Categories
Business Google Maps Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLXX🎄 – Un-De-Leaf-able – Even The Neighbour’s Leaves Have Been Caught Piling On

Aurora has made it certain that everyone knows I am disgraced by being arrested by their ex-cop. Then by their dog park contractor. Then by HER paralegal and by her old school principal. And the ex-cop’s lawyer, of course, same one as the spite fence specialist.

Once she made that first arrest July 13, 2017 she and Aurora encouraged everyone to take a piece of me… to pile on complaints about me while the cops were hot to keep me under bail conditions to shut up about her. So she assaults me, cops whitewash it and then it has been classic Thin Blue Line payback every since. 6 MORE arrests and 19 MORE charges because I just did not take the hint and shut up about her. She even faked changing her name.

Today, I stand accused of killing dogs with antifreeze and “serial harassment” of multiple women. Luckily I ended 16 charges outright, never went past the first justice who read the allegations.

Cops were so anxious for more charges after I recorded them February 27, 2020 admitting the collusion they convinced 3 lawyers to lie about something they never saw, never heard and definitely never happened. But all 3 swore to testify against me March 6, 2020. And if they do, they lose their licences for lying and public mischief. No one can lie to police JUST to get a person arrested. No one. In this case all 3 witnesses are licensed by the Law Society of Ontario with their myriad regulations and ethics standards and complaint mechanisms. When my charges are prosecuted, they lose their incomes. And to them it is a risk worth taking. After all, I am defeating them in court. Charles Painter was beat twice. Gwendolyn Adrian has to answer to a justice why she took $18,000 illegally in costs for a motion NOT EVEN HEARD. And an appeal.

Her response has been to publish hundreds of pages to support her 18 page claim against me. Just 6 sentences I spoke are in contention. Ms. Buckles was accused of 9 slanderous sentences, 509% MORE than me.

But now, even my west side neighbour knows he can treat me like shit now, and Bylaws will support him.

Lasy year, his retaining wall collapsed onto my land and much of his dirt washed out through it onto and under my interlocking stones. So I shovelled some of it back into the washed-out holes on his side, lest he think I threw it out. He came screaming to my door in the middle of a dinner party accusing me of putting his soil back on his land. I called police and trespassed him. I am a quick study. I threw out his dirt as my contractor had a dumper on site. 229 had the dumpster at the curb ticketed that day, but I got it rescinded like the off leash dogs tickjet for $1.

Parents can park INSIDE a bus stop at 3:00 pm daily, but I cannot park a dumpster at the curb to take away my neighbours washed out soil.

This week, his campaign is leaves. Or more accurately, ME and MY leaves. I noticed that he has been studying me, taking videos of my blowing style. I hoped it was to learn, but I think he was fixing to report me. Now he stands on his side deck and screams something at me. I think he has determined how I get rid of my back yard leaves… he thinks I blow them all under the fence into his yard. He thinks this because I pile them in my southwest corner and my son eventually bags them up. Or used to.

I finally figured out that he must jealous of our team, me and the 3 eastern neighbours, and our system. They work days, I do not. I like BLOWING leaves, not gift wraapping them. So, they bag what I pile up. And the whole street in front of our 4 homes. I even do the far side curbs.

So,

  1. I blow all 4 houses down to the curb mid-day.
  2. They come home from work and bag em up.
  3. Weekends we work together. Like today. I blew. They bagged

So, I can see my western neighbour at 229 figures to take a photo between 1 and 2 and send it to Bylaws or the cops, your guess is as good as mine.

Anyway, our Assuredly De-leaf-able Club at 221-227 Orchard Hts. Blvd. keeps the entire width of street clean and the folks from 229 and west just leaf them at the curb in huge piles to blow back east at us in the prevailing winds.

Revenge. Seems to be a bit kindergartenish, but what do I know?

So, 229 + west Orchard Hts… stop piling at the curb! Pick ’em up!

Categories
Business Google Maps Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLXX👁👁 – Vic Priestly’s lawyer piles on

I can get into hot water even when helping a stranger… and I know I swore off EVER helping anyone again, I kind of liked his TV show Salvage Kings. I thought I would visit it an dI had an idea for a virtual tour to show off what he tries to sell there, so looked it up in Google Maps.

It was in the wrong place and empty of any useful data about National Building Supply

I set out to make Vic aware his marketing people had not done their jobs, nor had Corus Entertainment NOR had the History Channel.

This is what happened.

I got this letter today:

20201023_Lawter-Letter-from-Priestly-Letter-to-Lepp

Turns out – It Is Closed up!

THINK!

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLXX👁 – Papal lawyers help Catholic District School Board.

Coverup under way

My Small Claims suit for having a false 500 meter radius trespass notice created had a settlement conference today. Someone ordered up some backup for the Board Lawyer. An HR guy determined to take responsibility for her. Unless the person who wrote the “facts” and the trespass notice to police apologizes, we go to trial.

I dropped my demand from $35,000 to $1,000 and an apology letter of the Principal’s choice. She declined to agree. She wanted to hide behind the Board’s skirts. She seemingly did not want her name in the apology at all.

Now, the Catholic School Board wants to take on all responsibility for my illegal trespass notice last winter. It got me arrested March 4, 2020.

Thursday, February 27, 2020 I was ordered by my Probation Officer that I had to meet with Det. Sgt. Bentham in her offices. She assured me in no uncertain terms that on that day, she had no one investigating me.

By Monday, March 2, 2020 she had already assigned 4 detectives to go dig up and document some dirt on me.

On March 3, 2020 she called to tell me to come in 7 am next day to be arrested. No, she did not want to interview me or get my reactions. Straight to jail, do not pass GO. I then spent 3 days in Lindsay Prison with no hand soap. COVID-19 was raging and while true criminals were being released to avoid getting ill, I was placed in confined quarters with many prisoners and not one of us was permitted to have hand soap.

