FAIL to prove that, she must have broken the law getting “Ms. Nunhov U.R. Business!” to give her my account details.

She is in a corner now. Backed in real tight.

If she DOES garnish my RBC Aurora pension money, she will break the law.

If she does NOT garnish RBC Aurora, she is admitting she can find no legal way to do that.

So, what shall it be?

I have already offered settlement in my suit of you and TD Bank. You declined. So at trial the justice can go nuts with a cash award. Especially when I tell him the same lawyer you hired AGAIN illegally garnished Canada Pension and OAS at CIBC.

My conundrum is what do I DO?

  • Do I sue CIBC for $35,000?
  • Do I sue you again for $35,000
  • Do I sue her client for $35,000

Any free legal advice for me?

I thought not. I have GoogleLaw, don’t worry about me.

Te following article is from 2017

GoogleLaw and creative destruction of the legal profession

Google and artificial intelligence may not be the end of the legal profession, but, boy, can you see it from here. 

Gary Goodwin

By Gary Goodwin

OPINION 06 Nov 2017

Google and artificial intelligence may not be the end of the legal profession, but, boy, can you see it from here. 

I anticipate encountering what Joseph Schumpeter euphemistically called creative destruction. Innovation destructs archaic business models and creatively releases capital to be deployed elsewhere — a benign description of being out on the street with your law degree.

Perhaps it’s too hyperbolic, but, for example, Google has made a database of federal and state case law and legal journal articles available via its Google Scholar search. In their defence, lawyers can now purchase on Amazon the “Please Do Not Confuse Your Google Search With My Law Degree” coffee mug. 

For a simpler DIY approach, YouTube displays more than 146 videos on family law. This also includes shuffle playlist for greater variety. 

For comparison, AI factors into more than 38 per cent of regular enterprise planning for mainly customer interfaces. As for law firms, it’s likely not so much. Most of law firm and in-house planning centres on how to augment regular legal work with new AI tools to make this more effective and efficient. 

JPMorgan Chase & Co., apparently, eliminated 360,000 hours of legal work creating legal security documents by the use of COIN, for Contract Intelligence, to review commercial loan agreements. The bank plans to use AI to analyze credit default swaps . . . since things worked out so well last time. 

Other forms of AI can review entire contracts, interpret sections and even recommend sections that are not there. These recommendations can depend on which side of a particular transaction you happen to be. Similar to customizing streaming music systems, one can imagine the type of customization that can occur as you adjust the lever from buyer focused over to seller focused. We await the ultimate customization that includes sliding the scale either to the far left or far right into the “jerk” setting. 

I tried a contract review application one time with a simple release. No comments came back. I imagine legal associates would be ecstatic to receive something back from a senior lawyer without any comments. I was hoping for at least one “atta boy” type of meme.

Instead of augmenting legal practice, another perspective suggests a client-based focus where the system asks questions and directs the client to certain resources. For example, The DoNotPay website helped users successfully appeal hundreds of thousands of parking tickets by having the client answer a number of questions. The system then interprets the situation and prints out a draft letter to send to the authorities.

I tested DoNotPay over the weekend and can confidently assert that the experience replicated that of retaining some legal firms. The site took in my request, said it was sorry to hear that and told me if I could email more information it would get back to me in 24 hours. Nice immediate reply, but a solution may come a bit later. Notwithstanding the delay, the value proposition — benefits divided by total costs — cannot be beat. The system is free. 

So, where do the law societies stand among all of this creative destruction? Their mandate includes the protection of the public. However, the other two mandates generally include advancing the cause of justice and the rule of law, which requires the public disclosure of legal codes and processes. Societies also facilitate access to justice. This suggests making it as easy as possible for the general public unable to afford a lawyer access to some form of legal information. 

This type of access does not mean providing paper or online brochures but a more customized response. In other businesses, chatbots can ask an advancing series of questions and provide a more “intelligent” and applicable answer. This forms the entire basis behind a customer-focused type of interface.  

A new client-driven model suggests perhaps an Uber approach. Uber does not own cabs and tries not to employ drivers. The courts have imposed some obligations here. Generally, Uber is a simple platform that connects customers and drivers. A similar approach could connect a client and a lawyer providing the most cost-effective service. Cost is not everything, but as the law becomes more commoditized, then perhaps being “the better lawyer” may not carry the day if everyone uses the same type of AI platform to research and provide a result. And, yes, everyone shall likely have their respective settings maximized over to jerk, so there will still be plenty to argue about. 

From a policy analysis perspective, one appreciates the different approaches each law society brings to the table and the complicated socio-economic analysis that would be required to balance justice access and public protection. The 2014 CBA Legal Futures Initiativeoutlined a number of areas that the legal profession could take to remain relevant. Implementation of the recommendations may be slow in coming. 

The various law societies currently have authority over who can practise law. One can easily imagine a public lobbying effort to storm the ramparts to allow some form of AI system that can ask questions and guide the individual to a possible area where help could be found.

There is nothing like a bit of urgency to assist in the legal change management process. 

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️8 – To: Toronto Police Services – The Law of Garnishment

Dear PC Mohammed

When and if your detectives speak to Ms Adrian, she will impress u[on them her superior knowledge of the law.

She will say: “Detective, I know the law and I did what it said to do.”

Well, faced with that assault on the competence of a highly trained Detective in Canada’s most sophisticated city… he or she may crumble and give up.

I ask that you do a couple of things for me:

  • Always read www.boblepp.com for the truth
  • The Bank Act section 462 is the law, and it says the garnishment must include the branch address and account number and be served to the BRANCH, NOT head office so the account number submitted can be compared to the one on the signature card in the branch
  • Did I mention www.boblepp.com?

I have done few related posts already. I created a new “category” ‘Whither Goest Gwendolyn Adrian?” for all such commentary on the Bank Act.

Just click HERE and see ALL posts about the legalities of Garnishment

and of course, get them to ask THE experts.. their credit union, because I am guessing NO ONE illegally garnishes them! 

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️7 – Bradford’s “Hay! Caramba!” as it joins my extensive Google Maps portfolio of 360 degree visual tours


Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️6 – The “Bought ’em” Line

Gwendolyn CANNOT have BOTH served a legal garnishment notice AND served it legally

WHO/DecisionYESNO
MEX
CIBCX
OBSIX
Toronto PoliceX

The choices above do NOT result in a possible solution.

BECAUSE…EITHER

  • She served a legal garnishment using my stolen bank identity, and
  • The CIBC PERMITTED it to happen

OR

  • She served an illegal garnishment WITHOUT my account number AND
  • The CIBC PERMITTED it to happen

AND, THEREFORE

CIBC is wrong REGARDLESS

CIBC is responsible for BOTH choices police make

  1. leaking my personal data AND
  2. acting on an illegally served garnishment.

Ms. Adrian REQUIRED my account number on the order which HAD or be served “personally” at my branch, not faxed to EITHER the branch OR head office

SO THAT

My CIBC ***BRANCH*** could MATCH it to their signature card.

So, now the OBSI will do its thing and recommend CIBC pay me money to stay silent about their illegal mistakes,

Oopsie… TOO LATE!

They missed their chance to avoid “Death by BLOGGER BOB”.

Can you say “Catch 22”?

Catch-22 (logic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to navigationJump to searchA flowchart showing how Catch-22 works

catch-22 is a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations.[1] The term was coined by Joseph Heller, who used it in his 1961 novel Catch-22.

An example is:In needing experience to get a job…”How can I get any experience until I get a job that gives me experience?” – Brantley Foster in The Secret of My Success.

Catch-22s often result from rules, regulations, or procedures that an individual is subject to, but has no control over, because to fight the rule is to accept it. Another example is a situation in which someone is in need of something that can only be had by not being in need of it (e.g.: the only way to qualify for a loan is to prove to the bank that you don’t need a loan). One connotation of the term is that the creators of the “catch-22” situation have created arbitrary rules in order to justify and conceal their own abuse of power.

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

to justify and conceal their own abuse of power.

THAT sums up the Newmarket version of justice.

Newmarket Crowns make up arbitrary rules all the time.

  • NO Crown Pre-Trial (CPT) meetings, the time to exchange evidence and discuss options to a trial, despite the Attorney General mandating Self reps should get MOPRE CPT’s than a represented accused so teycna be given some training in court room procedures. Crown Moull WANTS want EVERY self rep to look like a RUDE RUBE to a justice. He wants mistakes made, rudeness, anger fro the self rep FLOUDERING in a strange land
  • (Note: Over 50% of cases now self represent due only to HIGH COSTS of lawyer.)
  • NO Consent for obvious motions…Like: Suspend sentence for a first time criminal who appealed the DECISION…. should be automatically consented to.
  • NO Consent for obvious motions… Consent to Strike “term 6” as J. Dawe ordered in every OTHER active order, release order, probation order, conditional release order… WITHOUT FORCING AN EXPENSIVE MOTION.
  • NO paper given to the accused facing a trial on 8 Summary charges and a Preliminary Inquiry 3 Indictable charges within a week of each other June 11 to 18, 2019 so he cannot know WHEN to hire a paralegal
  • MIX an Indicatable charge in with 7 summary charges in a SUMMARY trial to bias the justice to evidence unrelated to the Summary charges
  • PRESENT to J.P. Premji March 6, 2020 for a REVERSE ONUS bail release …a list of DISPOSED CHARGES ALREADY WITHDRAWN OR DISMISSED, JUST to BIAS JP Premji to think I had all of those as CONVICTIONS.
  • Accuse me of “filing too many motions on the wrong day” and THEN order that I NOT FILE ANYTHING AT ALL.

Until last week, I could NOT have won for trying.

Today, I CANNOT POSSIBLY LOSE even if I tried.

Watch THEM lose ME now! They have it ALL figured out, I only have half.

The fact they will now screw me again is an:

Immutable truth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In philosophy and logic, an immutable truth is:

an unchanging universal fact

or reality

that is NOT influenced by human opinion.

(According to positivismobservation and experience are the only ways for immutable truths to become fully realized or understood.)

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️5 – CIBC/Garnishment… an arrestingly simple decision chart

Do we arrest Gwendolyn Adrian for stealing my banking data from CIBC in less than one day?… or do we forgive her?

https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/how-to-make-a-decision-matrix

There are now THREE entities examining their options. Each has just two options, YES (Arrested, Adrian erred) or NO (No arrest, Adrian did everything correctly)

So, in the end, we will have 4 YES/NO’s

ALL WILL most likely say NO!