March 6, 2020 I was back in court to be put on full house arrest and a whole list of people and one company name were typed in a “Not to mention” recognizance J. Edwards later found illegal and he struck it in its entirety.

So, had the principal NOT falsely accused me I would NOT have been arrested.

This is how The Pope covered up those pervert priests all these centuries.

And now the Pope approves of same sex marriages, hoping to deflect criticism of priests marrying each other and adopting altar boys.

Religion, politics and courts should not intermix.

“Arkers”, those believing two of EVERY species fit on a boat, should not be asked to swear on a Bible. Ever. Everyone should affirm, it has more meaning.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLXX – CPP and OAS cheque day is October 28, Ms Adrian!

Bob Does All His Banking at RBC Aurora Branch Yonge @ Aurora Heights Drive

One week until your next pay day, so mark your calendars.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLXtnein – A Sure Fire Class Action Suit Against all Banks

Just cut me on for a taste.

Sue for: “Over Reaching Garnishment by Banks Makes Account Useless.”

The Bank Act controls what funds banks can garnish and how. It did not permit them to freeze your account. But all banks DO freeze your account because they refuse to modify their systems to let you use the account to pay bills etc. while capturing deposits for the creditor.

SO… all banks instead FREEZE you out of doing anything so THEY have control at all times. You re forced to GO to the branch to do anything, even if physically challenged or susceptible to COVID-19.

So, everyone garnished suffers. They cannot get their CPP and OAS and RRIF’s because the account is frozen.

Extra costs ensue because now you have to play cat and mouse to open a new account for CPP and OAS.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLXt🎱 – OIPRD Tosses My Complaint Re: Police in Toronto Decline Data Theft Investigation

OIPRD says Det. Ozretic CAN ask me for My Personal Bank Acct. Number before she will even START to investigate.

So, The Thin Blue Line wanted to protect their own.

All police had to do was phone CIBC and ask how someone could get my bank account number within 24 hours. Just ask, and listen. And decide if they are hiding something.

Instead, she made up an excuse she MUST know my bank account number. Not JUST my:

  • Name
  • Birthdate
  • Drivers’ Licence Number
  • Address
  • Cell Number
  • CIBC Complaint number, name
  • OBSI complaint number, name

Nope, she HAD to know my bank account number or she would NOT lift a handset.

Then, as belt and suspenders, she “parked” my complaint saying CIBC owned my personal data and could give it away if they wanted to.

Which they did.

Categories
Business

BL20-🎄CLXt7 – York Declines my FOI on Joy Hulton – FOI 20-128

When I blogged the daily parking inside the bus stop #1208, Ms Hulton adminstered her Workplace Resolution skills

Her “Resolution”? She did not speak to me…then blocked my email address from contacting ANY Region staff, including the Provincial Offences courts.

BL20-CLXXX-Joy-Hulton-ex-Lawyer-for-York-Region-and-Police-Services-Board-Who-Blocked-Me-From-All-of

Joy is now running “Hulton Workplace Resolutions”.

My FOI asked if she took a buyout package to leave and if she now still contracts to York Region. Because after 23 years maybe she does not have any other clients yet.

Adam Briggs, FOI Officer, on October 13, 2020 said I did not specify enough detail to identify the records.

He wants ME to tell HIM “name of firms that you believe Joy Hulton has been working for”…..

So, he expects me to KNOW the details of what I am asking about.

If she was NOT back consulting he would have said “NO”.

Now, this letter seems to say “MAYBE” and asks for proof of what I suspect.

I will tell him her company’s name.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLXt6 – Police in Toronto Decline Data Theft Investigation

Det. Ozretic Declares CIBC OWNS My Personal Data Once I Open an Account

So, since they own the data they can do whatever they want with it.

Very logical.

Except…

CIBC obtains your consent before collecting, using or sharing personal information, except where otherwise permitted or required by law.

https://www.cibc.com/en/privacy-security/privacy-policy/privacy-principles.html

CIBC Privacy Principles

CIBC respects the following principles when collecting, using or sharing your personal information:
 

1. Accountability

  • CIBC is responsible for personal information under its control.
  • There are designated individuals within CIBC who are accountable for compliance with these privacy principles.

2. Identifying Purposes and Obtaining Consent

  • CIBC informs individuals, at or before the time it is collected, the purposes for the collection, use and sharing of personal information.
  • CIBC obtains your consent before collecting, using or sharing personal information, except where otherwise permitted or required by law.

3. Limiting the Collection, Use or Sharing of Your Personal Information

  • CIBC limits the personal information it collects to what is necessary for the purposes it has identified. CIBC collects personal information only by fair and lawful means.
  • CIBC does not use or share personal information for purposes other than those for which it was collected except with your consent or where permitted or required by law. CIBC retains personal information only as long as necessary for customer service, legal or reasonable business purposes.

4. Keeping Your Personal Information Accurate and Providing Access to Your Information

  • CIBC takes care to keep personal information as accurate, complete and up-to-date as is necessary for the purposes for which it is to be used.
  • Upon request, and subject to certain exceptions, CIBC will provide you with access to your personal information. You can ask how your personal information is to be used or shared so you can ensure your personal information is accurate and complete and can be updated if appropriate.

5. Protecting Your Personal Information

  • CIBC protects the privacy of personal information through security measures appropriate to the sensitivity of the information.

6. Openness and Addressing Your Concerns

  • CIBC makes available information about its policies and practices related to managing your personal information.
  • CIBC has steps you can follow if you have questions or concerns about your privacy.

CIBC Digital Privacy Statement

Effective May 2018

At CIBC, keeping your personal information in confidence is a cornerstone of our business and an integral part of our commitment to service excellence. This Digital Privacy Statement applies to the collection, use or sharing of any personal information collected by CIBC in the course of conducting its business in Canada. This Digital Privacy Statement explains how we collect, use, share and protect personal information collected through your online and mobile activities, including through the use of any CIBC site or other online or electronic technologies such as email and mobile applications. It is consistent with our CIBC Privacy Principles and is in addition to our Privacy Policy and the terms of your agreements with us.