WHO/DecisionYESNO
MEX
CIBCX
OBSIX
Toronto PoliceX

Depending on the mix of answers, I will take the next actions. I will do what every organization I asked said to do: “Sue ’em!” is all you CAN do.

Then, Charles Painter will have FRESH evidence of my vexatious tendencies.

See how they all work together? “They” force me to sue, so Aurora can defeat my $7 million suit claiming I overuse and abuse the courts.

“…🎶 and the painted ponies go round and round..♬”

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️4 – Road Trip!

You may “proceed directly to any medical…approved in advance by the Conditional Sentence Supervisor”

Signed july 18, 2020 by D Whitman for J. Harpur

I have a lab test requisition, which I believe is “any medical” in nature.

I must get approval from my CSS to go a lab test. He will ask where, I will say “Lifelabs Aurora, or an alternate if it is closed.”

He will say yes.

I will go to Lifelabs Aurora.

If it is closed, I will got to another Lifelabs at: 1040 Oliver Rd #101

If you Google that, it is in Thunder Bay.

I’ll be back Sunday morning Sept. 6. I have surgery, a secondary repeat of last time next week and according to probation I will get advanced approval.

Lord Tunderin’ Jeezuz... he’s going to go to Tunder Bay, by Jeezuz... how clever is that b’y?

I’m jest about gutfounded.

I’ll put da ol’ slut on and have me a yarn.

When the lab returns results showing I had ingested 4 beers and a martini minutes before the Dracula’s me.. I wil be asked to go to any Lifelab for a repeat.

That’s where St. John’s comes in.

I love the idea of “Lacey’s Blood Work”… I found no Lifelabs there so I substituted…

Driving just 10 hours a day, I can be back by the end of my sentence.

I booked the Ferry in case there is a Labour Day rush.

For those a little bit short of any such sense, this is called humour.

I have a permit for a “concealed carry LOADED” at all times. Fully Automatic, the large clip, no silencer, water cooled (well iced Martini-cooled, belt loaded (one belt 🍸 per load), 10X scope, crosshairs, laser pointed, accepts bayonet, integrated brass knuckles for larynx-to-ear combat, body camera Bluetooth linked while firing.

Virtual Reality playback enabled. Real time publishing on YouTube.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️3 – Here, My Crystal Ball Tells How The OBSI Will Whitewash CIBC

The OBSI exists to mediate to pay off people to NOT tell the public when banks break the law. Period.

They “Spoke and offered to think about ” paying me $1,000 to NOT talk more about how CIBC accepted and implemented an illegal garnishment in less than 24 hours of a brand new account.

CIBC pays OBSI to pay people off when its member has paid the current year dues, and broke a law

OBSI exists to negotiate to buy its members silence from those it abuses.
OBSI exists to subvert the law behind closed doors in silence so the Federal government does not cancel its charter

The dues CIBC paid for 2020 is “hush money” so no one knows they illegally removed my new bank account from my use, froze it March 4 without waiting 2 days, kept it frozen as I write September 2 four months later even though not one penny was deposited or garnished.

Are You A Logical Thinker?

Follow this closely and tell me why I am wrong.

The Bank Act is the law banks must follow.

s. 462 defines to the bank when and how to Legally garnish an account.

If a bank claims it acted legally, it can display the evidence of EACH and EVERY one ofthose actions.



Because, s. 462 says the entire process must be Properly documented documented.

CIBC, therefore, can show me NOW, TODAY these proofs

  • The carrier or postal registered mail receipt showing the exact branch address matching mine
  • A log or register from the branch
  • The paper letter from Gwendolyn Adrian being received AT MY BRANCH.
  • The name and account account number Ms Adrian specified to garnish
  • An image of the signature card used to verify that the correct account number matched what Ms Adrian wrote
  • The affidavit of service proving I was served the NEW garnishment order for the new account
  • The date of the request, the total to be garnished, and the date AFTER waiting 2 days to take money.
  • Proof that the account was left in a status which does NOT prevent me from using it to receive my CPP and OAS direct deposits
  • Proof I can still deposit online or accept transfers of money INTO my account
  • Proof that my CPP and OAS deposits will NOT BE GARNISHED
  • Proof that EVERY garnishment they acted on is now properly documented showing compliance with s. 462

It is designed only to satisfy the Bank Act.

CIBC will stick to its position they did nothing wrong despite the fact they have none of the documented evidence

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️2 – OBSI Provincial Ombudsman is run by the banks.

OBSI is a structure mandated by the law. It is just a necessary “last chance” when the bank says no.

OBSI is NOT on the side of the bank customer, nor is it biased to the bank. But, it IS funded by the banks and that answers the question. The Bank Act says they need to fund the OBSI, so they do, but it is NOT designed to help customers.

It is designed to be impartial enough tp satisfy the Bank Act.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-241 – There IS a doG!

Attributed to The Rev. Bob Dod, aka: “The Deacon of Dyslexia”

My dog, Scheibe was killed as a direct effect of Det. Sgt. Bentham’s push to punish me for blogging about her. By banning me from the dog park, she forced me to the forest where she impaled herself, March 2019.

So, she’s in heaven. Yup, there is one. It is populated ONLY with our dead dogs. They are the only creatures deserving of heaven. No cats, except to lick up after serving the meals.

Anyway I ask her to do stuff for me. She does them, and I give my wife’s dog, Coco, extra treats.

Seems Coco has a lot of sway with heaven too. She asked Scheibe for our back yard to be filled with rabbits, tender ones, for her to chase.

Poof! Rabbits are nesting in a large flower pot.
So, Darwin had to know this strain of rabbit had to be removed from the gene pool and a Scheibe gave him a paw.


Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-🎄C🍀🏌️‍♀️ – “Branching Out” for LEGAL Garnishment

It’s Time to Amend the Bank Act So Clients Can Collect on Judgments

Ontario utilizes a “loser pays” legal system in which the losing party is usually ordered by the court to pay a portion of the successful party’s legal fees. As a result, regardless of who wins, someone ends up with a piece of paper requiring the other party to pay money.

Assuming that the losing party does not voluntarily cut a cheque, a bank garnishment oughtto be the most straightforward and direct means to collect. I emphasize the word “ought”.

Put simply, once a bank is served with a Notice of Garnishment it is required to seize any funds the debtor holds at the bank and pay those funds (up to the amount owed to the creditor) to the sheriff. Ultimately the sheriff hands the money over to the creditor.

The catch is that in order to garnish the account, the creditor must serve the Notice of Garnishment at

the branch where the debt is payable.

If the creditor does not know the branch location then they are out of luck.

For example, the debtor may have $1 million dollars in a savings account at TD Canada Trust. However, if the creditor serves the Notice of Garnishment at the main branch, and the debtor’s “branch of account” is actually a different branch just around the corner from the main branch,

then the bank is not required to garnish and pay the funds over to the sheriff.

From a practical perspective, this means that if the creditor does not have any banking information for the debtor they have limited options.

The creditor can require the debtor to attend an examination and disclose his/her banking information. However, debtors often fail to show at these examinations and when they do they are often not very forthcoming. The result is more time and money wasted while the creditor returns to court to compel proper answers.

The creditor could also take a shot-gun approach and try to garnish different branches. While this may work in small rural areas, in larger urban centers there can be hundreds of bank branches which makes this approach cost prohibitive.

All of this got me to thinking, why on earth is it necessary to locate a specific bank branch.

The answer, it seems, was that this was initially required to make lives easier on the banks!

This case from 1981 discusses why the Bank Act created this requirement. At paragraph 32 the court states

“The subsection was necessary to protect the bank against garnishing orders issued, say, in Victoria when there was an account, say, in Halifax. The bank would be bound, upon receiving each garnishing order, to search the records of every branch in Canada and probably out of Canada, a quite impractical proposition. What need be done now is to search only the branch at which the garnishing order is served. If there is found to be neither property in the possession of the bank belonging to the person garnisheed nor moneys to the credit of that person, the bank need not search further.”

I agree that in 1981 having a bank search the records of every branch in Canada was likely “a quite impractical proposition”. However, over 30 years later one has to think that banks could, from a central location (or any location for that matter), easily search all of their records to see if the debtor has any accounts at any branch across the Province or Canada.

A simple amendment to s. 462 of the Bank Act could radically improve the way that litigants are able to recover sums of money that the courts have awarded to them. Instead of hunting for specific branches, litigants could easily take a shot-gun approach and serve all of the major banks.

Recovery prospects would increase dramatically. Enforcement costs would be reduced drastically given that litigants would only be paying fees associated with issuing 5 Notices of Garnishment as opposed to 500.

s. 462 of the Bank Act

Branch of account with respect to deposits

  • 461 (1) For the purposes of this Act, the branch of account with respect to a deposit account is
    • (a) the branch the address or name of which appears on the specimen signature card or other signing authority signed by a depositor with respect to the deposit account or that is designated by agreement between the bank and the depositor at the time of opening of the deposit account; or
    • (b) if no branch has been identified or agreed on as provided in paragraph (a), the branch that is designated as the branch of account with respect thereto by the bank by notice in writing to the depositor.
  • Where debt payable(2) The amount of any debt owing by a bank by reason of a deposit in a deposit account in the bank is payable to the person entitled thereto only at the branch of account and the person entitled thereto is not entitled to demand payment or to be paid at any other branch of the bank.
  • Idem(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2), a bank may permit either occasionally or as a regular practice, the person to whom the bank is indebted by reason of a deposit in a deposit account in the bank to withdraw moneys owing by reason of that deposit at a branch of the bank other than the branch of account or to draw cheques or other orders for the payment of such moneys at a branch other than the branch of account.
  • Situs of indebtedness

Situs of indebtedness

  • (4) The indebtedness of a bank by reason of a deposit in a deposit account in the bank shall be deemed for all purposes to be situated at the place where the branch of account is situated.

the place where the branch of account is situated.

Effect of writ, etc.

  • 462 (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), the following documents are binding on property belonging to a person and in the possession of a bank, or on money owing to a person by reason of a deposit account in a bank, only if the document or a notice of it is served at the branch of the bank that has possession of the property or that is the branch of account in respect of the deposit account, as the case may be:
    • (a) a writ or process originating a legal proceeding or issued in or pursuant to a legal proceeding;
    • (b) an order or injunction made by a court;
    • (c) an instrument purporting to assign, perfect or otherwise dispose of an interest in the property or the deposit account; or
    • (d) an enforcement notice in respect of a support order or support provision.
  • Notices(2) Any notification sent to a bank with respect to a customer of the bank, other than a document referred to in subsection (1) or (3), constitutes notice to the bank and fixes the bank with knowledge of its contents only if sent to and received at the branch of the bank that is the branch of account of an account held in the name of that customer.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C💩enein – And the winner is “Toronto Police Services”

It saddens me to say I snitched. I have a report number # is 2020-1645xxx

I snitched on CIBC and Kramer Dhillon Simaan. It took at least one from each company to collude and breach the trust of clients.

I think they all have reasonably good connections to various police forces, they are “in the biz” and nothing much will happen.

CIBC will now have to be sued since I did not get a final payoff amount from them. We verbally discussed $1,000 – 10,000 as a range of payoff, but I heard nothing from either CIBC or the OBSI today.

No one got back to me.

If no charges are laid, it seems easiest to just add Ms. Adrian and both her clients to my suit if they are not there already.. They are ALL working in concert, And Ms Adrian bridges the Civil-Criminal gap nicely, interfacing with Charles Painter and the Crown.

How Could She Legally Know of My New Bank Account – a theory

There is ONE possible way she got the data WITHOUT breach of trust and theft. A “system” all banks set up quietly in back rooms.

Banks lose money to deadbeats, as do lawyers.

If the majors wanted to collect MORE money MORE often, they need to know what deadbeat MOVED around. All Banks would ALL contribute THEIR deadbeats to a common, shared database of “Known DeadBeats”.

So every bank puts in their new garnishments. And every bank can inquire when they need to see who has failed t okay… A credit check maybe…..

Then, all the banks ALSO would share “new accounts” with each other, and then, daily, someone would “run” the new accounts names against the database of “Known DeadBeats”, and spit out matches back to every bank.

When they match on name, address, or SIN, or Driver’s Licence… they know someone skipped out at one bank and JUST that day went to another. BANG! GARNISH!… they get that account frozen again instantly.

That would do what happened to me.

It also smacks of illegal use of personal data.

So, if the major banks are “sharing deadbeats” like that, she did not steal my data.. Maybe CIBC just GAVE it to her.

But, that illegal system would need to keep a whole LOT of people silent about its existence, like covering up failed moon landings or Trade Center collapses.

Maybe some clever nerd figured out how to get “deadbeats; from some OTHER legal source, and maybe banks only submit NEW accounts.. .under the guise of making sure …like a credit check… to a Credit Rating Company.

Maybe the banks got one of them to write a new system.

Maybe “Return of the DeadBeats”.. or “UndeadBeats”, or “DeadBeats Arose”.

That is all its takes. A third party willing to get each bank to feed it garnishments and new accounts and it just innocently says…”Hey, DeadBeat Lepp at TD Aurora just opened a new account at CIBC Aurora.” And maybe banks PAY an amount per “hit”.

Maybe Equifax is tracking them. After all, Equifax tracks EVERYONE and maybe banks feed Equifax new accounts and maybe Equifax does the matching so it looks to be at “arms length.”

The banks will never tell us.

But it may be proven anecdotally. If a LOT of garnished people report their second attempt at a new bank account ALSO froze next day… we are onto something.

A rainy day project.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101 Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄C💩e8 – 3 lawyers arrested me for speaking to them in court, I attempt to arrest 1 lawyer for speaking to me OUT of court

OK, this is a fun thought for ME to start the day, Monday, August 31, 2020

I bet, that while 3 of “them” with no evidence of any illegal act on my part, were able to put me in Lindsay for 2 nights IN THE MIDDLE OF COVID-19… I will NOT be able to arrest ONE lawyer for ADMITTING she stole my identity under the guise of an “examination for discovery”.

I contend that this time Tuesday, she will still not be arrested.

Within a few hours of being asked by Det. Sgt. Bentham March 2, 3, 4 …THEY successfully arrested me and put me in prison for 2 nights and had me under house arrest and a $15,000 bond

March 2 thru 4, 2020 … Within just hours of starting out, YRP Lawyer Barry Stork, and Aurora Lawyer Charles Painter, and a 3rd ringleader, SIGNED (or WOULDN’T SIGN) affidavit(s) and were ABLE to arrest me on JUST the CROWN’s trust of their friend’s words, telling police I merely spoke to the ringleader in a court room, precisely where J. Dawe ordered me to talk to her.

August 31, I WILL ATTEMPT to arrest just ONE of “them” for ADMITTING to stealing my personal banking data ON VIDEO with a court reporter as witness

August 31, 2020 I ask to arrest Lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian for SPEAKING to me in a COURT ordered Zoom meeting, and saying she got and garnished my brand new banking data from CIBC in less than 24 hours … and then she asked me for EVERY answer for EVERY question one must use to secure a bank account for online access. She had everything needed to directly take my money with even needing a garnishment order.

What are the bets police WILL REFUSE?

“FILM at 11:00” as they once said, today it is “Check your Twitter feed”

I will bet you they will claim (all of):

  • The Zoom meeting was implicitly “without prejudice”
  • There was only one eye and ear witness
  • The video quality is 540P and not 720P for courtroom use
  • I had caught her in a tired and confused state after being exposed to MY VOICE from 10:00 to 2:07 without earmuffs
  • I cheated her into admitting it by asking her outright if she had done it
  • I’ve been harassing Gwendolyn Adrian since December 1, 2016
  • Ms Adrian does NOT have an ethics contract as an LOS licensee, it is merely a “memorandum of understanding” to be trustworthy and honourable
  • It was a on a day with a “Y” in it and there is a Y in “lawyer” specifically for that matching purpose. Because, if a man who farms is a farmer, why is a man who practices law not a LAWER? Why did they get the “privilege” of an EXTRA letter?
  • I was involved in a “matter” against her in court
  • That would be a collateral attack. (I say it is a colawyeral attack)
  • It’s a P.D. day. Not a Professional Development day, Police Domination day.
  • And the ever popular… “NO, just no.”

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-🌲🌲🂷 – Crime Spree in Bradford!

A sudden spike of serious crimes in Bradford has taken away my Probation Officer. So, yesterday the new man checked in and I am back in harness doing my best to be a good citizen. I hope he has been told what a great community advocate I am. $70,000 in just 3 months is my record.

So, why do I post this event?

Because the entire Ontario judicial system has survived COVID-19 by using email and the internet to conduct business.

EXCEPT for Probation officers, they DEMAND paper.

So, of course, I suggested to Premier Ford they be permitted the luxury of email during “the troubles”.

We’ll see if logic and fairness prevails.

Because, I already breached my latest orders. My new P.O. would not email me the required permission to travel to his office to pick up paper to let me travel to Costco for my meds.

I just needed that pile of chemicals that sustain my heart and thus my life. It was at Costco. Picking up heart meds is NOT an emergency medical visit. Even for that I need paper from him.

Here, look for yourself, I know you are all language majors and know how a comma works.

How clever is that?

OR, is it JUST ME and no one else!

Here are 2 sets of words JUST as they ARE written in my orders WITH a leading “-” dash:

– you may go to the bathroom 🚫 <- NO period

and

– with a note from the teacher● <- A PERIOD

This means “you may go if you have a note.” There is no question of that because.. what is a ●?

 It is a punctuation mark (.) at the end of a sentence. It shows that the sentence has finished. To be a sentence it must have at least one complete clause, with a verb and a subject.[1]

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(punctuation)

… so yesterday my supervisor says “Come to my office and get a note.”

and I said, “No, I can be arrested for travelling without a note, please email me a note.”.. and he said “We are not allowed to use email.”

I THINK this new rule is just for me, BUT, I am paranoid, right?

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-🌲🌲ꌛ – How to buy or rent a cop… a primer

Buying and paying for a cop in York Region

About $500 per half day… even if he has to borrow a cruiser for you.

Make sure to get one who can hit a target.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-07-17/social-media-star-lapd-cop-deadly-shooting

… when all you have is a hammer….

By JAMES RAINEYANDREW J. CAMPAJULY 17, 20206 AM

Just 23 years old and near the start of her life in law enforcement, Toni McBride brimmed with youthful exuberance. A slew of online videos show the Los Angeles Police Department officer blasting away at targets, with prize-winning speed and accuracy, on a gun range in the Simi Valley foothills.

McBride, an officer in LAPD’s Newton Division, fired an array of shotguns, pistols and assault rifles. She cavorted and strutted, sometimes within view of Hollywood glitterati, who used the same firing range to hone the gunplay they would use for movies and TV. When star Keanu Reeves shouted out to her LAPD division in one video, the young cop laughed with delight. “Hey, he knows!” she said, clapping. “Shootin’ Newton!”

But less than two weeks after the posting of that video, McBride’s gun use turned deadly earnest.

In the middle of a scruffy street south of downtown on April 22, she faced off with a man holding a razor box cutter. She fired six shots from her Glock 17, hitting Daniel Hernandez with every round and killing the 38-year-old carpet installer and father of a teenage daughter.

Don’t leave home without one.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-🌲🌲🏌️‍♀️ – Sentenced AT the crime scene to STAY at the scene of the crime

OK, did you find the lie in the previous post? It’ll come to you.

Now, back to Guinness records.

OK, I was not the first sentenced AT the scene of the crime. That went to the court room double murderer.

BUT, I contend I am the first to be CONFINED to STAY at the crime scene 24/7 for 60 days. 1,440 hours of not leaving where I committed these terrible crimes.

1,440 days of quiet practice time.

Are they they tempting me to make even more mistakes?

of course! Yes, that is what police and Crowns do EVERY day.

If, as a prosecutor, you find the courts are jammed and here comes a guy you hate and want punished…. you talk the judge into a ridiculously ambiguous bail term NO ONE can follow.

“Do not find fault in anyone”

Bail recognizance, Bob Lepp, arrest #5

Then, you nail his ass again and again as he defies the orders.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Clear?

No, but maybe it will make you think.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL20-tu-🌲🦮 – The Michaelangelo Style of Law

I have often helped young people along in business life. Well, if not often, at least more than once… I have passed on “Always leave a mistake for your boss to find.”.

An,. in my now obvious arrogance, I thought I was a trailblazer in the lives of sycophant worldwide. I thought only I had figured out that people in general like to “help” you through life, and so they like to correct your flaws, or they offer up themselves as a role model. I know I do, and you should copy me now.

See what I did there?

To make the inevitable project management review more palatable, I would leave an obvious error in whatever I submitted, the boss finds it, points it out to me, I fix it. and we both go away happy.

Seems Michaelangelo patented the idea a few years before me.