In this Digital Privacy Statement:

“CIBC,” “we,” “our” and “us” means collectively Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and its affiliates that offer deposits, loans, mutual funds, securities trading, portfolio management, investment counseling, mortgages, credit cards, trust services, insurance and other products or services.

“Digital” means CIBC Online Banking®, CIBC websites, CIBC mobile sites, CIBC mobile apps or our other electronic technologies. 

“Personal information” or “information” means information about an identifiable individual such as name, email or user IDs.

“Site” means a website and mobile site.

What we collect and how we collect it

The type of personal information we collect will depend on various factors, including your digital activities with us. We may collect information in the following ways:

  • Information you provide us, through your digital activities such as, mobile apps, applications for products or services, or information that you have inputted into our online tools or calculators. This may include information such as your name, email address, user IDs, passwords, service preference (e.g., language), age, gender, occupation and income range. If you communicate with us online or by email, mobile app or text message, we may collect information contained in that communication, such as your email address or mobile telephone number.
  • Information that your web browser may provide us, such as the type of web browser you use (e.g., Internet Explorer, Chrome, Safari or Firefox) or the address of the site you came from.
  • Information that your devices may provide us, such as device details (e.g., device ID, model, operating system or device notification status), privacy settings and other device configurations or settings, your geolocation, or your IP address (a number that is automatically assigned to your computer or device when you browse the Internet and from which the general geographical location of the device can be derived).
  • Information obtained using web technologies, such as cookies and web beacons. Refer to the Web Technologies section below for further information.

How we use information

We may use information for the following purposes:

  • Provide you with our digital products, services and support
  • Communicate with you, including providing alerts that you have requested
  • Personalize your user experience including offering you personalized marketing and offers
  • Better understand your interest in other CIBC products and services
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of our sites, communications, marketing, or offers and promotions
  • Measure site and mobile app usage and improve functionality
  • Enhance digital security including preventing and detecting security threats and criminal activities

Using third-party cookies and other web technologies, CIBC may market CIBC products, services or community initiatives on another company’s site (e.g., remarketing). CIBC’s partners and service providers may also use third-party cookies and web technologies to collect and use information from CIBC sites and other third-party sites to assist us in this marketing.  In some cases, the content of this marketing may be based on information we know about you, such as your browsing behavior on CIBC sites and third-party sites where you are shown CIBC ads, your CIBC products and services, and the information you have provided to us. If you access one of these marketing ads, we may also track the response rate, the specific CIBC ad that you selected and the site activity associated with each marketing ad. If you enter a third-party site which has a CIBC ad, we may use cookies to help us identify the site you accessed, but we do not track and create a profile of a user’s behaviour on that site. The response rate data is used to help us plan future online marketing campaigns.

CIBC may offer mobile applications or services that use location information. If you choose to use such applications or services, CIBC may, if your geolocation device settings allow us, collect information about your location to provide you with the applications or services you request.

We may also use location information to personalize your user experience including through site or mobile app content, marketing, or offers for products and services. For example, we may use general geographical location derived from your IP address (e.g., city) to customize CIBC site pages for you.

Some services may involve access to information on your device. For example, accessing your contact list can make it easier to use Interac e-Transfer® banking services, or accessing your photos and camera can make it easier to complete a remote cheque deposit on your mobile device. Some services may allow your device and your wearable to communicate with a CIBC app, such as for Apple Watch®.

Protecting your personal information

Protecting the security of your personal information and the financial transactions you conduct online is of utmost importance. We use multiple layers of protection when you access any of our digital products or services, such as digital banking, including:

  • Web browser encryption: all browsers supported by CIBC digital services offer industry standard encryption. This provides a high level of protection for transmitting confidential data over the Internet.
  • Firewalls: we have secure firewalls designed to prevent unauthorized access to our systems.
  • Monitoring: we monitor activity on CIBC digital services to enhance security and to protect your personal information.

CIBC sites may contain links to non-CIBC sites. CIBC is not responsible for the information and privacy practices of these third-party sites. We recommend that you read any such third-party site’s privacy policy to learn about its information and privacy practices before you provide any personal information.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLXt5 – The Star HAS not responded, NOR Bob Aaron, Lawyer

Re: Atkinson… He was particularly concerned about injustice

Throughout his 50 years as publisher of the Toronto Star from 1899 to 1948, Joseph E. Atkinson developed strong views on both the role of a large city newspaper and the editorial principles it should espouse. These values and beliefs now form what are called the Atkinson Principles. For more than a century, they have provided the intellectual foundation on which the Star has operated and have given the paper its distinctive voice.

The editorial principles Atkinson espoused were founded on his belief that a progressive newspaper should contribute to the advancement of society through pursuit of social, economic and political reforms. He was particularly concerned about injustice, be it social, economic, political, legal or racial

Fundamental to his philosophy was the belief that the state has the right, and duty, to act when private initiative fails. While Atkinson’s beliefs were never codified in any set form, the central Principles can be summarized as follows:

Star Principle: Individual and Civil Liberties

Everyone must be equal under the law, and able to enjoy the fundamental freedoms of belief, thought, expression and the press.

https://www.thestar.com/about/liberties.html

Refreshing Your Memory

Gwendolyn Adrian, senior lawyer for Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP and personal lawyer to partner Michael Simaan gave an interview to Alexandra Heck on Adrians’ suit against me litigated for an ex-cop, ex-Aurora Bylaws Manager, ex-Erin contractor. I asked for an opportunity to be interviewed but I got no reply in ten months.

The Toronto Star published her article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site.