So, when one goes to court, one comes across all manner of people wanting to buff out a rough edge in your exterior.

So, give them something to fix, otherwise they’ll just have to work harder to abuse you.

On both May 10 and 11, 2018 I failed to leave a mistake in the emails I sent to the volunteers who twice had signed the contract to manage the dog park.

Everything was true, correct, spelled properly, polite….. I should have just miss-spelled someone’s name or put in the wrong date. Instead , I even addressed BOTH of them to police officers, 2 of them, all the police I knew at that time… oh, and 2 local reporters, neither of which had ever written about me.

So, a perfect pair as Donald would say. Each email was complete and perfect.

So, the police had to get creative since there was nothing to correct in my nasty emails and so they went looking for a mistake I had not made. This made them blind.

How? They were so mad at me for the perfect email they forgot to read the list of people cc:’d and they’d not see that Det. Sgt. Heather Bentham and her underling, DC Jeff Brown would also have received a copy of my perfect emails asking for their help.

So, rather than have to ask themselves “What kind of idiot threatens, harasses and abuses a woman and sends 4 copies to people who can destroy him?”… they arrested me out of anger. And they descended into the lives of Jose Feliciano, Stevie and Ray Charles. Totally blind, they took the Crown by the hand (I hope it was a hand, being blind…) and removed their eyeballs as well.

And then the judge was enraged by reading the police synopsis of my arrest and he goes nuts because I have obviously not exhibited a single bit of respect for police or courts.

And so it went through the entire cast… an anger of such magnitude it blinded the participants.

Friday July 17, 2020 the court did what it does best, it judged me to be an harasser of women by sending repeated harassing emails to all the volunteers and the lead volunteer at a town dog park asking them to control out of control dogs. And to 2 cops and 2 reporters.

That judge cited all 6 emails I sent to all the volunteers from November 7, 2017 to May 11, 2018. Each email had the nerve to ask the volunteers to make the dog park just a little bit better for free.

Now, when the judge came to the conclusion I harassed all of them, he had access to a full 18 months of my emails. He found 6 emails out of 18 months. A year and a half. On average, he picked one email for each 3 months I advocated for a better park.

6 emails when the Crown told him there were hundreds Allan Doney claimed h alone got “thousands” of them. But Crown Elder showed just 6, such was his confidence.

That is 6 more than Superior Court justice Jonathan Dawe discovered in the piles. June 3, 2020 he ruled he could not find a single email OR blog which anyone should have feared.

The law normally lets the lower court judge use just 6 months worth only. The extra 12 months he reviewed gave him an edge. Because in the prior 6 months… there were just the May 10/11 pair to police and Bylaws asking for help with dog attack.

By law, people have to complain about being harassed within 6 months, otherwise the law considers he or she did not move fast enough to ask for help. If you cannot decide in 6 months that you are under siege, you have to admit the emails were just fine.

The volunteers got ny emails, and in real time they loved them. I had reversed 12 years of Allan Downey’s abuse and I had convinced Councillors to approve $70,000 as “kiss and make up” money. Every email back to September 2016 when I started were universally appreciated in writing by every volunteer, not just some. They all loved me.

But police hated me, so they dug deeper. This tripling of the volume of emails did little for them, just 6 were found, but at least they had 6.

Then, to make it worse they went back more in time so they could reference and include an email the victim sent to saying she was going on vacation and I should stop emailing her for a while. December 29, 2016.

So, by mid-June 2018 when they finally filed the charges, going back 18 months took them back to an 18 month period starting about mid-December 2016 when I ended my campaign.

This 12 month extension was a minor issue for the Crown when I complained at the opening of trial… they just lied to Trial Judge B that case manager Judge A months back APPROVED the tripling of time. Crown Elder simply said “Your honour, Lepp complains we used 18 months, not just 6 months, but J. Kenkel approved that when Bob complained to him. You are good to go based on J. Kenkel’s order to you.

Trouble is, J. Kenkel had NOT said that when I asked him to rule. What he said was “I cannot rule on using evidence from the past 6 versus 18 months. That job goes to Judge B at your trial.”

So, here I am under house arrest because Crown Elder lied. And there seems to be not much I can do about that.

What the police then did to me was slightly more irritating. But Crown Elder cut my clever defence off at the knees. I forgot to leave a mistake in my arguments for the judge to fix. Then he would feel OK to rule that 6 months was indeed the maximum. He would be happy, I would be happy.

So… the complainant won that chess match.

Stand by.

When my book draft goes to the editors, I plan to mess up one chapter and leave the most important one out so they will feel good to suggest changes. Just like that screen writer and Michaelangelo.

OK, I made an obvious lie above for you cops to find. Do you see it?

I’ll give you a hint, it happened just prior to May 11 in the evidence.

I bet you miss it. And I shall win.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutreewon – Ummmm… ok?

WEBDEV101: Invoke old fashioned songs to imply your company has a history, has some depth, some vulture…. or you can do what I do and lie, they’ll think you are a millennial. and listen to you.

“…highlighting what some say is a flawed process of raising concerns about police conduct.”

Angela Sterritt · CBC News · Posted: Jul 15, 2020 1:00 AM PT 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/rcmp-officer-suspension-bc-1.5645620?cmp=newsletter_CBC%20News%20Morning%20Brief_1665_56969

View in browserMorning BriefWednesday, July 15, 2020 – by John B.C. Mountie’s suspension over racist Facebook content highlights concernshttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/rcmp-officer-suspension-bc-1.5645620?cmp=newsletter_CBC%20News%20Morning%20Brief_1665_56969 over complaints process  
A B.C. RCMP officer’s suspension and subsequent resignation following a complaint that alleges he posted “racially insensitive, rage-fuelled and anti-government” material on Facebook is highlighting what some say is a flawed process of raising concerns about police conduct.

The characterization of Dustin Dahlman’s comments is part of a complaint filed with the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (CRCC) for the RCMP, which reviews complaints about police conduct and makes recommendations to the RCMP. CBC has obtained a copy of the letter. 

Dahlman, who used the name Vedder McNutt on Facebook, was stationed at an RCMP detachment in Sayward, a small town at the north end of Vancouver Island, for three years. For at least the first half of 2020, he posted videos, memes and comments on his now defunct public Facebook page that were critical of the Black Lives Matter movement, of police conduct he considered “too soft,” and of some of the government’s COVID-19 safety guidelines. One video he uploaded showed a man criticizing the Black Lives Matter movement who at one point says, “If you don’t want to be killed, don’t break the law.” 

Several people in Sayward raised concerns about Dahlman’s posts in mid-June on social media and with the Sayward RCMP detachment, but only one person made a formal complaint to the RCMP oversight body. At least four people who spoke to CBC News say they didn’t complain to the RCMP out of fear of retaliation since at the detachment level, there’s no guarantee a complainant’s identity will be kept confidential.  The CRCC, on the other hand, says it is committed to protecting complainant’s identities.  

The woman who eventually filed a complaint against Dahlman says she was punted to and from different RCMP departments — online and on the phone — and that throughout the process, RCMP representatives were unable to provide the information she needed to lodge the complaint. CBC has agreed to not name the complainant as she says she fears retribution from Dahlman.

At the beginning of July, a week after CBC inquired about Dahlman’s posts, RCMP spokesperson Janelle Shoihet said he was no longer with the force. “We were aware of the [social media] materials, and a code of conduct investigation was initiated,” Shoihet said in an emailed statement.  
   (With files from CBC News, The Canadian Press, The Associated Press and Reuters)    You’re all caught up.  Drop us a line anytime. Send your ideas, comments, feedback and notes to morningbrief@cbc.ca. Problems with the newsletter? Please let us know about any typos, errors or glitches.

Check CBCNews.ca throughout the day for the most recent headlines.  Share this newsletteror subscribe if this was 
forwarded to you.    Follow us View in browser Preferences Feedback Unsubscribe Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
250 Front St. W, Toronto, Ontario M5V 3G5cbc.radio-canada.ca | radio-canada.ca | cbc.ca

 

Stand By!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/civilian-review-and-complaints-commission-weak-1.5633986?cmp=newsletter_CBC%20News%20Morning%20Brief_1665_56969

Complaints against the RCMP are usually investigated by the RCMP themselves, according to the RCMP act. 

Experts have been saying for years that police investigating police is not best practice because police often protect other police, even from other agencies. 

After the RCMP investigates a complaint, if the complainant is unhappy with that investigation, they can request the complaints commission to review the file. 

The commission can then send the file back to the RCMP and ask for further investigating. 

Over the last three years, the commission received more than 7,000 complaints, commission spokesperson Kate McDerby told CBC. 

Complaints against the RCMP are usually investigated by the RCMP themselves, according to the RCMP act. 

Experts have been saying for years that police investigating police is not best practice because police often protect other police, even from other agencies. 

After the RCMP investigates a complaint, if the complainant is unhappy with that investigation, they can request the complaints commission to review the file. 

The commission can then send the file back to the RCMP and ask for further investigating. 

Over the last three years, the commission received more than 7,000 complaints, commission spokesperson Kate McDerby told CBC. 

Of those complaints, 795 complainants asked for a review, McDerby said. 

Eighteen of those files were sent back to the RCMP for further investigation.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutreeoh – Straight Out: Dep. Chief Andre Crawford… are there any Snoring Women, like Dot Khalm, or Dot Sea, eh?.in your life?

WEBDEV101: Solving mysteries can sometime go viral. Find a mystery in your town and see if you can clarify it by speaking to the people involved.

Because I seem to be between women right now, my second marriage is dead, thanks to you and/or yours.

Your Det. Loughry arrested me March 4, 2020 when 3 lawyers lied to him and cannot read Sr. Judicial orders.

…such as…

Justice Fuerst herself

Forcing Bra Removal Violated Woman’s Charter Rights: Judge

By Sam Pazzano, Toronto Sun

TORONTO – A woman accused of drunk driving had her Charter rights violated when police forced her to remove her underwire bra, a Superior Court judge ruled.

Justice Michelle Fuerst quashed the impaired driving conviction against Sang Eun Lee, now 40, and ordered a new trial, ruling that the York Regional Police’s unwritten policy treating the undergarments as potential weapons is unreasonable.

Fuerst also said the trial judge, Justice Anne-Marie Hourigan,

…..“erred by failing to consider the reasonableness of a York Regional Police policy that characterizes every underwire bra as a potential weapon.”

“She also didn’t consider the appropriateness of an unwritten police policy that leads to … female arrestees wearing underwire bras being automatically and without exception subjected to a form of stripe search,” wrote Fuerst.

A York sergeant admitted that the “wiring in an underwire bra is sewn into the bra itself, and that in order to remove it, a woman would have to unstitch the bra,” Fuerst wrote in a decision released Wednesday. “Wearing an underwire bra is not tantamount to carrying two wires loose in a pocket, where they are immediately accessible to the wearer.”

A strip search wasn’t necessary under the circumstances when police arrested Lee on Jan. 30, 2010, Fuerst said.

Hourigan convicted Lee, who had no previous convictions, in October 2011 and imposed the minimum fine of $1,000 and a one-year licence suspension.

“Strip searches are definitely necessary and there are cases where women will have to take off their bras,” said Lee’s defence lawyer, Leora Shemesh.

“But this blanket policy is wrong and must be changed. It’s unconstitutional.”

Hourigan ruled that Const. Jennifer Martin had searched, but not strip-searched, Lee when they were in a private room.

The officer asked Lee to remove her underwire bra – not to bare her breasts – to inspect and store the bra. Martin thought Lee would remove the bra through her sleeve, court heard.

But Fuerst said Hourigan “failed to consider that the court’s definition of a strip search isn’t limited to removal of clothing to inspect a person’s private areas.”

The Supreme Court’s definition of a strip search is two-pronged: The removal or rearrangement of all a person’s clothing to permit inspection of the private areas or the undergarments, Fuerst said.

Although Lee was crying and upset, she made no threats to harm herself or others, Fuerst said. Lee wasn’t physically violent or physically aggressive to officers and there was no indication that she had any mental health problems.

To The Haters: I cannot make UP better stuff than this!

https://www.pressreader.com/canada/toronto-star/20160329/282144995480105

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2019/03/26/jail-officials-face-contempt-citations-if-they-keep-failing-to-bring-inmates-to-court-on-time-senior-judge-warns.html

https://store.lexisnexis.ca/en/categories/shop-by-jurisdiction/ontario-10/ontario-courtroom-procedure-5th-edition-skusku-cad-6781/details

Biker launches lawsuit

SHANNON KARIVANCOUVERPUBLISHED OCTOBER 17, 2006 UPDATED OCTOBER 17, 2006 PUBLISHED OCTOBER 17, 2006 

This article was published more than 10 years ago. Some information in it may no longer be current.0 COMMENTSSHARE

The president of the Vancouver chapter of the Hells Angels says he has been harassed by police, shunned at his local supermarket and unfairly searched at an airport since an Ontario judge found the group to be a criminal organization.

Rickey Ciarniello says his security and liberty interests under the Charter of Rights have been violated and he is asking a B.C. Supreme Court judge to find the anti-gang provisions of the Criminal Code unconstitutional.

A hearing in B.C. Supreme Court to determine whether he can challenge the provisions began yesterday before Mr. Justice William Ehrcke.

“The effect of the Ontario judgment is to declare me a member of a criminal organization, notwithstanding that I have never engaged in the promotion of criminal conduct,” Mr. Ciarniello says in an affidavit filed in court.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Michelle Fuerst ruled in June, 2005, that the Hells Angels fit the definition of a criminal organization under the Criminal Code, in an extortion trial involving the sale of satellite television programming cards.

It was the first case in Canada to determine the constitutionality of organized-crime laws that came into effect in 2001. The provisions carry stiffer penalties and define a criminal organization as a group of three or more persons, “however organized,” that has the commission of serious offences as one of its main purposes.

In B.C., the Hells Angels were subject to a multimillion-dollar RCMP investigation that led to criminal charges being filed last year against six alleged full-patch members and 12 alleged associates.

Mr. Ciarniello is not facing any charges and his only criminal conviction was in 1971 for a minor weapons offence.

But he alleges that since the Ontario ruling was released, he has been stopped regularly by police in the Lower Mainland. “I have asked why I have been stopped and have been advised in each and every instance it was because of my membership in the Hells Angels,” the affidavit says.

People at the grocery store where Mr. Ciarniello has shopped for 20 years are no longer friendly and the attitude is the same at his local gas station.

The long-time B.C. spokesman for the Hells Angels says he has declined media requests for comment as a result of the Ontario ruling. “I am much more guarded because of my concern that I may be charged with participating in the activities of a criminal organization.”

Lawyers for the attorneys-general of Canada and British Columbia both argued yesterday in court that Mr. Ciarniello has no legal right to challenge anti-gang provisions because he is not facing criminal charges.

“There is no government or state action that engages Mr. Ciarniello’s constitutionally protected rights,” Justice Department lawyer Paul Riley said. The federal prosecutor suggested that Mr. Ciarniello’s complaints are part of the “war of public opinion” involving the Hells Angels, but not an issue for the criminal justice system.

Mr. Ciarniello is not prevented from “wearing his colours in public or continuing his association with the Hells Angels,” provincial Crown Joyce DeWitt-Van Oosten said. Any discomfort he may encounter as a member of the Hells Angels is not a violation of his Charter rights, she said.

Mr. Ciarniello has retained prominent Toronto defence lawyer Alan Gold, who is to begin his arguments today.

Judge Fuerst’s ruling has been appealed, and the federal Justice Department is appealing a B.C. court decision that struck down a section of the criminal organization laws because it was too broad

Comments Offon The Obstructionist Self-Represented Accused: the Challenge of ControlSharePOSTED IN:

The Obstructionist Self-Represented Accused: the Challenge of Control 

by Justice Michelle Fuerst

oscj_banner

Of the many challenges facing trial judges, one of the greatest is conducting proceedings with a self-represented accused. Invariably the self-represented accused comes to court with only a rudimentary knowledge of the trial process, often influenced by misleading depictions from television shows and the movies. He or she is unfamiliar with the substantive law, is confused by procedural requirements, and has difficulty grasping concepts such as relevance.

The burgeoning number of self-represented accused in the criminal courts may be explained by cut-backs to legal aid funding across the country, the cost of legal services, mental health problems that make it difficult for some accused to accept assistance form any lawyer, and even the sincere belief, fostered by movies and television shows, that anyone can perform as Perry Mason given the chance. 

Increasingly, however, trial judges are faced with a new breed of self-represented accused. He or she is argumentative, rude, and disrespectful of authority. He or she seizes every available opportunity to remind the trial judge about fair trial rights, yet engages in tactics that serve no purpose other than to delay and obstruct the proceedings. He or she comes to court with an annotated Criminal Code and a stack of highlighted cases, but makes no effort to comply with the rules of procedure, even once informed about them by the presiding judge. Attempts by the trial judge to move the proceedings along in an orderly fashion are met by the refrain “But I’m an unrepresented accused who is without counsel”. Section 7 of the Charter is mentioned early, and often. 

This is the self-represented accused who purposely foregoes counsel in order to cause as much disruption as possible to the trial, in the hope of derailing the proceedings.

If unsuccessful in that attempt, this sort of self-represented accused has no hesitation about arguing on appeal that the trial judge, whose every direction he ignored, failed to give him or her the appropriate assistance.

This new generation of self-represented accused poses the most difficulty for trial judges, and the greatest challenge to an administration of justice that is already tested by demands that self-represented litigants place on the system. 

Numerous examples of efforts to delay and disrupt the trial are noted in reported cases. The behaviour includes asking irrelevant questions of witnesses, and then arguing with the judge after rulings that specific questions could not be put; deliberately pausing for several minutes between questions of witnesses; asking witnesses to testify to hearsay even after the trial judge explained the objectionable nature of such evidence; asking individual witnesses the same question four or five times over; calling dozens of marginal defence witnesses so as to delay taking the witness box; repeatedly complaining to the jury that the trial judge would not compel the attendance of a particular witness; making long statements to the jury about irrelevant matters; and using profane and inflammatory language.

Appellate courts have sometimes supported the attempts of trial judges to control the difficult self-represented accused, as did the Quebec Court of Appeal in the notorious case of Fabrikant. But in other instances,

trial judges have not fared well on appeal. 

It is not surprising that trial judges have a sense of uncertainty about how far they can legitimately go in attempting to control the difficult self-represented accused. No trial judge aspires to be unfair, regardless of his or her level of frustration with an accused’s conduct.

Few trial judges relish reversal by the Court of Appeal

…on the ground that they improperly shut down a self-represented accused’s cross-examination or closing address. They are understandably uneasy about taking this step, even in egregious cases. Resort to the contempt power has little impact where the accused is already in pre-trial custody and is facing the potential of a long jail sentence at the end of the trial. Excluding the accused from the courtroom is viewed as an option reserved for the most egregious cases.

Is it time to rethink the broad proposition that counsel can never be imposed on an accused who wishes to represent him or herself?

The decision to self-represent has been described as a principle of fundamental justice, and even as a right.

Any interference with it cannot be undertaken lightly. But section 486.3 of the Criminal Code already provides a limited exception to an accused’s ability to self-represent. That section empowers a judge to make an order appointing counsel for the purpose of cross-examining one or more witnesses, even over the objection of the accused. Should this power to appoint counsel be extended to the conduct of a trial as a whole, in circumstances where the presiding judge is satisfied that the proper administration of justice requires that the accused not act for him or herself, because, for example, he or she has shown an unwillingness to follow judicial direction?

What if the various courts used their rule-making power to explicitly state what some appellate courts have suggested, that abuse of the opportunity to ask questions of witnesses, call witnesses, or make submissions can result in the loss of that opportunity, or at least its curtailment, for example, by the imposition of time limits on questioning of witnesses or making of submissions?

Is s. 650(2) of the Criminal Code worded too narrowly? That section permits a judge to order an accused removed from the courtroom where he misconducts himself by interrupting the proceedings so that to continue in his presence would not be feasible. Arguably, this provision does not extend to the accused who persists in asking repetitive, irrelevant or improper questions, or who deliberately tries to delay or slow down the proceedings, or who repeatedly fails to abide by judicial direction. Should the provision be amended to apply not only where the accused interrupts the proceedings, but also where the accused impedes the orderly conduct of the proceedings, for example by failing to follow the instruction of the presiding judge? 

If complete exclusion from the courtroom is thought too harsh a response to misconduct, should judges at least have the explicit power to require the hard to manage self-represented accused to participate in the proceedings by video link from somewhere in the courthouse other than the courtroom? 