This was the first of two misleading articles from The Star. Five days later, they have not responded AT ALL to my defamation notice and I doubt they ever will. The peril in taking that attitude is that it looks bad in court to be shown a pattern of bias spread by lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

Both AURORA and Erin terminated her client early and paid cash to make her go away. Part of ADRIAN‘s lawsuit claims I was responsible despite her client testifying in Newmarket court to exactly the opposite facts. She testified happily that she was terminated without cause in Aurora and paid a cash lump sum to avoid a lawsuit for letting her go “without reason”.

Her manager in Erin also testified in the same proceeding that he paid her two extra unearned months of her contract to leave early after just four months. Erin residents had applied pressure to the mayor for that decision at election time in October 2018.

The Toronto Court told Gwendolyn Adrian that she had not filed a legal lawsuit and that she was required to have filed it within three months of the alleged acts. Since that day ADRIAN has not advanced the lawsuit in any way. The suit has no chance of being litigated.

Gwendolyn Adrian has now been ordered by the court to justify 2 legal actions she took against me. The justice told her she litigated “the worst of the worst” allegations of me on October 14. That her motion was “grossly over reaching”, a “non starter” and “just not going to happen”.. she was ordered to write ten pages explaining why she chose to attack me in this fashion.

I, in turn, will do the same to show the court how she manipulated the press to quote her before the suit was even litigated. That seems inappropriate for a Law Society licensee. They have ethics rules for its members.

The true Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each with Gwendolyn Adrian and others. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. so each article was merely a hit job orchestrated by Gwendolyn Adrian and the Toronto star.

neither Alexandra heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

Well, so did I and now it is payback time. I had to give a DNA sample so maybe that will help.

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

But our great Charter of Rights let’s them do it because we have a legal system designed to keep them honest. I do not need to get upset at all. All I need do is sue them.

And Ontario wonders why its courts are now terminally disrupted by a bat from Wuhan China.

Now, will someone go to bat for me?

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLXt4 waiting

I think the day is near that the only solution to a spite fence is removal.

Especially if it is on someone else’s land. IF that ever happens in the future.

It is just a matter of time.

Categories
Law Without Remorse - a book Whither goest Gwendolyn Adrian?

BL20-🎄CLX🎄 – Zoom in on the Ontario Court of Appeal with Gwendolyn Adrian

I like the remote court appearances by Zoom software. They are much less stressful. It is impossible to feel stressed sitting in pyjama bottoms with a shirt, tie and jacket.

I filed a single judge motion to extend my time to perfect my appeal of Gwendolyn Adrian’s client refusing to wait for the SLAPP s.137.1 motion to be heard. I filed May 2019 and it has not yet been heard.

Despite that shortcoming, Ms. Adrian was able to convince several judges to award her massive unearned costs and a default judgement. NOTHING was to happen after May 2019 but so many justices just (pun intended) do not understand SLAPP s. 137.1 and its goal of eliminating EXACTLY this kind of assault on my bank balance.

When I get the extension, my appeal perfection will take maybe a week to finish off. So much happened I can now use as evidence of SLAPP.

Over the weekend I read the Plaintiff’s claim again. The suit was so poorly written. By law, it was to have included EVERY alleged slanderous thing she says I wrote. Instead, it had just 15 quotes, 9 for Buckles in Facebook and 6 for me from my blog and change.org petition and 1100 signatures.

Not one of the 15 alleged quotes is in any way slanderous.

And, more importantly, lawyer Brad T. Cran had no idea how to claim libel. He wrote that I had just made too MANY libellous posts to include and he would reveal them at trial.

Well, it turns out he did not know the law. By failing to cite EVERY alleged statement… he made the suit useless. Because the 15 he picked are simply innocuous. Both Marnee and I simply stated the facts and the history without making any personal comments or casting any aspersions. We both just stated what Adrian’s client had done and had said, and we left it to the reader to make up their minds.

Soon, I will be allowed to post them all here for you to read. Until then, come see me for a hard copy. You will laugh at what they claim was libellous.

Until then, as expected, Ms Adrian served 273 MORE pages in a NEGATIVE response of my motion late Friday for motion to be heard 10:00 am Monday. She expected the justice to read it over the weekend I guess.

Her entire law suit is just 18 pages, and YET, she came up with 255 MORE than that JUST to say NO! to the justice.

if your suit is just 18 pages, and you think it can succeed… why would you need 273 pages to explain how good the 18 were?

So she can claim costs! and sure enough, as I told the justice she would, she asked for $2,000 for the LATE 273 soft copy pages. No photocopying, no couriers, no binding… just a bag of bits and bytes sent with NOT enough time to be read. A waste of data.

I asked for $18,000 if I get the extension. I theorized that if Adrian got $18,000 for NOT arguing SLAPP s. 137.1 then I should get $18,000 for WINNING something.

But the justice knows self reps do not get costs compensation as we do not EXPEND any costs…. we magically beat lawyers on a regular basis without having to spend ANYTHING… not one penny….. so we get no costs and the lawyers just laugh at us for working hard enough t beat them and then NOT get paid a penny.

Such is the mystery of Ontario’s legal systems.

The big bucks in law can be made on “costs” alone since they are not audited. And with COVID, Zoom and soft copy everything, the profit on the costs gets better each month.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLX👁👁 – Guy Paul Morin’s lawyer Clayton Ruby on False Accusations and Convictions

Full interview:

I am in now way comparing my plight to that of Mr. Morin.

BUT, that said, Toronto Police are seemingly incompetent. They took HOW LONG to check the DNA they stored for decades?

Ruby: “We tend to trust prosecutors… we trust authority… there are mistakes… huge and inexplicable… a more sceptical approach to prosecution claims makes us all safe.”

His summary of the impact of Toronto Police FINALLy doing their job…

Says Clayton Ruby: “Why so long? It’s not tricky… People don’t trust the system…He cannot recover….There is no recovery from false arrest, false imprisonment, bearing false witness.

I now have 21 false charges from York Regional Police.