Lastly, should s. 475 of the Criminal Code, which deals with an accused who absconds during his trial, be amended to explicitly permit the judge to deem the accused to have absconded in certain circumstances? Such circumstances might include where the accused refuses to leave the jail or come out of the courthouse cells, or where he or she feigns illness or injury in an attempt to delay the proceedings when a request for adjournment is refused–all scenarios that trial judges have faced.

The trial judge has a duty to assist the self-represented accused in the proper conduct of the defence,

and to guide him or her throughout the trial. But this should not mean that the judge must endure manipulative or obstructive behaviour on the part of that accused. Unless and until trial judges have the necessary tools to control the obstructionist self-represented accused, the objective of a fair trial on the merits remains at risk.

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutu9ine – Aurora Ladies Sing Their Songs! To Dawe! To Dawe! Aurora Ladies Sing Their Songs All The Two Dawe Day

WEBDEV101: Invoke old fashioned songs to imply your company has a history, has some depth, some vulture…. or you can do what I do and lie, they’ll think you are a millennial. and listen to you.

Stand By!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutuweight – A Bank Account At Last!

I got one! And Gwendolyn Adrian will never find this one…

I literally blindfolded myself and stuck a pin into Google Maps, and I went to that branch of that bank.

She will NEVER guess even which Bank it was, let alone the Branch Address needed for a personally served garnishment notice.

And that is now my $.02 worth!

Stand By!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutu7 – Answering Hiring Questions

What media buys were typically executed to advertise the job of “Bylaws Manager” Alexander Wray in 2018?

What markets were targeted on Ontario? Canada? USA?

Stand By!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutusix – Getting Depositions In Civil Suits

In 2018 I was sued by one woman for eliminating two of her jobs in a row just by asking nicely.

Yes, I am a man who has NEVER gotten anything done by Aurora staff or councillors. So when both Aurora and Erin asked me whether to keep paying this person, I of course said “Nope!”. And I set in play a series of moves to cover up that it was me who cost this flawless woman to lose two jobs in 8 months.

First, the objective in any civil service firing is to maximize the benefits to the departing skill. Every member of staff KNOW that one day to will be their bum out the door so their last chance to get treated well is to treat EVERY person fired as best they can.

So, what HR came up with was to get the person to VOLUNTEER to quit.. and that is easy to do with an $80,000 as a sweetener.

Next, they get the happy ex-employee to sign a piece of paper saying they are leaving if their own accord and NO ONE coerced them to leave.

Lastly, they write the loser a very complimentary reference letter, and kick their ass to the curb.

So, there is what police call “evidence” at every turn proving the chain of events.

That chain is in turn padlocked and sealed away, far away for the public eye.

My job today is to BEGIN an assault on the lock and chains.

Stand By!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL20-tutufi’- Sandra McKenzie holds the keys to the vaults

In 2015, Ms. McKenzie (Newmarket now) was HR Manager for Aurora. She will know the EXACT hiring practices of that era.

She can relate where senior management jobs for $130K and up get their candidates.

Newspapers? LinkedIn? Grindr?

She will know where she advertised, and maybe even what agencies she used to select the best candidates. It is all in her head and just needs it put paper.

And the Current Bylaws Manager, Alexander Wray, can tell me how HE found the job was open.

Stand By!

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL 2O-22won – How Can My Suit Fail NOW?

WEBDEV101: – Admit when you are confused or troubled and let your readers pitch in to help. They can write comments on your blog posts asking them to assist. This simple tip lets your readers know you are not infallible, just human, and on occasion you may screw up.

It May Be Right to the Top of YRP

This is nuts!

If I can get divorce records and prove that……. The Deputy Chief is on his second marriage

is that not great or what?

What does karma really mean?

Karma (car-ma) is a word meaning the result of a person’s actions as well as the actions themselves. It is a term about the cycle of cause and effect. According to the theory of Karma, what happens to a person, happens because they caused it with their actions.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma

Welcome to Canada’s Birthday Town!… dot calm

🎶Happy Birthday To Bob, Happy Birthday to Bob, Happy Birthday, here‘s a $$million…..

Happy Birthday to Bob! And many MORE……,🎶🍸🍸🍸

Yahoo!

Oops.. GOOGLE! 😎

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL 2O-22uhoh – You Know You Will Have A Good Day When….

WEBDEV101: – Build excitement, tease, keep your readers on their oculatorical toes. Make them want to register to see it all! Grab their wallets!

CNN declares Dr. Fauci Is Worse Off Than I Am Today

This is nuts!

is that not great or what?

What does karma really mean?

Karma (car-ma) is a word meaning the result of a person’s actions as well as the actions themselves. It is a term about the cycle of cause and effect. According to the theory of Karma, what happens to a person, happens because they caused it with their actions.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma

Welcome to Canada’s Birthday Town!… dot calm

🎶Happy Birthday To Bob, Happy Birthday to Bob, Happy Birthday, here‘s a $$million…..

Happy Birthday to Bob! And many MORE……,🎶🍸🍸🍸

Yahoo!

Oops.. GOOGLE! 😎

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL 2O-219 – Aurora Man Forgets He Has Her Arm Pit Confession

WEBDEV101: – It’s ok if you are human and make mistakes. Just be sure to apologize and move on

Mea culpa – I found the confession!

i was cleaning up the dropped bits around my desk and I found the June 3 2017 affidavit of the person who assaulted my armpit.

under microscopic examination it is revealed that a signature of a maiden name is signed under a sworn report of activities while the person used a married nam.

the married name was on her Provincial Offences Officer license for 8 months MORE, right up to termination without cause Feb. 2018

This is nuts!

is that not great or what?

What does karma really mean?

Karma (car-ma) is a word meaning the result of a person’s actions as well as the actions themselves. It is a term about the cycle of cause and effect. According to the theory of Karma, what happens to a person, happens because they caused it with their actions.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma

Welcome to Canada’s Birthday Town!… dot calm

🎶Happy Birthday To Bob, Happy Birthday to Bob, Happy Birthday, here‘s a $$million…..

Happy Birthday to Bob! And many MORE……,🎶🍸🍸🍸

Yahoo!

Oops.. GOOGLE! 😎

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

BL 2O-218 – Aurora Forgets It Fired Her

WEBDEV101: – It’s up to you to be on the lookout for misfeasance in public office and to alert your neighbours.. Together, you can defeat corrupt politicians and staff.

Aurora Mayor Tom Mrakas forgot she was fired and let her “volunteer”… the thin end of the wedge!

Special thanks to Mumbo Jumbo for volunteering her time to create this web site.

Aurora bought a new domain name for Canada Day. And Mayor Mrakas let a person he terminated and paid out $80,000 to come back and “volunteer” to create the web site.

And yet, normally, in business anyway…

if you fire someone, they’re gone. Gone. They don’t get to come back.

This is nuts!

but this one came back… but only because she is living common law with a senior Director as was testified at my trial.

But. I’m not complaining. Because, she just destroyed her own lawsuit against…guess who? ME!

I sued Mrakas for $1,000,000!

She sued ME for a million. Mrakas then spent AURORA money defending an employee he terminated.

My suit is still in play because..well, because I … did not get her fired, SHE decided to work for free and live off Allan Downey’s massive paycheck .

is that not great or what?

What does karma really mean?

Karma (car-ma) is a word meaning the result of a person’s actions as well as the actions themselves. It is a term about the cycle of cause and effect. According to the theory of Karma, what happens to a person, happens because they caused it with their actions.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karma

Welcome to Canada’s Birthday Town!… dot calm

If you find it, you’ll laugh as hard as I did AFTER I captured the entire website for court.

🎶Happy Birthday To Bob, Happy Birthday to Bob, Happy Birthday, here‘s a $$million…..

Happy Birthday to Bob! And many MORE……,🎶🍸🍸🍸

Yahoo!

Oops.. GOOGLE! 😎

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

Bl20-217 – Aurora Animal Services Bylaws- $880 ticket

WEBDEV101: – Offer readers facts so they can make up their own mind. Take a stand, ALWAYS, but don’y hesitate to leave room for a good debate.

“Once the group has passed, Roxana said she continued on the pathway, but was abruptly met by Town of Aurora bylaw officer Mario Munguia in a vehicle marked animal services. He asked her why she was in the park and if she knew the park was closed and she responded that she was walking her dog. She said he then asked for her identification, which she didn’t have on her, but cooperated with giving him other personal information.

He then wrote her a ticket for $880 for being in the closed park and that she was standing around too long

Roxana followed up with an email to the town’s bylaw manager, Alexander Wray, to ask why Munguia was not wearing personal protective equipment and not adhering to physical distancing rules. Wray responded bylaw officers may break physical distancing in order to do their jobs, but didn’t make it clear why he wasn’t wearing PPE. A city spokesman told the Sun it’s up to individual officers to decide.

Aurora Mayor Tom Mrakas said he doesn’t have jurisdiction to revoke the ticket and that the town’s legal counsel has advised staff not to discuss the details of the case because the ticket will be fought in court.

I sued Mrakas for $1,000,000,

BECAUSE he won’t talk to me either.

Jenny Yuen was on the job at the Sun

https://torontosun.com/author/jyuenpostmedia

Click: https://torontosun.com/author/jyuenpostmedia

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Web Site Development 101

Bl20-216 – Short, Sharp jail terms; A History and a Her-story of EVERY email sent

WEBDEV101: – Offer readers facts so they can make up their own mind. Take a stand, ALWAYS, but don’y hesitate to leave room for a good debate.

The Crown asked for 6 months….This is simply not a rational term to ask for.

Women, your anal safety is only worth twice that of words in an email to Mr. Giordano. Not very nice.

Check out the her-story of sexual assault penalties in Canada: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Sentencing/Cases/Sexual_Assault#Sexual_Assault_Causing_Bodily_Harm

SO, here is EVERY reply I ever got back from advocating for a new dog park….

These are all the replies to me, not just a selection. There is nothing else. You need not see a single word I wrote, all you need is the reaction my words evoked.

So, think about being female, passed out/asleep, and some sleepwalking rapist visits the back door without even ringing the bell.

THAT GUY got one year, 12 months.

Crown Giordana asks Justice Harpur to treat me 50% as bad as Sleepy the anal rapist.

Why did Bekah D’Aoust work for 8 years to get the idiot only 12 months when she could have just lied that he PESTERED HER BY emailing her the many positive results of some hard word he had performed for her instead?