I defeated 16 without a lawyer. 3 are under appeal. 2 have not been to first appearance after SEVEN MONTHS! 3 lawyer lied to arrest me and send me to Lindsay Prison IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PANDEMIC.

I reported to Toronto Police on August 28 that Gwendolyn Adrian admitted to me in a recorded court ordered session that she obtained my banking data surreptitiously. She said it was “none of your business” who gave her the data required to legally garnish my shiny new, 24 hour old CIBC account.

Detective Nicole Ozretic has now taken 50 days to make one phone call to CIBC to see if there is any truth in her admissions.

So, if Guy Paul Morin is upset at Toronto Police, I am not surprised.

Maybe Mr Ruby should look into all ex-police officers on the suspect lists. Police will NOT investigate their own Thin Blue Line brothers and sisters.

And now they refuse to help those like me who reported crimes by ex-police and her lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

Categories
CV-18-00138394-0000 Aurora/YRP Suit

BL20-🎄CLX👁 – The Star would not respond to me in January either

Gwendolyn Adrian, senior lawyer for Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP and personal lawyer to partner Michael Simaan gave an interview to Alexandra Heck on Adrians’ suit against me litigated for an ex-cop, ex-Aurora Bylaws Manager, ex-Erin contractor. I asked for an opportunity to be interviewed but I got no reply in ten months.

The Toronto Star published her article. Google: “Alexandra Heck Robert Lepp Erin $950,000” and you may find the article is still in the Toronto Star web site.

This was the first of two misleading articles from The Star. They have not responded AT ALL to my defamation notice and I doubt they ever will. The peril in taking that attitude is that it looks bad in court to be shown a pattern of bias spread by lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian.

Both AURORA and Erin terminated her client early and paid cash to make her go away. Part of ADRIAN‘s lawsuit claims I was responsible despite her client testifying in Newmarket court to exactly the opposite facts. She testified happily that she was terminated without cause in Aurora and paid a cash lump sum to avoid a lawsuit for letting her go “without reason”.

Her manager in Erin also testified in the same proceeding that he paid her two extra unearned months of her contract to leave early after just four months. Erin residents had applied pressure to the mayor for that decision at election time in October 2018.

The Toronto Court told Gwendolyn Adrian that she had not filed a legal lawsuit and that she was required to have filed it within three months of the alleged acts. Since that day ADRIAN has not advanced the lawsuit in any way. The suit has no chance of being litigated.

Gwendolyn Adrian has now been ordered by the court to justify 2 legal actions she took against me. The justice told her she litigated “the worst of the worst” allegations of me on October 14. That her motion was “grossly over reaching”, a “non starter” and “just not going to happen”.. she was ordered to write ten pages explaining why she chose to attack me in this fashion.

I, in turn, will do the same to show the court how she manipulated the press to quote her before the suit was even litigated. That seems inappropriate for a Law Society licensee. They have ethics rules for its members.

The true Toronto star articles were completely one-sided and were published after only a single interview each with Gwendolyn Adrian and others. I was not contacted for fact checking at all. so each article was merely a hit job orchestrated by Gwendolyn Adrian and the Toronto star.

neither Alexandra heck nor Bob Aaron chose to provide a balanced article and each must’ve had some personal motive for doing so. It is not conceivable that a real newspaper reporter would refuse a detailed interview with an alleged criminal. Imagine if Guy Paul Morin asked for equal time and was refused. Yes, he would have been sent to prison needlessly…

Oh?, he DID go to prison? Oops!

Well, so did I and now it is payback time. I had to give a DNA sample so maybe that will help.

It seems a tad unfair for The Star to be given unlimited access to broadcast lies about me, including those proven as lies by the court transcripts.

But our great Charter of Rights let’s them do it because we have a legal system designed to keep them honest. I do not need to get upset at all. All I need do is sue them.

And Ontario wonders why its courts are now terminally disrupted by a bat from Wuhan China.

Now, will someone go to bat for me?

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLX – Finally …the Press is on my story!

Not in a good way… but they are on it and they must now tell the truth.

Dispute over a property line fence stirs up a costly battle at the Superior Court of Justice

Bob Aaron

By Bob AaronContributing Columnist

Click HERE ==> https://www.thestar.com/life/homes/2020/10/14/neighbours-dispute-over-a-property-line-fence-lands-them-in-an-costly-battle-at-the-superior-court-of-justice.html

Now, before Ms Adrian accuses me of publishing more slander of her client… that link is the Toronto Star and they never lie.

the first sentence is a lie: it was Toronto court, NOT Newmarket. How could a lawyer make that “mistake”… by simply taking the email sent to him and publish it as his own work.
No, someone in Aurora wrote that for him. Someone with so little respect for the law she did not even know what court the matter was in.

certainly Mr. Aaoron did not research it, the location of the court is on every piece of paper in the file. One might ASSUME an Aurora battle between two or three people in Aurora would be heard in Newmarket. But if you’re rich and easily embarrassed then you go far from home to litigate your lies.

One of the four women wrote this story and Bob Aaron copy pasted it into an email to his editors and they published it verbatim. So, if you don’t like what it says, go contact the Editor like I did.

“judgment against an online activist who interfered in the dispute.”

bob Aaron

How is blogging considered to be “interfering”?

how is my exercise of my Charter right to my opinions suddenly viewed as interfering by a lawyer like Aaron? Is it proper for a lawyer to dissuade people from expressing their opinions?

Are lawyers not to be “models” for the peasants to emulate? Is suppressing public opinion something a lawyer should be doing as a reporter?

Could anyone read that article and come away educated on how to be a good Canadian? Is this attitude prevalent in the Law Society? Do they want us to stop standing up for ourselves and hire lawyers instead.

is this lawyer really suggesting no one be their own person? Does he really want to jam up the courts with FENCES?

does the Superior Court have to intervene when a landowner disrespects her neighbour’s? Can we mere mortals not pay Bylaws Officers to enforce fence bylaws?

After xxx purchased her house in 2017, she constructed a wooden fence on the property line.

Bob Aaron

NO. She FIRST constructed a pair of huge black steel gates hung on a wooden gate post 100% on Buckles’ land and she was embarrassed to be told to remove it. THEN, she constructed a spite fence.

“Xxx reduced the height of the fence.”

Bob Aaoron

NO! When I was hired January the fence had been too high for five months. Only when I blogged and emailed and photographed the height beside a two meter long stick and threatened to buy a chainsaw did Aurora order it shortened.

“Buckles then went public with her complaints to the local media,”

Bob Aaron

NO! She went to The Star, and a reporter called the neighbour to fact check. The reporter was threatened with defamation if she published so she dropped the story. Now, The Star FAILS to fact check so Aaron could defame me. Irony.

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:46 PM,  <TVanLeeuwen@aurora.ca> wrote:

“He was able to get a measurement. The top rail of the fence is in compliance a few inches under the maximum height, the top of the posts are 2 to 3 inches over maximum. If they cut the posts it will not change the outcome for you. Your view from your windows will be the same unfortunately.”

Director of Legal Aurora Techa van Leeuwenhoek to Buckles

that was months BEFORE I got the posts shortened. I had to get “interfering” and Techa had to order AGAIN.

“He (Lepp) also launched an online petition signed by at least 300 people.”

Bob Aaron

NO! We got over 1,200:signatures.

”Lepp did not defend the action,”

Bob Aaron

NO! I filed my defense in 21 days because I had a vacation in Mexico. I beat Buckles filing by a week. Hers was accepted. Mine was rejected for being one day late and she put me in default and let Buckles defend.

”After a delay, Lepp applied to Superior Court to allow him to file a defence to the lawsuit, but he was turned down and ordered to pay $18,000 in costs.”

Bob Aaron

NO! I filed one day late due to vacation. The Judge, J. Schabas erred and awarded $18,000 for a SLAPP 137.1 challenge which was required to be heard August 26, 2019:but he refused to hear it, he forgot, and then awarded costs for it illegally.

“She found that Lepp accused xxx of deliberately acting illegally, that his statements suggested she received preferential treatment from the town because of political connections, and that she was a liar”

Bob Aaron

NO! Not “accused”. He meant “documented with her own sworn testimony before a judge”. I merely pointed out to the judge she had admitted knowing she drilled into Buckles foundation stones, removed them with the dirt and replace that with a post an concrete. Twice she admitted she built out of spite for having her gates rejected from being bolted to a post on Buckles’ land.

“Lepp has appealed the decision.”

Bob Aaron

NO! I TRIED to appeal. Instead of waiting for me to do that, she garnished our pensions illegally. I then spent a lot of time trying to reverse the illegal garnishment but the court told me I had to sue her. So I sued her boss Michael Simaan for failing to teach her the law. Then she did it again to my brand new CIBC account in less than 24 hours of opening it. So I sued her boss again. Now she refuses to garnish RBC Aurora branch YONGE and Aurora Heights.

today, it is over 7 weeks from telling her I am now at RBC Aurora branch, but she refuses to garnish it.

strange, she illegally garnished two banks but faced with a legal garnishment target she declines. Almost as if she thinks she would be embarrassed to have RBC learn what she has been doing all this time with banks.

Toronto police are investigating Adrian for theft of my CIBC data when no one knew I opened that account.

The timing is interesting. Did Ms Adrian plan it for the SAME day she planned my double contempt motion? Was it her plan next day to offer up I was now even deeper in?

Or, was it some other legal officer of the court? Someone on the periphery who had failed at every other attack on me?

Maybe… it is such a collection of lies that no reporter could have come up them with alone… just statistically, a reporter would have at least come up with ONE truthful sentence. But this time, nothing written is true.

The photo is the funniest part. A guy building a fence. Narrow boards, gaps, low height.

No one who investigated the fence would have chosen that photo. No one who has seen the fence would have chosen that stock photo.

here is Bob Aaron’s Law website tightly integrated with the Star.

So, Mr Aaron uses “articles” he “authors”, presumably for money, which he then uses to promote his law firm.

That’s not typically viewed as proper by the Law Society. Their rules are that any other profession practiced by a lawyer must …

SECTION 2.1 INTEGRITY

2.1-1 A lawyer has a duty to carry on the practice of law and discharge all responsibilities to clients, tribunals, the public and other members of the profession honourably and with integrity.

Commentary.

[1] Integrity is the fundamental quality of any person who seeks to practise as a member of the legal profession. If a client has any doubt about their lawyer’s trustworthiness, the essential element in the true lawyer-client relationship will be missing. If integrity i s lacking, the lawyer’s usefulness to the client and reputation within the profession will be destroyed, regardless of how competent the lawyer may be.

[2] Public confidence in the administration of justice and in the legal profession may be eroded by a lawyer’s irresponsible conduct. Accordingly, a lawyer’s conduct should reflect favourably on the legal profession, inspire the confidence, respect and trust of clients and of the community, and avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

[3] Dishonourable or questionable conduct on the part of a lawyer in either private life or professional practice will reflect adversely upon the integrity of the profession and the administration of justice. Whether within or outside the professional sphere, if the conduct is such that knowledge of it would be likely to impair a client’s trust in the lawyer, the Law Society may be justified in taking disciplinary action.

[4] Generally, however, the Law Society will not be concerned with the purely private or extra-professional activities of a lawyer that do not bring into question the lawyer’s professional integrity.

[4.1] A lawyer has special responsibilities by virtue of the privileges afforded the legal profession and the important role it plays in a free and democratic society and in the administration of justice, including a special responsibility to recognize the diversity of the Ontario community, to protect the dignity of individuals, and to respect human rights laws in force in Ontario.

Well, by publishing this drivel without one single question to me to verify his claims is a sure sign of dishonorable conduct.