Hi Bob, thank you for everything. I am confused as to the design of the new gate. I just want to make sure we still have an airlock system with the separate in and out entrance/exit you are proposing. 
Love it!!! Thank you!!!
Thank you. My husband and I said the same thing. Good cop/bad cop
Hi Bob, go ahead. It looks like we finally have the town’s attention.
Hi Jim, At this point I don’t know what to say I think the best way to approach this now is to start seeing some work done by the town I think we can devise a plan, timeline and budget over email for now If we start with the worst areas and some of the lower cost items, I think we can calm things down If we could please start with getting more wood chips right away to the big tree on the west side Then we need to worry about the removal of the dead tree in the north east corner and repair the gate right away We can plan for a new fencing either late in the year 2017 or as part of the 2018 budget We also, need to have a plan in place for next year for the paving of the parking lot Other items not as urgent include better lighting, drainage, a small dog area Users have also requested running water currently in need of additional blue bins(way down on the list), help with weeds and grass cutting If timelines and budget numbers are communicated to the user community then people will see the town’s commitment to the park What do you think of my plan? When can we get started? I can mobilize the user community if you need bodies to assist in any project you feel we can contribute I look forward to working with to create a dog park our town can be proud of Thank you, 
Users have also requested running water
currently in need of additional blue bins(way down on the list), help with weeds and grass cutting
If timelines and budget numbers are communicated to the user community then people will see the town’s commitment to the park
What do you think of my plan? When can we get started? I can mobilize the user community if you need bodies to assist in any
project you feel we can contribute
I look forward to working with to create a dog park our town can be proud of
Thank you,
Thank you,
I think you are saying things we all feel. I think all the town staff needs time to absorb our demands and emails. They will have areas with budget money left over they can allocate to us. Honestly, the really important things to us do not cost the town that much. I will send a note to Tom directly. I think he will be our most helpful person in the town. See if we can’t move this forward. It should be a no brainer. The one councillor who hate us (dog owners) is Evelyn Buck. She constantly puts up barriers to us getting anything at all. I am sure that now that you have lit a fire under their arse we will see at least the bare minimum of the work done before the new year. And now they know what we want more than ever. 
with budget money left over they can allocate to us. Honestly, the really important things to us do not cost the town that much. I will send a note to Tom directly. I think he will be our most helpful person in the town. See if we can’t move this forward. It should be a no brainer. The one councillor who hate us (dog owners) is Evelyn Buck. She constantly puts up barriers to us getting anything at all. I am sure that now that you have lit a fire under their arse we will see at least the bare minimum of the work done before the new year. And now they know what we want more than ever. It should be a no brainer. The one councillor who hate us (dog owners) is Evelyn Buck. She constantly puts up barriers to us getting anything at all. I am sure that now that you have lit a fire under their arse we will see at least the bare minimum of the work done before the new year. And now they know what we want more than ever. 
That’s great. We can do a lot with that. Thank you for everything that you have done. We have renewed the communication with the town and things are progressing. I actually asked that recognition be kept limited as I am not comfortable with publicity. I appreciate you not putting my name in further posts. Thank you. 
Hi Bob, I will always tell the truth. Not to worry about that. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Thank you for the gift card.
The park isn’t moving. That has not been decided.
That’s enough. You don’t know what’s going on. You are merely speculating and it’s not helping now.
Dear Bob, there are plenty of signs. People are aware of the rules. They choose not read them or to follow them. Not my problem. I will work with the town to see if some kind of first aid kit is in order. And what they do in other Parks around town. If you have an issue with a town please follow the proper procedures in filling your complaints/comments. If you have an issue with a town please follow the proper procedures in filling your complaints/comments.Have a nice day.I do not have a contract with the town. I am not the lead volunteer for the park. Therefore, you have no reason to contact me. Never contact me again for any reason and stop following me.

New Word – “Her-story”

Categories
Business Communicating To Counsel Public Service Announcement Web Site Development 101

Bl20-215 – Calcu-Carcerate… KNOW your jail time in advance

WEBDEV101: – ALWAYS make it easy for your readers to click once and get your new app.

So, you face sentencing, you wonder what you’ll get.

Bekah D’Aoust’s sleepwalking rapist got 12 months, and it took 8 years to litigate.

Crown Giordana asked I be given 4-6 months… a SHORT SHARP jail sentence…. so, in his mind, my email is still half as offensive as anal rape while the victim slept.

This is simply not a rational term to ask for.

Women, your anal safety is only worth twice that of words in an email to Mr. Giordano. Not very nice.

I wonder how many months vaginal rape gets in his mind? More or less than 12 months?

Ms. D’aoust’s rapist got 1 year of the 10 year maximum, 10%…. he must have had a lot of pre-sentencing incarceration. AND a 3 MONTH probation… I got 3 YEARS! Well, I guess it takes less time to reform a dick than it does a dickhead.

CrimeMaximum Sentence
sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or bodily harm14 years in prison
sexual assault tried as an indictable offence10 years in prison
sexual assault tried as a summary conviction offence*6 months in jail and a $2,000 fine

Calcu-Carcerate™ is for you! Get the app today!

How does it work?

Well, all the sentencing in Canada since confederation has been digitized. You need only find your EXACT crime and method of execution (pun intended) and it tells you how many months, years and decades you will get.

Take “ASSAULT”…. no, get up! That was NOT an order.

You have Male/Female perp, male or female victim, weapon used, orifice violated….. etc etc

All we need is YOUR answers to those questions, and we can find the jail term for that EXACT crime

Sex (NOT Y/N!)

PerpVictim
M ✔️ F OtherM F ✔️ Other
Specifying Sex of both parties
WeaponOrifice
Hand Foot Penis/Vagina ✔️ POA Ticket
Email. Text
Mouth Armpit Vagina Anus. ✔️
Who hit who with what?
State of Mind – PerpState of Mind – Victim
Awake Asleep ✔️ Drunk ????Awake Asleep ✔️ Drunk ✔️
What was the mental state in place?
Your Jail term
1 year
How long to pack for

SO, now you try!

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

Bl20-213 – There went the judge, there went the judge!

So, that was sentencing.

Webdev101: – Always be timely. Don’t wait weeks to post. Di it in real time. That way people Will come each day looking for new posts.

And the results could not have been better. I was permitted to phone in to court, so I was safe. But anyone in the building is exposed to airborne COVID-19 from prisoners and guards doing transport duty. It’s insane. They figure it’s safe because they installed som plexiglas panels. Spit floats over too and drops inside. There is just no need to risk it.

Anyway , we had a nice chat.

What went the best is that hot tempered Crown number 14 went off the reservation. He forgot he was in a court room with a reporter. Or, he forgot common sense. Whatever. The Crown read into the record something close to…

The Crown’s position is that Mr. Lepp should not ever be allowed to blog about these three women. Ever again.

Crown Giordano, July 10, 2020

Now, I need to check again, but the copies I have of the Charter dispute the Crown’s position.

First, this conviction is one woman. Not three. And the dog walking company was never quoted as taking any position.

So I am not sure how the Crown thinks that the conviction based on one woman means that I cannot talk about any of the three women. Ever!

So I am not sure how the KROWN thinks that the conviction based on one woman means that I cannot talk about any of the three women. Next the second problem is One cannot have his charter rights taken away in such a blatantly unfair fashion

then, I explained to the justice how he had been lied to within the first half hour of the first day of trial. I had pointed out that the charges cover the time period of 18 months when six months is as far back as they could go. I said that crown elder lied to the justice justice Kankel had already ruled that it was OK to go back 18 months just as Kankel had not made that order his order was that he could not make any order because the trial had not begun the word lie triggered a violent reaction from the crown he was so upset he said to the judge if Mr. Lepp were a lawyer I would file a complaint to the Law Society.

now that’s an interesting statement to make. Because I have been accused of being a vexatious litigant based only on the fact that I complained about lawyers to the Law Society and here is a KROWN saying that he would do exactly the same thing when another lawyer lied about him so it appears there are two separate sets of proper procedures one set for lawyers or friends of the court And a separate set of rules for self represented people and the difference appears to be that lawyers can complain about each other to the Law Society but no self represented person can complain about any lawyerand a separate set of rules for self represented people and the difference appears to be that lawyers can complain about each other to the Law Society but no self represented person can complain about any lawyer.

that is counterintuitive in that one would expect the Law Society is there to assure the public that lawyers are treating treating them properly. But today, the KROWN clarified that only lawyers can complain about lawyers in the public house to take whatever they get

another unusual request was that the crown wants a second DNA sample. Now that is unusual because it cannot be cheap to capture and store DNA samples they already have mine from December as ordered by Justice Rose so I must presume that asking for the second sample was just to intimidate me or to put me out next the KROWN insisted on what he called a short sharp jail sentence

he wanted to put me in jail to teach me respect for the law and he stated it in exactly those words now to the Lehman that sounds like he wants to use the facilities of a prison so that I will gain some new respect for lawyers and I am not sure that he is thinking this through COVID-19 is raging through prisons all over the world because they have so many men jam together in such small spaces and they do not permit prisoners to have hand soap so that means that every prisoner is touching the same surfaces as every other prisoner and everything gets passed around the prison very effectively also prisoners are yelling and screaming and carrying on and spitting find particles of Covid up into the air conditioning and back out into the next cell each prison is a virtual petri dish spreading everyone’s spit around

The province does not release facts and figures about the spread of Covid inside because it would force the discussion of whether it makes sense at all to put people in prison during the outbreak at another point the judge was looking for one of the five documents I filed in response to the sentencing The justice was given only the first three and at one point the KROWN accused me of refusing to except the verdict and accuse me of wanting only to relitigate the entire trial this was such an obvious ploy that has been used repeatedly on me that I figured I better defend it by submitting a document saying completely the opposite and I did that in document number 4 of five.