Real reporters MUST fact check.
Lawyers who are also reporters should be very accurate in their claims because they cannot argue they lack the mens rea to defame. He is a professional at knowing the law and whether his actions would break the law.

So he cannot defend his actions by claiming he made a minor mistake.

isn’t it ironic though his title suggests people just shut up about being wronged. That they should hire lawyers instead. He seems to misunderstand the charter and our rights to our opinions.

I’ll let you know what the law society says. This is blatant advertising.

And it is NOT “REPORTING” as the Toronto Star defines it.

I bet Aaoron pays The Star to publish his “contributions“. That would make more sense.

What are the bets The Star calls Bob Aron’s “articles” Infomercials, or “Advertorials”… anything other than reporting.

Stand down and stand back…. it could get noisy!

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLnein – The Ultimate Solution

This post exists solely to display Snoopy’s ultimate decision.

Words to live by! Here they are… write them down!

My wife’s dog does this to me all the time.

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CL8 – Gwendolyn Adrian (Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP) Forgot To Wear The Flameproof Pantsuit.

Instead of getting scheduling approval for dates for two contempt motions for her two clients, she got handed a new one.

Adrian moves on me for CONTEMPT X 2 for each of her clients.

Her argument to Justice Myers for WHY she wanted a pair of contempt hearings is… wait for it!… “Lepp refused to provide an affidavit of documents... twice!”

The justice reacted “You want TWO contempt hearings for (a failure to provide ) an affidavit of documents?”

“That is the worst (“thing you can move for”) of the worst! CONTEMPT? For (refusing) an affidavit of documents?”

Paraphrasing J. Myers now….”I am ordering a case conference. It is obvious there is a lot more going on here.”

“Mr. Lepp, are you planning or offering to provide evidence? You know you can provide, in addition, oral evidence and you can examine the plaintiff and ask her questions, did you know that?”

Justice Myers paraphrased

I do NOW, I said quietly to myself.

“Yes, your honour I sent you 70 pages for today and I have bails more!”

So…Stand back! and stand by! for his order. He may add in something about how much time and how much exchange of evidence there will be.

Or maybe that is TO MUCH to ask for.

Lastly, he ended with…

“It does not make sense to waste a lot of time on SOMETHING WHICH IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!”

J. Myers paraphrased from memory

In the end, judges “get it”… been there, done that!

They see through the bullshit and act.

Thanks to the Toronto Superior Court!

Until now the Newmarket crowd has not been so helpful. Maybe I should be GLAD she filed in the wrong court!

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLViaye- Steganographically speaking…

That is an oxymoron. Steganography is the act of hiding things in plain sight and speaking about it, by definition, is improper and unnecessary because it’s all there in plain sight for everyone to see.

Here is a person who uses Steganography to hide another COMPLETE person…

He was there all the time right in front of you. Did you not see him?

So, do not tell people “Open your eyes!”… say “Look around you!”

Plane’s sight

Plains sight

Play in sight

Playin’ site

Play’n inside

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLVaye- New Movie: Contemptible Me™©️ aka “Lying To Make Money”

Today, as always, a lawyer for an Aurora employee has me up before a judge to be given 30 days in prison and pay a $10,000 fine.

Lawyer Gwendolyn Adrian, (Kramer Simaan Dhillon LLP) claims my 600 answers to her questions about my financial history were inadequate. She says she MUST know the serial number of my lawn mower.

Subliminal Suggestion – Can you find it?

And of course, it is once again the Bible’s fault. I swore at it and look what happened? I mean…. I swore ON it and look…..

Lawyers do not ever swear on the Bible. But we peasants MUST swear on something. And that day, I was asked to swear on a “religious document”. But. it was on Zoom. So I grabbed the closest Torah to me and swore to tell the truth.

From that moment. Ms Adrian did not believe a word I said, and so, she set out to trick me into lying. Cuz that’s what the really good lawyers do. The good lawyers do not need bank account numbers to garnish , they need LIES to make REAL money, because “big money” is made in the game they call “COST-a-Rama”.

At the end of every case each lawyer gets a spin on the giant COSTS-WHEEL. Wherever it stops, that lawyer gets that much from that accused.

It all adds up.

If instead I had NOT sworn on a religious document, no one would trust me of course.

So, a suggestion when asked…. just “attest” to anything you like… they ain’t gonna believe you anyway. And it saves time.

And time is money to any lawyer. It is in their blood. A soaring “Lies per minute” is what they live for. Unless they come from their clients.

In which case, lies ARE money!

http://fitnessexpose.com/saturday-sharing-rant-lying-make-money/

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CLV- Herd Immunity “Trump-Style”

The NY Times is reporting the best news ever! https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/13/world/coronavirus-covid

unnamed White House staffers who say that the new “line” to be spun is that the USA should develop herd immunity…. let millions get COVID-19 and then everyone will be safe from it.

Close your eyes, relax, think about that for 30 seconds….

So, Democrats called for the herd of people who work in the White House to bring every living relative to work on Friday to be injected with the “finest, purest, best ever” strain and get the herd started.

Being Republicans with average IQ’s, White House staffers then resigned and went home to hunker down.

Donald and his entire bloodline came to work Friday and they were injected with DOUBLE doses distilled from pedigreed Wuhan bats in a room filled with actual Wuhan bats, and told to go far and wide and hold indoor rallies. Donald Junior shot a bat to mount on his wall.

…we interrupt this dream

It is good to dream, because only then will we learn what we are capable of.

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CL 👁V- Thanks J. Dow for the inspiration!

Today, Superior Court J. Dow in Toronto cleared it all up for me SLAPP-wise.

Spite fence lawsuits can be APPEALED and he says mine sounds like a SLAM DUNK to him if I told the truth. Of course, Ms Adrian THEN closed off and told him I lied to him so there’s that.

Selfreps are NEVER believed. Lawyers are ALWAYS believed. It’s a neat gig. Keep paying dues and the Law Society of Ontario sells you a franchise worth millions.

He also pointed out the public can get all the dirt on www.canlii.org. The full details of this SLAPP suit are there. You can get all the dirt legally.

So www.canlii.org is where you go.

Here is me beating Charles Painter and Lloyd’s of London.

Here is my winning appeal over Charles Painter and Lloyd’s of London, I beat him before J. Edwards, Painter appealed J. Edwards fine decision and lost again.

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2020/2020onca528/2020onca528.html?resultIndex=9

Here is J. Kenkel telling you how good a job he did in case management. He only ignored my warning May 2, 2019 and set up an indictable charge meant for a jury in a “judge only” Summary charge trial and the charge was dismissed as wrongfully heard. He did not supply the 486 counsel as he ordered and promised. But he did a great job he says. Trump-like in its greatness.

Then you can look up Lepp 2019 ONSC 6946, or Lepp 2020 ONSC 5430.

OR, get them all in one list if you filter correctly.

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CL 👁-👁-👁- Now THIS is a dog park.. artificial turf!

https://calgaryherald.com/life/homes/new-homes/dogs-have-their-day-at-new-currie-bark-park

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Public Service Announcement Uncategorized

BL20-🎄CL 👁-👁- Canadian Record Flight – 2 seat glider to 31,700 feet

It is my opinion no one will believe this. So few people understand clouds at all. They really don’t know clouds at all.

Rows and floes of angel hair
And ice cream castles in the air
And feather canyons everywhere
I’ve looked at clouds that way

But now they only block the sun
They rain and snow on everyone
So many things I would have done
But clouds got in my way

I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now
From up and down, and still somehow
It’s cloud illusions I recall
I really don’t know clouds at all

I’ve looked at life from both sides now 
From up and down and still somehow
It’s life’s illusions I recall
I really don’t know life at all

Tuesday Oct. 6, 2020 2 Canadians flew a motorless 2 seat glider to an altitude of 31,700 feet over the Rockies south of Calgary.

This is a new record for height gain and absolute altitude for multi-seat gliders in Canada/

https://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-3.0/gliding/flightinfo.html?dsId=8204904

The ex-RCAF pilot then realized he was hypoxic ands started down… QUICKLY to 25,000 feet where his brain regained enough oxygen to feel normal.

read about it here:

https://us18.campaign-archive.com/?u=72080979ac4fe538a62f765bb&id=5c53ee769e

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Law Without Remorse - a book Uncategorized

BL20-🎄CL 👁- Welcome back for the names…. finally

Well, as the masks go ON every day.some are REMOVED forever.

Justice Dawe has called for a retrial of J. Rose’s decision and probation order of December 4, 2019,

Since the “not to mention: clause is also GONE from my Release Order in March, I can mention anyone I want here again. Just like 2017, up until July 14 anyway.

I tend to state facts and not get caught up in emotions. And now there are so many court transcripts to paraphrase so everyone can see the evidence and testimony themselves.

Publication bans have ended. They never did get a ban on the victim impact statements. That would have been too funny. Your honour, our next victim really wants to pass along how she feels about Mr. Lepp. But she asks that no one outside this room listen in.

All 3 women were permitted to trash me December 4, 2019 and now that conviction has been quashed. And the Crown must now, with everyone watching, decide to re-try it. But they have a problem, J Dawe was quite clear the Crown NEVERE EVEN TRIED to prove the mens rea, my state of mind, and THEN the Crown argued they did not have to do that at all. J, Dawe has now written out what they have to do to convict. And THEN he told why no one could prove my mens rea was reckless.

That charge, one of two… the other was “not guilty”… was for an iPhone post of a photo of two stacks of paper from a distance. Get out a huge TV set and a microscope and you may see some words. But no one saw them before posting it.

So, look for there victim impacts… one blames me for her mother dying confused about my motivations.

One says she barfed every time I emailed her about how much more money I got her at Council.

One is an ex-cop telling the court how she feared my name on an email asking for help. A big, bad cop is afraid of the written word.

I had to get ALL my transcripts, so I only need to publish facts with no spin at all to get my point across. All these people made up alternate facts for everything they told police. Now I just get to post them here.

Stand back and stand by.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Uncategorized

BL20-🎄CL – Opinions… All together again

It will be gone in court for the Crown to argue “Your honour, he posted in Bob Lepp’s Opinions again!”

Categories
Uncategorized

BL20-🎄C4d9 – His Opinions Are Back!

From the vaults come every option he has ever held.

The vaults? Every dog knows how to keep stuff safe.

Categories
Public Service Announcement

BL20-🎄CL4dviii – Covid-19 History was made today, but Melania was uncovoidable!

Trump gets a Hicks-ee

A great day to be Melania, the only person in the world guaranteed not to have touched him.

Categories
Det/Sgt. Heather Bentham Police Region Public Service Announcement York Regional Police

BL20-🎄CL4dvii – Police wanted me silenced, not the Crown or courts

Perfecting my appeal of J. Harpur clarifies who wanted me silent and why

I have been reading the trial transcripts. Not one word describes any effects of my blog on anyone.

Yet, from the arrest May 30, 2018 to today the court has silenced me in my blogging, a Charter Right of every Canadian.

But not one word was said to the court that indicated the effect of my blog on anyone. Yet, the justices all picked the same 195 word “Term #6” to shut me up.

Why is that even possible?

Police. It is possible because police tell the Crown what to do. And if they do not do it, then, implicitly, police will not protect the Crowns from all those bad mafia guys they put in prison.

Anyone who does not believe police use a threatened withdrawal of protection to sway the courts is naiive. Of course they do.

Would you be a justice of you knew police would refuse to protect you and your family? No, you would not.

How do we stop that?

By tasking the RCMP to be the protectors of the justices. Without such protection they cannot be expected to order cops guilty or find them guilty of witness tampering, breach of trust or any number of charges only police can accumulate.