The clerk quickly found document number five but the one in the middle number four was still missing I explain to the justice I needed only to quote him to WORDS from that filing but he would not permit me to do so without having the paper in his hands himself eventually the clerk found the fourth document and printed it out for the justice but in the meantime I have course stated it was my opinion that the crown had purposely made that document go missing because it was in Absolute opposition to what they were claiming so document number four opened with I’m guilty ““ and the next sentence was I am not trying to relitigate the case so my gut feeling was correct when the crown made exactly that argument to the justice and asked that I be sent to prison for being a bad boy my claim of the crown losing the document on purpose evoked a very angry contradiction which means I had hit a nerve but the mistake the crown made was opening up the concept that I was lying about them holding back documents so tomorrow I will do a detailed report on how the crown held back complete filings that I had hand written when I was first for bidden from using any computers they figured that would stop me from filing motions and providing evidence of my innocence Mr. mole will remember this as the set of filings in multi colored folders and he told the justice on the record your honor I have never seen these forms that Mr. Lepp has filed the forms were standard form number one for filing a motion my family had both attended that day and Mr. mole took the opportunity to declare to the judge that he felt I needed a mental health examination this same claim has been made multiple times but of course the crown has never put it in writing all they have done is mouth the words knowing full well that they cannot order such an examination strangely back in December the probation order had some wording that indicated to the probation officer that maybe I should see a shrink but in the eight months that have passed they have not been able to find one that had the time to help me the most interesting activity today was the reading of a victim impact statement I have been given a copy of it yesterday to review I gave my comments on each separate statement in the statement And I asked that my comments not be passed along so it was a bit of a surprise to find out that my comments had been passed along and the victim chose to edit some portion I have yet to compare what was read into the record with what was given to me in advance I am sure it will be revealing before the victim read her statement I pointed out I had a $1 million lawsuit against the victim and I was going to use the impact statement as evidence of how she lies about me despite that warning the victim read the statement and when the smoke clears‘s I will publish it here so you can see to what extremes I have driven these women now the lawyer provided to this woman by your insurance company probably does not know what she said about me I say that because I’m pretty certain the lawyer would’ve recommended a bit more careful phrasing and perhaps some accuracy I believe if it was homeowner insurance that paid for the lawyer it does not cover legal issues to do with a business being illegally operated out of that home the home does not have a Business license for a kennel nor does it have a dog walking license and so the insurance holder is operating illegally and trying to use homeowner insurance improperly if the insurance is small business insurance then that is evidence that she is running a business out of her home without the required Aurora bylaws licensing being purchased I may be wrong and all that but I cannot imagine the lawyers writing up insurance contracts permitting somebody to break the law and then expect the insurance company to spend money in court
I always find it fascinating when people forget what they have lied about and then do something in complete opposition to what they had previously complained about as an example one woman claimed that she could not force her self to come into the court building if she knew I was there yet the same woman not only came to the court knowing I was there in March but she then had me arrested three weeks later because she forgot at the time that she had expressed the fear and so now she has to explain to the court why her fear suddenly disappeared

it’s interesting to see how people react when they are enabled to get away with cheating because they know there are no repercussions they will say and do the most unusual things

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel Law Without Remorse - a book The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL2O-212 – Sentencing Tomorrow – My Guess At My Jail Term + SafeZoom™©️®

WEBDEV101: Some issues you deal with in any blog or web site are difficult, and you will want your readers to properly appreciate the nuances. So, help them with a technique called “Test The Extremes”. Show them the “edges” of the issue, how far up or down, left and right, in or out the facts can go or take you. How high will it raise its ugly head?

When you can describe the edges, a reader can make up their own mind where they stand “in” the issue.

My Sentencing On The May 30, 2018 Charges Is Tomorrow

What amount of jail time can I expect? I have no idea, but I know where to Google that.

So, I am convicted of harassing a Town sub-contractor running both the volunteers AND her own business in a town park. In getting her $70,000 for a new park to work in, I assaulted her eyeballs with copies of emails ranting about our ineffective Bylaws/Parks Director couple. It took a couple of months, but they broke down under my “assault” and gave my accuser $70,000. She got to pick out the carpet AND the drapes… beautiful shag depth wood chips and fencing almost small enough to keep in the dogs. She FORGOT it was her choice to accept my emails, to encourage more of them, and to beg me to help her “former” volunteers get their just rewards. She forgot she could just block my emails. Or just TRASH them with the simplest Outlook rule. When her ex-IBM’er husband thought of that he messed up the block and my inked nastiness got through like a giant octopus. (squid ink.. get it?)

So, how does my “eyes wide open”, full on, e- ssault™ rank against REAL SERIOUS assaults, emailed or otherwise?

I think uninvited anal penetration of a male penis is an assault (no pun intended, it’s just that anal assault is a redundant phrase. a waste of words. I will fix that in Urban Dictionary). And the worst of that MUST be while I am passed out, so even if I were guy I would not be allowed to enjoy it. So I Googled something like “buggery while sleeping: and instead of just the “catcher” sleeping, I found one where the “pitcher” also snored through the entire affair, from drinks, into petting through clothes, right past 3rd base, the slide PAST home plate all the way to 5th base… Zz.z.z.z.z.z.z.z..z..zzsnort…. two totally napping in the dark zombies making out like Elton and Furnish on their anniversary.

That guy, while anally raping a sleeping woman got 1 year total. It took 9 years to get him jailed, and even THEN he appealed AGAIN.

OK, I think I need not look at any Peter assault, this I step worst and he got a year.

So, how much less than 1 can I get? .5? .1? 0?

My range os 0.00-1 years.

I like the full year. There is no use painting up a new cell for just a week or two. It would still smell o faint when I leave.

So. Zoom IN tomorrow at 9:30-11:30 am in Room 203, J. Harpur . It’s public hanging, so if you find out the magic code to connect, let me know and I will see your face there!

SafeZoom ™©️® – Be Safe, Zoom Safely!

I may become part of the con-dom™!

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Web Site Development 101

BL2O-211 – Congrats to YRP Deputy Chief Andre Crawford on his retirement

WEBDEV101: Local news… help your readers know the important events around town, they will keep caiman back for more.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Web Site Development 101

BL2O-210 – “BoB” swag… B-ail o-ut B-ob is on the way

WEBDEV101: Swag = Big Bucks! Sell it yourself or someone else will! Be sure you get your fundraisers established early on. If you do not, someone else will profit from your woes.

SWAG

The word Swag is actually an acronym for “Stuff We All Get”, originated from the .com years where companies used these give-away items as promotional mechanisms. … Another meaning is an acronym for “Scientific Wild Ass Guess”. Another meaning in the pirate days: Swag was a term for pirate “booty” or treasure.

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=what+is+the+origin+of+swag&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

or…

By now, you are familiar with my financial woes. $44,000+ and counting. I need a bail fund.

Bail Out Bob!

So… my logo’d items are in production. Hats, shirts, mugs…. everything you have ever wanted…

emblazoned with…..

Yes! The same fat head, the same pathetic nutsack, and the same colour blind selection of random splotches.

Could be “Bob Pride” actually, I may be in for a copywrong issue.

Anyway, if you have a few dollars to spare to bail me out next time (maybe later today at this rate) just email me what item and size you’d like. In return, I will send you a quote. A BIG quote.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Communicating To Counsel The Story - 6/3/17 to now Web Site Development 101

BL2O-2O9 – Why I Cannot Catch A Break!

WEBDEV101: ABA… A-lways B-e A-nticipating.. an obvious question. Answer it ahead of time, save your readers the trouble of asking it.

I got to thinking, maybe I am NOT being centered out by DS Bentham. MAYBE, just MAYBE I deserve it!

I got to thinking.

Better late than never they say.

Maybe, lawyers around the world have figured out guys like me.

So, Google suggested: https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/lawreview/articles/volume156/issue5/Bowers156U.Pa.L.Rev.1117(2008).pdf

Much of the worry over an innocence problem in plea bargaining proceeds from misperceptions over

(1) the characteristics of typical innocent defendants, 

(2) the types of cases they generally face, and

(3) the level of due process they typically desire.

First, most innocent defendants are probably recidivists. These repeat players are the principal target population of police activities and investigations. And, as such, they are more likely to be caught erroneously in miscast or overwide police nets.
when challenging false charges but-perhaps counterintuitively-enjoy concurrent unique plea-bargaining benefits. On the burden side, they are more likely to be charged or indicted postarrest and less likely to have pending charges dismissed, even when evidence is weak.’ Additionally, they are more likely to face pretrial detention and are less able to adequately fight their cases at trial.
fits side, recidivists suffer less-if at all-from the corollary consequences of convictions.

JOSH BOWERS – PUNISHING THE INNOCENT – U. of PA Law Review – May 2008, Vol. 156 No. 5

These repeat players are the principal target population of police activities and investigations.

THERE! Lawyers HAVE figured it out. Cops have figured it out. I am the only one in the dark.

Innocent people are mostly criminals who simply effed up again!

Now I do not feel any bias.

Crown Prosecutors are simply prescient (Defined as: having or showing knowledge of events before they take place.) and so they play the odds that, as an innocent person, I am very likely not a newbie…, that I have done this BEFORE.

And guilty people are, well, simply guilty of dong something wrong.

Therefore, cumulatively, all the people in the world are probably guilty or have already been found guilty.

That makes it much more clear.

And a lot more fair to everyone.

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Web Site Development 101

BL2O-2O7 – Your Mama!

WEBDEV101: ABI… A-lways B-e I-nsulting… people love the adrenaline rush of an insult coming about their mothers. Makes therm think. And ABC – A-lways B-e C-loning/Copying… ABE A-lways B-e E-mbedding….it saves time.

And, if you can, make an email do double duty as a blog post.

If it is not obvious form the following email, I have been in a tussle with Google Maps. And I think it makes a great post standalone, without further embellishment. See if you can adopt this style in YOUR web site.

Oh, and always create a PDF if you can… then you just EMBED it for people to read, no need to copy/paste even!

Your-Mama-Re-Your-Google-Support-Inquiry-Case-ID-51360000030331

See how easy that was? As easy as ABC, ABI, ABE….ABRACDABRA!

Categories
A real gnu it all Business Web Site Development 101

BL2O-2O6 – THIS will scare you!

WEBDEV101: ABS,,, A-lways B-e S-caring… people love the adrenaline rush of panic! Makes therm think.

If you melt ALL the ice in the world, and take all theroceans, lakes, streams and humidity and place it in a giant clear beach ball, this is what you would have…

Now, that is a big beach ball, but compared to earth it is a drop on a bucket (Pun intended)

1,384 km diameter versus 12,742 km diameter of earth. So about 10%.

And that is ALL the water we have to live on and do our laundry in. And to flush our toilets.

All of us, every country… animals too. Alien flybys. Loaded onto rockets and blasted to the SpaceLab.

Make you think… Hmmmmmmmmmm! don’t it

And there is NO more being made either.

Top you want t see what happens if you put a hole in the ball and let it run all over earth again?

Notice, Florida and the ENTIRE easy coast of the USA drowns. Parts of Alaska gone.

I guess we lose PEI and most of Vancouver Island.

216 feet rise all over earth.

Where have you ever seen a 271 foot wall at the shore?

so, what about air?

So, next time you’re thinking about air pollution, remember there is really not as much as you believed existed. And we are not mining it or pumping it out of the ground.